`IPR 2016-01262
`U.S. Patent No. 7,764,777
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`
`
`Bright House Networks, LLC,
`WideOpenWest Finance, LLC,
`Knology of Florida, Inc.
`Birch Communications, Inc.,
`Petitioners
`v.
`
`Focal IP, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`_____________________
`
`Case No. IPR2016-01262
`U.S. Patent No. 7,764,777
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, JONI Y. CHANG, and BARBARA A. PARVIS,
`ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGES.
`
`PETITIONERS’ RESPONSIVE LISTING OF SUPPORT SHOWING
`REPLY ARGUMENTS ARE PROPER
`
`
`
`
`
`DM2\8020774.2
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s Order (Paper No. 40), Petitioners provide the
`
`following citations to show that statements made in the Petitioners’ Reply were (1)
`
`first raised in the Petition, and/or (2) raised in response to arguments and
`
`statements made by Patent Owner in the Patent Owner’s Response (“P.O. Resp.”)
`
`and its expert in his declaration (“Bates Dec.”). For the Board’s convenience,
`
`Petitioners have repeated Patent Owner’s assertions of new argument/evidence
`
`using the same numbering as Patent Owner, followed by Petitioners’ support by
`
`citation to the record to show that all arguments constitute a proper reply:
`
`(1) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 41:3-50:16, 58:14-19; Bates Dec., ¶¶68-77,
`
`91; Pet., 19:9-20:2, 20:2-21:2, 22:2-7, 24:1-9, 25:15-19, 26:6-10, 42:21-43:5,
`
`48:6-16, 52:4-9, 14:1-5.
`
`(2) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 52:16-17, 53:22-54:2; Bates Dec., ¶¶81, 83;
`
`EX1059, 155:13-158:11; Pet., 59:16-22, 23:20-24:3 (FIG. 4 (68)), 22:4-10.
`
`(3) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 41:3-50:16, 50:20-22; 51:4-55:2, 58:14-19;
`
`Bates Dec., ¶¶68-77, 80-84, 91; Pet., 19:9-20:2, 20:2-21:2, 22:2-7, 24:1-9,
`
`25:15-19, 26:6-10, 42:21-43:5, 48:6-16, 52:4-9, 40:7-41:15, 22:8-23:4 (FIG. 4
`
`(68)).
`
`(4) Petitioners’ Support: Pet., 19:9-20:2, 20:2-21:2, 22:2-7, 24:1-9, 25:15-19, 26:6-
`
`10, 42:21-43:5, 48:6-16; P.O. Resp., 41:3-42:14, 45:5-48:7, 55:3-61:14, 58:14-
`
`19; Bates Dec., ¶¶68-70, 74-77, 85-95.
`
`
`
`DM2\8020774.2
`
`1
`
`
`
`(5) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp. 55:3-61:14; Bates Dec. ¶¶85-95; EX1060,
`
`356:9-357:8; Pet., 22:2-8, 25:5-14, 44:13-18, 36:18-21, 37:15-19, 42:6-15.
`
`(6) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 46:1-48:6, 56:11-57:9, 59:6-60:16, 41:3-42:14,
`
`58:14-19; Bates Dec., ¶¶74-77; 87-89, 92-94, 45, 91; EX1059, 22:23-23:8;
`
`26:7-15; Pet., 19:9-20:2, 20:2-21:11, 22:2-7, 22:20-23:4, 24:1-9, 25:15-19,
`
`26:6-10, 48:6-16, 52:4-9.
`
`(7) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 32:19-37:8; 37:9-40:19, 46:1-48:7, 55:3-
`
`60:17; Bates Dec., ¶¶61-67, 74-77, 85-94; Pet., 19:9-20:2, 20:2-21:2, 22:2-7,
`
`24:1-9, 25:15-19, 26:6-10, 42:21-43:5, 48:6-16, 52:4-9.
`
`(8) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp. 41:3-50:16, 55:3-60:17; Bates Dec., ¶¶68-77,
`
`85-94; EX1059, 201:22-202:11, 205:15-206:16, 211:21-213:14.
`
`(9) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 41:3-42:14, 49:9-50:15, Bates Dec., ¶¶45, 68-
`
`70, 77-78; Pet., 16:18-17:5, 34:19-35:11, 56:1-58:18.
`
`(10) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 38:8-39:19, 45:9-46:15, Bates Dec., ¶¶45,
`
`67-69, 79-80; Pet., 16:18-17:5, 31:5-32:15, 34:19-35:17.
`
`(11) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 61:1-14; Bates Dec., ¶95; Pet., 16:18-18:2,
`
`51:3-14, 52:4-9.
`
`(12) Petitioners’ Support: P.O Resp., 52:16-17, 53:22-54:2, Bates Dec., ¶¶81, 83;
`
`EX1059, 155:13-158:11; Pet., 40:7-41:15, 22:8-23:4 (FIG. 4 (68)).
`
`(13) Petitioners’ Support: see (1), (4), (6)-(8), (9)-(10) above.
`
`
`DM2\8020774.2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 21, 2017
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Patrick D. McPherson/
`Patrick D. McPherson
`USPTO Reg. No. 46,255
`Duane Morris LLP
`505 9th Street NW, Suite 1000
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`LEAD COUNSEL FOR
`PETITIONERS
`
`
`DM2\8020774.2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON PATENT OWNER
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on the 21st
`
`day of July 2017, a complete and entire copy of this Responsive Listing of Support
`
`Showing Reply Arguments Are Proper was provided via the Patent Trial and
`
`Appeal Board End to End (PTAB E2E) System as well as delivering a copy via
`
`email on the following counsel for Patent Owner at:
`
`Brent N. Bumgardner
`brent@nelbum.com
`PAL-IPR@nelbum.com
`
`John Murphy
`murphy@nelbum.com
`
`NELSON BUMGARDNER, P.C.
`3131 W. 7th Street, Suite 300
`Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`
`Dated July 21, 2017
`
`LEAD COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS
`
`
`
`
`DM2\8020774.2
`
`
`
`By: /Patrick D. McPherson/
`Patrick D. McPherson
`USPTO Reg. No. 46,255
`Duane Morris LLP
`505 9th Street NW, Suite 1000
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`
`