`571.272.7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 19
`Entered: November 14, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS, LLC, WIDEOPEN WEST FINANCE,
`LLC, KNOLOGY OF FLORIDA, INC., and BIRCH
`COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FOCAL IP, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Cases: IPR2016-01259 and IPR2016-012631
`Patent 8,155,298 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, JONI Y. CHANG, and
`BARBARA A. PARVIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PARVIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Dismissing Petitioner’s Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of
`Sarah J. Guske
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`1 This Order applies to each of the listed cases. We exercise our discretion
`to issue one Order to be docketed in each case. The parties, however, are
`not authorized to use this caption for any subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01259, IPR2016-01263
`Patent 8,155,298 B2
`
`
`Petitioner moves for pro hac vice admission of Ms. Sarah J. Guske.
`See, e.g., IPR2016-01259, Paper 14.2 Petitioner provides Declarations from
`Ms. Guske in support of its Motions. See, e.g., Id. at Exhibit A.
`Petitioner’s Motions do not comply with all of the requirements of
`37C.F.R. § 42.10––namely that “the party must designate . . . at least one
`back-up counsel” and “[t]he Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice
`during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause.” See 37
`C.F.R. § 42.10(a),(c). Each of Petitioner’s Motions contain statements
`indicating that Cisco Systems, Inc. is the petitioner. Paper 14, 1, 2. For
`example, Petitioner states “Petitioner Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”)
`respectfully requests that the Board recognize Ms. Guske as counsel pro hac
`vice during this proceeding.” Id. at 1. Additionally, Petitioner states
`“[t]herefore, Cisco respectfully submits that there is good cause for the
`Board to recognize Ms. Guske as counsel pro hac vice during this
`proceeding.” Id. at 2.
`However, in this proceeding Bright House Networks, LLC,
`WideOpen West Finance, LLC, Knology of Florida, Inc., and Birch
`Communications, Inc. collectively are the petitioner. See Paper 1, 2.
`Petitioner’s statements regarding Cisco Systems, Inc. do not satisfy the
`requirement that Ms. Guske be designated by Petitioner in this proceeding,
`i.e., Bright House Networks, LLC, WideOpen West Finance, LLC, Knology
`of Florida, Inc., and Birch Communications, Inc. Additionally, the
`statements do not satisfy the showing of good cause with respect to
`Petitioner in this proceeding.
`
`
`2 Citations herein will be to IPR2016-01259, unless otherwise noted.
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01259, IPR2016-01263
`Patent 8,155,298 B2
`
`
`Petitioner is further reminded of other requirements for pro hac vice
`motions. For example, Ms. Guske attests that she agrees to be subject to the
`Code of Professional Responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 10.20 et seq.
`Paper 14, Ex. A ¶ 10. However, new Rules of Professional Conduct have
`been adopted and took affect May 3, 2013. See Changes to Representation
`of Others Before the United States Patent and Trademark Office; Final Rule,
`78 Fed. Reg. 20180 (Apr. 3, 2013). Additionally, Petitioner attached Exhibit
`A to its Motion. However, such evidence must be filed as a separate exhibit
`in each proceeding and uniquely numbered sequentially in the range of
`1001–1999. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(c). Petitioner further is reminded that
`motions for pro hac vice admission shall be filed in accordance with the
`Order Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission in Case
`IPR2013-00639, Paper 7, a copy of which is available on the Board Web site
`under “Representative Orders, Decisions, and Notices.” Paper 6, 2.
`For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motions for pro hac vice admission of
`Ms. Sarah J. Guske are dismissed without prejudice; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is authorized to file corrected
`Motions for pro hac vice admission of Ms. Guske.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01259, IPR2016-01263
`Patent 8,155,298 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Wayne Stacy
`Britton Davis
`wstacy@cooley.com
`zCisco-PAL-IPR@cooley.com
`bdavis@cooley.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Brent Bumgardner
`bbumgardner@nbclaw.net
`
`John Murphy
`murphy@nelbum.com