throbber
Case No. IPR2016-01260
`U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`YMAX CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`FOCAL IP, LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`Case: IPR2016-01260
`U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2016-01260
`U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner YMax Corporation
`
`(“Petitioner”) requests an oral hearing in IPR Nos. IPR2016-01256; IPR2016-
`
`01258; and IPR2016-01260. The Board has set Due Date 7 for September 19,
`
`2017 for these IPRs. Paper No. 13 at 4, 6. Petitioner requests (without any intent
`
`to waive consideration of any issue not requested) a total of 90 minutes for the
`
`Petitioner to address the following issues at the oral hearing for these IPRs:
`
`1. The unpatentability of claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 8,155,298 (“the ‘298
`
`patent”) from instituted Ground 1 (U.S. Patent No. 6,463,145 to
`
`O’Neal et al. (“O’Neal”) in view of U.S. Patent No. 5,809,128 to
`
`McMullin (“McMullin”), the Admitted Prior Art and the knowledge
`
`and skill of a person of ordinary skill in the art (“POSA”) in May
`
`2000), and claim 20 of the ‘298 patent from Ground 2 (O’Neal in
`
`view of U.S. Patent No. 5,958,016 to Chang et al. (“Chang”), the
`
`Admitted Prior Art and the knowledge and skill of a POSA in May
`
`2000) as relied upon in the Petition in IPR2016-01256;
`
`2. The unpatentability of claims 18, 23, 25, 26, 29–31, 37, 38, 41, and 45
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 7,764,777 (“the ‘777 patent”) from instituted
`
`Ground 1 (Anticipation by O’Neal), and claims 21 and 28 of the ‘777
`
`patent from Ground 2 (O’Neal in view of the knowledge and skill of a
`
`POSA in May 2000) as relied upon in the Petition in IPR2016-01258;
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2016-01260
`U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113
`
`3. Whether Patent Owner has met its burden to demonstrate the
`
`patentability of proposed substitute claims 47 and 48 of the ‘777
`
`patent in view of the teachings of O’Neal, Lamb, Admitted Prior Art,
`
`Burke, Blaze, Fuentes, Deschaine, Hanmer, MeLampy, Allen, Elliot,
`
`Wegner, Schumacher, Scherer, Russell, and Andrews and
`
`combinations of the teachings of such references in view of the
`
`knowledge and skill of a POSA, and the state of the art, in May 2000
`
`in IPR2016-01258;
`
`4. The unpatentability of claims 1, 2, 8, 15, 18, and 19 of U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,457,113 (“the ‘113 patent”) from Ground 1 (Anticipation by
`
`International Published Application No. WO 99/14924
`
`(“Schtivelman”)), claims 1, 2, 8, 18, and 19 of the ‘113 patent from
`
`Ground 2 (Anticipation by O’Neal), claims 1, 11, and 15-17 of the
`
`‘113 patent from Ground 3 (O’Neal in view of the knowledge and
`
`skill of a POSA in May 2000), and claims 1, 2, 8, 11, and 15–19 of
`
`the ‘113 patent from Ground 4 (Schtivelman in view of O’Neal and
`
`the knowledge and skill of a POSA in May 2000) as relied upon in the
`
`Petition in IPR2016-01260;
`
`5. Whether Patent Owner has met its burden to demonstrate patentability
`
`of proposed substitute claim 183 of the ‘113 Patent in view of the
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2016-01260
`U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113
`
`teachings of O’Neal, Lamb, Burke, Blaze, Fuentes, Deschaine,
`
`Hanmer, MeLampy, Allen, Elliot, Voit, Russell, and Andrews and
`
`combinations of the teachings of such references in view of the
`
`knowledge and skill of a POSA, and the state of the art, in May 2000
`
`in IPR2016-01260;
`
`6. Responses to any issues identified in Patent Owner’s Request for Oral
`
`Argument; and
`
`7. Any other issues the Board deems necessary for issuing a final written
`
`decision.
`
`In coordination with Bright House Networks, LLC, WideOpenWest Finance,
`
`LLC, Knology of Florida, Inc., and Birch Communications, Inc. (Petitioner in
`
`IPR2016-01259, IPR2016-01261, IPR2016-01262, and IPR2016-01263) (“BHN”),
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. (Petitioner in IPR2016-01254 and IPR2016-01257) (“Cisco”),
`
`and the Patent Owner, Petitioner also proposes the following order for the oral
`
`hearings on September 19, 2017:
`
`1. BHN’s IPRs where each side has 90 minutes;
`
`2. Cisco’s IPRs where each side has 30 minutes; and
`
`3. Petitioner’s IPRs where each side has 90 minutes.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2016-01260
`U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113
`
`Petitioner additionally requests that the Board provide audio-visual
`
`equipment to display demonstrative exhibits, including a projector to be connected
`
`to a laptop, and an ELMO for displaying documents of record. In accordance with
`
`the Trial Practice Guide, Fed. Reg. Vol. 77, No. 157, at 48768, Petitioner will
`
`contact the Board Trial Division paralegal to discuss this request.
`
`Date: August 21, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Joseph J. Richetti/
`Joseph J. Richetti (Reg. No. 47,024)
`BRYAN CAVE LLP
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104
`General Tel: (212) 541-2000
`Direct Tel: (212) 541-1092
`Fax: (212) 541-4630
`Email: joe.richetti@bryancave.com
`
`Attorney for Petitioner – YMax Corporation
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2016-01260
`U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing PETITIONERS’
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) was
`
`served electronically via e-mail on August 21, 2017, in its entirety on the
`
`following:
`
`Bren N. Bumgardner
`brent@nelbum.com
`John Murphy
`murphy@nelbum.com
`PAL-IPR@nelbum.com
`NELSON BUMGARDNER P.C.
`3131 W. 7th Street, Suite 300
`Fort Worth, TX 76107
`
`Victor Siber
`VSiber@SiberLaw.com
`Hanna Madbak
`HMadbak@SiberLaw.com
`SIBER LAW LLP
`28 West 44th Street, Suite 604
`New York, NY 10036
`
`Date: August 21, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Joseph J. Richetti/
`Joseph J. Richetti (Reg. No. 47,024)
`BRYAN CAVE LLP
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104
`General Tel: (212) 541-2000
`Direct Tel: (212) 541-1092
`Fax: (212) 541-4630
`Email: joe.richetti@bryancave.com
`
`Attorney for Petitioner – YMax Corporation
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket