`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`NEIL GREENBLUM
`Monday, August 14, 2017 5:49 PM
`'Trials'
`'darren.jiron@finnegan.com'; 'Long, J. Preston'; 'Yoches, Bob'; 'Goldberg, Joshua';
`'TSMC-IPB-PTAB'; 'Kent Cooper'; 'floyd.adam@dorsey.com'; MICHAEL FINK; ARNOLD
`TURK; 'AMANDA DOVE'
`RE: IPR2016-01246: Request for Authorization
`
`Dear PTAB:
`
`The case number is IPR2016-00394, decision entered June 23, 2017.
`
`Thank you,
`Neil F. Greenblum
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`From: Vignone, Maria [mailto:Maria.Vignone@USPTO.GOV] On Behalf Of Trials
`Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 5:03 PM
`To: NEIL GREENBLUM; Trials
`Cc: 'darren.jiron@finnegan.com'; 'Long, J. Preston'; 'Yoches, Bob'; 'Goldberg, Joshua'; 'TSMC-IPB-PTAB'; 'Kent Cooper';
`'floyd.adam@dorsey.com'; MICHAEL FINK; ARNOLD TURK; AMANDA DOVE
`Subject: RE: IPR2016-01246: Request for Authorization
`
`Counsel: Patent Owner is authorized to provide the case number, by reply to this email. No argument or
`further briefing is permitted.
`
`Thank you,
`
`Maria Vignone
`Paralegal Operations Manager
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`703-756-1288
`
`
`
`
`
`From: NEIL GREENBLUM [mailto:NGREENBLUM@gbpatent.com]
`Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 1:09 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: 'darren.jiron@finnegan.com' <darren.jiron@finnegan.com>; 'Long, J. Preston' <J.Preston.Long@finnegan.com>;
`'Yoches, Bob' <bob.yoches@finnegan.com>; 'Goldberg, Joshua' <Joshua.Goldberg@finnegan.com>; 'TSMC-IPB-PTAB'
`<TSMC-IPB-PTAB@finnegan.com>; 'Kent Cooper' <kjcooperlaw@gmail.com>; 'floyd.adam@dorsey.com'
`<floyd.adam@dorsey.com>; MICHAEL FINK <MFINK@gbpatent.com>; ARNOLD TURK <ATURK@gbpatent.com>;
`AMANDA DOVE <adove@gbpatent.com>; NEIL GREENBLUM <NGREENBLUM@gbpatent.com>
`Subject: IPR2016-01246: Request for Authorization
`
`Dear PTAB:
`
`
`1
`
`IP Bridge Exhibit 2080
`TSMC v. IP Bridge
`IPR2016-01246
`
`
`
`During the oral hearing in IPR2016-01246 on Monday, August 7, 2017, Judge Arbes asked Patent Owner's counsel if he
`knew of a case in the semiconductor field that supports the proposition that it is necessary for Petitioner to demonstrate
`the process of manufacturing the proposed combination in order to properly support an obviousness invalidity
`argument. The parties do not have a transcript to get the exact wording, but this accords generally with their
`recollection. Patent Owner did not have a case citation at the time, but requests authorization to file as an exhibit a
`recent PTAB Final Written Decision that Patent Owner believes is responsive to the question. A copy of the citation has
`now been provided to Petitioner Counsel.
`
`Counsel for the parties have met and conferred about this issue, and Petitioner’s counsel opposes the request on
`procedural grounds and because Patent Owner is treating a citation as if it were evidence. If, however, the Board allows
`the filing, Petitioner asks the Board to allow TSMC to submit a half page paper to address the case. Patent Owner’s
`counsel objects to Petitioner’s request.
`
`Counsel for the parties are generally available on the afternoons of 8/11 and 8/14 for a call, should one be needed.
`
`Thank you,
`Neil F. Greenblum
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
