`IPR 2016-01254
`U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`Petitioner
`v.
`
`Focal IP, LLC,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_____________________
`
`Case No. IPR2016-01254
`U.S. Patent No. 8,457,113
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ RESPONSIVE LISTING OF SUPPORT SHOWING
`REPLY ARGUMENTS ARE PROPER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s Order (Paper No. 40), Petitioners provide the
`
`following citations to the record to show that statements made in the Petitioners’
`
`Reply were (1) first raised in the Petition, and/or (2) raised in response to
`
`arguments and statements made by Patent Owner in the Patent Owner’s Response
`
`and its expert in his declaration (“Bates Dec.”). For the Board’s convenience,
`
`Petitioners have repeated Patent Owner’s assertions of new argument/evidence
`
`using the same numbering as PO, followed by Petitioners’ support by citation to
`
`the record to show that all arguments constitute a proper reply:
`
`(1) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 34:15-40:9, 59:1-3; Bates Dec., ¶¶67-72, 98-
`
`101; EX1048, 201:22-202:11, 205:15-206:16, 211:21-213:14; Pet., 31:11-32:6,
`
`33:11-13; 34:-11-14, 35:6-8; 38:5-6.
`
`(2) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 40:15-41-7; 44:17-45:4; Bates Dec., ¶¶72-82;
`
`Pet., 53:10-55:3, 66:2-67:6 (FIG. 4 (68)).
`
`(3) Petitioners’ Support: P.O Resp., 34:15-40:9, 44:17-45:4; 59:1-3; Bates Dec.,
`
`¶¶61-66, 72-82, 98-101; EX1048, 201:22-202:11, 205:15-206:16, 211:21-
`
`213:14; Pet., 31:11-32:6, 33:11-13; 34:-11-14, 35:6-8; 38:5-6, 53:10-55:3.
`
`(4) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 34:15-40:9, 59:1-3; Bates Dec., ¶¶67-72, 83-
`
`97; Pet., 31:11-32:6, 33:11-13; 34:-11-14, 35:6-8; 38:5-6.
`
`(5) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp. 48-54, 57-61; Bates Dec. ¶¶83-97; EX1049,
`
`356:9-357:8; Pet., 24:10-26:7, 35:17-20, 48:22-26; 64:9-65:12.
`
`1
`
`
`
`(6) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 34:15-40:9; 48:10-51:6; Bates Dec., ¶¶67-72,
`
`83-85, 88, 90, 91, 98-101; EX1048 22:23-23:8; 26:7-15; Pet. 31:11-33:10
`
`(7) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 29:16-34:8; 35:19-38:9; 48:10-51:6; Bates
`
`Dec., ¶¶61-65, 68-69, 83-97; Pet. 31:11-33:10, 34:4-10; 35:6-14; 36:20-37:12.
`
`(8) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp. 34:15-40:9, 57:1-62:11; Bates Dec., ¶¶67-72,
`
`98-105; EX1048, 201:22-202:11, 205:15-206:16, 211:21-213:14.
`
`(9) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp. 34:15-40:9, 57:1-62:11; Bates Dec., ¶¶67-72,
`
`98-105; EX1048, 201:22-202:11, 205:15-206:16, 211:21-213:14.
`
`(10) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 29:16-34:8, 59:1-3, 47:14-17; Bates Dec.,
`
`¶¶61-65, 101-102; Pet., 57:15-60:16.
`
`(11) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 34:15-40:9, 48:10-51:6, 57:1-59:8, Bates
`
`Dec., ¶¶67-72, 83-105, EX1048, 201:22-202:11, 205:15-206:16, 211:21-213:14
`
`(12) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 34:15-40:9, 48:10-20; 54:7-56:18; Bates
`
`Dec., ¶¶67-72, 83, 92-97; Pet., 38:1-42:10.
`
`(13) Petitioners’ Support: P.O. Resp., 34:16-35:19, 61:1-62:11; Bates Dec., ¶¶67,
`
`104; Pet., 13:4-15, 61:1-62:8.
`
`(14) Petitioner’s Support: P.O. Resp., 46:14-15, 47:2-4; Bates Dec., ¶¶78, 80;
`
`EX1048, 155:13-158:11
`
`(15) Petitioners’ Support: see (1)-(14) above.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 21, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Wayne Stacy/
`Wayne Stacy
`USPTO Reg. No. 45,125
`
`LEAD COUNSEL FOR
`PETITIONERS
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON PATENT OWNER
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on the 21st
`
`day of July 2017, a complete and entire copy of this Listing of Support Showing
`
`Reply Arguments Are Proper was provided via the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`End to End (PTAB E2E) System as well as delivering a copy via email on the
`
`following counsel for Patent Owner at:
`
`Brent N. Bumgardner
`brent@nelbum.com
`PAL-IPR@nelbum.com
`
`John Murphy
`murphy@nelbum.com
`
`NELSON BUMGARDNER, P.C.
`3131 W. 7th Street, Suite 300
`Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`
`Dated July 21, 2017
`
`LEAD COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Wayne Stacy/
`Wayne Stacy
`USPTO Reg. No. 45,125
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
