throbber
lllilllllflilllllllllflllillfllfllllllfllll
`
`
`US005702976A
`
`
`
`United States Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`Schuegraf et al.
`
`[19]
`
`
`
`an PatentvNumber:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`5,702,976
`
`
`
`
`Dec. 30, 1997
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[54] SHALLOW TRENCH ISOLATION USING
`now DIELECTRIC CONSTANT INSULATOR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[75]
`
`
`
`Inventors: Klaus F. Schuegmf; Aftab Ahmad,
`
`
`
`
`
`both of Boise, Id.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[73] Assignee: Micron Technology, Inc., Boise. Id.
`
`4,824,797
`5,429,995
`5,492,736
`5530.293
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4/1989 Goth
`"1995 Nishiyama et
`
`
`211996 Laxman et al.
`
`
`
`6/1995 Cohm 8! a1-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`437167
`437/238
`
`427/579
`
`257/752
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`P'i'"0’Y EW"""'¢"‘-T1'|"18 D338
`Attorney, Agen; or Firm—Knobbe. Martens. Olson & Bear.
`
`
`
`
`
`[LP-
`
`
`ABSTRACT
`[57]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A shallow trench isolation is disclosed wherein the trench
`depth is reduced beyond that achieved in prior an processes-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The reduced wench depth helps to eliminate the formation of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Voids during _th=_trcnch rcfil} prodcss and provides _for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`greater plananty In the final isolation structure. Effective
`device isolation is achieved with a reduced trench depth by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`utilizing refilling dielecuic materials having low dieleclric
`
`constant
`
`Appl. No.: 547,620
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[22] Filed:
`Oct. 24, 1995
`
`
`
`[51]
`Int. Cl.‘ ..........
`us. Cl.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`H0lL 2lfl6
`357737; 437/240; 437/238;
`
`
`
`
`
`143/D1G_ 50
`
`
`
`437/64. 65, 67,
`
`
`
`437/23g_ 240; 143/DIG 50
`
`
`
`
`[58] Field of Search
`
`
`[55]
`
`4,502,914
`
`
`
`
`Refemnces Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`
`3/1985 Tmmpp et al.
`
`
`
`
`
`437/67
`
`
`
`
`
`
`22 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`‘£7’ S’
`
`
`
`r §.4.1E//
`
`TSMC Exhibit 1009
`
`Page 1 of 9
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`//W//
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`H
`,0
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 9
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 9
`
`

`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`
`
`
`Dec. 30, 1997
`
`
`Sheet 3 of 4
`
`5,702,976
`
`
`
`ré’t'9r3/1
`
`22
`
`22
`
`2.?
`
`”
`I0
`
`,§5'g3.5’
`
`
`
`
`22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`%////%
`
`Page 4 of 9
`
`Page 4 of 9
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`
`
`Dec. 30, 1997
`
`
`
`
`Sheet 4 of 4
`
`
`5,702,976
`
`
`
`
`
`22
`
`
`
`‘r
`
` %//
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 9
`
`Page 5 of 9
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`25
`
`45
`
`
`
`
`1
`SHALLOW TRENCH ISOLATION USING
`
`
`
`
`LOW DIELECTRIC CONSTANT INSULATOR
`
`
`
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The invention relates generally to silicon integrated cir-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cuit design and process technology. In particular, the inven-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tion pertains to trench isolation process technology.
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Implementing electronic circuits involves connecting iso-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lated devices through specific electronic paths. In silicon
`
`
`
`
`
`
`integrated circuit fabrication it is necessary to isolate devices
`from one another which are built into the same silicon
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`matrix. They are subsequently interconnected to create the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`desired circuit configuration. In the continuing trend toward
`
`
`
`
`
`
`higher device densities, parasitic interdevice currents
`become more problematic, thus isolation technology has
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`become one of the most critical aspects of contemporary
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`integrated circuit fabrication.
`Over the last few decades a variety of successful isolation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`technologies have been developed to address the require-
`ments of different integrated circuit types such as NMOS,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CMOS and bipolar. In general, the various isolation tech-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nologies exhibit difierent attributes with respect to such
`characteristics as minimum isolation spacing, surface
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`planarity, process complexity and defect density generated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`during isolation processing. Moreover, it is common to trade
`off some of these characteristics when developing an isola-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tion process for a particular integrated circuit application.
`In metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) technology it is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`necessary to provide an isolation structure that prevents
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`parasitic channel formation between adjacent devices, such
`devices being primarily NMOS or PMOS transistors or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CMOS circuits. The most widely used isolation technology
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`for MOS circuits has been that of LOCOS isolation, an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`acronym for LOCal Oxidation of Silicon. LOCOS isolation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`essentially involves the growth of a recessed or semito-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cessed oxide in unmasked non-active or field regions of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`silicon substrate. This so-called field oxide is generally
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`grown thick enough to lower any parasitic capacitance
`occurring over these regions, but not so thick as to cause step
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`coverage problems. The great success of LOCOS isolation
`technology is to a large extent attributed to its inherent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`simplicity in MOS process integration, cost eflectiveness
`and adaptability.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In spite of its success, several limitations of LOCOS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`technology have driven the development of alternative iso-
`lation structures. A well-known limitation in LOCOS isola-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tion is that of oxide undergrowth at the edge of the mask
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`which defines the active regions of the substrate. This
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`so-called bird's beak (as it appears) poses a limitation to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`device density, since that portion of the oxide adversely
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`influences device performance while not significantly con-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tributing to device isolation. Another problem associated
`with the LOCOS process is the resulting circuit planarity or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lack thereof. For submicron devices, planarity becomes an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`important issue, often posing problems with subsequent
`
`
`
`
`layer conformality and photolithogmphy.
`Trench isolation technology has been developed in part to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`overcome the aforementioned limitations of LOCOS isola-
`
`
`
`
`
`tion for submicron devices. Refilled trench structures essen-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tially comprise a recess formed in the silicon substrate which
`is refilled with a dielectric material. Such structures are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fabricated by first forming submicron-sized trenches in the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`silicon substrate, usually by a dry anisotropic etching pro-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cess. The resulting trenches typically display a steep side-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wall profile as compared to LOCOS oxidation. The trenches
`are subsequently refilled with a dielectric such as chemical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vapor deposited (CVD) silicon dioxide (SiO2). They are then
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`planaxized by an etchback process so that the dielectric
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`remains only in the trench, its top surface level with that of
`the silicon substrate. The etchback process is often per-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`formed by etching photoresist and the deposited silicon
`dioxide at the same rate. The top surface of the resist layer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is highly planarized prior to etchback through application of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`two layers of resist, and flowing the first of these layers.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Active regions wherein devices are fabricated are those that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`were protected from etch when the trenches wae created.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The resulting structure functions as a device isolator having
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`excellent planarity and potentially high aspect ratio benefi-
`cial for device isolation. Refilled t:rench isolation can take a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`variety of forms depending upon the specific application;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`they are generally categorized in terms of the trench dimen-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sions: shallow trenches (<1 pm), moderate depth trenches
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(1-3 pm), and deep, narrow trenches (>3 um deep, Q mu
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wide). Shallow Trench Isolation (STI) is used primarily for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`isolating devices of the same type and is often considered an
`alternative to LOCOS isolation. Shallow trench isolation has
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the advantages of eliminating the birds beak of LOCOS and
`
`
`
`
`
`providing a high degree of smface planarity.
`The basic trench isolation process is, however, subject to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`drawbacks, one of these being void formation in the trench
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`during dielectric refill. Such voids are formed when the
`refilling dielectric material forms a constriction near the top
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of a trench, preventing flow of the material into the trench
`interior. Such voids compromise device isolation as well as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the overall structural integrity. Unfortunately, preventing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`void formation during trench refill often places minimum
`size constraints on the trenches themselves, which may
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compromise device packing density or device isolation. For
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`example, a key parameter measuring device isolation is the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`field threshold voltage between adjacent devices, that is. the
`voltage necessary to create a parasitic channel beneath a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`field oxide region linking adjacent devices. The field thresh-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`old voltage is influenced by a number of physical and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`material properties of the trench isolator such as insulator
`thickness, dielectric constant c, substrate doping, field
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`implant dose and substrate bias. Thus, a principal difiiculty
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in decreasing the trench depth is the compromise in device
`isolation. Clearly, it is highly desirably to develop a shallow
`
`
`
`
`
`
`trench isolation process which overcomes the problem of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`void formation while providing effective device isolation.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SUMM.ARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`
`
`It is an object of the present invention to provide a trench
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`isolation process which alleviates the problem of void
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`formation during dielectric refill. It is another object of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`present invention to provide a trench isolator having reduced
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dimensions, advantageous for device density and wafer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`planarity. It is a further object of the present invention to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`provide a shallow trench isolator having enhanced device
`isolation characteristics.
`
`
`In accordance with one aspect of the present invention. a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`process for isolating devices on a semiconductor substrate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`comprises first removing portions of the semiconductor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate,
`thereby forming recesses preferably having a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`trench profile. The trenches are then refilled with a material
`having a dielectric constant lower than the dielectric con-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`stant of silicon dioxide which is about 3.9. Using a low-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`edielectric material allows the trench dimensions to be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reduced while still providing effective device isolation char-
`acteristics. Preferably, the dielectric material comprises a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`halide-doped glass such as Fluorine-doped SiO2. To insure
`
`5,702,976
`
`
`
`2
`
`50
`
`55
`
`
`
`65
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 9
`
`Page 6 of 9
`
`

`
`
`3
`against device contamination, the invention further com-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`prises forrning a barrier Layer over the trenches prior to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`refilling them with the low-edielectric material.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In accordance with another aspect of the present
`invention, an isolation stucture in a semiconductor substrate
`
`
`
`
`
`comprises a recessed tench formed in the semiconductor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate and a material having a low dielectic constant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`filling the tench. The tench stucture preferably has a depth
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`less man 250 nm, and furthermore comprises a barrier layer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`disposed between the interior tench surface and me dielec-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tic material. The dielectric material preferably has a dielec-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tic constant lower man about 3.9, and may comprise a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fluoride-doped silicon dioxide composition.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In accordance with yet another aspect of the present
`invention, a method of reducing the formation of voids in a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`refilled tench isolation process comprises forming trenches
`having an aspect ratio less than about 2:1, and men refilling
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the trenches with a material having a dielectric constant less
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`man the dielectic constant of silicon dioxide. The tenches
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`preferably have a depth of less than 200 nm, and are refilled
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with a material comprising a Fluorine-doped silicon dioxide
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`composition.
`These and other aspect and attributes of the present
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`invention will become more fully apparent with the follow-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ing detailed description and accompanying figures.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`
`
`
`FIGS. lA—lC are schematic sections illustrating an exem-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plary shallow tench isolation process.
`FIG. 2 is a schematic section of a tench refill having a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`void.
`
`FIG. 3 is a schematic section illustating an embodiment
`
`
`
`
`
`of the present shallow tench isolation process.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`
`
`
`INVENTION
`
`In accordance with the principles of the present invention,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`an improved shallow tench isolation technology utilizes a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tench that is shallower than prior art trenches, and yet
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`provides the same degree of device isolation. The shallower
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tench helps prevent the formation of voids during dielectric
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`refill. However, despite the smaller dimensions of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`present
`inventive tench, equivalent device isolation is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`achieved through use of a dielectric refill having a lower
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dielectric constant e than in prior an isolation trenches. To
`
`
`
`
`
`
`better illustrate these inventive principles, a brief description
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of an exemplary S'I‘I process is provided first hereinbelow.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`An exemplary S'II process may comprise first a masking,
`patterning and dry etch process, producing trenches in the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`silicon substrate as shown in FIG. 1A. The semiconductor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate 10 is masked and patterned to expose the regions
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of the substrate to be etched. ‘The mask 12 may for example
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`comprise a resist layer which is resistant to the dry aniso-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tropic etch used to create the tenches. The mask 12 may be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`patterned by conventional photolithographic means to define
`
`
`
`
`
`the regions of the substrate 10 to have trenches formed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`thmein. The tenches 14 are formed by an anisotropic dry
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`etch, such as a plasma or reactive ion etch. A preferred
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`characteristic of the tenches 14 is the steep sidewall profile
`as compared to conventional LOCOS processes.
`
`
`
`
`
`After the trenches 14 are formed, the mask 12 is removed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`by selective etching or chemical mechanical polishing and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the trenches are refilled with a dielectric material 16, as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`shown in FIG. 1B. A preferred dielectric refill material for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SP1 is chemical vapor deposited silicon dioxide (CVD-Si0,)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`due to its high quality and excellent conformality. Confor-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mality is particularly important because the refilled material
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`must be supplied to fill trenches having relatively high
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`aspect ratios (height:widm>1).
`
`S
`
`25
`
`
`30
`
`
`35
`
`
`45
`
`50
`
`
`
`55
`
`
`
`65
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 9
`
`5,702,976
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Following the tench refill 16, the top surface of the
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate 10 is planarized by an etchback process, typically
`
`
`
`
`
`
`also performed using a chemicallmechanical polish. Prior to
`etchback. the substate 10 may be coated with a layer of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`photoresist (not shown) in order to provide a planar surface
`with which to begin the etchback. The etchback itself
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`provides a planarized substrate surface 18, having dielectric
`material 16 filling the trenches 14 up to and level with the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`top surface 18.
`
`
`
`As shown in FIG. 2, a common problem associated with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tench refill
`isolation is the formation of voids in the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`trenches. During refill of the tench 14 with dielectic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`material 16, the tench 14 often becomes constricted near the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`top of the tench, mereby preventing complete refill of the
`tench, resulting in a void 20. The void 20 lowers the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`isolation characteristics of the refilled tench in addition to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`introducing structural instabilities in subsequent processes.
`Increasing the tench width can alleviate void formation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`however it also undesirably decreases device density.
`In accordance with the principles of the present invention,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`void formation is alleviated by decreasing tench depth.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Utilizing shallower tenches decreases the possibility of void
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`formation and favorably increases surface planarity of the
`final refilled trench structure. For example in a typical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DRAM application, a tench in accordance with the present
`invention may have dimension of approximately 200 nm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`deep and 250 nm wide while prior art trenches typically have
`dimensions of approximately 275 nm deep and 350 nm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wide. However, as is well known in the art, a key parameter
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`measuring device isolation is the field threshold voltage
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`between adjacent devices, that is, the voltage necessary to
`create a parasitic channel beneath a field oxide region
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`linlcing adjacent devices. The field threshold voltage is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`influenced by a number of physical and material properties
`of the tench isolator such as insulator thiclmess, dielectic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`constant a, substrate doping, field implant dose and substrate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`bias. Thus, a principal dilficulty in decreasing the tench
`depth is the compromise in device isolation.
`
`
`
`
`
`To circumvent this problem, the shallow tench isolation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of the present invention maintains effective device isolation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in a shallower tench by utilizing dielectic materials having
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a lower dielectric constant than used in the prior art. For a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`given tench geometry,
`the field threshold voltage is a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`decreasing fundion of the field dielectric constant. Thus, to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compensate for smaller tench dimensions,
`the present
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`invention utilizes dielectic materials having lower dielectric
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`constant. A possible dielectic material is a low index glass
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`such as a halide-doped silicon dioxide, deposited by into-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ducing the halide during CVD of silicon dioxide. For
`example, F:SiO, possesses a dielectric constant of approxi-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mately 3.2, while typical CVD—SiO2 has a dielectric constant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of about 3.9. Use of such materials allows arelative decrease
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in tench depth by about 20%.
`Fluorine or other elements comprising a reduced dielec-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tric constant material may however cause deleterious effects
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`on neighboring devices if they diffuse into adjacent active
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`areas. Therefore, a preferred embodiment of the present
`
`
`
`
`
`
`invention also incorporates a diffusion barrier layer lining
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the tench so as to prevent dopant migration into the silicon
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`substate. Use of a preferred barrier layer in the form of a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`grown oxide or nitide film. or a deposited stoichiometric or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`non-stoichiometric oxide or nitride film inhibits contamina-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tion of the isolation field—efl’eet tansistor, thereby preserving
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`desirable characteristics such as a high mreshold voltage.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The integrated devices subject to isolation are also protected
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`by the barrier layer from contamination.
`
`
`
`
`
`In accordance with the aforementioned principles, a pre-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ferred shallow trench isolation may for example comprise
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the following process steps illustated in FIGS. 3A—3D. As
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`shown in FIG. 3A, the silicon wafer 10 is first covued by a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 9
`
`

`
`
`mask 12, such as a resist or silicon oxide/nitride bilayer, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`then patterned and etched to define the field isolation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`regions. The wafer is then subject to a dry anisotropic etch
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`such as a halide plasma complex, thereby forming the
`trenches 22 in the silicon substrate 10. As mentioned earlier,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in comparison to the prior art trench isolation, the trenches
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of the present invention are about 200 nm deep, shallower
`
`
`
`
`
`
`than the prior art by about 20%.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`As mentioned previously, to avoid contamination of sub-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`strate regions adjacent to the trenches 22, it is preferable to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`form a barrier layer 24 over the trenches 22 prior to
`dielectric refill as shown schematically in FIG. 3B. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`barrier layer 24 may for example comprise a silicon oxide or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nitride film grown in an appropriate ambient or a chemical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vapor deposited oxide or nitride film at least 5 nm thick. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`barrier layer 24 functions to prevent difiusion of dopants
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`deposited during the subsequent dielectric refill process.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Although in general nitride forms a superior dilfusion barrier
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to oxide, the higher dielectric constant of nitride should be
`considered in the overall isolation sn'ucture. It may be for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`that oxide performs adequately as a ditfusion
`example.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`barrier while having the advantage of a lower dielectric
`constant than nitride. Thus, barrier layer thickness and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dielectric constant should be considered in the overall trench
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`design.
`A shown in FIG. 3C, the trenches 22 are refilled with a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dielectric material 26 having a low dielectric constant e of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`about 3.3. As mentioned previously,
`the use of a low
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dielectric constant material lowers the gate capacitance of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the isolation field-efiect transistor,
`thereby raising the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`threshold voltage. A CVD-Si02 doped with a halide such as
`
`
`
`
`Fluorine is a presently preferred material.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`To complete the trench structure, a planarizing step is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`performed as shown in FIG. 3D. A planarizing process may
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`for example comprise depositing and reflowing a resist layer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to attain a planar top surface, followed by an etchback
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`procedure to remove material down to the substrate surface.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`While the planarizing process may proceed in accordance
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with well-known processes, the present preferred isolation is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`advantageous because the shallower trench structures and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`consequent thinner refilled layers allow for a greater degree
`
`
`of planarity.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Thus. the present invention provides several advantages
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`over the prior art by avoiding cavities in the trenches,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`providing more effective device isolation using low-e mate-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`rials and having a greater degree of planarity in the final
`trench struwure.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Although described above with reference to the preferred
`embodiments, modifications.within the scope of the inven-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tion may be apparent to those slcilled in the art, all such
`modifications are intended to be within the scope of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`appended claims.
`What is claimed is:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1. A process for isolating devices on a semiconductor
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate comprising the steps of:
`
`
`
`
`
`removing predetermined portions of the semiconductor
`substrate forming recesses therein; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`refilling the portions of the semiconductor substrate with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a material comprising an in situ doped silicon oxide
`
`
`
`
`
`
`complex,
`the material having a dielectric constant
`lower than the dielectric constant of undoped silicon
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dioxide.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2. The process of claim 1, wherein the step of removing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`portions of the semiconductor wafer comprises forming
`trenches in the semiconductor wafer.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3. The process of claim 2. wherein the trenches have a
`
`
`
`
`
`depth of less than 200 nm.
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4. 'll1e process of claim 3, wherein the trenches have an
`
`
`
`
`
`aspect ratio of less than 2:1.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5. A process for isolating devices on a semiconductor
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate comprising the steps of:
`
`
`
`
`
`removing predetermined portions of the semiconductor
`substrate forming recesses therein; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`refilling the portions of the semiconductor substrate with
`a material having a dielectric constant lower than the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dielectric constant of silicon dioxide,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wherein the material having a dielectric constant lower than
`
`
`
`
`
`
`that of silicon dioxide comprises a halide-doped silicon
`
`
`dioxide composition.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6. The process of claim 5, wherein the halide-doped
`
`
`
`
`
`silicon dioxide complex comprises a Fluorine-doped silicon
`
`
`dioxide complex.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7. The process of claim 1, wherein the refilling material
`has a dielectric constant less than about 3.9.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8. The process of claim 1. further comprising forming a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`barrier layer over the semiconductor substrate prior to the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`step of refilling portions of the semiconduaor substrate.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9. The process of claim 8, wherein the barrier layer
`
`
`
`
`comprises a silicon dioxide composition.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10. The process of claim 8. wherein the barrier layer
`
`
`
`
`comprises a silicon nitride composition.
`11. A method of reducing the formation of voids in a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`refilled trench isolation process comprising the steps of:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`forming trenches having an aspea ratio less than 221;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`refilling the trenches with an insulating material; and
`
`
`
`halide-doping the material.
`12. The method of claim 11, wherein the trenches have a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`depth of less than 200 nm.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13. A method of reducing the formation of voids in a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`refilled trench isolation process comprising the steps of:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`forming trenches having an aspect ratio less than 2:1; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`refilling the trenches with a mataial having a dielectric
`constant less than the dielectric constant of silicon
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dioxide,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wherein the refilling material comprises a Fluorine-doped
`silicon dioxide composition.
`
`
`
`14. The method of claim 11, wherein the halide-doped
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`material has a dielectric constant of less than about 3.9.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15. The method of claim 1, wherein the material com-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`prises a halide-doped oxide.
`16. The method of claim 1, wherein the material com-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`prises a fluoride-doped oxide.
`17. The method of claim 11. wherein refilling fire trenches
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`comprises depositing silicon dioxide.
`18. The method of claim 17. wherein depositing silicon
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dioxide comprises a chemical vapor deposition.
`19. The method of claim 18, wherein halide-doping the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mataial comprises in situ halide doping during chemical
`
`
`
`
`vapor deposition of the material.
`20. The method of claim 11, wherein doping the material
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`comprises introducing a halide into the material while
`
`
`
`refilling the trenches.
`21. The method of claim 11. wherein the halide comprises
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fluorine.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`22. A process for isolating devices on a semiconductor
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate comprising the steps of:
`
`
`
`
`
`forming trenches within the substrate;
`lining the trenches with a dilfusion barrier;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`refilling the trenches with silicon dioxide; and
`
`
`
`halide-doping silicon dioxide.
`3|!
`*
`*
`3t!
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SR
`
`5,702,976
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`25
`
`
`
`35
`
`
`
`45
`
`
`
`
`
`55
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 9
`
`Page 8 of 9
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
`
`
`
`
`PATENT NO.
`: 5’702’976
`
`
`
`DATED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`; December 30, 1997
`
`"WEN1-OR(S) 1 Klaus Schuegraf Afiab Ahmad
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`It is certified that error appears in the above-indentified patent and that said Letters Patent is hereby
`corrected as shown below:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On the title page item [57],
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In the Abstract,I.ine3, delete “wench” and insert —-trench-—.
`
`
`
`Attest:
`
`
`
`
`
`Signed and Sealed this
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Twenty-third Day of June, 1998
` ( QM
`
`
`BRUCE LEHMAN
`
`
`
`
`AfI€S!ing Oflicer
`
`
`
`Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 9
`
`Page 9 of 9

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket