throbber
Case IPR2016-01254
`Patent 8,457,113
`
`
`
`Paper No. 35
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`________________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`
`v.
`
`
`FOCAL IP, LLC,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`________________
`
`Case IPR2016-01254
`Patent Number: 8,457,113
`________________
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER FOCAL IP, LLC’S LISTING OF IMPROPER
`REPLY/NEW ARGUMENT AND EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-01254
`Patent 8,457,113
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 35
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s Order (Paper No. 33), Patent Owner provides the
`
`following listing of statements and evidence that are beyond the proper scope of a
`
`reply, including new argument and evidence:
`
`(1)
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`(4)
`
`(5)
`
`(6)
`
`(7)
`
`(8)
`
`(9)
`
`Petitioner’s Reply at p. 1 ln. 11-p. 2 ln. 2 (“PO’s first argument . . .”)
`
`Petitioner’s Reply at p.2 lns. 12-15 (“Moreover, Archer’s description . . .”)
`
`Petitioner’s Reply at p.3 lns. 1-5 (“Because PO’s first two arguments . . .”)
`
`Petitioner’s Reply at p. 4 lns. 9-11 (“A. Burger (Ground 1) Discloses . . .”)
`
`Footnote 3 (“In his deposition . . .)
`
`Petitioner’s Reply at p. 4 ln. 5-p. 6 ln. 4 (“Specifically, Burger discloses . . .”)
`
`Petitioner’s Reply at p. 6 lns. 5-11 (“Moreover, even if the claims . . .”)
`
`Petitioner’s Reply at p. 6 lns. 12-14 (“B. Archer (Ground 3) Discloses . . .”)
`
`Petitioner’s Reply at p. 6 lns. 17-21 (“A POSA would understand . . .”)
`
`(10) Petitioner’s Reply at p. 7 lns. 1-10 (including figure) (“Even if the
`
`claims . . .”)
`
`(11) Petitioner’s Reply at p. 8 ln. 1-p. 11 ln. 15 (including figures) (“C. A POSA
`
`Understood . . .”)
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`Ex. 1046 (entirety)
`
`Ex. 1047 (entirety)
`
`(12) Petitioner’s Reply at p. 11 lns. 16-20 (“D. Burger in view of Alexander . . .”)
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-01254
`Patent 8,457,113
`(13) Petitioner’s Reply at p. 13 ln. 8-p.15 ln. 2 (including footnote) (“E. Archer in
`
`Paper No. 35
`
`
`
`view of Chang . . .”)
`
`(14) Petitioner’s Reply at p. 17 ln. 13-p. 18 ln. 5 (“PO’s arguments . . .”)
`
`(15) Petitioner’s Reply at p. 18 lns. 6-19 (“H. Conclusion . . .”)
`
`Dated: July 14, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/s/ Brent N. Bumgardner
`Brent N. Bumgardner
`
`Registration No. 48,476
`NELSON BUMGARDNER, P.C.
`3131 W. 7th Street, Suite 300
`Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`Telephone: (817) 377-3490
`Email: brent@nelbum.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-01254
`Patent 8,457,113
`
`
`
`Paper No. 35
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 14th day of July 2017, a copy of Patent Owner
`Focal IP, LLC’s Listing of Improper Reply/New Argument and Evidence has been
`served in its entirety via email on the following:
`
`Wayne Stacy
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`2001 Ross Avenue
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Phone: (214) 953-6678
`Facsimile: (214) 661-4678
`wayne.stacy@bakerbotts.com
`
`Sarah J. Guske
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`101 California Street, #3070
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Phone: (415) 291-6205
`Facsimile: (415) 291-6305
`sarah.guske@bakerbotts.com
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 14, 2017
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/s/ Brent N. Bumgardner
`Brent N. Bumgardner
`
`Registration No. 48,476
`NELSON BUMGARDNER, P.C.
`3131 W. 7th Street, Suite 300
`Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`Telephone: (817) 377-3490
`Email: brent@nelbum.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket