throbber
Consommation
`et Corporations Canada
`
`Consumer and
`Corporate Affairs Canada
`
`Bureau des brevets
`
`Patent Office
`
`Ottawa, Canada
`K1A oce
`
`(11)
`
`(C)
`
`1 3275,8116
`
`(21)
`
`(22)
`
`(45)
`
`493,257
`
`1985/10/18
`
`1990/ll/O6
`
`96-256
`
`5
`
`(51)
`
`INTL.CL. H05K—3/O6
`
`u9)um) CANADUWJPATENT(1m
`
`(54) Process of Forming a Negative Pattern in a Photoresist
`Layer
`
`(72) Roland, Bruno , Belgium
`Vrancken, August
`, Belgium
`
`(73) U C B Electronics S.A.
`
`, Belgium
`
`(30)
`
`(GB) U.K.
`
`84/27149 1984/l0/26
`
`(57) 15 Claims
`
`CCA 3254 (10-89) 41
`
`Page 1 of 30
`
`11> Bridge Exhibit 2014
`
`TSMC V. IP Bridge
`IPR2016-01246
`
`Page 1 of 30
`
`IP Bridge Exhibit 2014
`TSMC v. IP Bridge
`IPR2016-01246
`
`

`

`ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE:
`
`A process of
`
`forming high resolution negative
`
`patterns in a photoresist layer, comprises the steps of (a)
`coating a substrate with a layer of a photosensitive resin
`comprising a polymer, preferably a phenolic polymer, mixed
`or bound to a photoactive compound such as a diazoquinone,
`(b) exposing the layer to ultraviolet or visible light
`through a mask,
`(c)
`treating the layer with a silicon
`compound (e.g. hexamethyldisilazane) and (d) dry developing
`by plasma etching (e.g. an oxygen plasma)
`to remove the non-
`irradiated portions of
`the layer.
`The silicon compound is
`able to diffuse selectively into the irradiated portions of
`
`a
`By dry etching,
`the layer and fix in these portion.
`silicon oxide etch mask is formed which protects these
`
`irradiated portions efficiently throughout
`
`the process.
`
`The
`
`process is useful
`
`in the manufacture of semiconductor
`
`devices,
`
`including integrated circuits.
`
`Page 2 of 30
`
`Page 2 of 30
`
`

`

`1275848
`
`The present
`
`invention relates to a new microlithographic process.
`
`More particularly,
`
`it relates to a process of forming a negative pattern
`
`in a photoresist layer which enables the production at
`
`industrial scale, with
`
`high yield, of very large scale integrated microcircuits (VLSI),
`
`the linewidth
`
`of which can go down to the submicrometer level. The invention also relates to
`
`the use of
`circuits.
`
`this new process in the manufacture of
`
`integrated semiconductor
`
`The continuing trend towards miniaturization in the field of integrated
`
`semi—conductor circuits gives rise to the need to accomodate more active
`
`10
`
`circuits per unit area on the surface of a semiconductor crystal.
`
`As an illustration of this, reference is made to the commercial
`
`development of metal oxide semiconductor
`
`(MOS)
`
`random access memory (RAM)
`
`devices from 1 Kbyte in 1975, via 16 Kbyte in 1977 and 64 Kbyte in 1979 to
`
`256 Kbyte in 1982. It is expected that this trend will continue over the next
`
`two decades. As a result,
`
`the minimum feature size of semiconductor devices is
`
`expected to continue to decrease from 8 micrometers for 1 Kbyte MOS RAM devices,
`
`over 2 micrometers for 256 Kbyte MOS RAM devices in l982 to below 1 micrometer
`
`before the end of the l98OFs.
`
`Microcircuit fabrication requires the selective diffusion of controlled,
`
`20
`
`small quantities of
`
`impurities into specific regions of the semiconductor
`
`surface to produce the desired electrical characteristics of the circuit, such
`,
`and other
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`as transistor/elements of which a large scale integrated circuit contains
`
`several
`
`tens of thousands of
`
`individual units that are interconnected in
`
`complex ways by conductors, such as aluminium or highly doped polycrystalline
`silicon.
`
`25
`
`The technique used in the commercial production of integrated circuits
`
`to obtain specific patterns is called photolithography or microlithography. The
`
`optionally oxidized silicon substrate (wafer),
`
`is coated with a photosensitive
`
`layer (also called photoresist) and exposed through a mask to ultraviolet light
`
`30
`
`The chemical and physical properties of the irradiated regions are different
`
`from the non-irradiated regions and create the possibility,
`
`in a development‘
`
`step, of removing the exposed (in a positive resist) or unexposed part (in a
`
`negative resist).
`
`.,q:4s§:*i
`
`Page 3 of 30
`
`Page 3 of 30
`
`

`

`fi2’?581l8
`
`Development processes are mainly based on solubility differences and are
`
`carried out by a wet
`
`technique. After removal of part of the resist layer,
`
`the uncovered substrate surface can be treated (etched, doped, oxidized,
`
`nitride treated, plated, etc.).
`
`This photolithography process is repeated (to more than l0 times) before
`
`the three-dimensional circuit geometries necessary for a completed metal oxide
`
`semiconductor (M05) or bipolar device are achieved. The structure of an
`
`integrated circuit is complex, both in the topography of its surface and in
`
`its internal composition. Each element of this device has an intricate three-
`
`dimensional structure that must be reproduced exactly in every circuit. The
`
`structure is made up of many layers, each of which is a detailed pattern. Some
`
`of the layers lie within the silicon wafer and others are stacked on the top.
`
`The process is described in detail in the book of L.F. THOMESON, C.G.hHLLSON
`
`and M.J. BOWDEN "Introduction to Microlithography", American Chemical Society
`
`Symposium Series 219, Amer.Chem.Soc., Washington D.C., 1983.
`
`As a result of the increasing density of very large scale integrated
`
`circuits,
`
`the minimum feature size of semiconductor devices decreases and the
`
`production processes become more difficult. Achieving a high resolution with
`
`good linewidth control on substrates with surface topography is a serious
`
`problem. As a result of optical reflections and variations of resist thickness
`
`over high steps,
`
`linewidth control becomes very difficult and relatively thick
`
`resist layers are necessary. Since, for these small features, lateral dimensions
`
`shrink more rapidly than vertical dimensions, higher height-to—width aspect
`
`ratios of resist
`
`images are required.
`
`In addition, dry etch techniques require
`
`relative thick and stable resist patterns. However,
`
`thick resist layers limit
`
`resolution and give depth of focus problems for projection printing. Furthermore
`
`swelling of negative resists in organic solvent developers also makes them
`
`unsuitable for high resolution microlithography and restricts the choice to the
`
`positive-acting diazoquinone resists. However, even these high contrast and
`
`high resolution resists become insufficient when linewidths decrease to the
`
`micrometer and submicrometer regime.
`
`Several approaches to obtain higher resolution and better linewidth
`
`control have been studied during the past few years. New exposure techniques
`
`are being investigated, such as electron beam writing, X-ray and deep UV
`
`exposure. Electron beam lithography requires very costly equipment, suffers
`
`Page 4 of 30
`
`Page 4 of 30
`
`

`

`‘;l2’?E584S
`
`from low throughput and is unable to produce high aspect ratios as a result
`
`of backscattering of electrons,
`
`i.e.
`
`the so-called proximity effect. X-ray
`
`exposure has very high resolution capabilities but equipment and resist
`
`materials are still in the developmental stage. The manufacturing of X-ray
`
`masks is also a difficult operation. The use of deep UV light decreases diff-
`
`raction effects, but resolution is still limited by swelling of the negative
`
`resists and positive deep UV resists with sufficient sensitivity are not yet
`available.
`
`In order to eliminate the adverse effects of solvents during wet
`
`developing, plasma development of photoresists has been considered (cf.
`
`J.N. SMITH, H.G. HUGHES, J.V. KELLER, W.R. GOODNER and T.E. WOOD,
`
`in
`
`Semiconductor International,g,(l979,n°lO, December),p.4l-AD. The dry
`
`development of resists is an important step towards achieving a totally dry
`
`microfabrication process, offering better process control, reproducibility
`
`and cleanliness.
`
`In addition, dry development solves problems such as
`
`resolution loss by swelling (particularly in the case of negative resists) and
`
`handling of large amounts of inorganic or organic solvents. It also has a much
`
`better adaptability to automatic line fabrication processes. However, most dry
`
`development resist systems have a low contrast and undergo a serious reduction
`
`of resist thickness during development.
`
`Another approach to obtain high resolution and high aspect ratio consists
`
`in the use of the multi*layer resist systems.
`
`In these processes, excellent
`
`step coverage and dry etch resistance of a thick planarizing bottom layer are
`
`combined with the high resolution of a thin top imaging layer. Both layers can
`
`be optimized for their specific requirements. After exposure and development
`
`of the thin top resist,
`
`the patterns obtained are transferred almost vertically
`
`into the thick underlying layer either by deep UV exposure and development or
`
`by oxygen-reactive ion etching. For
`
`the latter method, a third intermediate
`
`layer is sandwiched between the imaging and the planarizing layer. Usually, a
`
`thin layer of plasma-deposited or spin-on silicon oxide is applied on top of
`
`the planarizing layer. The exposed and developed patterns in the top resist
`
`layer are first transferred into the intermediate (silicon oxide) layer by
`
`etching techniques. After removal of
`
`the resist,
`
`the thin oxide patterns act
`
`as a very effective mask for oxygen-reactive ion etching of the thick bottom
`
`layer, resulting in profiles with almost vertical sidewalls. Aluminium or
`
`Page 5 of 30
`
`Page 5 of 30
`
`

`

`i'i2‘?5848
`
`silicon nitride have also been used as intermediate layer.
`
`with these techniques, high resolution and high aspect ratios can be
`
`realized on substrates with surface topography (cf. J.M. MORAN and D. HAYDAN
`
`in The Bell System Technical Journal,§§,(l979,n°5,May-June, p.1027-1036).
`
`However,
`
`the multi-layer resist systems have also several serious draw-
`
`backs. Thus,
`
`formation of interfacial
`
`layers occurs when one polymer material
`
`is spun on another. Hard bake steps may somewhat reduce this phenomenon but
`
`even then additional
`
`treatments are required to remove these layers before
`
`pattern transfer. However, baking may induce film stress. Spun-on silicon oxide
`
`films are very susceptible to cracking when the baking temperature is too high.
`
`On the other hand, a sufficiently high baking temperature is required to
`
`avoid interfacial mixing between the oxide and the imaging layer.
`
`Another problem is the optical
`
`interference effects. Even with a highly
`
`absorptive bottom layer, reflections can occur at the interfaces, resulting in
`
`standing waves. A post-exposure bake of the imaging layer can reduce this
`
`effect but only at
`
`the expense of a contrast loss.
`
`Finally,
`
`the thin top resist layers which are used in multi-layer systems
`
`to produce better images make the system more susceptible to pinhole problems.
`
`Multi—1ayer resist systems are discussed in depth by B.J. LIN in the above-
`
`mentioned book "introduction to Microlithography", p.287~3SO.
`
`Another major disadvantage of mu1ti~1ayer systems is process complexity.
`
`Several
`
`layers have to be applied and baked and each of them has to be exposed,
`
`developed and/or etched. Therefore, efforts have recently been made to
`
`simplify these multi-layer systems, without losing their advantages. One
`
`example is the two-layer reactive ion etching (RIE) process in which the top
`
`imaging layer is a resist containing both organic and inorganic components (for
`example, poly(dimethy1 siloxane) and poly(viny1-methyl siloxane) (cf.
`
`M. HATZAKIS §£‘al.,
`
`in Proceedings of the International Conference on Microlitm
`
`graphy, 1981, p.386~396), copolymers of chloromethylstyrene and trimethylsilyl“
`
`styrene (cf. M. SUZUKI eE_al.,
`
`in J.Electrochem.Soc.l30,(l983).P~1962-1966)
`
`and copolymers of vinyltrimethylsilane and sulfur dioxide (U.S.Patent
`
`Specification No. 4,357,369). The thin top resist layer is exposed and
`
`developed,
`
`followed by etching of the thick bottom layer by oxygen RIE. During
`
`this process,
`
`the inorganic components in the resist form refractive oxides
`
`which act as an in situ~formed etch mask.
`
`In this way,
`
`the top imaging layer
`
`Page 6 of 30
`
`Page 6 of 30
`
`

`

`12"?ES8§8
`
`and the intermediate silicon oxide layer of
`
`the three—layer resist system
`
`are combined into one organo~metallic resist layer. Processing of
`
`these
`
`systems is easier than the three-layer resists but
`is still more Complex than
`single layer resist systems. They have also only been developed so far for
`
`electron beam and deep UV exposure and still require wet development
`
`in
`
`organic solvents. Another example of a simplified multi-layer system consists
`in the use of a contrast enhancement
`layer.
`In this process, a thin photo-
`bleachable layer is coated over a standard positive photoresist. During
`exposure,
`the dye in the coating bleaches,
`forming a new mask in intimate
`
`Contact with the resist surface. After exposure,
`
`the layer is removed in a
`
`solvent system and the resist is further processed by standard techniques.
`Although this method improves contrast and adds little to the process complexity,
`it does not overcome the standing waves problem and linewidth variations over
`
`steps.
`
`In addition, extended exposure times are required.
`
`The ideal would obviously be to have at one's disposal a single layer
`resist system affording the same technical advantages as multi-layer resist
`systems, but which does not have their drawbacks.
`In this way,
`the formation
`of
`interfacial layers, optical
`interference effects and film stress problems
`would disappear and process complexity would be drastically reduced.
`
`However,
`the difficulty is to find a single layer resist system, which can
`be dry developed and which is characterized at
`the same time by high resolution,
`high aspect ratios and excellent linewidth control on substrates with surface
`
`topography,
`
`in order to obtain high quality resist patterns which enable the
`
`production with a good t'epr.‘OduCib.’l_l.'l.'Cy
`circuits.
`
`of very large scale semiconductor
`
`That is the reason why various attempts have been made
`to
`improve the single layer resist systems. As an example,
`in Japanese patent
`application n° 23937/Sifi a process is described in which a positive photo-
`resist, coated on a substrate,
`is exposed to an atmosphere containing an
`organic silicon compound, more particularly hexamethyldisilazane. After
`
`exposure to ultraviolet light,
`the photoresist is developed in a conventional
`manner by dissolving the exposed areas with an alkaline liquid developer. The
`treatment with the hexamethyldisilazane vapors has as effect
`to reduce the
`
`,
`
`developing rate of
`
`the photoresist in the alkaline developing solution,
`
`thus
`
`* published 8th February 1982
`
`Page 7 of 30
`
`Page 7 of 30
`
`

`

`fi2*?i':S848
`
`permitting the formation of a resist pattern having a higher contrast
`vertical edges).
`
`(more
`
`It must be emphasized that, apart from the treatment with the hexamethyl-
`
`disilazane vapor,
`
`this process does not differ in any way from the conventional
`
`photolithographic process. The image formation is still based on solubility
`
`differences produced by the creation of carboxylic groups in the photoresist
`
`under the effect of the ultraviolet light and development is exclusively
`
`carried out by wet development
`
`in an alkaline developer. Even if the contrast
`
`is enhanced by this process,
`
`the well known drawbacks of wet development are
`
`not suppressed. The light exposure has to be effected in depth in the resist
`
`layer, with the consequence that effects such as reflections and standing
`
`waves cannot be suppressed. This can give rise to linewidth variations
`
`(especially on a reflective topography).
`
`D. FOLLET e£_gl.
`
`("Polarity reversal of PMMA by treatment with chlorosi1a-
`
`H
`
`- The Electrochemical Society Extended Abstracts,§g-2 (1982, October l7-
`nes
`2l), p.321~322) describe a process in which a poly(methyl methacrylate) resin
`
`(hereafter called PMMA)
`is electron beam irradiated,
`then sequentially treated
`with dichlorodimethylsilane and water vapor,
`to form polysiloxanes, and finally,
`
`developed in an oxygen plasma. According to these authors,
`
`there would be
`
`selective diffusion of
`
`the dichlorodimethylsilane in the irradiated and
`
`partially degraded areas of the resist.
`
`followed by polymerization of
`
`the
`
`chlorosilane upon exposure to the water vapor. They find a polarity reversal
`
`of
`
`the resist Erom positive into negative:
`
`the irradiated and treated areas of
`
`indeed a higher resistance to the oxygen plasma. A pattern is
`the PMMA 0EEer
`obtained consisting of 2 pm lines and 4 mm spaces and abrupt edge profiles.
`This process has nevertheless several
`important drawbacks. Electron beam
`
`exposure, even if it allows a high resolution, requires a very expensive
`equipment, and the irradiation times per silicon wafer are too long. Because
`of these limitations, up to the present electron beam lithography is only
`used for direct writing of patterns for devices intended for research. Moreover,
`PMA is a material which offers a very weak resistance to dry etching operations
`because it degrades very rapidly in the plasmas used to this end (5 times faster
`
`than the aromatic polymers). Finally, owing to the fact that dichlorodimethyl-
`
`Page 8 of 30
`
`Page 8 of 30
`
`

`

`?l2’?/58118
`
`silane is not
`
`immediately fixed in the irradiated areas of the PMMA layer
`
`(since water vapor is necessary for the conversion in polysiloxanes),
`
`it
`
`is conceivable that
`
`this compound can easily go out again from the layer by
`
`diffusion. This will necessarily have a detrimental effect on the reproducibi-
`
`lity of the characteristics of the obtained patterns, since the concentration
`
`of
`
`the dichlorodimethylsilane in the layer will be a function of the time
`
`which elapses between the treatment with this compound and the treatment with
`
`the water vapor.
`
`T.M. WOLF 35 al.,
`
`in J.E1ectrochem.Soc.131,(1984,n°7),p.l664-1670,
`
`propose still another process intended to improve the single layer resist
`
`systems. The photoresists used by these authors are negative photoresists
`
`conventionally used in photolithography. They consist of a partially cyclized
`
`polyisoprene containing a bis~azide as photosensitizer (commercial WAYCOAT IC-
`
`&3*and SELECTILUX N-60*).The proposed process comprises the steps of
`
`ultraviolet irradiation or electron beam exposure,
`
`treatment with a volatile
`
`inorganic halide,
`
`followed by development by oxygen-reactive ion etching.
`
`In
`
`the described experiments,
`
`these authors use silicon tetrachloride (SiCl4),
`
`tin tetrachloride (SnCl4) and dichlorodimethylsilane ((CH3)2SiCl2) as volatile
`inorganic halides, since these compounds are able to react with the secondary
`
`amines created during the photolysis of the resist. They hoped indeed that
`
`this reaction could be used to incorporate the inorganic halides selectively
`
`into the exposed areas of
`
`the resist,
`
`thus allowing the formation by oxidation
`
`of a thick inorganic oxide protecting layer in said exposed areas during the
`
`following development step by oxygen~reactive ion etching. Only the unexposed
`
`areas of the photoresist would thus be removed selectively by oxygen—reactive
`
`ion etching.
`
`Nevertheless,
`
`they find that the inorganic compounds are sorbed quickly,
`
`not only in the exposed areas, but also in the unexposed areas of the resist.
`
`Moreover,
`
`they note that, contrary to all expectations, by oxygen-
`
`reactive ion etching,
`
`the unexposed areas of the photoresist are protected
`
`by an oxide layer and etched at a significantly lower rate than the exposed
`
`areas, whereas these latter are selectively removed during the dry etching
`
`development step.
`
`In other words,
`
`the photoresist behaves as a positive tone
`
`resist. The authors explain this phenomenon by the fact that,
`
`in the
`
`unexposed areas, complexes between the inorganic halide and the azide group
`
`of the photosensitizer are also formed, while in the exposed areas,
`
`the
`
`* trade mark
`
`Page 9 of 30
`
`Page 9 of 30
`
`

`

`fl2”?E$8£l£
`
`anticipated reaction with the photolysis products of the resist takes place.
`
`Moreover,
`
`in the unexposed areas,
`
`the formed complexes are readily hydrolyzed
`
`by the water vapor present
`
`in the ambient atmosphere and converted to
`
`refractory inorganic oxides,
`
`thus forming an in situ protective masking layer,
`
`whereas the reaction products formed in the exposed areas are more slowly
`
`hydrolyzed and therefore readily removed as volatile compounds during oxygen-
`
`reactive ion etching.
`
`Nevertheless,
`
`this process still has important drawbacks.
`
`First, according to the statements made by the authors themselves,
`
`this
`
`process is satisfactory only provided very strict light exposure times and
`
`at the same time very strict treatment
`
`times with the inorganic halide are
`
`observed.
`
`Indeed,
`
`in order to obtain a satisfactory result, it is necessary
`
`that
`
`the exposure of the photoresist
`
`to light
`
`takes place during 16 seconds
`
`and that the treatment with the inorganic halide takes place during 7 seconds.
`
`Shorter or longer exposure and/or treatment
`
`times give unsatisfactory results.
`
`Thus, for example, after a treatment with the inorganic halide for 10 seconds,
`
`it is no longer possible to develop the resist by etching, regardless of exposur
`
`time.
`
`In other words,
`
`the operating conditions are very critical, which can
`
`only be detrimental
`
`to the reproducibility of the results.
`
`3eC0nd1Y.ewen under the optimal oxrfitkxs curd hereinbefore, Only 70% Of
`
`the initial thickness of the photoresist remains after development by dry
`
`etching.
`
`Thirdly, as shown in figure 11 of page 1669 of the publication,there
`.
`.
`.
`.
`at as
`.
`remains after development, an important residue in the uncoveredfi w ich residue
`
`is very difficult to remove (this fact shows at
`
`the same time that
`
`the
`
`selectivity of the process is insufficient).
`
`To conclude, it can be seen that till now, a microlithographic process
`
`has not yet been developed in which a single layer resist system is used which
`
`is entirely satisfactory.
`
`It is for these reasons that we have carried out research work to develop
`
`a single layer microlithographic process, which would be free from the
`
`drawbacks of the hitherto known processes, particularly of those described in
`
`Japanese patent application n° 23937/82 and in the above mentioned publications
`
`of D. FOLLET 3c_§_1., and of 17.24. WOLF 35 31;
`
`This object is fully achieved by the process described hereinafter,
`
`which has all the advantages and the simplicity of single layer microlitho-
`
`_ 3 _
`
`Page 10 of 30
`
`Page 10 of 30
`
`

`

`'132’?58¢‘li§
`
`graphy, which allows the use of dry etching techniques, which can be used
`
`on standard projection printing equipment and wafer stepper equipment, and
`
`yet gives equal or better submicrometer resolution than the above-mentioned
`
`multi-layer processes.
`
`Thus,
`
`the present invention provides a new improved microlithographic
`
`process. More specifically,
`
`the present
`
`invention provides a process of
`
`forming
`
`a negative pattern in a photoresist layer comprising the following steps:
`
`(a) coating a substrate with a layer of a photosensitive resin comprising a
`
`polymer mixed or bound to a photoactive compound, said layer
`
`enabling
`
`a silicon compound to diffuse selectively into irradiated portions
`
`thereof, on exposure of said portions to visible or ultraviolet
`radiation;
`
`(b) exposing the photosensitive resin layer to ultraviolet or visible light
`
`through a mask to expose only selected portions of the layer;
`
`(c)
`
`treating the photosensitive resin layer with a silicon compound, whereby
`
`said compound is selectively absorbed into the irradiated portions of
`
`the coating and is caused to react with said irradiated portions; and
`
`(d) dry developing the thus treated photosensitive resin layer by plasma
`
`etching to remove selectively the non-irradiated portions thereof in order
`
`to obtain the desired negative pattern.
`
`According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention,
`
`the
`
`substrate is a silicon water,
`
`the photosensitive resin used comprises a phenolic
`
`polymer and the photoactive
`
`compound which is mixed or bound to it is a
`
`diazoquinone, whereas the silicon compound is an easily vaporizable silylating
`agent.
`
`According to a particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention,
`
`the phenolic polymer is chemically bound to the diazoquinone.
`
`On the other hand, according to the present invention,
`
`the treatment with
`
`the silicon compound is preferably carried out after exposure of the photo~
`
`sensitive resin layer to ultraviolet or visible light. However,
`
`those skilled
`
`in the art will understand that, for the purpose of simplicity and readiness
`
`of execution, it is possible to carry out
`
`the treatment with the silicon
`
`compound already during the exposure of the photosensitive resin layer to
`
`light.
`
`In other words, it is possible to conduct steps (b)
`
`and U3)oE the
`
`process simultaneously.
`
`Page]l_0f30
`
`Page 11 of 30
`
`

`

`12758413
`
`According to a particularly preferred embodiment,
`
`the silicon compound is
`
`volatilized and brought
`
`into contact
`
`in vapor form with the photosensitive
`
`resin layer.
`
`According to a particularly advantageous embodiment of the invention, dry
`
`development
`
`is carried out by oxygen~reactive ion or oxygen plasma etching.
`
`The invention further comprises the use of
`
`the new microlithographic
`
`process in the manufacture of
`
`integrated semiconductor circuits.
`
`The process according to the invention is based on the surprising
`
`discovery that positive acting photosensitive resins, comprising a polymer
`
`associated with a photoactive
`
`compound such as a diazoquinone, undergo
`
`substantial modifications of their properties under the influence of a visible
`
`or ultraviolet radiation. We have found indeed that
`
`the exposure to the
`
`radiation modifies to a considerable extent
`
`the permeability properties of
`
`these resins, and we have taken advantage of this particularity in order to
`
`better differentiate the irradiated portions from the nonrirradiated portions
`
`of a layer of these resins coated on a substrate, and in consequence,
`
`to
`
`develop an improved single layer microlitnographic process. To this end,
`
`according to the invention,
`
`the irradiated photosensitive resin layer is
`
`subjected to a treatment with a silicon compound,
`to the particularity just mentioned hereinbefore,
`
`in order to allow,
`thanks
`this compound to penetrate
`
`selectively in the irradiated portions of the layer, preferably in the top
`
`part thereof, and consequently fix selectively in these irradiated portions
`
`by reaction with the functional groups of the photosensitive resin.
`
`Experience has shown that
`
`the silicon compounds actually diffuse
`
`selectively in the irradiated portions of the layer, whereas such a diffusion
`
`practically does not occur-in the non-irradiated portions, or only to a
`minor extent.
`
`Thus, unlike the process of T.M. WOLF et_al. above described,
`
`the silicon
`
`compounds do not diffuse in all the regions of the photoresist layer, but only
`
`in the irradiated portions of
`
`this layer.
`
`The process of the invention is thus based on selective diffusion of the
`
`silicon compounds in the irradiated portions of the photoresist, unlike the
`
`process of
`
`the state of the art, which is exclusively based on a selective
`
`Page 12 of 30
`
`Page 12 of 30
`
`

`

`i’i.2’?ii§84£
`
`reaction of the silicon compounds in either the exposed or the unexposed
`
`r€8i0flS
`
`(the silicon compounds being incorporated in every region of the
`
`photoresist).
`
`From the technical point of view,
`
`this difference has considerable
`
`repercussions on the results because,
`
`in the process according to the
`
`invention, after development by dry plasma etching, superior quality patterns
`
`are obtained. Moreover,
`
`the above-mentioned disadvantages of
`
`the known
`
`single layer processes are definitively suppressed. By dry etching,
`
`the non-
`
`irradiated portions of the photoresist are completely removed and,
`
`in the
`
`irradiated portions, a silicon oxide mask is very quickly formed in situ,
`
`which remains and protects very efficiently these portions throughout
`
`the
`
`etching process. After development,
`
`the thickness of the obtained pattern is
`
`practically identical
`
`to the initial thickness of the photoresist;
`
`the
`
`residual
`
`thickness generally represents more than 952 of the initial thickness
`
`of the resin layer coated on the substrate.
`
`In the uncovered parts, no residue
`
`remains. Moreover,
`
`the reproducibility is considerably improved since the
`
`light exposure times and the treatment
`
`times with the silicon compound do
`
`practically not have any effect on the results (contrary to the process of
`
`T.M. WOLF et al.
`
`above described).
`
`Thus,
`
`the present
`
`invention provides a single layer resist system which
`
`can be dry developed and which has all the advantages of the multi-layer
`
`resists: planarization, high resolution, high aspect ratios with excellent
`
`retention of the initial thickness of the photosensitive resin layer coated
`
`on the substrate, good linewidth control over the steps, good reproductibility
`
`of the pattern characteristics and suppression of the interference with light
`
`reflected at substrate topography.
`
`In addition,
`
`the described system has
`
`several advantages over the multi-layer resist systems. Formation of
`
`interfacial layers does not occur,
`
`interference with reflected light does not
`
`occur, film stress problems do not exist and process complexity is drastically
`reduced.
`
`Even if the process of
`
`the invention provides a negative acting resist
`
`system, it does not need wet development, which definitively suppresses the
`
`problems of resolution losses caused by the swelling in development solvents.
`
`Moreover, since no solvents are used in the development step, adhesion is no
`
`longer a critical parameter. The completely dry processing of the resist
`
`Page 13 of 30
`
`Page 13 of 30
`
`

