throbber
Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113 B2
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Bright House Networks, LLC,
`WideOpenWest Finance, LLC,
`Knology of Florida, Inc.
`Birch Communications, Inc.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`Focal IP, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent No. 8,457,113 B2
`Filing Date: Jun. 22, 2010
`Issue Date: Jun. 4, 2013
`
`BRANCH CALLING AND CALLER ID BASED CALL ROUTING
`TELEPHONE FEATURES
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113 B2
`
`Inter Partes Review No. [________]
`
`DM2\6931386.1
`
`YMAX CORPORATION v. FOCAL IP, LLC
`FOCAL IP, LLC EX2023 - 1
`Bright House Petition Excerpts
`IPR2016-01258
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113 B2
`
`even recite call features. A year later, that application was allowed and the ’113
`
`patent issued on June 4, 2013. Id., 15.
`
`However, it was well-known and standard practice to implement subscriber-
`
`selected call features using intelligent servers located within, or coupled to
`
`centralized “switching facility[ies]” in the PSTN. §V.E; TLP ¶¶77–78.
`
`C. Claim Construction Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(b)(3)
`Claim terms construed during inter partes review are given their broadest
`
`reasonable interpretation (BRI). 37 C.F.R. §42.100(b). Claim terms that are not
`
`construed are to be given their plain and ordinary meaning to a POSA at the time
`
`of the claimed invention when read in light of the specification and file history.
`
`Petitioners believe the terms in the challenged claims are readily understood by a
`
`POSA in light of the specification and file history and have applied them in
`
`accordance with their plain and ordinary meaning. Petitioners provide additional
`
`explanation of a POSA’s understanding where relevant.
`
`D. A POSA’s Level of Skill in the Art
`A POSA is a hypothetical person of ordinary creativity presumed to be
`
`aware of all pertinent prior art and thinking along conventional wisdom. For the
`
`’113 patent, a POSA would have been an engineer or computer scientist with at
`
`least a bachelor’s degree, or equivalent experience in electrical engineering, or a
`
`related field, and at least three years of industry experience in the fields of analog
`
`DM2\6931386.1
`
`10
`
`YMAX CORPORATION v. FOCAL IP, LLC
`FOCAL IP, LLC EX2023 - 2
`Bright House Petition Excerpts
`IPR2016-01258
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113 B2
`
`geographical hierarchy, where tandem switches serve to interconnect geographical
`
`regions and edge switches connect between tandem switches and end-user devices,
`
`like telephones, within a local area. TLP ¶53; EX1037, 64-69, 106-13, 119-22,
`
`137-38, Fig. 4-4, 111; EX1001, 1:42-51.
`
`In the traditional Bell telephone system of the 1980s, edge switches were
`
`operated by local telephone service providers. TLP ¶54; EX1037, 59-62, 90-92,
`
`97-100, 106-13. Calls that were required to be routed to tandem switches for
`
`connection to other edge switches were known as long-distance calls and generally
`
`incurred a toll. TLP ¶55; EX1037, 64, 106-13.
`
`Call Components—Signaling and Media
`
`3.
`Traditional telephone calls consisted of two distinct parts—signaling and
`
`media. TLP ¶56; EX1037, 131-36, Fig. 8-1, 133. The signaling portion was used
`
`for call setup and feature selection, and the media portion consisted of the actual
`
`voice traffic. Id.; TLP ¶57; EX1051, 9-12, 22-25. Once a telephone was answered,
`
`the call accept signal was used to finalize the path, or circuit, over which the voice
`
`traffic (i.e. media) of the call traveled. TLP ¶57; EX1037, 95-102, Fig. 3-8, 101,
`
`131-35; EX1027, 9-10. Signaling protocols, such as Signaling System 7 (SS7),
`
`were used in parallel to notify the switches of a completed call. TLP ¶58–59;
`
`EX1027, 1.
`
`4.
