throbber
Case IPR2016-01264 for
`U.S. Patent No. 6,538,324
`
`
`Filed on behalf of Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
`
`By: Michael J. Fink (mfink@gbpatent.com)
`Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.
`1950 Roland Clarke Place
`Reston, Virginia 20191
`Tel: (703) 716-1191
`Fax: (703) 716-1180
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GODO KAISHA IP BRIDGE 1,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01264
`U.S. Patent No. 6,538,324
`____________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE IN
`RESPONSE TO PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBITS
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD, PTAB
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Case IPR2016-01264 for
`U.S. Patent No. 6,538,324
`
`
`Patent Owner, Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 (“Patent Owner”), submits this
`
`Notice of Supplemental Evidence in Response to “Petitioner’s Objections to Patent
`
`Owner’s Exhibits 2001-2004” dated January 3, 2017. In response to Petitioner’s
`
`objections, Patent Owner serves herewith supplemental evidence, identified as
`
`Exhibits 2005, 2006 and 2007 pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(2). Patent Owner
`
`further files and serves herewith Patent Owner’s Current Exhibit List pursuant to
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e). Patent Owner’s Current Exhibit List identifies its
`
`supplemental evidence, Exhibits 2005, 2006 and 2007.
`
`I. Petitioner’s Objections to Exhibit 2001
`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibit 2001 under FRE 401-403 alleging that the
`
`exhibit is irrelevant because it presents cumulative information. Exhibit 2001 does
`
`not present cumulative information.
`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibit 2001 as hearsay under FRE 802. Exhibit 2001
`
`is not inadmissible hearsay under FRE 801, and would nevertheless be admissible
`
`under one or more of the hearsay exceptions under FRE 803 and 807, e.g., FRE
`
`803(18). In the event Patent Owner seeks to exclude Exhibit 2001 for any reason,
`
`Patent Owner reserves the right to seek judicial notice under FRE 201 of scientific
`
`facts contained therein, the accuracy of which Petitioner has not disputed.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`II. Petitioner’s Objections to Exhibit 2002
`
` Case IPR2016-01264 for
`U.S. Patent No. 6,538,324
`
`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibit 2002 under FRE 401-403 as irrelevant. Exhibit
`
`2002, a portion of the prosecution history of the Ding patent, is not irrelevant.
`
`Exhibit 2002 is additional evidence of how a person of ordinary skill in the art
`
`would have understood the Ding patent at the relevant time period. Exhibit 2002
`
`confirms the express teachings in the Ding patent.
`
`In the event Patent Owner seeks to exclude Exhibit 2002, Patent Owner
`
`reserves the right to seek judicial notice under FRE 201 of undisputed statements
`
`contained therein.
`
`III. Petitioner’s Objections to Exhibits 2003 and 2004
`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibits 2003 and 2004 under FRE 401-403 as
`
`irrelevant because of the dates of the dictionary definitions. Exhibits 2005 and
`
`2006 are submitted to overcome these objections. Exhibit 2007 authenticates these
`
`exhibits.
`
`In the event Patent Owner seeks to exclude Exhibits 2003 and 2004, or
`
`Exhibits 2005 and 2006, Patent Owner reserves the right to seek judicial notice
`
`under FRE 201 of the apparently undisputed dictionary definitions.
`
`Patent Owner reserves all rights to respond to any further explanations
`
`Petitioner is allowed to provide regarding its evidentiary objections. Patent
`
`Owner’s service of supplemental evidence is timely under 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(2)
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Case IPR2016-01264 for
`U.S. Patent No. 6,538,324
`
`
`because it is served within 10 business days of the service of Petitioner’s
`
`objections.
`
`Dated: January 11, 2017
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted by:
`
`/Michael J. Fink/
`Michael J. Fink
`Registration No. 31,827
`Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.
`1950 Roland Clarke Place
`Reston, Virginia 20191
`Tel: 703-716-1191
`Fax: 703-716-1180
`Email: mfink@gbpatent.com
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner,
`IP Bridge
`
`
`
`3
`
`{R50502 02985245.DOC}
`
`

`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01264
`for U.S. Patent No. 6,538,324
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing:
`
`PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE IN
`RESPONSE TO PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBITS
`
`including exhibits, was served by electronic mail on this 11th day of January,
`
`2017, upon Counsel for Petitioner, as follows:
`
`E. Robert Yoches (bob.yoches@finnegan.com);
`Stephen E. Kabakoff (stephen.kabakoff@finnegan.com);
`Joshua L. Goldberg (joshua.goldberg@finnegan.com); and
`TSMC-IPB-PTAB@finnegan.com.
`
`
`
`/Michael J. Fink/
`Michael J. Fink
`Registration No. 31,827
`Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.
`1950 Roland Clarke Place
`Reston, Virginia 20191
`Tel: 703-716-1191
`Fax: 703-716-1180
`Email: mfink@gbpatent.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket