`IPR 2016-01259
`U.S. Patent No. 8,155,298
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`
`
`Bright House Networks, LLC,
`WideOpenWest Finance, LLC,
`Knology of Florida, Inc.
`Birch Communications, Inc.,
`Petitioners
`v.
`
`Focal IP, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`_____________________
`
`Case No. IPR2016-01259
`U.S. Patent No. 8,155,298
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, JONI Y. CHANG, and BARBARA A. PARVIS,
`ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGES.
`
`PETITIONERS’ RESPONSIVE LISTING OF SUPPORT SHOWING
`REPLY ARGUMENTS ARE PROPER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DM2\8016322.2
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s Order (Paper No. 40), Petitioners provide the
`
`following citations to the record to show that statements made in the Petitioners’
`
`Reply were (1) first raised in the Petition, and/or (2) raised in response to
`
`arguments and statements made by Patent Owner in the Patent Owner’s Response
`
`(“P.O. Resp.”) and its expert in his declaration (“Bates Dec.”). For the Board’s
`
`convenience, Petitioners have repeated Patent Owner’s assertions of new
`
`argument/evidence using the same numbering as Patent Owner, followed by
`
`Petitioners’ support by citation to the record to show that all arguments constitute a
`
`proper reply:
`
`(1) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 38:13-44:21; Bates Dec., ¶¶68-76; Pet., 23:12-
`
`17, 32:1-4, 32:16-33:8, 60:10-13, 15:14-19.
`
`(2) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 30:19-38:10, 38:13-44:21, 45:18-49:14; Bates
`
`Dec., ¶¶61-83; Pet., 23:12-17, 32:1-4, 32:16-33:8, 60:10-13, 15:14-19.
`
`(3) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 30:19-38:10, 43:1-44:21, 45:18-49:14; Bates
`
`Dec., ¶¶61-83; Pet., 23:12-17, 32:1-4, 32:16-33:8, 60:10-13.
`
`(4) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp. 43:1-44:21, 45:18-49:14; Bates Dec. ¶¶74-83;
`
`EX1060, 356:9-357:8; Pet., 23:12-17, 32:1-4, 32:16-33:8, 60:10-13.
`
`(5) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 43:1-44:21, 47:13-48:14, 38:13-40:2; Bates
`
`Dec., ¶¶74-76; 80, 68-70; EX1059, 22:23-23:8, 26:7-15; Pet., 23:12-17, 60:4-6,
`
`62:6-10.
`
`
`DM2\8016322.2
`
`2
`
`
`
`(6) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 30:19-38:10, 43:1-44:21; Bates Dec., ¶¶61-67,
`
`74-76; Pet., 23:12-17, 32:1-4, 32:16-33:8, 60:10-13.
`
`(7) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp. 38:13-44:21, 45:18-49:14; Bates Dec., ¶¶61-
`
`83; EX1059, 201:22-202:11, 205:15-206:16, 211:21-213:14.
`
`(8) Petitioners’ Support: see (1)-(3), (5)-(8) above.
`
`
`DM2\8016322.2
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 21, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: /Wayne Stacy/
`Wayne Stacy
`USPTO Reg. No. 45,125
`Baker Botts LLP
`101 California Street, Suite 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`LEAD COUNSEL FOR
`PETITIONERS
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON PATENT OWNER
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on the 21st
`
`day of July 2017, a complete and entire copy of this Responsive Listing of Support
`
`Showing Reply Arguments Are Proper was provided via the Patent Trial and
`
`Appeal Board End to End (PTAB E2E) System as well as delivering a copy via
`
`email on the following counsel for Patent Owner at:
`
`Brent N. Bumgardner
`brent@nelbum.com
`PAL-IPR@nelbum.com
`
`John Murphy
`murphy@nelbum.com
`
`NELSON BUMGARDNER, P.C.
`3131 W. 7th Street, Suite 300
`Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`
`Dated July 21, 2017
`
`LEAD COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS
`
`
`
`DM2\8016322.2
`
`2
`
`
`
`By: /Wayne Stacy/
`Wayne Stacy
`USPTO Reg. No. 45,125
`Baker Botts LLP
`101 California Street, Suite 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`
`