throbber
EEIER
`
`Microelectronic Engineering 50 (2000) 277—284
`
`www.clscviernl /locathmac
`
`Physical and chemical analysis of advanced interconnections using
`energy filtering transmission electron microscopy
`
`R. Panteli, J. Torres, P. Paniez, G. Auvert
`
`France Telecom CNET, BP 98, F-38243 Meylan, France
`
`Abstract
`
`IPR2016-01246
`
`In new interconnection process technology, very thin diffusion barriers are deposited in high aspect
`ratio contact holes fabricated using reactive ion etching (RIE). Physical and chemical characterization
`of difl‘hsion or contamination is increasingly challenging due to topography. The transmission electron
`microscopy (TEM) analysis technique is more extensively used to overcome this difliculty in
`association with the focused ion beam (FIB) specimen preparation technique [1]. Recently, we have
`shown the advantages of adding electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) to FIB—TEM analysis for
`chemical characterization [g]. In this paper, we present the newest technique to overcome this physical
`and chemical analysis challenge using FIB sample preparation allowing localized site specific thinning
`with thickness in the range of 100 nm and energy filtering transmission electron microscopy
`(EFI'EM) observations. The EFTEM technique allows high-resolution compositional mapping using
`
`specimen thinning and energy filtering
`Our newest method for interconnection analysis using focused ion beam
`transmission electron microscopy is presented. It is shown that using the site-specific capability and the controlled
`thinning efl'ect of the FIB in addition with the high spatial resolution of the EFTEM technique. fast chemical analysis of
`materials with nanometre spatial resolution can be obtained. This is the only method for the observation of very thin
`difl'ilsion barriers and interfaces in the presence of drastic topography. Application examples are given concerning firstly. the
`in-depth analysis of tungsten aluminum technology. barrier integrity and interdifliision of elements near interfaces and
`secondly. the surface contamination of copper in copper interconnection technology with high aspect ratio contacts. In this
`case. photoresist spin-coating is carried out prior to FIB thinning. This method is an alternative to surface analysis techniques
`and ofl'ers the best spatial resolution without topography limitations. © 2000 Elsevier Science BM All rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: Energy filtering transmission election microscopy: Chemical analysis: Focused ion beam: Microelectronics:
`Metal interconnections
`
`1. Introduction
`
`‘Corresponding author. Fax: + 33-4-7676—4379.
`E—mail address: roland.pantel@cnet.fi'ancetelecom E (R. Pantel)
`
`0167-9317/ 00/ $ — see front matter © 2000 Elsevier Science BM All rights reserved.
`PII: 50167—93l7(99)00293-2
`Page 1 of 8
`
`TSMC Exhibit 1050
`
`TSMC v. IP Bridge
`
`

`

`278
`
`R. Pantel et al. / Microelectronic Engineering 50(2000)277–284
`
`imaging of core level ionization edges [3]. We show applications of FIB–EFTEM for bulk analysis of
`tungsten–aluminum technology interconnection, interface or diffusion barriers observation and surface
`contamination observation of contact etching in copper technology.
`
`2. Experimental details
`
`The specimens were thinned using the FIB technique as already described [2]. The FIB system is a
`MICRION model 9500 EX using a gallium ion beam of 50 keV maximum energy with a 5-nm
`minimum spot diameter. In the particular case of the contamination control in copper interconnection
`technology, a special technique was used to allow FIB cross section of contacts just after oxide
`etching (i.e. before barrier deposition and metal filling). A conventional I-line photoresist solution was
`spin-coated over the contacts and let to dry at room temperature in order to imbed and protect, the
`surface which is intended to be analyzed in the TEM, from the ion gallium irradiation.
`The thinned samples were observed at 200 keV electron energy using a TEM PHILIPS CM200 FEG
`equipped with an electron energy filter (Gatan Imaging Filter GIF200). The energy filtering equipment
`uses a magnetic prism and a set of electromagnetic lenses [3] allowing energy filtration of transmitted
`electrons (tunable energy loss and energy window). These electrons of particular energy are used to
`form, on a CCD camera, a magnified image of the thinned specimen with a resolution better than 1
`nm.
`
`3. Results and discussion
`
`3.1. Tungsten aluminum interconnection technology analysis
`
`The first series of FIB–EFTEM application examples concerns bulk analysis of tungsten, titanium
`nitride diffusion barrier and aluminum interconnection technology. The purpose of Fig. 1 is to
`illustrate the improvement due to EFTEM in the high-resolution physical imaging of materials.
`Fig. 1 shows TEM bright field images of a contact thinned using FIB. This contact has intentionally
`been shifted with respect
`to the lower aluminum line in order to study the consequences of
`photolithography misalignment. Fig. 1a presents an unfiltered TEM image and Fig. 1b shows the same
`contact imaged using filtration on the zero loss energy. Fig. 1a corresponds to what is currently
`obtained in the classical TEM technique. All electrons are collected and, due to the chromatic
`aberration of TEM lenses, those who have loss energy are coarsely focused on the image. This effect
`induces a diffuse background, which affects contrast and resolution. On the contrary, in the image of
`Fig. 1b, only the electrons which have not lost energy are collected and the effect of chromatic
`aberration is suppressed. Small details, which are not visible in Fig. 1a, can now be observed in Fig.
`1b. Particularly the TiN anti-reflecting coating (ARC) on top of the aluminum can be seen as
`composed of three layers. The two lower layers are Ti and TiN sputter deposited; the upper layer is
`probably formed during the intermetal dielectric deposition.
`Another important purpose of energy filtering in the TEM is to allow elemental compositional maps
`with high spatial resolution. This is obtained using core level ionization edges imaging combined with
`electron background subtraction (i.e. three window method) [4]. In the resulting compositional image,
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`

`R. Pantel et al. / Microelectronic Engineering 50(2000)277–284
`
`279
`
`Fig. 1. TEM images of a tungsten contact presenting a negative overlap with respect to the lower aluminum line. (a)
`Unfiltered classical TEM bright field image. (b) Zero loss energy EFTEM image.
`
`the intensity roughly increases with atomic concentration: dark contrast for zero concentration and
`bright contrast for higher concentrations.
`Fig. 2a–c present respectively: the zero loss image, the compositional map of titanium (TiL
`ionization edge) and the compositional map of fluorine (F ionization edge). These images were
`K
`obtained on a contact such as that shown in Fig. 1. Despite the improved contrast and quality of the
`zero loss image, the gray level intensity is not directly related to the local chemical composition of the
`materials. Faintly contrasted interfaces may not be visible at low magnification such as in the ARC
`
`Fig. 2. EFTEM images of the same contact type as that presented in Fig. 1. (a) Zero loss energy EFTEM image. (b)
`Compositional map of titanium (Ti
`ionization edge). (c) Compositional map of fluorine (F ionization edge).
`K
`
`L
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`

`280
`
`R. Pantel et al. / Microelectronic Engineering 50(2000)277–284
`
`layer as seen in Fig. 1. Also, the diffusion barrier, which is critical for the contact quality, could not
`be visualized on the image of Fig. 2a. On the contrary, the titanium map of Fig. 2b allows a clear
`visualization of the TiN barrier. This barrier is not continuous below the tungsten plug. The fluorine
`map of Fig. 2c shows fluorine accumulation on the bottom of the plug and below the anti-reflecting
`coating.
`Different gray level compositional maps can be combined in a color map. Three images can be
`easily mixed, each one representing one basic color component of the color map (i.e. green, red and
`blue). Fig. 3a shows a color map of the plug with oxygen in green, titanium in red, fluorine in blue,
`and Fig. 3b a color map of the same plug with nitrogen in green, titanium in red, oxygen in blue. Both
`images are obtained using color mixing of images similar to the one presented in Fig. 2b and c. Some
`complex layers are better interpreted than using only the separate images of Fig. 2b or c. In particular,
`at the left bottom of the contact, a three level layer composed of titanium nitride, a titanium fluorine
`rich compound and titanium is evidenced. In Fig. 3b, the TiN above and below the aluminum line
`appears in yellow, which is the addition of green and red. As a consequence of this analysis, the
`physical observation of the three layers of the TiN anti-reflecting coating, shown with high resolution
`in Fig. 1b, is confirmed and improved by the chemical analysis of each layer. In Fig. 3a, evidence is
`shown that the fluorine (in blue) is present where the diffusion barrier is discontinuous.
`The main advantage of the color compositional maps is that all materials and atomic elements are
`present in the same image and their localization with respect to each other is more evident.
`
`3.2. Copper interconnection technology analysis
`
`In this part we show that this volume analysis technique can be used as a surface analysis tool in
`the case of drastic surface morphology. Using a light material, as a protective layer, the surface is
`embedded and the application of this technique is illustrated on copper interconnections.
`Fig. 4 shows EFTEM pictures of a contact hole opened in SiO using a selective SiO –SiN plasma
`2
`2
`etching process. The etching process has stopped in the SiN layer above the copper line. In the zero
`
`Fig. 3. EFTEM compositional color maps of the same contact as that presented in Fig. 2. (a) Fluorine (blue), titanium (red)
`and oxygen (green). (b) Oxygen (blue), titanium (red), nitrogen (green) and TiN appears yellow (green plus red).
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`

`R. Pantel et al. / Microelectronic Engineering 50(2000)277–284
`
`281
`
`Fig. 4. EFTEM images of a contact hole opened in SiO using a selective SiO –SiN plasma etching process. (a) Zero loss
`2
`2
`energy EFTEM image. (b) Compositional color map of oxygen (blue), nitrogen (red) and copper (green).
`
`loss image presented in Fig. 4a no surface contamination is evidenced either on the bottom or on the
`contact sides. The compositional color map presented in Fig. 4b (nitrogen in red, oxygen in blue and
`copper in green) confirms this result, except for some traces of nitrogen on the bottom left of the
`contact hole.
`Fig. 5a shows a zero loss EFTEM picture of another contact after SiN removal using plasma
`etching. Dark residues are now observed at the bottom and on the edges of the contact hole. These
`residues are composed mainly of copper as shown on the EFTEM compositional color map of Fig. 5b
`in which copper is in green color, oxygen in blue and nitrogen of the SiN layer in red.
`Fig. 6 presents EFTEM pictures of a similar contact than in Fig. 5 but after wet cleaning using
`hydrofluoric acid. Fig. 6a presents the zero loss image showing the removal of the residues observed
`in Fig. 5a. The copper removal is confirmed on the color compositional map of Fig. 6b.
`The analysis presented here is typically an experimental problem which could be solved using
`surface analysis techniques: Auger, electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (ESCA) or secondary
`
`Fig. 5. EFTEM pictures of the same contact hole as that shown in Fig. 4, but after SiN removal using plasma etching. (a)
`Zero loss energy EFTEM image. (b) Compositional color map of oxygen (blue), nitrogen (red) and copper (green).
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`

`282
`
`R. Pantel et al. / Microelectronic Engineering 50(2000)277–284
`
`Fig. 6. EFTEM pictures of a contact hole similar to that shown in Fig. 5 but after wet cleaning using hydrofluoric acid. (a)
`Zero loss energy EFTEM image. (b) Compositional color map of oxygen (blue), nitrogen (red) and copper (green).
`
`ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS). However, due to critical topography shown in this example, such
`experiment could not be carried out successfully. Moreover the spatial resolution (1 nm) obtained
`using EFTEM is more than one order of magnitude better then the spatial resolution of any surface
`analysis technique.
`Finally, to observe the entire configuration of the copper interconnection, we use the FIB–EFTEM
`bulk analysis. Fig. 7 shows compositional color map of the interconnection structure after deposition
`of the diffusion barrier, CVD copper contact filling and top copper removal using mechanical
`chemical polishing. The TiN barrier, which is difficult to observe using classical TEM contrast, is
`clearly visualized in the EFTEM color image. This TiN barrier is continuous and has a uniform
`thickness. The compositional map is modulated in intensity with crystal orientation, which changes
`the electron diffraction conditions.
`
`4. Conclusion
`
`In this communication, we present a powerful method for volume and surface analysis applied to
`the observation of interconnections. We show that the EFTEM technique allows a great improvement
`of spatial resolution and contrast of the TEM physical material imaging. In addition the EFTEM
`technique allows a specific chemical information with nanometre spatial resolution using elemental
`mapping. This is valuable for the observation of very thin diffusion barriers. The barrier integrity and
`interdiffusion of elements near interfaces can be observed. Contamination control of high aspect ratio
`contacts can be performed using photoresist spin-coating prior to FIB thinning. This method is an
`alternative to surface analysis techniques and offers better spatial resolution without topography
`limitations.
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`

`R. Pantel et al. / Microelectronic Engineering 50(2000)277–284
`
`283
`
`Fig. 7. EFTEM compositional color map of a complete copper interconnection structure: nitrogen (blue), titanium (red) and
`copper (green).
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`This work was performed within a cooperation between CNET France Telecom, CEA LETI and
`SGS Thomson Microelectronics.
`
`References
`
`[1] L.R. Herlinger, S. Chevacharoenkul, D.C. Erwin, TEM sample preparation using a focused ion beam and a probe
`manipulator, in: Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium For Testing and Failure Analysis, Los Angeles,
`California, 18–22 November, 1996, pp. 199–205.
`[2] R. Pantel, G. Auvert, G. Mascarin, Focused ion beam sample preparation. Transmission electron microscopy and
`electron energy loss spectroscopy analysis of advanced CMOS silicon technology interconnections, Microelectr. Eng.
`37–38 (1997) 49–57.
`
`Page 7 of 8
`
`

`

`284
`
`R. Pantel et al. / Microelectronic Engineering 50(2000)277–284
`
`[3] L. Reimer, in: Energy-filtering Transmission Electron Microscopy, Springer Series in Optical-sciences, Springer Verlag,
`Berlin, 1995.
`[4] F. Hofer, P. Warbichler, W. Grogger, G. Kothleitner, Application of electron spectroscopic imaging in materials science,
`Eur. Microsc. Anal. (1995) 11–13, November.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket