Case 113-cv-01206-LPS
`
`Document 154 Filed 10/24/14
`
`Page
`
`of 15 PagelD
`
`1729
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`UCB NC UCB PHARMA GMBH
`RESEARCH CORPORATION
`TECHNOLOGIES INC and HARRIS FRC
`CORPORATION
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`ACCORD HEALTHCARE INC and
`INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD
`
`Defendants
`
`C.A.No.13-1206-LPS
`
`CONSOLIDATED
`
`NOTICE OF AMENDED SUBPOENA
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE of the attached
`
`amended subpoena directed to The tJniversity
`
`of Houston
`
`OF COUNSEL
`Karen Bromberg
`Gurpreet Walia M.D
`Maria Granovsky Ph.D
`COHEN GRESSERLLP
`800 Third Avenue
`New York NY 10022
`212 707-1329
`
`Greco
`Richard
`GREC0 PC
`RICHARD
`do COHEN
`GRESSER LLP
`800 Third Avenue
`New York NY 10022
`212 203-7625
`
`Dated October 24 2014
`
`John
`
`Karen
`
`John
`
`Show
`Shaw No 3362
`Keller No 4489
`OByrne No 4446
`Stephanie
`SHAW KELLER LLP
`300 Delaware Avenue Suite 1120
`Wilmington DE 19801
`302 298-0700
`jshawshawkeller.com
`
`kkeller@shawkeller.com
`
`sobyrne@shawkeller.com
`Attorneys for Accord Healthcare Inc and
`Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1027
`
`0001
`
`

`
`Case 113-cv-01206-LPS
`
`Document 154 Filed 10/24/14
`
`Page
`
`of 15 PagelD
`
`1730
`
`TAB1
`
`0002
`
`

`
`Case 113-cv-01206-LPS
`
`Document 154 Filed 10/24/14
`
`Page
`
`of 15 PagelD
`
`1731
`
`A0 88A Rev 02/14 Subpoena to Testify at
`
`Deposition
`
`in Civil Action
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`for the
`
`District of Delaware
`
`UC1 ic UC..Y opOrY$CiSeftL
`rciw Tec5 sic -kc fL uvpiw.rl
`eLrd
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Accord Healthcare Inc et al
`
`___________________________________________________________________________________
`Defendant
`
`Civil Action No
`
`13-1 206LPS/Consolidated
`
`SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT
`
`DEPOSITION IN CWIL ACTION
`
`To
`
`The University of Houston
`
`Name ofperson to whom this subpoena is directed
`IJ Testimony YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at the time date and place set forth below to testif at
`deposition to be taken in this civil action If you are an organization you must designate one or more officers directors
`or managing agents or designate other persons who consent
`to testif on your behalf about
`the following matters or
`those set forth in an attachment
`
`Strawn LLP
`Place Winston
`1111 Louisiana Street 25th Floor
`Houston TX77002
`
`Date and Time
`
`10/30/2014
`
`1000 am
`
`The deposition will be recorded by this method
`
`Stenographer or videotape
`
`Production You or your representatives must also bring with you to the deposition the following documents
`electronically stored information or objects and must permit inspection copying testing or sampling of the
`material Documents identified in Exhibit
`
`Rule 45c relating to the place of compliance
`The following provisions of Fed Civ
`45 are attached
`Rule 45d relating to your protection as
`subpoena and Rule 45e and
`relating to your duty to
`person subject to
`respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so
`
`Date
`
`10/0/2014
`
`CLERK OF COURT
`
`Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
`
`OR
`
`/s/JohnW Shaw
`
`Attorneys signature
`
`The name address e-mail address and telephone number of the attorney representing name ofparty
`who issues or requests this subpoena are
`
`See end list
`
`_____________________________________________________________________
`Shaw Esquire No 3362
`John
`SHAW KELLER LLP 300 Delaware Aienue Suite 1120
`Notice to the person who issues or requests this subpoena
`If this subpoena commands the production of documents electronically stored information or tangible things before
`is served on the person to
`notice and
`copy of the subpoena must be served on each party in this case before it
`Civ 45a4
`whom it
`is directed Fed
`
`trial
`
`0003
`
`

`
`Case 113-cv-01206-LPS
`
`Document 154 Filed 10/24/14
`
`Page
`
`of 15 PagelD
`
`1732
`
`AD 88A Rev 02/14 Subpoena to Testi at Deposition
`
`in Civil Action Page
`
`Civil Action No 131206LPS/Consoidated
`
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed
`
`Civ
`
`45
`
`received this subpoena for name of individual and title
`
`any
`
`_________________________________________________
`
`on date
`
`__________________
`
`served the subpoena by delivering
`
`copy to the named individual
`
`as follows
`
`IJ
`
`returned the subpoena unexecuted because
`
`on date
`
`or
`
`Unless the subpoena was issued on behalf of the United States or one of its officers or agents
`have also
`tendered to the witness the fees for one days attendance and the mileage allowed by law in the amount of
`
`_________
`My fees are
`
`for travel and
`
`for services for
`
`total of
`
`0.00
`
`declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true
`
`Date
`
`__________________
`
`________________________________________________________________
`Servers signature
`
`Additional
`
`information regarding attempted service etc
`
`Printed name and title
`
`Servers address
`
`0004
`
`

`
`Case 113-cv-01206-LPS
`
`Document 154 Filed 10/24/14
`
`Page
`
`of 15 PagelD
`
`1733
`
`AO 88A Rev 02/14 Subpoena to Testify at
`
`Deposition
`
`in Civil Action Page
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45
`
`and
`
`Effective 12/1/13
`
`Place of Compliance
`
`For Trial Hearing or Deposition
`subpoena may command
`trial hearing or deposition only as follows
`person to attend
`within 100 miles of where the person resides is employed or
`regularly transacts business
`in person or
`within the state where the person resides is employed or regularly
`transacts business
`in person if the person
`party or partys officer or
`trial and would not incur substantial
`is commanded to attend
`
`is
`
`ii
`expense
`
`subpoena may command
`For Other Discovery
`production of documents electronically stored information or
`place within 100 miles of where the person resides is
`tangible things at
`employed or regularly transacts business
`in person and
`inspection of premises at the premises to be inspected
`
`Protecting
`
`Person Subject
`
`to Subpoena Enforcement
`
`Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense Sanctions
`party or attorney
`subpoena must take reasonable
`responsible for issuing and serving
`steps
`to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on
`person subject to the
`subpoena The court for the district where compliance is required must
`this duty and impose an appropriate sanctionwhich may include
`enforce
`lost earnings and reasonable attorneys feeson party or attorney who
`fails to comply
`
`Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection
`person commanded to produce
`Appearance Not Required
`documents electronically stored information or tangible things or to
`permit the inspection of premises need not appear
`in person at the place of
`production or inspection unless also commanded to appear
`for
`deposition
`hearing or trial
`
`person commanded to produce
`documents or tangible
`Objections
`inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated
`things or to permit
`written objection to inspecting copying testing or
`in the subpoena
`sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premisesor to
`producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested
`The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for
`compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served If an objection is made
`the following rules apply
`At any time on notice to the commanded person the serving party
`may move the court for the district where compliance is required for an
`order compelling production or inspection
`ii These acts may be required only as directed in the order and the
`order must protect
`person who is neither
`from
`party nor partys officer
`significant expense resulting from compliance
`
`Quashing or Modifying Subpoena
`
`When Required On timely motion the court for the district where
`compliance is required must quash or modify
`subpoena that
`
`time to comply
`fails to allow reasonable
`ii
`person to comply beyond the geographical
`requires
`specified in Rule 45c
`requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter
`iii
`exception or waiver applies or
`iv subjects
`person to undue burden
`When Permitted To protect
`person subject to or affected by
`subpoena the court for the district where compliance is required may on
`motion quash or modify the subpoena if it requires
`
`if no
`
`limits
`
`Contempt
`The court for the district where compliance is requiredand also after
`motion is transferred the issuing courtmay hold in contempt
`person
`who having been served fails without adequate excuse to obey the
`subpoena or an order related to it
`
`For access
`
`to subpoena materials see Fed
`
`Civ P.45a Committee Note 2013
`
`research development
`
`trade secret or other confidential
`disclosing
`or commercial
`or
`infonnation
`ii disclosing an unretained experts opinion or information that does
`not describe specific occurrences
`in dispute and results from the experts
`study that was not requested by party
`Speq5ing Conditions as an Alternative
`described in Rule 45d3B the court may instead of quashing or
`modifying subpoena order appearance or production under specified
`conditions if the serving party
`shows
`substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be
`otherwise met without undue hardship and
`ii
`ensures that
`the subpoenaed
`person will be reasonably compensated
`
`In the circumstances
`
`Duties in Responding to Subpoena
`
`Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information These
`apply to producing documents or electronically stored
`procedures
`information
`Documents
`documents
`subpoena to produce
`person responding to
`must produce them as they are kept
`in the ordinary course of business or
`must organize and label them to correspond to the categories
`in the demand
`Formfor Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specfled
`If
`subpoena does not specify
`form for producing electronically stored
`information the person responding must produce
`form or forms in
`in
`which it
`reasonably usable form or forms
`is ordinarily maintained or in
`Electronically Stored Informat ion Produced In Only One Form The
`person responding need not produce the same electronically stored
`information in more than one form
`Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information The person
`responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information
`from sources that
`because
`the person identifies as not reasonably accessible
`of undue burden or cost On motion to compel discovery or for
`protective
`order the person responding must show that
`the information is not
`because of undue burden or cost
`reasonably accessible
`If that showing is
`made the court may nonetheless
`order discovery from such sources if the
`requesting party shows good cause considering the limitations of Rule
`26b2C The court may specify cOnditions
`for the discovery
`
`it
`
`it
`
`information
`
`Claiming Privilege or Protection
`Information Withheld
`person withholding subpoenaed
`under
`claim that
`is privileged or subject
`to protection as trial-preparation
`material must
`expressly make the claim and
`describe the nature of the withheld documents communications or
`ii
`tangible things in manner that without
`revealing information itself
`privileged or protected will enable the parties
`to assess the claim
`Information Produced If information produced
`in response to
`claim of privilege or of protection as
`subpoena
`to
`is subject
`trial-preparation material the person making the claim may notify any party
`that received the information of the claim and the basis for it After being
`party must promptly return sequester or destroy the specified
`notified
`information and any copies it has must not use or disclose the information
`the claim is resolved must take reasonable steps to retrieve the
`information if the party disclosed it before being notified and may promptly
`for the district where
`the information under seal
`to the court
`present
`determination of the claim The person who
`compliance is required for
`the information must preserve the information until
`the claim is
`produced
`resolved
`
`until
`
`0005
`
`

`
`Case 113-cv-01206-LPS
`
`Document 154 Filed 10/24/14
`
`Page
`
`of 15 PagelD
`
`1734
`
`EXHIBIT
`
`Definitions
`
`The Le Gall Thesis means
`
`Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the
`
`Department of Chemistry University of Houston-University Park In Partial Fulfillment of the
`
`Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Philippe Le Gall dated December 1987 on 2-
`
`Substituted-2-acetamido-N-benzylacetamides
`
`Synthesis Spectroscopic and Anticonvulsant
`
`Properties
`
`The Vimpat Lacosamide Tablets Litigation refers to UCB Inc et al
`Accord Healthcare Inc et al C.A No 13-1206 LPS
`
`The Vimpat Lacosamide Tablets Litigation Plaintiffs refers to Harris FRC
`
`Corporation Research Corporation Technologies Inc UCB Inc UCB Pharma GmbH
`
`substituted by UCB Biopharma SPRL and UCB Biopharma SPRL
`The U.S Patent Application No 08/8 18688 refers to U.S Patent Application
`
`No 08/818688 U.S Patent No 5773475 which issued from U.S ApplicationNo 08/818688
`and U.S Patent No RE38551 which reissued from U.S Patent No 5773475 and any
`
`invention covered by the aforementioned patent application and patents
`
`Harold Kohn refers to the inventor
`
`listed on the face of U.S Patent Application
`
`No 08/8 18688 U.S Patent No 5773475 and U.S Patent No RE38551
`
`Topics for the Deposition
`
`The general practice for indexing cataloging and shelving theses of students of
`
`the University of Houston between 1987 and 1996
`
`The customary research aids available in the library between 1987 and 1996
`
`through which member of the public could locate theses of students of the University of
`
`Houston
`
`0006
`
`

`
`Case 113-cv-01206-LPS
`
`Document 154 Filed 10/24/14
`
`Page
`
`of 15 PagelD
`
`1735
`
`The date when the Le Gall Thesis was first placed in any library or other
`
`collection of literature maintained by the University of Houston or any other library or literature
`
`collection
`
`The manner in which the Le Gall Thesis was indexed cataloged shelved and/or
`
`recorded as part of any library or literature collection including electronic or paper indexing and
`
`the dates when the indexing cataloging shelving and/or
`
`recording occurred
`
`The manner in which the Le Gall Thesis could be identified by
`
`search including
`
`search directed to anti-convulsants or chemical compound names including 2-acetamido-N-
`
`benzylacetamides and the date when such
`
`search was first possible
`
`Whether the Le Gall Thesis could be identified or accessed by
`
`search conducted
`
`via the internet or through any publically available literature search service and the date when
`
`such identification or access was possible
`
`The date when the Le Gall Thesis was first available to any member of the public
`
`through customary research aids available in the library or otherwise
`
`The manner in which any records were kept between January
`
`1987 and June
`
`30 2010 regarding who accessed and/or borrowed any thesis of
`
`student of the University of
`
`Houston including but not limited to the Le Gall Thesis including whether any record was kept
`
`of the identity and affiliation if known of any person or entity who accessed or borrowed
`
`thesis and the date that
`
`thesis was accessed or borrowed
`
`Any record of the Le Gall Thesis being accessed or borrowed between January
`
`1987 and June 30 2010 including if available the identity and affiliation of any person or
`
`entity who accessed or borrowed the Le Gall Thesis and the date that the Le Gall Thesis was
`
`accessed or borrowed
`
`10
`
`Any agreement between the University of Houston and the Vimpat Lacosamide
`Tablets Litigation Plaintiffs relating to U.S Patent Application No 08/818688
`
`including the
`
`agreement between the University of Houston and Research Corporation Technologies
`
`Inc
`
`0007
`
`

`
`Case 113-cv-01206-LPS
`
`Document 154 Filed 10/24/14
`
`Page
`
`of 15 PagelD
`
`1736
`
`referred to in the Assignment of Patent Application in the file history of U.S Patent No
`
`RE38551 attached herewith as Appendix
`
`11
`
`Harold Kohns obligation to assign his rights title and interest
`
`in U.S Application
`
`No 08/8 18688 and the invention covered by the application to the University of Houston
`
`12
`
`Communications between the University of Houston or its counsel and the
`
`Vimpat Lacosamide Tablets Litigation Plaintiffs or their counsel regarding the Vimpat
`
`Lacosamide Tablets Litigation
`
`0008
`
`

`
`Case 113-cv-01206-LPS
`
`Document 154 Filed 10/24/14
`
`Page
`
`of 15 PagelD
`
`1737
`
`EXHIBIT
`
`Documents
`
`to be produced
`
`Definitions
`
`The term document
`
`is defined to be synonymous in meaning and equal
`
`in scope
`
`to the usage of the term documents or electronically stored information in Fed
`34a1A
`
`Civ
`
`The Le Gall Thesis means
`
`Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the
`
`Department of Chemistry University of Houston-University Park In Partial Fulfillment of the
`
`Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Philippe Le Gall dated December 1987 on 2-
`
`Substituted-2-acetamido-N-benzylacetamides
`
`Synthesis Spectroscopic and Anticonvulsant
`
`Properties
`
`The Vimpat Lacosamide Tablets Litigation refers to UCB Inc et al
`Accord Healthcare Inc et al C.A No 13-1206 LPS
`The Vimpat Lacosamide Tablets Litigation Plaintiffs refers to Harris FRC
`
`Corporation Research Corporation Technologies Inc UCB Inc UCB Pharma GmbH
`
`substituted by UCB Biopharma SPRL and UCB Biopharma SPRL
`The U.S Patent Application No 08/818688 refers to U.S Patent Application
`No 08/818688 U.S Patent No 5773475 which issued from U.S ApplicationNo 08/818688
`and U.S Patent No RE38551 which reissued from U.S Patent No 5773475 and any
`
`invention covered by the aforementioned patent application and patents
`
`Harold Kohn refers to the inventor
`
`listed on the face of U.S Patent Application
`
`No 08/818688 U.S Patent No 5773475 and U.S Patent No RE38551
`
`Documents Requested
`
`Documents sufficient to show the date on which the Le Gall Thesis was added to
`
`the library or any literature collection maintained by the University of Houston
`
`0009
`
`

`
`Case 113-cv-01206-LPS
`
`Document 154 Filed 10/24/14
`
`Page 10 of 15 PagelD
`
`1738
`
`Documents sufficient to establish the date on which the Le Gall thesis was
`
`available to members of the public through customary research aids available in the library or
`
`otherwise
`
`Documents sufficient to show the manner in which the Le Gall Thesis was
`
`indexed cataloged and/or shelved as part of any library or literature collection maintained by the
`
`University of Houston and the dates on which such indexing cataloging and/or shelving was
`
`done
`
`Documents sufficient to show the means by which the Le Gall thesis could be
`
`accessed by member of the public through electronic means including through any public or
`
`commercial literature search services
`
`Documents sufficient to show the general practice for indexing cataloging and
`
`shelving theses of students of the University of Houston between 1987 and 1996
`
`Documents sufficient to show the customary research aids available in the library
`
`between 1987 and 1996 through which member of the public could locate theses of students of
`
`the University of Houston
`
`Any record of the Le Gall Thesis being accessed or borrowed between January
`
`1987 and June 30 2010 including documents sufficient to show the identity and affiliation of
`
`any person or entity who accessed or borrowed the Le Gall Thesis and the date that the Le Gall
`
`Thesis was accessed or borrowed
`
`Any agreement between the University of Houston and the Vimpat Lacosamide
`Tablets Plaintiffs relating to U.S Patent Application No 08/818688
`
`including the agreement
`
`between the University of Houston and Research Corporation Technologies
`the Assignment of Patent Application in the file history of U.S Patent No RE38551 attached
`
`Inc referred to in
`
`herewith as Appendix
`
`Documents sufficient to show Harold Kohns obligation to assign his rights title
`
`and interest
`
`in U.S Application No 08/8 18688 and the invention covered by the application to
`
`the University of Houston
`
`0010
`
`

`
`Case 113-cv-01206-LPS
`
`Document 154 Filed 10/24/14
`
`Page 11 of 15 PagelD
`
`1739
`
`10
`
`Communications between the University of Houston or its counsel and the
`
`Vimpat Lacosamide Tablets Litigation Plaintiffs or their counsel regarding the Vimpat
`
`Lacosamide Tablets Litigation
`
`0011
`
`

`
`Case 113-cv-01206-LPS
`
`Document 154 Filed 10/24/14
`
`Page 12 of 15 PagelD
`
`1740
`
`List of Parties Who Join in Subpoena
`
`Accord Healthcare Inc Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd Amneal
`
`Pharmaceuticals LLC Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York LLC Apotex Inc Apotex
`
`Corp Aurobindo Pharma Ltd Aurobindo Pharma USA Inc Breckenridge Pharmaceutical
`
`Inc Vennoot Pharmaceuticals LLC Hetero USA Inc Hetero Labs Limited Mylan
`
`Pharmaceuticals Inc Mylan Inc Sandoz Inc Sun Pharma Global FZE Sun Pharmaceutical
`
`Industries Ltd Watson Laboratories Inc
`
`Florida n/k/a Actavis Laboratories FL Inc
`
`Watson Pharma Inc n/k/a Actavis Pharma Inc Actavis Inc
`
`0012
`
`

`
`Case 113-cv-01206-LPS
`
`Document 154 Filed 10/24/14
`
`Page 13 of 15 PagelD
`
`1741
`
`APPENDIX
`
`0013
`
`

`
`Case 113-cv-01206-LPS
`r11999 123
`
`Document 154 Filed 10
`SCOTT TIJRPHY
`
`/24/14
`
`1742
`
`ioGO
`
`is
`
`1J4NT o11TNT PPLJQ
`
`.xvNr
`
`eaD.2
`
`1iwzTIcw iieafl XICO 3OHflIC r4I
`
`AcID
`
`covering
`the U.S patent AppliCat.0t1
`or desi9tt4 an U.S.Z
`filed along with thLn
`
`xtLeafln
`
`fi1ed
`
`Thiivereit
`
`of
`
`ltott3tot
`
`euetofl
`
`.-.
`
`meanS
`
`iesearCh orporatibU
`
`3339
`
`772O4
`
`Inc
`
`b1aiJare
`
`èibiigat to
`
`fl
`
`ii
`
`ob.igatioflfl
`
`Internet
`
`jn
`
`Ii
`
`to
`
`to
`
`bi or
`
`bin or her enti right itle and
`
`rnoTIO ueat1n
`coiporatiofl at 101 borth Wiluict Road 9ttit 600 TuCDa XiO 95711-
`the INENTXO Each.IER
`in th ItTZtIO and
`The I17ETOR5
`tnade
`ightn title and
`annifl hie or her
`PLICTI0 to the TNSTITUTI or Lte
`thde.r rhich
`RC1 and the I2STITtTIO are partie to xt agretinfl
`the
`nO tteti-
`IO
`0blite to tjayto NST
`has eiraluated arid
`RCT
`provided in that agreementi
`the reven1ea generated by thC XN1RNTXO
`share of
`her obligatioZth tothQ
`fuxtheranC of hi
`PX each iNVENTOR wighes
`Ii
`I9T1TOTI
`in the VEtTION and
`her rigbt title end intereet
`to RCT
`jach IOR he anni to
`the xIO
`
`and
`the
`
`the
`
`the ppLICTIOL aU fcreigu app1iCati0 Inel
`contirniation in whole and
`LXCT10
`.ppLICP.TION
`resulting rom the
`all pateflt
`and
`reissuen extensions rextewals nd eexamifli of
`dencried in
`patentfl described in os
`all
`icatiotlA dnàcri3ed in
`Thin a5igJt giLall al.low RCT to file th
`in it wfl te bIt naiving the T1NO
`the .Lttvetttors
`prIztiflnilé nd theright
`to
`jn all 0intrieB of tht io1d where it
`paragraph
`th teif.ati0na1
`rLgt provided
`the prioriti
`o.aim the benefit of
`Ccrnvsfltlon of 1883 ae tnended
`
`diuiIioflal
`
`--
`
`0014
`
`

`
`MYi3--tS97
`
`Case 113-cv-01206-LPS
`j33
`r-vx
`
`Document 154 Filed 10/24/14
`SC
`GCOTT MURPHY
`
`Page 15 of 15 PagelD
`
`1743
`
`10030
`
`hereby authoizea ád reqUeta the Counasoner of
`XNVNTOR
`Each
`that uay be gré
`the United atn
`Jmezi Ed iait.o RCT
`patents and TradeturkB
`all U.S. patents described in pagaph
`Each INVENTOR agrees oz hims4 ore 11ii
`rMijejra
`ifli1 donk that
`inistraEds to ectté fy ftrthet
`cec-utors and
`RCT miit oonider noaary to full o.èat CdinEé
`tyi
`INVENTIOi and the documentn deacrthe z.n aragrapli
`right or
`ach nVNTQR cotenanta
`that ha oi she han not gra
`the IWTI0 to anyohôid1however
`or sell
`license to naake
`1ca ma have zite in the
`the United Staten of
`the government of
`Dee1 1dixig
`and APPLXCTIO by reason of soitaorhip
`IVENTXOb
`to the mting of
`the IV2NrxON
`
`the
`
`that he or she baa not èc eéd hIs or
`INVE1TOR also covenants
`Each
`in the INVENTION or AttIW.TZO àiid has
`her riht1 title and interest
`that con.fliotn with tbinment
`rzot and vifl not aign ny document
`afld ba not1 idiilrtot
`the exoeptiotiJ.iated in pararph
`other thai
`aign any
`doothuenc
`t1it
`ictn id.th thin
`-cOn
`the rht thet.s
`documents necessazy tomemoriJ.ize orrotéct
`the IN1TZTZON nd APPLICATION
`if any itt
`Government
`
`INVBNTQRv Signature
`Ero1d lcohn
`
`me oi INR
`
`ryed
`
`.j.
`
`Eate
`
`--
`
`ddreea
`4102 Aberdeen Way
`Houston TX 77025
`
`STATE or
`
`cotrry
`
`iQ
`On this
`day of
`1J14-V
`personally appearet
`the aJove-namcd parsozially iaiown to
`me to be the one whe executed
`the foxegQiug iiiatrumiterit1
`th seine to
`the same
`my presence and ácknowleded
`deed.before
`
`19 97-
`and knon by
`and E6drLbed
`frea act and
`
`--
`
`i-
`
`0015