throbber
Sarah J. Guske
`
`
`
`Sarah Guske is a partner in the firm's Intellectual Property group with
`twelve years of experience litigating software and electronics patent
`litigation cases. She has litigated matters in district court and before the
`PTAB involving a wide variety of technologies, including
`telecommunication protocols and systems, MPEG Multimedia data for
`broadcast, telephonic voice recognition software and graphic chipset
`design. Ms. Guske also has significant appellate experience, and has
`served as an Adjunct Professor teaching patent litigation.
`
`Representative Litigation Cases:
`
`Interactive Systems Worldwide, Inc. v. Mikohn Gaming Corp. et al.
`(District of Nevada) - litigation counsel to Mikohn Gaming Corp. and
`STB Holdings, Inc. in patent litigation related to real-time sports betting
`technologies,
`
`Zenith Electronics v. Thomson, Philips Electronics, TTE Technology,
`Pioneer Electronics (Eastern District of Texas) - litigation counsel to
`Zenith in patent litigation over patents essential for compliance with
`ATSC Digital Television Standard.
`
`Bookham, Inc. v. Unaxis Balzers AG et al. (Northern District of
`California) - litigation counsel to Bookham in patent litigation related to
`color wheel technology,
`
`HyperRoll Israel, Ltd. v. Hyperion Solutions (Eastern District of
`Texas) - litigation counsel to HyperRoll Israel, Ltd. in a patent litigation
`against Hyperion Solutions, The technology in this case involves
`database-management software.
`
`HyperRoll, Inc. v. Hyperion Solutions (Northern District of
`California) - litigation counsel to HyperRoll, Inc. in a declaratory
`judgment action brought by Hyperion Solutions. The technology in this
`case involves database-management software.
`
`Qualcomm Incorporated v. Nokia Corporation (Eastern District of
`Texas) - litigation counsel for Qualcomm in a patent infringement action
`involving cellular telephony systems and mobile TV applications.
`
`PARTNER
`101 California Street
`30th Floor, Suite 3070
`San Francisco California 94111
`United States of America
`+1.415.291.6205
`+1.415.291.6305 fax
`sarah.guske@bakerbotts.com
`
`EDUCATION AND HONORS
`
`J.D., University of California, Davis School
`of Law, 2004
`
`B.S., Electrical Engineering, Washington
`State University, 2001
`summa cum laude
`
`B.A., Physics, Whitworth University, 2001
`summa cum laude
`
`Recognized as a Super Lawyer-Rising Star
`(Thomson Reuters), 2014
`
`Recognized as an "Associate to Watch,"
`Chambers USA, 2012
`
`BAKER BOTTS
`
`1
`
`Bright House Networks - Ex. 1057, Page 1
`
`

`
`
`
`International Printer Corp. v. Brother International et al. (Eastern
`District of Texas) - litigation counsel for International Printer in a patent
`infringement action against twelve manufacturers of networkable multi-
`function printer and imaging technology.
`
`Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. v. Chevron et al. (Eastern
`District of Texas) - litigation counsel for Katz in a patent infringement
`action against nine defendants. The technology involves computer
`telephony and call-center systems.
`
`Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. v. Consolidated Edison et
`al. (Eastern District of Texas) - litigation counsel for Katz in a patent
`infringement action against nine defendants. The technology involves
`computer telephony and call-center systems.
`
`Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. v. Comcast et al. (Eastern
`District of Texas) - litigation counsel for Katz in a patent infringement
`action against nine defendants. The technology involves computer
`telephony and call-center systems.
`
`Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. v. Fifth Third Bancorp et
`al. (Eastern District of Texas) - litigation counsel for Katz in a patent
`infringement action against nine defendants. The technology involves
`computer telephony and call-center systems.
`
`Widevine Technologies, Inc. v. Verimatrix, Inc. (Eastern District of
`Texas) - litigation counsel for Verimatrix in a patent infringement action
`involving encryption technology.
`
`Widevine Technologies, Inc. v. Verimatrix, Inc. (Western District of
`Washington) - litigation counsel for Verimatrix in a patent infringement
`action involving encryption and data stream flow control technology.
`
`OPTi Inc. v. nVidia Corp. (Eastern District of Texas) - litigation counsel
`for nVidia in a patent infringement action involving chipset design and
`operation.
`
`OMS Investments, Inc., et al. v. TerraCycle, Inc. (District of New
`Jersey) - litigation counsel for TerraCycle in trade dress infringement and
`unfair competition action.
`
`
`
`Sarah J. Guske
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COURT ADMISSIONS &
`AFFILIATIONS
`
`State Bar of California
`
`State Bar of Colorado
`
`United States Court of Appeals for the
`Federal Circuit
`
`United States District Court for the
`Northern, Southern and Central Districts
`of California
`
`United States District Court for the
`District of Colorado
`
`United States District Court for the
`Eastern District of Texas
`
`
`
`
`
`BAKER BOTTS
`
`2
`
`Bright House Networks - Ex. 1057, Page 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket