`l:i-benzylpropionamide
`(ili).a
`
`for
`
`the Polar Analogues
`
`107a-e
`
`of 2-Acetaniido·
`
`0
`
`R
`
`/l--,N~~"-"Ph
`H o
`
`107
`
`No.
`
`R
`
`liib H
`
`Cti3
`
`COCH3
`
`CH
`
`COCH
`
`22.50
`
`169.ooc
`
`42.50
`
`169,60c
`
`CH2
`
`. 42,00
`
`fill.ab
`
`CH3
`
`22,50
`
`169.5
`
`42.00
`
`174.3
`
`42.10
`
`1..01.a'
`
`CN
`
`22.07
`
`162.01
`
`44.22
`
`169.69
`
`42,64
`
`lQlll CONH2
`
`22.48
`
`1 68.5JC
`
`57.28
`
`169,41c
`
`42.22
`
`C1"
`
`C2•C3•
`
`C4•
`
`R
`
`139.30 126. 10d,e
`12s. rod,e
`
`139.70 121. tod,B"
`12S..3od.e
`
`136.36 12s,god,e
`121.11d,&
`
`126.50
`
`126.70
`
`15.80
`
`t28.23
`
`116.45
`
`138.99 121.02d,&
`12a.19d,e-
`
`126.73
`
`166.67
`
`.....
`""' <O
`
`
`
`1.Q1'
`
`COOCH2CH3
`
`22.50
`
`167.41
`
`58.B 1
`
`170.42
`
`43.67
`
`1il<! CHzOH
`
`22.19
`
`169.B6c
`
`S4.B7
`
`1 s9,oac
`
`41.59
`
`lllid CHzOCH3
`
`23.19
`
`169.96°
`
`52.40
`
`169,96c.
`
`43.55
`
`137.45 121.390,g
`12e.so0.•
`
`127.399
`
`13.81 (CH3)
`62.29 (CH2i
`165.19 (CO)
`
`138.90 12s.53d,•
`127.11d.•
`
`128.15
`
`81.30
`
`h
`
`127.4.td.•
`12s.1od.•
`
`127.49
`
`59.08 (CH3)
`71.65 (CH2)
`
`B.The llc NMR '~ra ware !ale.en In OMSO-d5 unless 01herwlse ln.Qicats<l. The number ln each enlry Is
`lhe chemical ahtn va!uo observed ·1n par1s por
`mlflion rela!lve lo ™$· The Information In parentheses In sel&ci cases Is lh• proposed asstgnm&nl. bRef. 103. C Th!s aal ol resonrinces may be In·
`lor6hangeablo, d The close proxlmhy ol
`lhase lwo peaks did not permit lhe ass.lgnmenl ot lhese resonancea. • Thls poakhad approxlmalely
`lw*ce !he·
`ln!onsily of neatby peaks.. I The 13c NMR spoctrum wa$1 lakon In CO.Ct3. g This penk had !!pproxlmalety three times the lnlenslty of nearby poa.ks, h A
`discreie algnal for this· ca1bon resonanco was nol ob1Grvod.
`
`....
`c.n
`0
`
`., ... , .. ,_,;·
`
`
`
`Table 43.
`
`13 C NMR
`
`Spectral Properties
`
`for Oxnzole Derivatives ill and ill.a
`'o~R'
`I \
`'
`'
`RJ.!__N , R
`l
`
`No,
`
`A2
`
`R4
`
`111ll
`
`H
`
`H
`
`Rs
`
`H
`
`C2
`
`C4
`
`--e:5-
`
`R2
`
`R4
`
`Rs
`
`150,60
`
`125.40
`
`138,10
`
`....
`01 _.
`
`ill
`
`CH3
`
`COOCHzCH3
`
`OCH2CH3
`
`tS1.53b
`
`107.30
`
`151.01 13,90
`
`15.00(CH3)
`0~.11{Cll::i)
`
`14.93(CH3)
`64.'"'(CH2)
`
`14.48 (CH3)
`CO,.J.O (Cl !2}
`161.4Sb (CO)
`
`41.69 (CH2)
`126.69 (C4')
`126.94
`(C2" or C3")
`12a.2ad.
`(C2" o~ C,J.")
`139.96 (C1")
`.154.sob(CO)
`
`llle CH3
`
`y
`0
`
`~
`
`~·"
`
`l"
`
`!"
`
`, ..
`
`OCH2CH3
`
`159.42b
`
`104,55
`
`141.74 13.94
`
`
`
`·'·"'""
`
`ill
`
`CH3
`
`. ~•"
`Y~~'" NH2
`0
`
`?''
`
`1eJ.o:1ob
`
`106,37
`
`1'9.<0 13.29
`
`42.S1 {CH2)
`127.10 (C4"}
`127,tl.-ld,o (C2" or C3"}
`120.<!Sd,o {C2" or C3") .
`13a.so 1c1")
`1 ss.ssb ccoi
`
`...
`
`t/l
`N
`
`anief~c NMR spectra wore takon lnCDCl3,vnlos! olhorwise lndicalod. The numbor in oach enlry Is Iha chomicol shilt valuo In parts per million rel3·
`intorchangQnblo. e Tho 1:lc NMR -spoc11a was
`tnkon in OMSO·dG. d This se1 ol resoniiices may bo
`tlvG
`to TMS. b This sot o! resonnnces may be
`lnterchal"Qeablo. e Th1s peak had opproximo.loly lwico the inton-sity or noarby poaks.
`·
`
`
`
`153
`
`,.,
`
`'!
`::i
`
`gen atoms at carbons -4 and -5 by an electron - withdrawing and a
`
`electron-donating groups,
`
`respectively,
`
`led
`
`to a pronounced shift in
`
`the resonances of the corresponding carbon atoms. The carbon-4
`from 1..1.fil1., while
`the carbon-5 atom was shifted downfield (11.30 - 13.64
`
`signal moved upfield . (19.03 - 20.85 ppm)
`
`the
`
`resonance
`
`for
`
`ppm)
`from
`that observed in 11.l!Q. This perturbation
`in the 13c NMR
`spectra for ID. ill and lli is attributed to the push-pull resonance
`
`effects exerted by the carbon-5 and carbon-4 substituents.
`
`3.
`
`Pharmacological Evaluation.
`
`The 2-substituted-2-acetamido-N-benzylacetamides 107a-d and
`
`the oxazole derivative 111 prepared
`
`in this study were submitted to
`
`the Eli Lilly Corporation, Indianapolis,
`
`Indiana,
`
`for evaluation of
`
`their
`
`anticonvulsant activity. They were
`
`tested using
`
`the same protocols
`
`described in Chapter r.
`
`Pharmacological data
`
`for these functiona-
`
`lized amino acids are
`
`listed
`
`in Table 44.
`
`Compounds 1 O?a-c did not exhibit significant activity in the
`
`MES seizure
`
`test.
`
`The
`
`lack of anticonvulsant properties of
`
`these
`
`adducts was
`
`in
`
`light of
`
`the pronounced activity of
`
`the
`
`methyl analogue
`
`interesting
`filIB..
`
`A
`
`tentative explanation
`for
`this dichotomy
`first approximation compounds filIB.
`
`In a
`
`of results can be offered.
`
`and 1 O?a-c all contain relatively small substituents.
`
`The primary
`
`difference between
`
`the two sets of compounds
`
`is the presence of
`
`an
`
`electron-donating
`
`(fillli) or an
`
`electron-withdrawing (107a-c)
`
`moiety at the a-carbon. Our previous studies have
`
`indicated
`
`that
`
`
`
`154
`
`Pharmacological Evaluation of
`Table 44.
`2-Acetamido-N-be nzylpropionamide (film). a
`
`the Polar Analogues of
`
`No.
`
`-2.fu!.d
`
`.1Qla
`
`107b
`
`1Qk
`
`j_QZQ
`
`A
`
`CH3
`
`CN
`
`CONH2
`
`COO Et
`
`CH20H
`
`.107
`
`MES,Eosob
`
`rox. ro5oc
`
`51 (46.6 - 58.6)
`
`> 1ooe
`
`> 300
`
`> 300
`
`> 300
`
`> 100, < 300
`
`> 300
`
`> 300
`
`< 300
`
`< 300
`
`arhe compounds were administered intraperitoneally. ED50 and TD50
`values are
`in mg/kg.
`The number
`in
`parentheses
`is the 95 %
`confidence
`interval.
`b Maximal electroshock seizure
`test. CHorizontal
`indicated. d Ref. 104.
`screen
`test
`(neurotoxicity), unless otherwise
`eRotarod ataxia test.
`
`
`
`155
`
`the activity of the drug candidate
`
`in
`
`the MES seizure test
`
`is en(cid:173)
`
`hanced by
`
`the presence
`
`of
`
`electron-donating groups at the
`
`a-carbon.
`
`The negligible activity of 1 OZa.b and Q.. is
`
`in agreement
`
`with this trend.
`
`The
`
`serine
`
`derivative .lil1.d. exhibited only
`
`slight
`
`anticonvulsant activity
`
`in
`
`the MES seizure
`
`test.
`
`The activity of
`
`this
`
`compound
`
`was
`
`considerably
`
`diminished
`
`from
`
`the
`
`corresponding
`
`may
`
`reflect
`
`the
`
`inability of
`
`isomeric methoxy ether fill.a (Table 33).
`.1.Q1d.
`
`to
`
`readily pass
`
`This result
`
`through
`
`the
`
`blood-brain barrier. The more
`
`lipophilic methoxy ether .1.QTu. has not
`
`been evaluated yet. The ·close structural analogy of this compound
`
`with fill.!:2. suggest
`
`that
`
`this adduct may have · good anticonvulsant
`
`activity.
`
`No activity
`
`in the MES seizure
`
`test was observed for
`
`the oxazole derivative 111. The absence of · other pharmacological
`
`data in
`
`this series prohibits any definitive statement concerning
`
`the
`
`significance of this observation.
`
`Experimental Section .GeneralMethods.Syntheses. Melting
`
`points were determined with a Thomas Hoover melting point apparatus and
`
`are uncorrected. Infrared spectra (IR) were run on a Perkin-Elmer 1330
`
`spectrophotometer and are calibrated against the 1605 cm·1 band of
`
`polystyrene. Absorption values are expressed in wavenumbers (cm·1 ).
`
`Proton nuclear magnetic resonances (1 H NMR) and carbon nuclear magnetic
`
`resonances (13c NMR) spectra were taken on a Nicolet NT-300 instrument or
`
`
`
`156
`
`a General Electric QE-300 instrument. Chemical shift are in parts per million
`
`(o values) relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS) and coupling constant (J
`
`Values) are in hertz. Mass spectra were performed at the Eli Lilly
`
`Corporation, Indianapolis, Indiana, or by Dr. John Chinn at the Department of
`
`Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin. Elemental analysis was conducted
`
`at the Eli Lilly Corporation, Indianapolis, Indiana. p-Toluenesulfonic acid,
`
`diethyl 2-acetamidomalonate and diisobutylaluminum
`
`hydride were
`
`purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin;
`
`ph.osphorus pentoxide and lithium chloride were obtained from Fisher
`
`Scientific, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania. Tetrahydrofuran was distilled from
`
`Na/benzophenone. All other chemicals were of the highest grade available
`
`and were used without
`
`further purification.
`
`The
`
`reaction with
`
`diisobutylaluminum hydride was run under anhydrous conditions.
