`
`Institution Grounds
`
`Petitioner
`
`Claims 38 and 65 obvious over: 1) Burger and the knowledge of a
`POSA; 2) Burger, Alexander, and Admitted Prior Art (Ex. 1001,
`1:42–51); 3) Archer and the knowledge of POSA; and 4) Archer
`and Chang
`Claims 143–147, 149, 150, 163, and 176–178 obvious over: 1)
`Burger and the knowledge of a POSA, including the SS7 Paper; 2)
`Burger, the knowledge of a POSA, including the SS7 Paper, and
`Alexander; and 3) Archer and the knowledge of a POSA
`
`Cisco
`
`Cisco
`
`YMax
`
`BHN et al.
`
`BHN et al.
`
`YMax
`
`BHN et al.
`
`Patent/IPR
`
`‘113 Patent,
`IPR2016-
`01254C
`
`‘113 Patent,
`IPR2016-
`01257C
`
`‘298 Patent,
`IPR2016-
`01263 A
`‘298 Patent,
`IPR2016-
`01256 B
`‘298 Patent,
`IPR2016-
`01259 A
`
`‘777 Patent,
`IPR2016-
`01258B
`‘777 Patent,
`IPR2016-
`01262A
`
`‘113 Patent,
`IPR2016-
`01260 B
`
`1) Claims 1, 2, 8, 15, 18, and 19 anticipated by Shtivelman; 2)
`Claims 1, 2, 8, 18, and 19 anticipated by O’Neal; 3) Claims 1, 11,
`and 15–17 obvious over O’Neal; and 4) Claims 1, 2, 8, 11, and
`15–19 obvious over Shtivelman and O’Neal
`
`‘113 Patent,
`IPR2016-
`01261A
`
`Claims 1, 2, 8, 11, 15–19, 94, 95, 102, 109–13, 128, 163, 164,
`166–68, 175, and 179–81 obvious over: 1) Archer and the
`knowledge of a POSA; and 2) Archer and Chang
`
`Claim 1 is obvious over Archer, Chang, and
`the Admitted Prior Art.
`
`1) Claim 1 is obvious over O’Neal, McMullin, and the Admitted
`Prior Art; and 2) Claim 20 is obvious over O’Neal, Chang, and the
`Admitted Prior Art
`Claim 20 is obvious over: 1) Archer, Chang, and the Admitted
`Prior Art; and 2) Archer, Chang, Swartz, and the
`Admitted Prior Art
`
`1) Claims 18, 23, 25, 26, 29–31, 37, 38, 41, and 45 are anticipated
`by O'Neal; and 2) Claims 21 and 28 are obvious over O'Neal
`
`YMax
`
`Claims 18, 21, 23, 25, 26, 28–31, 37, 38, 41, 45, and 46 are
`obvious over Archer, Chang, and the Admitted Prior Art
`
`BHN et al.
`
`BHN, et al. v. FOCAL IP, LLC
`FOCAL IP, LLC EX2063 - 1
`Cheat Sheet
`IPR2016-01262
`
`