`Patent 8,457,113
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 17
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________
`
`
`YMAX CORPORATION,
`
`PETITIONER
`
`V.
`
`FOCAL IP, LLC,
`
`PATENT OWNER
`
`________________
`
`CASE IPR2016-01260
`PATENT NUMBER: 8,457,113
`________________
`
`PATENT OWNER FOCAL IP, LLC’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
`PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF HANNA F. MADBAK UNDER
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(C)
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01260
`Patent 8,457,113
`
`I.
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`
`
`Paper No. 17
`
`In the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition (“Notice”) mailed July 5,
`
`2016, the Board authorized the parties to file motions for pro hac vice admission
`
`under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c). The Notice requires that such motions be filed in
`
`accordance with the “Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in
`
`Case IPR2013-00639, Paper No. 7 (“Order”).
`
`Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board recognize Hanna Madbak
`
`as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`II. NO OPPOSITION TO THIS MOTION
`
`Patent Owner has conferred with Petitioner with regard to this Motion, and
`
`Petitioner has confirmed that they will not oppose this Motion.
`
`III. GOVERNING LAWS, RULES, AND PRECEDENT
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding on a
`
`showing of good cause. “[W]here lead counsel is a registered practitioner, a
`
`motion to appear pro hac vice may be granted upon a showing that counsel is an
`
`experienced litigation attorney and has an established familiarity with the subject
`
`matter at issue in the proceeding.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`
`IV. STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`Based on the following statement of facts, and supported by the Declaration
`
`of Hanna Madbak submitted herewith as Exhibit 2008, Patent Owner submits that
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01260
`Patent 8,457,113
`
`a showing of good cause has been made and respectfully requests the pro hac vice
`
`Paper No. 17
`
`
`
`admission of Hanna Madbak in this proceeding:
`
`1. Patent Owner’s lead counsel, Brent Bumgardner, is a registered
`
`practitioner (Reg. No. 48,476).
`
`2. Mr. Madbak is an experienced litigating attorney and has been litigating
`
`patent cases for over fourteen years. (Ex. 2008, ¶¶ 2-3).
`
`3. Mr. Madbak is a member in good standing of the New York State Bar.
`
`(Ex. 2008, ¶ 4).
`
`4. Mr. Madbak has never been suspended or disbarred from practice before
`
`any court or administrative body, nor has he ever been the subject of any ethical
`
`grievance procedure or investigation. (Ex. 2008, ¶ 5).
`
`5. No application filed by Mr. Madbak for admission to practice before any
`
`court or administrative body has ever been denied. (Ex. 2008, ¶ 6).
`
`6. No sanctions or contempt citations have been imposed against Mr.
`
`Madbak by any court or administrative body. (Ex. 2008, ¶ 7).
`
`7. Mr. Madbak has read and agrees to comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of
`
`Title 37 of the C.F.R. (Ex. 2008, ¶ 8).
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01260
`Patent 8,457,113
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 17
`
`8. Mr. Madbak understands that he will be subject to the USPTO Rules of
`
`Professional Conduct as set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary
`
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). (Ex. 2008, ¶ 9).
`
`9. Mr. Madbak has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue
`
`in this proceeding. He assisted in drafting the Preliminary Response to the Petition
`
`for Inter Partes Review filed in this matter. Mr. Madbak has substantively
`
`reviewed all materials filed in this proceeding, including the Petition and all
`
`accompanying exhibits, and the Preliminary Response and all accompanying
`
`exhibits. (Ex. 2008, ¶ 10).
`
`V. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR THE PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`MR. MADBAK IN THIS PROCEEDING
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a
`
`showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead counsel be a registered
`
`practitioner and any other conditions as the Board may impose. 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.10(c). Patent Owner’s lead counsel, Brent Bumgardner, is a registered
`
`practitioner. Based on the facts contained herein, as supported by Mr. Madbak’s
`
`declaration (Ex. 2008), good cause exists to admit Mr. Madbak pro hac vice as
`
`backup counsel in this proceeding.
`
`Patent Owner has a substantial need for Mr. Madbak’s pro hac vice
`
`admission and his involvement in depositions and other issues arising from this
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01260
`Patent 8,457,113
`
`proceeding. Admission of Mr. Madbak will also ease the burden on Patent
`
`
`
`Paper No. 17
`
`Owner’s lead counsel in this proceeding.
`
`VIII. CONCLUSION.
`For the foregoing reasons as well as the reasons contained in the attached
`
`declaration, Patent Owner respectfully requests admission of Hanna Madbak as
`
`counsel pro hac vice as backup counsel in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: February 16, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Brent N. Bumgardner
`Brent N. Bumgardner
`
`Registration No. 48,476
`NELSON BUMGARDNER, P.C.
`3131 W. 7th Street, Suite 300
`Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`Telephone: (817) 377-3490
`Email: brent@nelbum.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01260
`Patent 8,457,113
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 17
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of PATENT OWNER’S
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF HANNA F.
`MADBAK UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(C) and Exhibit 2008 were served in
`their entirety via electronic mail, upon the following lead and backup counsels of
`record for Petitioner:
`
`Mark D. Passler (mark.passler@akerman.com)
`Brice S. Dumais (brice.dumais@akerman.com)
`David Brafman (david.brafman@akerman.com)
`
`
`Date of Service: February 16, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Signature: /s/ Brent N. Bumgardner
`
` Brent N. Bumgardner, Reg. No. 48,476
`
`
`
`5
`
`