`
`In this
`
`case all glassware was flame dried under N2, the solid starting material was
`dried in vacuo immediately prior to use, and the reaction was conducted
`
`under positive pressure of N2. Preparative flash column chromatographies
`were run using Merck silica gel, grade 60, 230-240 mesh, GOA from Aldrich
`
`Chemical Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
`
`Preparation of 2-Acetamldo-N:-benzyl-2-cyanoacetamide
`
`(107a). Benzylamine (.e.3_) (4.72 g, 4.78 ml, 44.0 mmol) was added in one
`
`portion to a suspension of ethyl acetamidocyanoacetate (lll.8.) (4.90 g, 28.8
`
`mmol) in ethanol (75 ml). The mixture was stirred at room temperature (18 h)
`
`and the resulting suspension was evaporated invacuo. The residue was
`
`recrystallized (tetrahydrofuran/petroleum ether (35-60 °0)) to give 4.26 g
`
`(64%) of the desired product as white crystals: Rt 0.25 (95:5
`
`
`
`157
`
`chloroform/methanol); mp: 179-160 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) Ii
`1.94 (s, CH3), 4.33 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH2), 5.59 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, CH), 7.20-7.36
`(m. Ph), 8.66 (t. J = 6.0 Hz. NH). 9.09 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, NH): 13c NMR (75 MHz,
`
`DMSO-d5) 22.07 (CH3), 42.64 (CH2), 44.22 (CH), 116.45 (CN), 126.90
`
`(2C2" or 2C3u), 127.11 (2C2" or 2C3"), 126.23 (C4u), 136.36 (C1"),
`
`162.61 (CH3CO), 169.69 (NHCO) ppm; IR (KBr) 3200, 3040, 1620 (br), 1565
`(br), 1505 (br), 1360, 1260, 1210, 1030, 990 (br), 690, 725, 690, 560 cm-1;
`
`mass spectrum, m/e (relative intensity) 231 (4), 215 (1), 204 (2), 190 (4), 172
`
`(17), 146 (1 ), 129 (6), 106 (20). 98 (42), 91 (100), 77 (19), 65 (29).
`
`Anal. Calcd for C12H13N302: C,62.33; H 5. 67; N, 16.17. Found: C,
`62.60; H, 5.65; N, 17.99.
`
`Preparation of 2·Acetamldo-N.-benzylmalonamlde (107b).
`
`2-Acetamido-N-benzyl-2-cyanoacetamide (.1.QZa) (2.00 g, 6.65 mmol) and
`
`concentrated aqueous HCI (4.20 g, 4 ml, 34.6 nimol) were combined and
`
`stirred at 40 °C (15 min). The resulting suspension was filtered and the white
`
`solid was triturated with chloroform (20 ml, 5 min), filtered, and then
`
`dissolved in 4:1 n-butanol/H20 (150 ml). The organic phase was
`
`concentrated to a small volume i.uvacuo, and then hexanes were added and
`
`the resulting solution was refrigerated (-16 °C) overnight to yield after filtration
`
`1.20 g (55%) of the desired compound as a white solid: R1 0.18 (95:5
`chloroform/methanol); mp 191-192°C;1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-ds) o 1.92
`(s, CH3), 4.31 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, CH2), 4.92 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, CH), 7.20-7.34 (m,
`Ph), 7.36 (s, NHH'), 7.50 (s, NHH'), 8.10 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, NH), 8.60 (t, J=5.7
`
`Hz, NH); 13c (75 MHz, DMSO-d5) 22.46 (CH3). 42.22 (CH2). 57.28 (CH),
`
`126.73 (C4"), 127.02 (2C2" or 2C3u). 126.19 (2C2" or 2C3"). 138.99
`
`
`
`: ..
`
`158
`
`(C1u), 166.87 (CONH2). 168.53 (COCH3), 169.41 (CONH) ppm; IR (KBr)
`
`3370, 3300, 3160, 2905, 1665 (br), 1635 (br), 1520, 1480, 1390, 1260, 1050,
`
`730, 690, 665, 600 cm-1; mass spectrum, m/e (relative intensity) 249 (6), 232
`
`(3), 206 (5), 190(13),163 (6), 146 (8), 116 (70), 99 (92), 91 (100), 73 (95), 66
`
`(46); high resolution mass spectrum, calcd for c 12H15N302 249.11134,
`found 249.11101.
`
`Preparation of Ethyl 2-Acetamido·N.·benzylmalonamate
`
`(107c). To an ethanolic suspension(400ml) of 2-acetamido·fi-benzyl-
`
`2-benzyl-2-cyanoacetamide (lfil.a) (4.00 g, 17.2 mmol), was added
`
`p-toluenesulfonic acid (3.26 g, 17.2 mmol). The mixture was heated to reflux
`
`(9 h) and then stirred at room temperature (12 h). The resulting suspension
`was concentrated in vacuo and the residue dissolved in a 2:1 mixture of ethyl
`
`acetate and H20 (300 ml), the organic layer was separated and the aqueous
`
`layer extracted with ethyl acetate (200 ml). The organic layers were
`
`combined, washed with aqueous 10% NaHC03 (100 ml), dried (Na2S04)
`
`and evaporated in.vacuo. The white residue was recrystallized (75:25
`
`ethanol/H20) to yield 1.34 g (45%) of the desired product as slightly beige
`
`crystals: Rt 0.43 (95:5 chloroform/methanol); mp 142-143 °C; 1H. NMR (300
`MHz, CDCl3) o 1.22 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, CH3CH2). 2.02 (s, CH3), 4.21 (q, J = 7.2
`Hz, CH3CH2). 4.35 (dd, J = 5.4 Hz, J =14.7 Hz, NHCHH'), 4.50 (dd, J = 6.3
`
`Hz, J= 14.7 Hz, NHCHH'), 5.18 (d, J= 7.2 Hz, CH), 7.01 (d, J= 7.2 Hz, NH),
`
`7.20-7.33 (m. Ph, NH); 13c NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 13.81 (CH3CH2). 22.50
`
`(CH3CO), 43.67 (CH2NH), 56.81 (CH), 62.29 (CH3CH2). 127.39 (2C2" or
`
`2C3", C4"), 128.50 (2C2" or 2C3"), 137.45 (C1"), 165.19 (COCH 3),
`167.41 (COOCH 3), 170.42 (CONH) ppm; IR (KBr) 3250, 1750, 1625 (br),
`
`
`
`159
`
`1525 {br), 1365, 1300, 1230, 1180, 1140, 1080, 101 O, 895, 730, 680, 600
`
`cm-1; mass spectrum, m/e {relative intensity) 278 (6), 259 (8), 219 (5), 163
`
`'i. .
`
`(12), 145 (93), 117 (5), 104 (77), 99 (100), 74 (53), 66 (44).
`AnaL Calcd for c14H18N204: C, 60.42; H, 6.52; N, 10.07. Found: C,
`60.64; H, 6.48; N, 10.19.
`
`Preparation of 2-acetamldo-N_-benzylhydracrylamlde
`
`(107d). Ethyl 2-acetamido-N-benzylmalonamate (iQl.c.) (2 17 g, 7.8 ml)
`
`was dissolved in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (50 ml). To this solution dry
`
`UC! (0.66 g, 15.6 mmol), NaBH4 (0.59 g, 15.6 mmol) and ethyl alcohol (30
`ml) were successively added. The mixt1Jre was stirred at room temperature
`
`(15 h), cooled {O °C) and then made acidic (pH 4) by the addition of a 5%
`
`aqueous solution of citric acid (ca. 14 ml). The suspension was concentrated
`in vacuo, and then H20 (20 ml) was added, and the resulting ·solution was
`
`extracted with ethyl acetate (3 x 25 ml). The organic layers were combined,
`dried (NaS04), and evaporated in vacuo to give a colorless oil (1.52 g) which
`was crystallized with hexanes. The desired product was further purified by
`
`recrystallization from acetonitrile to yield 1.21 g (66%) of 1.Q.M as white
`
`crytals: Rf 0.20 (95:5 chloroform/ethanol); mp 201-203 °C; 1H NMR (300
`MHz, DMSO-d5) o 1.88 (s, CH3), 3.59 (dd, J = 5.7Hz, J = 5.7 Hz, CH20),
`4.19-4.35 (m, CH2NH, CH), 4.92 {t, J= 5.7 Hz, OH), 7.10-7.40 {m, Ph), 7.94
`{d, J = 5.7 Hz, NHCH), 8.38 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, NHCH2); 13c NMR (75 MHz,
`
`DMSO-d5) 22.19 {CH3). 41 .58 (CH2NH), 54.87 (CH), 61.30 (CH20H),
`
`126.15 (C4 u), 126.53 (2 C2" or 2 C3•o}, 127.71 {2 C:z• or 2 C3•o}, 138.90
`(C1 .. ), 169.08 (CH3CO), 169.86 {CHCO) ppm; IR {KBr) 3220 (br), 1605 (sh),
`1530 (br), 1375, 1280, 1230, 1045, 895, 725, 690, 570 cm·1; mass spectrum,
`
`;_~
`
`
`
`160
`
`m/e (relative fritensity) 237 (48), 219 (4), 206 (10), 193 (5), 177 (37), 163
`
`(21), 146 (11), 130(76),106 (100), 91 (100).
`Anal. Calcd for C12H15N2o3: C, 61.26; H, 6.43; N, 11.91. Found: C,
`61.06; H, 6.72; N, 11'78.
`
`Preparation of 2-Acetamido-N:-benzyl-3-methoxyproplon(cid:173)
`
`amlde (107e). To a
`
`tetrahydrofuran (ca. 20 ml) suspension of
`
`2-acetamido- N.-benzylhydracrylamide (1.!l.lli) (150 mg, 0.63 mmol) was
`
`added 3-methyl-p-tolyltriazene (.11.Q.) (210 mg, 1.41 mmol), and the resulting
`
`mixture was stirred at reflux (4 d). The suspension was then tittered and the
`
`filtrate evaporated lD_ vacuo. The residue was purified by column
`
`chromatography (100% chloroform, then 97:3 chloroform/methanol) to give 7
`
`light yellow solid: Rf 0.30 (97:3
`mg (4%) of the desired product as a
`chloroform/methanol); mp 109-112 °c; 1NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3 ) o 2.02
`(s,CH 3). 3.31 (s, CH30), 3.30-3.45 (m, CHH'0),3.70-3.85 (m, CHH'O),
`4.39-4.42 (m, CH2NH), 4.48 (dt, J =4.2 Hz, J =7.2 Hz, CH), 6.46-6.56 (br d, J
`
`=4.2 Hz, NHCH), 6.80-6.90 (br s, NHCH2). 7.20-7.36 (m, Ph); 13c NMR (75.
`
`MHz, CDCl3) 23.19 (CH3CO), 43.55 (CH2NH), 52.40 (CH), 59.06 (CH30),
`
`71.65 (CH20), 127.44 (2 C2" or 2 C3u). 127.49 (C4u), 128.70 (2 C2" or 2
`
`C3u), 169.96 (COCH3, CONH) ppm. [The C1" was not detected].
`
`IR (KBr)
`
`3240, 1610, 1525, 1150, 1085, 720, 690 cm·1.
`
`Acid
`
`f:!...-benzylamlde
`
`Preparation of 5-Ethoxy-2-methyloxazole-4-carboxylic
`(11JJ. To a solution of
`N-benzylmalonamate (1.QZQ) (1.35 g, 4.85 mmol) in chloroform (15 ml) was
`added P.2o5 (6.88 g, 48.5 mmol) and the resulting suspension was heated to
`reflux (8 h). The reaction mixture was carefully neutralized (10% aqueous
`
`2-acetamido(cid:173)
`
`
`
`161
`
`KOH) and then extracted with dichloromethane (4 x 100 ml). The organic
`fractions were combined, dried (Na2so4) and concentrated in vacuo to yield
`a beige residue which was recrystallized (4:2 tetrahydrofuran/hexanes) to
`
`give 1.22 g (97%) of the desired product as white crystals: Rt 0.85 (95 : 5
`chloroform/methanol); mp 111 - 113 °C; 1 H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) o
`1.33 (t, .J = 8.3 Hz, CH3CH2). 2.33 (s, CH3), 4.25 (q, J = 8.3 Hz, CH2CH3),
`4.50 (d, J= 6.9 H, CH2Ph), 7.15-7.35 (m, Ph, 2NH); 13c NMR (75 MHz,
`
`DMSO-d6) 13.94 (CH3), 14.83 (CH3CH2). 41.69 (CH2Ph), 64.44 (CH2CH3).
`
`104.55 (C4), 126.68 (C4u), 126.94 (2C2• or 2 C3"), 128.28 (2C2" or 2C3"),
`
`139.96 (Cr·), 141.74 (C5). 154 .. 50 (C2 or CONH), 159.42 (C2 or CONH)
`
`ppm; IR (KBr) 3300, 2900, 1620 (br), 1585, 1570, 1540, 1430 (br), 1380,
`
`1350, 1300, 1175, 1085, 900, 720 cm·1; mass spectrum, m/e (relative
`
`intensity) 260 (48), 215 (12), 173 (7), 126 (6), 106 (6), 91 (100).
`
`Anal. Calcd for C14H13N203: C, 64.11; ·H, 6.92; N, 10.68. Found: C,
`
`64.38; H, 6.74; N, 10.76.
`
`Preparation of 5-Amlno-2-methyloxazole-4-carboxylic
`
`Acid
`
`li_-benzylamide
`
`(1_W.To a chilled solution (-5 °C) of
`
`2-acetamido-N- benzyl-2-cyanoacetamide (1.Q.Ia) (0.50 g, 2.16 mmol) in
`
`anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (40 ml) was slowly added (7 min) a 25% solution
`
`of diisobutylaluminum hydride (0.92 g, 6.48 mmol) in toluene . The solution
`
`was stirred at -5 to O °C for 15 min, and then at room temperature (50 h), and
`
`finally at reflux (96 h). A saturated aqueous solution of NH4CI (50 ml) was
`then added to the reaction, followed by a 5% aqueous solution of H2so4 (20
`ml). The mixture was then extracted with ethyl acetate (3 x 60 ml). The
`organic layers were combined, dried (Na2S04) and evaporated to dryness in
`
`
`
`162
`
`vacuo. The residue. was purified by flash chromatography (95:5
`
`chloroform/methanol) to yield 0.20 g (37%) of the product as a pale yellow
`solid: Rt 0.58 (95:5 chloroform/methanol); mp 108-110 °C; 1 H NMR (300
`MHz, CDCl3) o 2.28 (s, CH3), 4.54 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, CH2), 5.20-5.35 (br s,
`NH2). 6.60-6.80 (br s, NH), 7.20-7.50 (m, Ph); 13c NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d5)
`
`13.29 (CH3), 42.51 (CH2). 106.37 (C4), 127.10 (C4"),. 127.44 (2C2" or
`
`2C3u), 128.45 (2C2" or 2C3 .. ). 138.50 (C1"), 149.40 (C2). 156.65 (CO),
`163.40 (C5) ppm: IR (KBr) 3360, 3240, 3230, 1605 (br). 1510 (br), 1220,
`121 o, 1090, 890, 730, 690 cm·1: mass spectrum, m/e (relative intensity) 231 ·
`
`(21 ), 106 (63), 98 (18), 91 (100); high resolution mass spectrum, calcd
`
`forC12H13N302 231.10078, found 231.10107.
`
`Pharmacology.The compounds prepared in this study were tested for.
`
`anticonvulsant activity using male albino mice (CF-1 strain, 18-25 g, Charles
`
`River, Wilmington, MAJ.The drug candidates were intraperitoneally
`
`administered to the animals in 30% polyethylene glycol 400 or 5%
`
`acacia/water prior to the tests. Maximal electroshock seizures (MES) were
`
`elicited with a 60-cycle alternating current of 50 mA intensity (approximately 6
`
`times that was necessary to elicit minimal electroshock seizures) delivered for
`
`0.2 s via corneal electrodes. A drop of 0.9%saline solution was instilled in the
`
`eyes of the animal prior to application of the electrodes so as to prevent the
`
`death of the animal. Protection in this test was defined as the abolition of the
`
`hind limb tonic extension component of the seizure. In this initial test, the
`
`compound to be evaluated was administered at three dosages (300, 100, 30
`
`mg/kg), with four mice at a dose, and maximal electroshock seizures were
`
`elicited at 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hr post-treatment to determine the approximate
`
`
`
`163
`
`. time of peak .effect (TPE). Compounds demonstrating significant
`
`.· anticohvulsant activity were then retested at the estimated TPE using at least
`
`four doses, with twelve mice at a dose, and the ED 50 was calculated. The
`
`neurologic toxicity was evaluated by the horizontal screen (HS) test.
`
`Previously trained mice were dosed with the compounds and placed
`
`individually on top of a square (13 x13 cm) wire screen (No. 4 mesh) which
`
`was mounted on a metal rod. The rod was rotated 180°, and the number of
`
`mice that returned to the top of the screen within ·one minute was determined.
`
`This measurement was performed at the estimated TPE, using at least four
`
`doses, with twelve mice at a dose, and the TD 50 was calculated.
`
`
`
`164
`
`GENERAL CONCLUSIONS
`
`The synthesis and pharmacological properties of
`
`the new
`
`functionalized amino acids analogues of u-acetamido-N-benzylphenyl(cid:173)
`
`acetamide (filll2) and 2-acetamido-N-benzylpropionamide (filli!.) revealed
`
`several
`
`notable
`
`findings.
`
`First,
`
`the use of amidoalkylation
`
`procedures provided a straightforward and
`
`reliable method to
`
`intro(cid:173)
`
`duce an electron
`
`rich heteroaromatic substituent at
`
`the a-carbon
`
`in the amino acid derivatives.
`
`In particular,
`
`the employed condi-
`
`tions
`
`(boron
`
`trifluoride · etherate, ether) permitted
`
`the synthesis of
`
`both
`
`2-acetamido-N-benzyl-2-pyrroleacetamide (lill.Q), 2-acetamido-N-
`
`benzyl-3-indoleacetamide (2.ag_) and 2-acetamido- N-benzyl-2-benzofurana-
`
`in
`results
`unaware of any previous
`We are
`cetamide
`(.Qfil).
`the acid sensitive unsubstituted heterocycles, pyrrole fill ,
`which
`benzofuran as and
`transformations. We suspect
`in amidoalkylation
`
`indole (l2), have been successfully employed
`
`that optimization of
`
`the general reaction conditions will not only provide higher yields
`
`but permit
`
`the use of less reactive heteroaromatic compounds
`
`in
`
`this
`
`procedure.
`
`Second,
`
`all
`
`five-membered
`
`ring
`
`heteroaromatic
`
`analogues of §.§Q proved highly active
`
`in
`
`the MES seizure
`
`test.
`
`Significantly,
`
`the
`
`furan-(2.9_a) and pyrrole-(2.9.b) adducts
`
`exhibited
`
`activities similar
`
`to
`
`those of phenytoin ~ and diazepam
`
`l21k)
`
`,
`. ~·
`
`under
`
`comparable
`
`that
`
`the
`
`D-enantiomers of
`
`than
`
`the corresponding
`
`conditions.
`The
`recent
`finding
`.fillli were more active and
`fill.a and
`toxic
`less
`racemates6B suggests that the D-enanliomer.
`
`
`
`165
`
`of each of
`
`these compounds (fill.£ and
`
`.Qfil;)_) may display even
`
`improved
`
`pharmacological
`
`properties.
`
`Third,
`
`the composite
`
`biological
`
`data
`
`suggests
`
`that
`
`stringent
`
`electronic and
`
`steric
`
`requirements exist for maximal activities. Moreover this study supports
`
`the
`
`notion
`
`that
`
`the
`
`a-carbon
`
`substituent
`
`interacts with an
`
`electrophilic site on
`
`the
`
`receptor.
`
`This
`
`scenario
`
`for biological
`
`activity can be tested.
`
`We suggest
`
`that
`
`replacement of the ring
`
`hydrogen atoms in
`
`the
`
`furan (fill.£) and pyrrole (filth) adducts by
`
`small electron-donating groups may be accompanied by an
`
`increase
`
`in anticonvulsant activity
`
`in
`
`the MES seizure
`
`test.
`
`Furthermore,
`
`we speculate
`
`that
`
`the 0-vinyl and 0-ethynyl adducts (120a-d) may
`
`be active
`
`in
`
`this biological screen.
`
`Fourth,
`
`the
`
`importance of
`
`the
`
`location of
`
`the
`
`heteroatom on
`
`the
`
`a.-substituent
`
`in
`
`the
`
`monocyclic derivatives
`
`fillg_ and filtb. has not been adequately
`
`addressed. This information should be accessible by comparing
`
`the
`
`biological data of 120e-g with those already obtained for the
`
`furan
`
`derivative 69a .
`
`the
`
`pyrrole
`
`adduct
`
`fillQ
`
`and
`
`the
`
`two
`
`thienyl
`
`compounds filk and filill.
`
`0
`
`R
`
`~~~'-./Ph
`
`~: R = OCH=cH,
`~: R = CHpCH=CH,
`~=R:OC=oCH
`ft: R = CH,oc:cH
`
`120
`
`-
`
`e:R: n
`~=R=Q
`
`'(N)l
`l
`
`H
`
`
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Wilder, B.J.; Bruni, J. Seizure Disorders: A Pharmacological
`Approach to Treatment; Raven Press: New York, 1981.
`
`Hauser, W.A.; Kurland, L.T. Epilepsia . 1975, 16, 1-66.
`
`Sprinks, A.; Waring, W.S. Progress
`1963, 3, 261 - 331.
`
`in Medicinal Chemistry
`
`Swinyard, E.A. Adv. Neurol. 1980, 27, 1 - 9.
`
`Vida, J.A. Anticonvulsants, Medicinal Chemistry, A Series of
`Monograph; Academic Press: New York, 1977; vol. · 15.
`
`Peters, A. Adv. Neurol. 1980, 27, 21 - 48.
`
`Scheibe!, A.B. Adv. · Neurol. 1980, 27, 49 - 61.
`
`Lux, H.D. Adv. Neurol. 1980, 27, 63 - 83.
`
`Ebersole, J.S.; Levine, R.A.
`266.
`
`J. Neurophysiol. 1975, 38, 250 -
`
`Delgado - Escueta, V. A. Adv. Neurol. 1980, 27, 85 -126.
`
`Prince, D.A. Exp. Neurol. 1968, 27, 155 - 167.
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12. Westrum, J.; White, L.; Ward, A.J. Neurosurg. 1964, 21, · 1033 -
`1046.
`
`13. Woodbury, J.W. Basic Mechanism of
`brown: Boston, 1969.
`
`the Epilepsies;
`
`Little
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`Somjen, G.G. Adv. Neuro/. 1980, 27, 155 - 167.
`
`Ogata, N.; Hori, N.; Katsuda, N. Exp. Neurol. 1974, 36,
`
`337 - 345.
`
`166
`
`
`
`167
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`Ogata, N.; Hori, N.; Katsuda, N. Brain Res. 1976, 110, 371 -
`375.
`
`Meldrum, B.S.; Porter, R.J. Current Problems in Epl1epsy
`- New Anticonvulsant Dnigs; Jahr Libbey: London, 1986.
`
`Schlesinger, K.; Boggan, W.; Freedman, D.X. Ufe Sci. 1968,
`7. 437 - 444.
`
`19.
`
`Stone. W.E. Am. J. Phys. Med. 1957, 36, 222 - 227.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`Kilian, M.; Frey, H.H. Neuropharmacol. 1973, 12, 681 - 692.
`
`Crill, W.E. Adv. Neural. 1980, 27, 169 -183.
`
`Gastaut, H. Epilepsia 1970, 102 - 113.
`
`Penry, J.K. Adv. Neural. 1975, 11, 132-151.
`
`Purpura, D.P.; Penry, J.K.; Tower, D.B.;
`R.D. Experimental Models of Epilepsy.
`Laboratoiy Worker; Raven Press: New
`
`Woodbury, D.M.; Walter,
`A Manual for the
`York, 1972.
`
`Woodbury, D.M. Adv. Neural. 1980, 27, 249 - 303.
`
`Woodbury, D.M.; Penry, J.K.; Pippenger, C.E. Antiepileptic
`Drugs, 2nd ed.; Raven Press: New York, 1982.
`
`Toman, J.E.P.; Goodman, LS. Proc. Assoc. Res. Nerv. Ment.
`Dis. 1946, 26, 141 - 163.
`
`Goodman, LS.; Toman, J.E.P.; Swinyard, E.A. Arch. Int. Phar(cid:173)
`macodyn. Ther. 1949, 78, 144 - 162.
`
`Penry, J.K.; White, B.G.; Kupferberg, H.J.;
`(a) Krall, R.L;
`Swinyard, E.A. Epilepsia 1978, 19, 404- 428.
`(b) Coughenour, LL; Mclean, J.R.; Parker, R.B. Pharm. Bio(cid:173)
`chem. Behavior 1977, 6, 351 - 353.
`
`30.
`
`Putnam, T.J.; Merritt, M.H. Science .1937, 85, 525- 526.
`
`i-
`
`
`
`168
`
`Toman, J.E.P.; Everett, G.M.; Richards, R.K. Tex. Rep. Biol.
`Med. 1952, 10, 96 - 104.
`
`Swinyard, E.A.
`
`J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 1949, 38, 201 - 204.
`
`Chapman, A.G.; Croucher, M.J.; Meldrum, B.S. Arzneim.
`1984, .34, 1261 - 1264.
`Forsch.
`
`Marescaux, C.; Micheletti, G.; Vergnes, M.; Depaulis, A.; Rum(cid:173)
`back, L.; Warter, J.M. Epilepsia 1984, 25, 326 - 331.
`
`Killiam, K.J.; Naquet, R.; Bert, J. Epilepsia 1966, 7, 215-219.
`
`Foye. W.O. Principles of Medicinal Chemistry; Lea and Feb(cid:173)
`iger: Philadelphia, 1981.
`
`Peterman, M.G.
`
`J.A.M.A. 1948, 138, 1012- 1019.
`
`Chen, G.; Portman, R.
`54 - 61.
`
`J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1951, 103,
`
`Richards, R.K.; Everett, G.M.
`
`Fed. Proc. 1944, 3, 39.
`
`Lennox, W.G.
`
`J.A.M.A. 1945, 129, 1069 - 1074.
`
`Everett, G.M.; Richards, R.K. J. Phann. Exp. Ther. 1944, 81,
`402 - 407.
`
`Bogne, J.Y. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1953, 8, 230 - 236.
`
`Handley, R.; Stewart, A.S.R.
`
`Lancet 1952, 1, 742- 744.
`
`Krall, R.L.; Penry, J.K.; Kupferberg, H.J.; Swinyard, E.A.
`Epilepsia 1978, 19, 393 - 403.
`
`Swinyard, E.A.; Castellion, A.W.
`1966, 151, 369 - 375.
`
`J. Pharmaco/. Exp. Ther.
`
`Theobald, W.; Kunz, H.A. Arzneim . Forsch. 1963, 13, 122 .-
`
`
`
`169
`
`125.
`
`47.
`
`48.
`
`Meunier, H.; Carraz, G.; Meunier, Y.; Eymard, P.; Aimard, M.
`Therapie 1963, 18, 435 - 438.
`
`Nardi, D.; Tajana, A.; Leonardi, A.; Pennini, R.; Portiali, F.;
`J. Med. Chem. 1981, 24, 727 -
`Magistratti, M.J.; Subissi, A.
`731.
`
`49. Walker, K.A.M.; Wallach, M.B.; Hirschfeld, D.R.
`1981. 24, 67 - 74.
`
`J. Med. Chem.
`
`50.
`
`51.
`
`52.
`
`53.
`
`54.
`
`55.
`
`56.
`
`57.
`
`58.
`
`59.
`
`Evans, R.H.; Francis, A.A.; Jones, A.W.; Smith, D.A.S.; Wat-
`Brit J. PharmacoL 1982, 75, 65 - 75.
`kins, J.C.
`
`Lippert, B.; Metcalf, B.W.; Jung, M.J.; Casara, P. Eur. J. Bio(cid:173)
`chem. 1977, 74, 441 - 445.
`
`Uno, H.; Kurokawa, M.; Natsuka, K.; Yamato, Y.; Nishimura, H.
`1976, 24, 632 - 643.
`Chem. Pharm. Bull.
`
`Uno, H.; Kurokawa, M. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1978, 26, 312-
`313.
`
`Uno, H.; Kurokawa, M.
`
`J. Med. Chem. 1979, 22, 180-183.
`
`Yokoyama, N.; Ritter, B.; Neubert, A.D. J. Med. Chem. 1982,
`25, 337 - 339.
`
`Braestrup, C.; Nielsen, M.; Olsen, C.E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
`1980, 77, 2288 - 2292.
`
`Braestrup, C.; Schmiechen, R.; Neef, G.; Nielsen, M.; Petersen,
`E.N.
`Science 1982, 216, 1241 -1243.
`
`Neef, G.; Eder, U.; Huth, A.; Rahtz, D.; Schmiechen. R.;
`Seialman, D.
`Heterocycle 1983, 20, 1295 - 1313.
`
`Hallot, A.; Brodin, R.; Merlier, J.; Brochard, J.; Chambon, J.P.;
`J. Med. Chem. 1986, 29, 369 - 375.
`Biziere, K.
`
`~---------------·
`
`
`
`170
`
`60.
`
`61.
`
`62.
`
`63.
`
`64.
`
`65.
`
`66.
`
`67.
`
`68.
`
`69.
`
`70.
`
`71.
`
`72.
`
`73.
`
`74.
`
`Desmedt, L.K.C.; Niemegeers, C.J.E.; Janssen, P.A.J. Arzneim.
`Forsch. 1975, 1408- 1413.
`
`Dagani, R. Chem. Eng. News 1986, Sept. 23 - 25.
`
`Ferendelli, J.A.; Kupferberg, H.J. Adv. Neurol. 1980, 27,
`587 - 596.
`
`Godin, Y.; Heiner, L.; Mark,. J~; Mande.I, P.
`1969, 16, 869 - 873.
`
`J. Neurochem.
`
`Saad, S.F.; El Masry, AM.; Scott, P.M. Eur. J. Pharmacol.
`1972, 17, 386 - 392.
`
`Sawaya, M.C.B.; Horton, R.N.; Meldrum, B.S. Epilepsia 1975,
`16, 649 - 655.
`
`Camerman, A.; Camerman. N. Science 1970, 168, 1457 - 1458.
`
`Camerman, A.; Camerman, N. Adv. Neurol. 1980, 27, 223 -
`232.
`
`Conley, J.D.; Kohn, H;
`
`J. Med. Chem. 1987, 30, 568 - 574.
`
`Callery, P.S.; Geelhaar, L.A.; Nayar, M.S.B.; Stogniew, M.;
`Rao, K.G.
`J. Neurochem. 1982, 38, 1063-1067.
`
`Meldrum, B.S.; Chapman, A.G. Neural. Neurobio/.
`625 - 641.
`
`1983, 7,
`
`Mac Bean, R.P.J. Nature 1981, 291, 593 - 595.
`
`De Freudis, F.V.; Mandel, P.
`Chichester, 1981.
`
`Amino Acid Transmitters; Wiley:
`
`Spero, L.
`
`Lancet 1982, 1319 - 1322.
`
`Meldrum, B.S.; Croucher, M.J.; Czuczwar, J.F.; Collins. K.;
`Curry, K.;
`Joseph, M.; Stone, T.W. Neuroscience 1983, 9,
`
`,-l
`
`' -
`
`~
`
`-\
`
`•.
`
`'
`
`
`
`1.71
`
`925. 930.
`
`75.
`
`76.
`
`77.
`
`78.
`
`79.
`
`80.
`
`81.
`
`82.
`
`83.
`
`84.
`
`85 .
`
`86.
`
`87.
`
`Croucher, M.J.; Meldrum, B.S.; Collins, J.F. Neuropharmaco!ogy
`1984, 23, 467. 472.
`
`Davies, J.; Evans, R.H.; Francis, A.A.; Jones, A.W., Walkins,
`J.C. J. Neurochem. 1981, 36, 1305 • 1307.
`
`Collins, J.F.; Dixon, A.J. : De Sarrov, G.; Chapman, A.G.; Hart,
`G.P.; Meldrum, B.S. Neurosci. Lett.
`1984, 51, 371 • 376 ..
`
`Perkins, M.N.; Stone, T.W. Brain Res. 1982, 247, 184-187.
`
`Foster, A.C.; Vezzani, A.; French, E.D.; Schwarcz, R. Neurosci.
`Lett 1984, 478, 273 · 278.
`
`Peet, M.J.; Leah, J.D.; Curtis, D.R.
`83. 95 .
`
`Brain Res. 1983, 266,
`
`Jones, A.W.; Smith, D.A.S.; Watkins, J.C. Neuroscience 1981,
`13, 573. 578.
`
`Stone, T.W.; Perkins, M.N.; Collins, J.F.; Curry, K. Neuro(cid:173)
`science 1981, 6, 2249 - 2252.
`
`Croucher, M.J.; Collins, J.F.; Meldrum, B.S.
`216, 899-901.
`
`Science 1982,
`
`Turski, L.; Meldrum. M.N.; Jones, A.W.; Watkins, J.C. Eur. J.
`Pharmaco!. 1985, 111, 279- 283.
`
`Croucher, M.J.; Meldrum, B.S.; Jones, A.W.; Watkins, J.C. Brain
`Res 1984, 322, 111 -118.
`
`Turski, L.; Meldrum, B.S.; Collins, J.F.
`336, 162 - 166.
`
`Brain Res. 1985,
`
`Christophe, J.; Kurzner, R.; Ngoc Diem, N.; Damien, C.; Chat-
`elain, P.; Giller, L.
`Life Sci. 1983, 33, 533 - 541.
`
`. ~:
`
`. ~-·
`
`,.
`
`f-
`•
`. '\:
`. -1
`
`fr
`;
`
`
`
`172
`
`88.
`
`89.
`
`90.
`
`Krosgaard-Larsen, P.; Scheel-Kruger, P.; Kofod, H. GABA(cid:173)
`Neurotransmittf]rs; Munksgaard: Copenhagen, 1979.
`
`Galzigna, L.; Garbin, L.; Bianchi, M.; Marzotto, A. Arch.
`i 978, 235, 73 - 85.
`Pharmacodyn.
`
`Int.
`
`Tunicliff, G.; Ngo, T.T.; Barbeau, A. Experientia 1977, 33,
`20-22.
`
`91.. .
`
`Johnston, G.A.R.; Krosgaard-Larsen, P.; Stephenson, A.L.;
`Twitchin, B.
`J. Neurochem. 1976, 26, 1029 - 1032.
`
`92.
`
`93.
`
`94.
`
`95.
`
`96.
`
`97.
`
`98.
`
`99.
`
`Johnston, G.A.R.; Krosgaard-Larsen, P.; Stephenson, A.L.;
`Nature 1975, 258, 627 '628.
`
`Krosgaard-Larsen, P.; Johnston, G.A.R.; Lodge, D.; Curtis, D.R.
`Nature 1977, 268, 53 - 55.
`
`Ronquist, G.; Agren, G.; Ponten, J.; Westermark, B.
`1976, 89, 433 - 439.
`Physiol.
`
`J. Cell
`
`Scheechter, P.J.; Traner, Y.; Yung, M.J.; Sjoerdsma, A.
`Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1977, 201, 606 - 612.
`
`J .
`
`Scheechter. P.J.; Traner, Y.; Yung, M.J.; Bohlen, P. Eur. J.
`Pharmaco/. 1977, 45, 319 - 328.
`
`Lippert, B.; Metcalf, B.W.; Jung, M.J.; Casara, P. Eur. J.
`Biochem. 1977, 74, 441 - 445.
`
`Brennan, M.J.W.; Cantril!, R.C. Nature 1979, 280, 514 - 515.
`
`Johnston, G.A.R.; Curtis, D.R.; Beart, P.M.; Game, C.J.A.;
`McCulloch, R.M.; Twitchin, B.
`J. Neurochem. 1975, 24,
`157 - 160.
`
`100. Thorne, D.E. U.S. Patent 3,657,341, granted April 18, 1972.
`Chem. Abst. 1972, 72, P 55885j.
`
`!
`i· •
`
`t
`i
`
`I\
`.'$,
`1-:
`1:·
`
`' ..
`
`
`
`173
`
`101. Takahashi, T.; Ogiu, K.; Fujimura, H.; Satoda, I.; Fukui, T.;
`Yamamoto, Y. Swiss Patent 393,355, granted October 30,
`1965. Chem. Abst.1966, 59, P 8660h.
`
`102. Cortes, S.; Liao, Z.K.; Watson, D.; Kohn, H. J. Med. Chem.
`1985, 28, 601 - 606.
`
`103. Conley, J. D. Thesis, University of Houston - University Park,
`Houston, 1986.
`
`104. Kohn, H.; Conley, J.D. (Unpublished results).
`
`