throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`__________________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`__________________
`
`PRIME FOCUS CREATIVE SERVICES CANADA INC.
`Petitioner
`v.
`LEGEND3D, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`__________________
`
`CASE IPR2016-01243
`Patent No. 7,907,793
`
`__________________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF
`DANNA J. COTMAN UNDER 37 CFR § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case No.: IPR2016-01243
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Docket No.: LF-L0015
`
`
`
`I. RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) § 42.10, and the
`
`Board’s prior authorization for this Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission dated June
`
`30, 2016 (Paper 3), Patent Owner Legend3D, Inc. (“Patent Owner”) respectfully
`
`requests that the Board admit Danna J. Cotman pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`II. GOVERNING AUTHORITY
`
`
`
`37 CFR § 42.10(c) states as follows:
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a
`showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead counsel be a
`registered practitioner and to any other conditions as the Board may impose.
`For example, where lead counsel is a registered practitioner, a motion to
`appear pro hac vice by counsel who is not a registered practitioner may be
`granted upon showing that counsel is an experienced litigating attorney and
`has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`Further, the Board requires that pro hac vice admission be filed in
`
`accordance with a representative order reflected by Unified Patents, Inc. v.
`
`Parallel Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-00639 (PTAB October 15, 2013) (Paper 7)
`
`(“Representative Order”). The Representative Order states that the motion for pro
`
`had vice admission must “[c]ontain a statement of facts showing there is good
`
`cause for the Board to recognize counsel pro hac vice during the proceeding,” and
`
`that the motion “[b]e accompanied by an affidavit or declaration of the
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`
`Case No.: IPR2016-01243
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Docket No.: LF-L0015
`
`
`
` individual seeking to appear attesting to the following:”
`
`i. Membership in good standing of the Bar of at least one
`State or the District of Columbia;
`ii. No suspensions or disbarments from practice before any
`court or administrative body;
`iii. No application for admission to practice before any court
`or administrative body ever denied;
`iv. No sanctions or contempt citations imposed by any court
`or administrative body;
`v.
`The individual seeking to appear has read and will
`comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s
`Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the C.F.R.;
`vi. The individual will be subject to the USPTO Code of
`Professional Responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 10.20 et seq. and
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a);
`vii. All other proceedings before the Office for which the
`individual has applied to appear pro hac vice in the last (3) years; and
`viii. Familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the
`proceeding.
`
`III. STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`As a preliminary matter, lead counsel for this proceeding is a registered
`
`practitioner: Mr. Joseph J. Mayo, Reg. No. 53288. With that said, the following
`
`facts, supported by the Declaration of Danna J. Cotman (“Cotman Dec.”)
`
`(LEGEND3D Ex.1016), establish good cause to admit Ms. Cotman pro hac vice in
`
`this proceeding (and the ensuing paragraph numbers correspond with both the
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`Case No.: IPR2016-01243
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Docket No.: LF-L0015
`
`
`
`Representative Order numbers referenced above and the paragraph numbers set
`
`forth in the Cotman Dec. with the addition of one final paragraph).
`
`1. Ms. Cotman is a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of
`
`California (State Bar Number 188245) admitted in June 1997.
`
`2. Ms. Cotman has not been suspended or disbarred from practice before
`
`any court or administrative body.
`
`3. Ms. Cotman has never had an application for admission to practice
`
`before any court or administrative body denied.
`
`4. No sanctions or contempt citations have been imposed against Ms.
`
`Cotman by any court or administrative body.
`
`5. Ms. Cotman has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of
`
`37 C.F.R.
`
`6. Ms. Cotman will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional
`
`Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under
`
`37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`7. Ms. Cotman previously applied and was granted pro hac vice status
`
`before this office in Legend3D, Inc. v. Prime Focus VFX Services II Inc. Inter
`
`Partes Review petition (IPR2015-01350) and in Legend3D, Inc. v. Prime Focus
`
`VFX Services II Inc. Inter Partes Review petition (IPR2016-00806).
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`Case No.: IPR2016-01243
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Docket No.: LF-L0015
`
`
`
`8. Ms. Cotman is an experienced litigation attorney, with ten (10) years
`
`of experience litigating patent cases in federal courts. Her experience includes
`
`representing clients in other intellectual property related litigation as well. She has
`
`appeared as counsel for Legend3D in a number of litigation matters (including
`
`patent litigation) over the span of her career. Further, she is currently lead counsel
`
`for the defense in the related patent infringement lawsuit entitled Prime Focus
`
`Creative Services Canada, Inc. v. Legend3D, Inc., United States District Court,
`
`Central District of California, Case No. 2:15-cv-02340-MWF-PLA, and she
`
`therefore knows the issues involved in that case which overlap with numerous
`
`issues involved in this proceeding.
`
`9. Ms. Cotman has worked with lead counsel and from her experience,
`
`she is familiar with the established practices of the Board.
`
`10. This motion is unopposed as the parties have further agreed in the
`
`attached email correspondence dated July 6, 2016, to a mutual non-opposition for
`
`pro hac vice admission of Jonathan Kagan, for petitioner, and Danna J. Cotman,
`
`for patent owner. (LEGEND3D Ex. 1017)
`
`IV. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`The facts contained in the Statement of Facts above, and contained in the
`
`Cotman declaration, establish that there is good cause to admit Ms. Cotman pro
`
`hac vice in this proceeding under 37 CFR § 42.10(c). Lead counsel is a registered
`
`practitioner, Ms. Cotman is an experienced litigating attorney, and Ms. Cotman has
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`
`Case No.: IPR2016-01243
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Docket No.: LF-L0015
`
`
`
`an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding as lead
`
`trial counsel in the co-pending district court litigation involving the same patent
`
`and concomitantly a number of the same issues.
`
`V. CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner Legend3D, Inc. respectfully requests
`
`that the Board admit Ms. Cotman pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`Dated: July 12, 2016
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`By: /Joseph J. Mayo/
`Joseph J. Mayo, Reg. No.: 53288
`ARC IP Law, PC
`7744 Herschel Avenue
`La Jolla, CA 92037
`P. (858) 442-5877
`F. (858) 777-5425
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Docket No.: LF-L0015
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Case No.: IPR2016-01243
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 Code of Federal Regulations § 42.6, the undersigned certifies
`
`that on July 12, 2016, a copy of the foregoing document was served via Express
`
`Mail on counsel of record identified below, and a courtesy copy was sent
`
`electronically, and that this document was filed with the Patent Trial and Appeal
`
`Board via the PTAB End-to-End System.
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Joshua Glucoft, Esq.
`Jonathan S. Kagan
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, CA 90067-4276
`PrimeFocusIPR@irell.com
`
`
`
`
`/Marie L. Acosta/
`
`6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket