`U.S. Patent No. 6,538,324
`
`
`Filed on behalf of Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
`
`By: Michael J. Fink (mfink@gbpatent.com)
`Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.
`1950 Roland Clarke Place
`Reston, Virginia 20191
`Tel: (703) 716-1191
`Fax: (703) 716-1180
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GODO KAISHA IP BRIDGE 1,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01249
`U.S. Patent No. 6,538,324
`____________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE IN
`RESPONSE TO PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBITS
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD, PTAB
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Case IPR2016-01249 for
`U.S. Patent No. 6,538,324
`
`
`Patent Owner, Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 (“Patent Owner”), submits this
`
`Notice of Supplemental Evidence in Response to “Petitioner’s Objections to Patent
`
`Owner’s Exhibits 2001-2004” dated January 3, 2017. In response to Petitioner’s
`
`objections, Patent Owner serves herewith supplemental evidence, identified as
`
`Exhibits 2005, 2006 and 2007 pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(2). Patent Owner
`
`further files and serves herewith Patent Owner’s Current Exhibit List pursuant to
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e). Patent Owner’s Current Exhibit List identifies its
`
`supplemental evidence, Exhibits 2005, 2006 and 2007.
`
`I. Petitioner’s Objections to Exhibit 2001
`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibit 2001 under FRE 401-403 alleging that the
`
`exhibit is irrelevant because it presents cumulative information. Exhibit 2001 does
`
`not present cumulative information.
`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibit 2001 as hearsay under FRE 802. Exhibit 2001
`
`is not inadmissible hearsay under FRE 801, and would nevertheless be admissible
`
`under one or more of the hearsay exceptions under FRE 803 and 807, e.g., FRE
`
`803(18). In the event Patent Owner seeks to exclude Exhibit 2001 for any reason,
`
`Patent Owner reserves the right to seek judicial notice under FRE 201 of scientific
`
`facts contained therein, the accuracy of which Petitioner has not disputed.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`II. Petitioner’s Objections to Exhibit 2002
`
` Case IPR2016-01249 for
`U.S. Patent No. 6,538,324
`
`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibit 2002 under FRE 401-403 as irrelevant. Exhibit
`
`2002, a portion of the prosecution history of the Ding patent, is not irrelevant.
`
`Exhibit 2002 is additional evidence of how a person of ordinary skill in the art
`
`would have understood the Ding patent at the relevant time period. Exhibit 2002
`
`confirms the express teachings in the Ding patent.
`
`In the event Patent Owner seeks to exclude Exhibit 2002, Patent Owner
`
`reserves the right to seek judicial notice under FRE 201 of undisputed statements
`
`contained therein.
`
`III. Petitioner’s Objections to Exhibits 2003 and 2004
`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibits 2003 and 2004 under FRE 401-403 as
`
`irrelevant because of the dates of the dictionary definitions. Exhibits 2005 and
`
`2006 are submitted to overcome these objections. Exhibit 2007 authenticates these
`
`exhibits.
`
`In the event Patent Owner seeks to exclude Exhibits 2003 and 2004, or
`
`Exhibits 2005 and 2006, Patent Owner reserves the right to seek judicial notice
`
`under FRE 201 of the apparently undisputed dictionary definitions.
`
`Patent Owner reserves all rights to respond to any further explanations
`
`Petitioner is allowed to provide regarding its evidentiary objections. Patent
`
`Owner’s service of supplemental evidence is timely under 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(2)
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Case IPR2016-01249 for
`U.S. Patent No. 6,538,324
`
`
`because it is served within 10 business days of the service of Petitioner’s
`
`objections.
`
`Dated: January 11, 2017
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted by:
`
`/Michael J. Fink/
`Michael J. Fink
`Registration No. 31,827
`Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.
`1950 Roland Clarke Place
`Reston, Virginia 20191
`Tel: 703-716-1191
`Fax: 703-716-1180
`Email: mfink@gbpatent.com
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner,
`IP Bridge
`
`
`
`3
`
`{R50501 02979741.DOC 2}
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01249
`for U.S. Patent No. 6,538,324
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing:
`
`PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE IN
`RESPONSE TO PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBITS
`
`including exhibits, was served by electronic mail on this 11th day of January,
`
`2017, upon Counsel for Petitioner, as follows:
`
`E. Robert Yoches (bob.yoches@finnegan.com);
`Stephen E. Kabakoff (stephen.kabakoff@finnegan.com);
`Joshua L. Goldberg (joshua.goldberg@finnegan.com); and
`TSMC-IPB-PTAB@finnegan.com.
`
`
`
`/Michael J. Fink/
`Michael J. Fink
`Registration No. 31,827
`Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.
`1950 Roland Clarke Place
`Reston, Virginia 20191
`Tel: 703-716-1191
`Fax: 703-716-1180
`Email: mfink@gbpatent.com