`
`US. Patent No. 7,764,777
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`YMAX CORPORATION
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`FOCAL IP, LLC ‘
`Patent Owner
`
`Case No. IPR2016—01258
`
`I US. Patent No. 7,764,777
`
`AFFIDAVIT OF ALEXANDER WALDEN
`
`YMaX Exhibit 1044
`
`YMaX Corp. V. Focal IP
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-01258
`
`US. Patent No. 7,764,777
`
`1.
`I, Alexander Walden, am more than twenty-one years of age, am
`competent topresent this affidavit, and have personal knowledge of the facts set
`forth herein.
`I
`
`2.
`
`This affidavit is given in supportof Petitioner YMaX Corporation’s
`
`(“YMax”) Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Alexander Walden.
`
`I
`
`3.
`
`I am an associate at the law firm Bryan Cave LLP. I
`
`I am an
`
`experienced litigating attorney and have been litigating cases for more than
`
`seven years. I have also been litigating patent cases for six years.
`
`4.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of New York. I have
`
`never been suspended or disbarred fiom practice before any court or administrative
`
`A body. No court or administrative body has ever denied my application for
`admiSsion to practice before it. No court or administrative body has ever imposed
`
`sanctions or contempt citations on me.
`
`5.
`I have read and Will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the Code
`
`of Federal Regulations.
`
`6.
`
`I understand that I Will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional
`
`1
`
`Conduct set forth in 37 CPR. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under
`
`37 CPR. § 11.19(a).
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016—01258
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,764,777
`
`7.
`I was admitted pro hac vice in Case No. IPR2016—01433 on June 19,
`2017 (Paper No.. 15), in Case No. IPR2015i-01892 on May 10, 2016 (Paper No.
`
`18), and in Case IPR2014—00090 on October '30, 2014 (Paper No. 28), both
`
`proceedingsinvolving the Petitioner.
`
`I also requested pro hac vice admission in
`
`Case IPR2014—00088 (Paper No. 27), which was a then co—pending proceeding
`
`with IPR2014-00090.
`
`In Case'IPR2014—00088,
`
`the Board indicated during a
`
`conference call that it had no objection to the pro hac vice admission, but a written
`
`Order was not issued in that proceeding.
`
`I am also requesting pro hac vice
`
`admission in two related IPR proceedings, Case Nos.
`
`IPR2016-01256 and
`
`IPR2016—01260, involving the same parties.
`I have not applied to appear in any
`otherproceedings before the Office in the last three (3) years.
`
`8.
`
`I have an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`I have litigated patent cases in the'area of electrical engineering,
`
`I began representing
`computer science and electronic devices since at least 2009.
`v and advising Patent Owner Na; in matters relating to patent strategy in early
`
`2017. Since that time, I have become very familiar with U.S. Patent No. 7,764,777
`
`and with its prosecution file history.
`
`In particular, I have assisted YMaX in
`
`V preparing its reply to the patent owner’s response and its opposition to the patent
`
`owner’s motion to amend, as well as other submissions in the above—referenced
`
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-01258
`
`US. Patent No. 7,764,777
`
`%@
`
`Alexander Walden
`
`Sworn to and subscribed before me
`
`this 7thdayofJuly, 2217
`
`Notary Public
`
`SHEILA FREEMAN
`Notary Public, State of New York
`' No. 01FR4756733
`Qualified in Bronx County
`Commission Expires February 28, 20.19
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