`
`PSTN Call Features and Intelligent Networks
`
`DM2\6931386.1
`
`12
`
`YMAX CORPORATION v. FOCAL IP, LLC
`FOCAL IP, LLC EX2023 - 3
`Bright House Petition Excerpts
`IPR2016-01258
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113 B2
`
`subscriber access to the database anytime, such as over the Internet. EX1003, 7:44-
`
`50. Archer further teaches that end-user devices, such as computers (e.g., 134b)
`
`can use web browsers. EX1003, 8:2-11. Web browsers are software that allow
`
`users to view web pages provided on the Internet by web servers. EX1003, 8:8-10,
`
`TLP ¶80; EX1049, 124-27. As a result, a POSA would be motivated to combine
`
`Archer’s database (138) and server processor (128) with a web server and web-
`
`enabled processor to allow subscribers to change their call forwarding settings in
`
`database (138) over the Internet at any time and to satisfy the commercial pressures
`
`driving services online during the “Dot.Com” boom. TLP ¶117.
`
`(iv) Ground 2: To the extent the Board does not find Archer teaches and
`
`renders obvious a web server with a web-enabled processing system, the
`
`combination with Chang renders this limitation obvious. It would have been
`
`obvious to combine the web-based user control interface of Chang with the server
`
`processor and database of Archer.
`
`(v) Chang teaches a web server with a web-enabled processor. Chang
`
`teaches a web server with a web-enabled processor for allowing users to set call
`
`features in the form of its Secure Access Platform (25) that controls the SCPs (19)
`
`of the PSTN Intelligent Network. EX1004, Fig. 1 (19, 25), TLP ¶¶118–19.
`
`Chang’s Secure Access Platform (25) connects over the Internet (27) to a user
`
`terminal (29) that has a web browser (293). EX1004, Fig. 1 (25, 27, 29), 2 (25, 27,
`
`DM2\6931386.1
`
`22
`
`YMAX CORPORATION v. FOCAL IP, LLC
`FOCAL IP, LLC EX2023 - 4
`Bright House Petition Excerpts
`IPR2016-01258
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113 B2
`
`routing calls from and to subscribers within a local geographic area and switching
`
`facilities for routing calls to other edge switches or other switching facilities local
`
`or in other geographic areas…” Archer teaches that one of its communications
`
`networks contains the claimed edge switches and switching facilities in the form of
`
`circuit-switched networks (118, 136) which are preferably the PSTN. EX1003, 5:5-
`
`32, TLP ¶¶135–36. The PSTN consists of switches known as tandem switches or
`
`class 4 switches (switching facilities in the claims) which serve to interconnect
`
`between different geographical regions and edge switches or class 5 switches,
`
`which connect to end-user devices, like telephones, within a local geographic area.
`
`EX1001, 1:45-50; EX1004, Fig. 1, 7:43-8:24, 18:66-19:12; TLP ¶¶136–39;
`
`EX1037, 64-69, 11-92, 106-13, 139-45; EX1010, 87 n.1. To the extent the Board
`
`finds that the PSTN does not expressly disclose the claimed switching facilities
`
`and edge switches, they are inherent because the PSTN’s structure (Archer’s
`
`preferred circuit-switched network 118) necessarily requires tandem switches (i.e.,
`
`switching facilities) interconnecting to edge switches or obvious because that is the
`
`only way the PSTN is structured. TLP ¶¶140–41; EX1003, 5:23-25.
`
`(d) Claims 1[pre(iv) and 94[pre(iv)] (Grounds 1-2): “…the method
`
`[communication network] for enabling voice communication from a calling party
`
`to a called party across both the packet network and the second network [circuit-
`
`switched network and a packet network], the method comprising the steps of [the
`
`DM2\6931386.1
`
`29
`
`YMAX CORPORATION v. FOCAL IP, LLC
`FOCAL IP, LLC EX2023 - 5
`Bright House Petition Excerpts
`IPR2016-01258
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket