PATENT OWNER’S PRESENTATION
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
`v.
`FOCAL IP, LLC
`
`ORAL HEARING
`September 19, 2017
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113
`IPR2016-01254 and -01257
`
`1
`
`
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
`v.
`FOCAL IP, LLC
`
`ORAL HEARING
`September 19, 2017
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113
`IPR2016-01254 and -01257
`
`1
`
`
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OF
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OF
`UNAMENDED CLAIMS
`
`UNAMENDED CLAIMS
`
`2
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001 (’113 Pat.) at 24 (-1254, -1257)
`
`3
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001 (’113 Pat.) at 25 (-1254, -1257)
`
`4
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001 (’113 Pat.) at 27 (-1254, -1257)
`
`5
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001 (’113 Pat.) at 28 (-1254, -1257)
`
`6
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001 (’113 Pat.) at 17 (-1254, -1257)
`
`7
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001 (’113 Pat.) at 17 (-1254, -1257)
`
`8
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001 (’113 Pat.) at 17 (-1254, -1257)
`
`9
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001 (’113 Pat.) at 18 (-1254, -1257)
`
`10
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001 (’113 Pat.) at 18 (-1254, -1257)
`
`11
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001 (’113 Pat.) at 18 (-1254, -1257)
`
`12
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001 (’113 Pat.) at 19 (-1254, -1257)
`
`13
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`…
`
`Ex. 2005 (’777 Pros. Hist.) at 134-35 (-1254, -1257)
`
`14
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`Ex. 2005 (’777 Pros. Hist.) at 81-82 (-1254, -1257)
`
`15
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`Ex. 2005 (’777 Pros. Hist.) at 82 (-1254, -1257)
`
`16
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`Ex. 2005 (’777 Pros. Hist.) at 63 (-1254, -1257)
`
`17
`
`
`
`THE CHALLENGED CLAIMS ARE
`
`THE CHALLENGED CLAIMS ARE
`PATENTABLE OVER THE INSTITUED
`GROUNDS
`
`PATENTABLE OVER THE INSTITUED
`
`GROUNDS
`
`18
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,353,660 to Burger
`US. Patent No. 6,353,660 to Burger
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1003)
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1003)
`
`19
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01254 (‘113 Patent, Claim 65)
`Claim 24
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`“the web-enabled processing system designed to be coupled
`to at least one switching facility of the circuit-switched network”
`
`“the circuit-switched network comprising edge switches . . .
`and switching facilities for routing calls to other edge switches
`or other switching facilities ”
`
`“establishing the voice communication between the calling
`party and the called party after the call is completed, across
`both the packet network and the circuit-switched network”
`
`(IPR2016-01254, 1001)
`
`20
`
`
`
`Burger Figure 1
`Burger Figure 1
`Claim 24
`
`26
`
`3°
`
`22
`
`32
`
`60
`
`Enhanced
`Services
`
`Platform
`
`Processing
`Unit
`
`TDMN
`Circuit
`Switched
`
`Interface
`
`
`
`72
`
`Circuit Switched
`
`
`
`
`Network
`
`3‘4 -
`
`-
`
`38
`
`40
`
`
`
`
`Packet Switched
`
`Network
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1003)
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1003)
`
`FIG. 1
`
`21
`3‘
`
`
`
`Burger Figure 2
`Claim 24
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1003; Paper 25, p. 37)
`
`22
`
`
`
`Burger 4:35—41
`Burger 4:35-41
`Claim 24
`
`Thc ESP 150 is ccttttcctcd tc thc circuit switchcd Itctwcrk
`
`22 via intcrccnttccticn 100. In cttc Embfldilflflflh intct'ccn-
`Itcctictt 101] has a sct cf DID lincs frcm thc Cctttrai cfficc
`
`switch 94 tc thc ESP til}. Each DID linc ccnnccts in a spccific
`pcrt cf thc circuit switchcd iutcrfacc 64 {Scc FIG. 1) cf t]1c
`ESP 60. Prcfcrahly, thc intcrccnnccticn 100 is a T1 linc that
`carrics thc DID lincst
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1003)
`(I PR201 6-01 254, Exhibit 1003)
`
`23
`23
`
`
`
`Bates Declaration (Exhibit 2022) Para. 68
`Claim 24
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 2022, para. 68)
`
`24
`
`
`
`Bates Declaration Para. 69
`Claim 24
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 2022, para. 69)
`
`25
`
`
`
`Bates Declaration Para. 91
`Claim 24
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 2022, para. 91)
`
`26
`
`
`
`Specifically= Burger discloses
`
`that PSTN-to-IP packet interface..-"'gatets-'a}-' 68 would he coiniected to a tandem
`
`switch in the PSTN 22 because it receives voice from the PSTN as time division
`
`multiplexing (TDM) which is used hv a tandem switch but not an edge switch.
`
`EXIUUB, Figs 1. 2, 5:59-62. PO‘s espeit (Mr. Bates) confirmed that PCMFTDM
`
`IPR2016-01254, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 8
`|PR2016—O1254, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 8
`Claim 24
`
`‘150.
`
`protocol is used bv a tandem switch and would overcome the transmission loss and
`
`impairment problems identified in the Shared Specification (’113 Patent. 1:59-65}.
`
`132511048, 22:23-23:81 26115: 20515-20611 Ex. 2022:
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Paper 34, p. 5)
`
`27
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01257, Petition, pp. 21-22
`|PR2016—O1257, Petition, pp. 21—22
`Claim 24
`
`(iii)
`
`cor-Hpr-'IT.5‘I?I--zg a 1..-1....=eb-erzabled pmcesasing shrew-'2 1?n C]1.15.7271?Hg one or
`
`more 1-1....aeb
`
`.5"er't.rer.s* coupled to a call pm662.945???"ng 818163???
`
`— Burt-gags Fig.
`
`1 3150
`
`shows a web-enabled. processing system in the form of the ESP 60 and.
`
`its
`
`processing unit 62._
`
`
` Call
`
`Web-Enabled
`
`Processing System
`
`Enhanced Semccs P aiform
`GT3
`
`Processing
`
`System
`
`28
`(IPR2016-01257, Paper 2, pp.21-22 )
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,798,767 to Alexander
`US. Patent No. 6,798,767 to Alexander
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1006)
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1006)
`
`29
`
`
`
`Alexander Figure 1
`Claim 24
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1006)
`
`30
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 6,683,870 to Archer
`US. Patent 6,683,870 to Archer
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1004)
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1004)
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1004)
`
`31
`
`
`
`Archer Figure 2
`Claim 24
`
`Archer Figure 2
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1004)
`(I PR201 6-01 254, Exhibit 1004)
`
`FIG. 2
`
`32
`32
`
`
`
`Archer 5:23—31
`Archer 5:23-31
`Claim 24
`
`The public switched telephone network (PSTN) is the
`preferred circuit-switched communication network 118. In
`this context, the PSTN refers to the worldwide voice tele-
`phone system. Once only an analog system, the heart of most
`telephone networks today is digital. In the United States,
`most of the remaining analog lines are the ones from homes
`and offices to the telephone company’s central office. It is
`not difficult to imagine that some day these lines will also be
`digital.
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1004)
`(I PR201 6-01 254, Exhibit 1004)
`
`US Patent No. 6,683,870, 5:23-31
`
`US Patent No. 6,683,870, 5:23—31
`
`33
`33
`
`
`
`Archer 5:32—46
`Archer 5:32-46
`Claim 24
`
`The circuit-switched communication network 118 is
`
`coupled to converter 126 which serves to convert the tele-
`phone signals into digitized packets. Converter 126 can also
`be referred to as a gateway, a digitizer or an encoder. For
`voice communicationsz the conversion function would
`include sampling the voice signals and generating digitized
`representations. This digital sample data can then be com-
`bined with packet headers and footers in a manner consistent
`with the protocol used on packet-switched network 130.
`While Internet Protocol (IP) is preferred, the precise proto-
`col used is not critical to the claimed invention. In general,
`converter 126 may convert signals from a first network (e.g.,
`circuit-switched network 118 into a di ital
`rotocol which
`
`can be routed through packet—switched network 130.
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1004)
`(I PR201 6-01 254, Exhibit 1004)
`
`34
`34
`
`
`
`Archer’s Converter 126
`Claim 24
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1004)
`
`35
`
`
`
`Archer 5:47—58
`Archer 5:47-58
`Claim 24
`
`FIG. 3 illustrates a simplified block diagram of a con-
`verter 126. The converter receives telephone signals from
`circuit-switched network 118. These signals are provided to
`a modem 70 and control circuitry 72. The modem translates
`the signals into digital signals which can be handled by
`router 74. The control circuitry 72 utilizes the signaling
`information to generate the packet addressing information
`for router 74. In the preferred embodiment, control circuitry
`72 comprises a processor based system such as a computer
`or specialized hardware. The control circuitry 72 can be
`embedded within router 74. The router then provides pack-
`etized information to the packet-switched network 130.
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1004)
`(I PR201 6-01 254, Exhibit 1004)
`
`36
`36
`
`
`
`IPR 2016-01254, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 7
`Claim 24
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Paper 34, p. 7)
`
`37
`
`
`
`Archer’s Converter 126
`Claim 24
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1004)
`
`US Patent No. 6,683,870, 5:59-67
`
`38
`
`
`
`Bates Declaration, Para. 71
`Claim 24
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 2022, para. 71)
`
`39
`
`
`
`|PR2016—O1254, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 8
`IPR2016-01254, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 8
`Claim 24
`
`(12) United States Patent
`Lewis
`
`
`(54) SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR BYPASSING
`DATA FROM EGRESS FACILITIES
`
`(75)
`
`Inventor: Shawn M. Lewis, Southboro, MA (US)
`
`(73) Assignee: Level 3 Communications, Inc.,
`Broomfield, CO (US)
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(1)) by 0 days.
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 09f196,756
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`Nov. 20, 1998
`
`PSTN
`
`PSTN edge
`
`PSTN tandem
`
`switch 1%‘4
`
`
`switch 106
`
`
`
`TAC 502
`
`412
`IP network
`
`FIG. 4
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Paper 34, p. 8)
`(IPR2016-01254, Paper 34, p. 8)
`
`40
`40
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Reply, P. 10
`Claim 24
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Paper 34, p. 10)
`
`777 Reply, P. 9
`
`
`
`IPR 2016-01263, Petition, p. 66
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Paper 2, p. 66)
`
`42
`
`
`
`Archer Figure 4
`Archer Figure 4
`Claim 24
`
`Establish mmmunication
`
`68
`
`(IPR2016-01254, Exhibit 1004)
`(I PR201 6-01 254, Exhibit 1004)
`
`43
`43
`
`
`
`CONTINGENT MOTION TO AMEND
`
`CONTINGENT MOTION TO AMEND
`CLAIM 143 OF U.S. PATENT NO.
`8,457,113 TO PROPOSED
`8,457,113 TO PROPOSED
`SUBSTITUTE CLAIM 184
`
`CLAIM 143 OF US PATENT NO.
`
`SUBSTITUTE CLAIM 184
`
`44
`
`
`
`Substitute Claim 184 Of ‘113 Patent
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`45
`
`
`
`Substitute Claim 184 Of ‘113 Patent
`The ‘8923 Patent
`
`46
`
`
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OF
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OF
`AMENDED CLAIMS
`
`AMENDED CLAIMS
`
`47
`
`
`
`Construction of Tandem Access Controller
`Claim 24
`
`Tandem Access Controller:
`
`“a controller associated with a
`tandem switch, not an edge switch.”
`
`Mot. to Amend, Paper 26 of -01257 at 3
`
`48
`
`
`
`Construction of PSTN Tandem Switch
`Claim 24
`
`PSTN Tandem Switch:
`
`“a switch in the PSTN that
`interconnects other PSTN tandem
`switches and edge switches.”
`
`Mot. to Amend, Paper 26 of -01257 at 5-7
`
`49
`
`
`
`Construction of Request to Establish a Call
`Claim 24
`
`Request to Establish a Call:
`
`“signaling indicating a request to set
`up a connection that provides for a
`two way voice communication”
`
`Mot. to Amend, Paper 26 of -01257 at 7-8
`
`50
`
`
`
`PRIOR ART IN IPR PETITIONS
`
`PRIOR ART IN IPR PETITIONS
`
`51
`
`
`
`MATERIAL PRIOR ART IN IPR PETITIONS
`The ‘8923 Patent
`Substitute Claim is Patentable Over the IPR Art
`External to PSTN:
`• Alexander
`• Archer
`• Burger
`• McMullin
`• O’Neal
`• Schwab
`• Shtivelman
`• Swartz
`
`Internal to PSTN:
`• Chang
`
`Mot. to Amend, Paper 26 of -01257 at 14
`
`52
`
`
`
`Chang
`Chang
`
`53
`
`
`
`IN Art - Chang
`Claim 24
`
`IN Art fails to disclose:
`
`• a TAC that receives call requests, initiates
`calls, answers a call, and other functions
`of the TAC recited in the Substitute
`Claims
`
`Chang’s Purported TAC
`• Secure Access Platform that operates as
`a normal web server
`• SCP that merely serves as a database to
`receive database queries and send
`responses to those queries
`
`Mot. to Amend, Paper 26 of -01257 at 19-21
`
`54
`
`
`
`IN Art - Chang
`Claim 24
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`IN Art is a Closed System
`• Not capable of processing a call sent
`over a different network than the
`PSTN
`
`IN Art’s SCP does not receive a call
`request to establish voice communication
`
`IN Art Requires Modification to Switches
`to Communicate with the SCP
`
`Mot. to Amend, Paper 26 of -01257 at 19-21
`
`55
`
`
`
`No Reason to Modify EXT Art with IN Art
`Claim 24
`
`• EXT Art’s architectural design and
`implementation is a completely different
`solution than the closed IN architecture
`
`• Unclear how or why a POSA would
`modify Archer with Chang with a
`predictable result
`
`• To modify or combine any of the art to
`read on the Substitute Claims requires
`impermissible hindsight to use the
`claimed invention as a blueprint
`
`Mot. to Amend, Paper 26 of -01257 at 20-25
`
`56
`
`
`
`Proposed Substitute Claim 184 is
`Patentable Over Archer
`
`57
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over Archer
`Claim 24
`
`Archer fails to disclose:
`
`“communications, including the first request
`to establish the incoming call, between the
`tandem access controller and the particular
`PSTN tandem switch occur without passing
`through any of the edge switches”
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 1-5
`
`58
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over Archer
`Claim 24
`
`• Archer does not use the term “tandem” or
`any other term that refers to the claimed
`PSTN tandem switch
`
`• Archer teaches that data to and from the
`purported TAC must first pass through an
`edge switch of the PSTN
`• Modem converts analog to digital
`• Netspeak product designed to receive
`analog signals from an edge switch
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 1-5
`
`59
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over Archer
`Claim 24
`
`Archer fails to disclose:
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`“initiating a second call request … by the tandem
`access controller, without yet answering the first
`incoming call”;
`
`“answering the first incoming call at the tandem
`access controller when the second call is answered”;
`and
`
`“enabling communication between the first call and
`the second call by the tandem access controller
`when the second call is answered by connecting the
`first call to the second call.”
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 5
`
`60
`
`
`
`Proposed Substitute Claim 184 is
`Patentable Over Burger
`
`61
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over Burger
`Claim 24
`
`Burger fails to disclose:
`
`“communications, including the first request
`to establish the incoming call, between the
`tandem access controller and the particular
`PSTN tandem switch occur without passing
`through any of the edge switches”
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 5-7
`
`62
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over Burger
`Claim 24
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 5-7
`Burger, Fig. 2
`
`63
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over Burger
`Claim 24
`
`Burger fails to disclose:
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`“initiating a second call request … by the tandem
`access controller, without yet answering the first
`incoming call”;
`
`“answering the first incoming call at the tandem
`access controller when the second call is answered”;
`and
`
`“enabling communication between the first call and
`the second call by the tandem access controller
`when the second call is answered by connecting the
`first call to the second call.”
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 5-7
`
`64
`
`
`
`Proposed Substitute Claim 184 is
`Patentable Over Lewis
`
`65
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over Lewis
`Claim 24
`
`Lewis fails to disclose:
`
`•
`
`•
`
`“tandem access controller”; and
`
`“access[] control criteria … based upon
`the call data”
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 7-10
`
`66
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over Lewis
`Claim 24
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 8
`Lewis, 30:51-60
`
`67
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over Lewis
`Claim 24
`
`• Lewis fails to disclose “initiating a second
`call request to establish a second call via
`the [voice over IP network]”
`
`• PO construed call request to be “signaling
`indicating a request to set up a
`connection that provides for a two way
`voice communication”
`
`• Petitioner relies exclusively on the
`embodiment directed to data calls (i.e.,
`non-voice calls)
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 7-10
`
`68
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over Lewis
`Claim 24
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 7-10
`Lewis, 27:3-18
`
`69
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over Lewis
`Claim 24
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 7-10
`Lewis, Fig. 10A
`
`70
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over Lewis
`Claim 24
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 7-10
`Lewis, Fig. 5
`
`71
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over Lewis
`Claim 24
`
`Lewis fails to disclose:
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`“initiating a second call request … by the tandem
`access controller, without yet answering the first
`incoming call”;
`
`“answering the first incoming call at the tandem
`access controller when the second call is answered”;
`and
`
`“enabling communication between the first call and
`the second call by the tandem access controller
`when the second call is answered by connecting the
`first call to the second call.”
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 7-10
`
`72
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over Lewis
`Claim 24
`
`Petitioner’s Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 30 of -01257 at 16
`
`73
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over Lewis
`Claim 24
`
`• Lewis fails to disclose “initiating a second call request to
`establish a second call”
`
`• Lewis only discloses routing received data to an ISP:
`
`Lewis, 20: 50-53
`
`Lewis, 30: 15-19
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 7-10
`
`74
`
`
`
`Proposed Substitute Claim 184 is
`Patentable Over LaPier
`
`75
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over LaPier
`Claim 24
`
`LaPier fails to disclose:
`
`•
`
`•
`
`“tandem access controller”; and
`
`“access[] control criteria … based upon
`the call data”
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 10-12
`
`76
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over LaPier
`Claim 24
`
`LaPier fails to disclose:
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`“initiating a second call request … by the tandem
`access controller, without yet answering the first
`incoming call”;
`
`“answering the first incoming call at the tandem
`access controller when the second call is answered”;
`and
`
`“enabling communication between the first call and
`the second call by the tandem access controller
`when the second call is answered by connecting the
`first call to the second call.”
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 10-12
`
`77
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over LaPier
`Claim 24
`
`Petitioner’s Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 30 of -01257 at 22
`
`78
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over LaPier
`Claim 24
`
`• LaPier fails to disclose “initiating a second call request to
`establish a second call”
`
`• LaPier teaches:
`• A single call request is generated via the PSTN, which then is
`converted from PSTN format (IAM 704) to an IP format (Setup
`call message 706), then the call request is answered at a
`terminating device conversant in the IP format.
`
`• Only after the call has been answered, a single call answer
`message is converted from IP format (Connect message 712)
`to PSTN format (ANM 714), and then the answer message is
`received by PSTN device conversant in the PSTN format.
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 10-12
`
`79
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over LaPier
`Claim 24
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 10-12
`LaPier, Fig. 7A
`
`80
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over LaPier
`Claim 24
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 10-12
`LaPier, 38:13-24
`
`81
`
`
`
`Subst. Claim 184 is Patentable Over LaPier
`Claim 24
`
`Reply to Opp. to Mot. to Amend, Paper 39 of -01257 at 10-12
`LaPier, 38:25-39
`
`82
`
`
`
`Questions
`
`Questions
`
`83
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
