`571.272.7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 21
`Entered: February 23, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FOCAL IP, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Cases: IPR2016-012541
`Patent 8,457,113 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, JONI Y. CHANG, and
`BARBARA A. PARVIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PARVIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Conditionally Granting Patent Owner’s Motions for Admission
`Pro Hac Vice of Hanna F. Madbak
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`Patent Owner moves for pro hac vice admission of Mr. Hanna F.
`Madbak. See, e.g., IPR2016-01254, Paper 20. Patent Owner indicates it has
`conferred with Petitioner, and Petitioner does not oppose Patent Owner’s
`
`1 This Order addresses the same issues in the inter partes reviews listed in
`the Appendix. Therefore, we issue one Order to be filed in all of the cases.
`The parties, however, are not authorized to use this style of filing in
`subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01254
`Patent 8,457,113 B2
`
`Motions. Id. Patent Owner provides Declarations from Mr. Madbak in
`support of its Motions. See, e.g., IPR2016-01254, Ex. 2008.
`Neither the Motions nor Mr. Madbak’s Declarations identify other
`proceedings before the Office for which Mr. Madbak has applied to appear
`pro hac vice in the last three (3) years, or indicate that no such applications
`were sought. See Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, IPR2013-
`00639, slip op. at 3 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (Paper 7) (setting forth the
`requirements for pro hac vice admission). Additionally, upon review of the
`record before us, we note that powers of attorney in accordance with
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b) have not been submitted for Mr. Madbak in these
`cases.
`In view of the above, Patent Owner’s motions are conditionally
`granted, and are to be effective after a corrected declaration and power of
`attorney is filed in each case. Mr. Madbak’s corrected declaration should
`identify all other proceedings before the Office for which Mr. Madbak has
`applied to appear pro hac vice in the last three (3) years, or indicate that no
`such applications were sought.
`For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motions for pro hac vice admission
`of Mr. Hanna F. Madbak are conditionally granted provided that within
`seven (7) business days of the date of this order, Patent Owner submits in
`each of the instant cases Mr. Madbak’s corrected declaration and a Power of
`Attorney in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b); Mr. Madbak is authorized
`to act as back-up counsel in these cases only;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in these cases;
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01254
`Patent 8,457,113 B2
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Madbak comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Madbak is subject to the Office’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and to the USPTO
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Wayne Stacy
`Sarah Guske
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`wayne.stacy@bakerbotts.com
`sarah.guske@bakerbotts.com
`
`Mark D. Passler
`Brice S. Dumais
`AKERMAN LLP
`ip@akerman.com
`brice.dumais@akerman.com
`
`Patrick McPherson
`Christopher Tyson
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`PDMcPherson@duanemorris.com
`CJTyson@duanemorris.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Brent Bumgardner
`John Murphy
`NELSON BUMGARDNER, P.C.
`bbumgardner@nbclaw.net
`murphy@nelbum.com
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01254
`Patent 8,457,113 B2
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. Inter Partes Review Patent Owner’s
`Motion3
`Paper 18
`Paper 25
`Paper 18
`Paper 29
`Paper 32
`Paper 20
`Paper 20
`Paper 17
`Paper 25
`
`APPENDIX2
`
`IPR2016-01258
`IPR2016-01262
`IPR2016-01256
`IPR2016-01259
`IPR2016-01263
`IPR2016-01254
`IPR2016-01257
`IPR2016-01260
`IPR2016-01261
`
`7,764,777 B2
`
`8,155,298 B2
`
`8,457,113 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 Bright House Networks, LLC, WideOpenWest Finance, LLC, Knology of
`Florida, Inc., and Birch Communications, Inc. are Petitioner in IPR2016-
`01259, -01261, -01262, and -01263.
`
`YMax Corporation is Petitioner in IPR2016-01256, -01258, and -01260.
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. is Petitioner in IPR2016-01254 and -01257.
`
`3 The Declaration of Mr. Madbak is filed as Exhibit 2008 in each of the
`cases listed in this Appendix.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
