`CLEAN AND REDLINED VERSIONS OF THE PROPOSED SUBSITUTE CLAIMS
`
`Redline of Original Claim 46 against Proposed Substitute Claim 49
`
`A method for processing an incoming call from a switching facilityparticular PSTN
`tandem switch on a PSTN communication network thatusing a tandem access controller, wherein
`the PSTN communication network comprises edge switches for routingconnected to telephones
`on one side and PSTN tandem switches on the other side, wherein the PSTN tandem switches
`include the particular PSTN tandem switch, wherein the edge switches route calls within a local
`geographic area and switching facilities for routing, wherein the PSTN tandem switches route
`calls to the edge switches or to the PSTN tandem switches in other geographic areas, wherein the
`PSTN tandem switches are not the edge switches, and wherein the PSTN tandem switches are
`not directly connected to any of the telephones, the method comprising the steps of:
`
`receiving a first request to establish the incoming call, which is intended for a specified
`recipient, at a controlling devicetandem access controller in communication with one of the
`switching facilities;the particular PSTN tandem switch, wherein communications, including the
`first request to establish the incoming call, between the tandem access controller and the
`particular PSTN tandem switch, occur without passing through any of the edge switches,
`
`identifying a control criteria previously associated with the specified recipient at the
`tandem access controller, wherein the control criteria is previously entered via a web-based
`interface and instructs the controlling devicetandem access controller to block calls for the
`specified recipient; and
`
`blocking the firstincoming call received at the controlling devicetandem access controller
`in accordance with the control criteria.
`
`BHN, et al. v. FOCAL IP, LLC
`FOCAL IP, LLC EX2062 - 1
`Redlined and Clean Substitute Claims
`IPR2016-01262
`
`
`
`Clean Version of Proposed Substitute Claim 49
`
`
`
`A method for processing an incoming call from a particular PSTN tandem switch on a
`PSTN communication network using a tandem access controller, wherein the PSTN
`communication network comprises edge switches connected to telephones on one side and PSTN
`tandem switches on the other side, wherein the PSTN tandem switches include the particular
`PSTN tandem switch, wherein the edge switches route calls within a local geographic area,
`wherein the PSTN tandem switches route calls to the edge switches or to the PSTN tandem
`switches in other geographic areas, wherein the PSTN tandem switches are not the edge
`switches, and wherein the PSTN tandem switches are not directly connected to any of the
`telephones, the method comprising the steps of:
`
`
`
`
`
`receiving a first request to establish the incoming call, which is intended for a specified
`recipient, at a tandem access controller in communication with the particular PSTN tandem
`switch, wherein communications, including the first request to establish the incoming call,
`between the tandem access controller and the particular PSTN tandem switch, occur without
`passing through any of the edge switches,
`
`identifying a control criteria previously associated with the specified recipient at the
`tandem access controller, wherein the control criteria is previously entered via a web-based
`interface and instructs the tandem access controller to block calls for the specified recipient; and
`
`blocking the incoming call received at the tandem access controller in accordance with
`the control criteria.
`
`BHN, et al. v. FOCAL IP, LLC
`FOCAL IP, LLC EX2062 - 2
`Redlined and Clean Substitute Claims
`IPR2016-01262
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