`

`results in improved process control and makes this system particularly
`
`suitable for automatic line fabrication processes.
`
`The invention will now be further described with reference to the
`
`accompanying drawing wherein like reference numerals refer to same parts
`
`throughout
`
`the several views, wherein the layers are greatly exaggerated.
`
`Figure 1
`
`is a partial cross-section of a silicon wafer coated with a
`
`photosensitive resin layer before the exposure step.
`
`Figure 2 is a partial cross~section of a silicon wafer coated with a
`
`photosensitive resin layer during its exposure to light through a mask.
`
`Figure 3 is a partial cross-section of a silicon wafer coated with a
`
`photosensitive resin layer after the treatment with the silicon compound.
`
`Figure 4 is a partial cross-section of a negative pattern obtained after
`
`development by oxygen-reactive ion or oxygen plasma etching.
`
`A wide range of polymers can be used in order to prepare the
`photosensitive resin used in the process according to the invention. However,
`
`preferably a phenolic polymer is used, which is selected from:
`
`~ the condensation products of a phenol, a naphthol or a derivative thereof
`
`ring-substituted by an alkyl or aryl radical or by a halogen atom, with an
`aliphatic or aromatic aldehyde, which can be substituted by a halogen atom,
`
`the po1y(viny1pheno1s),
`
`the phenolic group of which can be substituted by an
`
`alkyl or aryl radical or a halogen atom,
`
`the copolymers of a vinylphenol with an ethylenically unsaturated compound,
`and
`
`mixtures of the aforesaid polymers between them or with other aromatic
`
`polymers, such as polystyrene or poly(N—vinylcarbazole).
`
`As illustrative but not limitative examples of phenolic polymers,
`
`there
`
`may be mentioned: phenolsnovolacs, cresol-novolacs, condensation products of
`
`formaldehyde with alkylphenols (p-tert~butylphenol; p-n-propylphenol; p-
`
`ethylphenol;
`
`octylpheuol and the like), condensation products of benzaldehyde
`
`with cresols or naphthols (e.g.
`
`l-naphthol), poly(p-vinylphenols), copolymers‘
`
`of p-vinylphenols with p—ch1orostyrene, and the like.
`
`The photoactive compound mixed or bound to the polymer is
`
`preferably a diazoquinone such as those used in traditional positive photo-
`
`_ 12 _
`
`Page 14 of 30
`
`Page 14 of 30
`
`

`

`’.l.2’?58-5&8
`
`resists (see British Patent Specification No. 711,626). As non-limitative
`
`examples of these diazoquinones,
`
`there may be mentioned: 5-diazo-5,6-dihydro-
`
`6-oxo-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid, 6-diazo—5,6-dihydro-S-oxo-1-naphthalene-
`
`sulfonic acid, 3-diazo-3,A-dihydro-&*oxo-lrnaphthalenesulfonic acid, 4-
`
`diazo-3,4-dihydro-3-oxo-l-naphthalenesulfonic acid, 3-diazo-3,4—dihyaro—
`
`4-oxo-1-benzenesulfonic acid,
`
`the corresponding carboxylic acids, derivatives
`
`thereof and mixtures of at least
`
`two of
`
`the aforesaid compounds.
`
`As an example of a derivative of the aforesaid acids,
`
`the condensation
`
`product of 3 moles of 6-diazo-S,6-dihydro-S~oxo-l-naphthalenesulfonyl chloride
`
`with 1 mole of 2,3,4-trihydroxybenzophenone may be mentioned.
`
`The photoactive compounds such as diazoquinones can easily be chemically
`
`bound to the afores

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket