throbber
Benefits and Side Effects of Different Vegetable Oil
`Vectors on Apoptosis, Oxidative Stress, and P2X7 Cell
`Death Receptor Activation
`
`Toibiri Said,‘ Melody Dut0t,1 Raymond Cl9rist0n,2 jean-Louis Beaudeux,3 Chantal Martin,‘
`jean-Michel Warnet,1’4 and Patrice Rat1’4
`
`PURPOSE. Ocular side effects in patients using eye drops may be
`due to intolerance to the vector used in eye drops. Castor oil is
`the commonly used lipophilic vector but has been shown to be
`cytotoxic. Effects on cells of four oils (olive, camelina, Aleu-
`rites moluccana, maize) were compared with those of castor
`oil in human conjunctival cells.
`METHODS. Human conjunctival cells were incubated with the
`oils for 15 minutes. After a 24-hour recovery period, cells were
`tested for viability, proliferation, apoptosis (P2X7 cell death
`receptor and caspase 3 activation), intracellular redox poten-
`tial, and reactive oxygen species production. Fatty acid incor-
`poration in cell membranes was also analyzed. In vivo ocular
`irritation was assessed using the Draize test.
`
`RESULTS. Compared to the four other oils, castor oil was shown
`to induce significant necrosis and P2X7 cell death receptor and
`caspase 3 activation and to enhance intracellular reactive oxy-
`gen species production. Aleurites moluccana and camelina
`oils were not cytotoxic and increased cell membrane omega-3
`fatty acid content. None of the five tested oils showed any in
`vivo ocular irritation.
`CONCLUSIONS. The results demonstrated that castor oil exerts
`
`cytotoxic effects on conjunctival cells. This cytotoxicity could
`explain the side effects observed in some patients using eye
`drops containing castor oil as a vehicle. The lack of cytotoxic
`effects observed with the four other oils, Aleurites, camelina,
`maize, and olive, suggest that they could be chosen to replace
`castor oil in ophthalmic formulations. (Invest Opbtbalmol Vis
`Sci. 2007;48:5000 -5006) DOI:10.1 167/iovs.07-0229
`
`Topical drug administration is very often used to treat ocular
`surface and intraocular disease, providing higher local
`drug levels than systemic administration,‘ with minimal gen-
`eral side effects.2 The therapeutic efficacy of a topical formu-
`
`From the llaboratoire de Toxicologie and 3Stress Oxydant et
`Atteintes Vasculaires, Faculte des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Bi-
`ologiques, Universite Rene Descartes Paris, Paris, France; ZINRA (Insti-
`tut National de la Recherche Agronomique), Lipides Membranaires et
`Regulation Fonctionnelle du Coeur et des Vaisseaux, UMR (Unite Mixte
`de Recherche)-INRA Physiologic, Universite Paris XI, Ch:itenay-Mala-
`bry, France; and 4INSERM (Institut National de la Sante et de la Recher-
`che Medicale), UMRS (Unite Mixte de Recherche en Sante), Institut
`Biomedical des Cordeliers, Paris, France.
`Submitted for publication February 22, 2007; revised July 2, 2007;
`accepted September 4, 2007.
`Disclosure: T. Said, None; M. Dutot, None; R. Christon, None;
`J.-L. Beaudeux, None; C. Martin, None; J.-M. Warnet, None; P. Rat,
`None
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
`charge payment. This article must therefore be marked “advertise-
`ment” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`Corresponding author: Patrice Rat, Iaboratoire de toxicologie
`(INSERM U 598), Fac11lte des sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques,
`Universite Rene Descartes Paris 5, 4 avenue de l’Observatoire, 75006,
`Paris, France; patrice.rat@univ-paris5.fr.
`
`5000
`
`lation depends on both its composition and the physicochem-
`ical properties of the vehicle. Use of an appropriate vehicle is
`critical to increase the optimal efficacy of the pharmacologi-
`cally active drug.3 Most commercialized eye drops are pre-
`pared in aqueous form, although most active components are
`lipophilic. Another drawback of the hydrophilic formulations
`is the fast elimination of the eye drop by tears, reducing
`contact duration between the drug and the ocular tissue.
`The use of a lipophilic vehicle in eye drops increases solu-
`bility and pharmacologic effects of the drug. An improvement
`of the cell delivery of drugs using vector oil is based on the
`modulation of membrane fluidity that directly depends on its
`fatty acid composition. Castor oil, which mainly contains rici-
`noleic acid (90% of total fatty acid content),4 is one of the
`lipophilic vehicles used in cyclosporine eye drops.2’5‘(’ How-
`ever,
`it presents both a low-stability and an epithelial and
`conjunctival toxicity7 as well as systemic adverse effects such
`as purgative effects, hypersensitivity, nephrotoxicity, and neu-
`rotoxicity.4’8 Since castor oil is presumed to be responsible for
`cytotoxic effects in the eye, its replacement by another li-
`pophflic vector could result in better tolerance of the drops.
`Omega-3 fatty acids are important in the structure and
`function of the visual system.9 ac-Linolenic acid (ALA) is the
`precursor of the long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty ac-
`ids (n-3 PUFA)—mainly, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and ei-
`cosapentaenoic acid (EPA)1°—found in fish oils and in nerve
`tissue cell membranes. Several vegetable oils exhibit a high
`content of omega-3 fatty acids. For instance, Aleurites m0luc-
`cana and camelina oils are rich sources of linolenic acid (36%-
`40%).”‘12 Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids are rapidly incorpo-
`rated into cell membrane phospholipids, thereby resulting in
`changes in receptor functions and alteration in cell signaling
`mechanisms and membrane-bound enzymes.” On the other
`hand, incorporation of ac-linolenic acid or other n-3 series fatty
`acids into the diet results in marked changes in cell membrane
`composition as well as in arachidonic acid metabolism.” Ara-
`chidonic acid, a long-chain omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid
`(n-6 PUFA) abundant in membrane phospholipids, is the first
`step of the inflammatory process after metabolism by cyclooxy-
`genases and lipoxygenases, which are present in the conjunc-
`tiva.15‘16 The omega-3 fatty acids contained in vegetable oils,
`such as camelina oil, could thus replace arachidonic acid in cell
`membranes and decrease inflammation. Therefore, it is of in-
`terest to develop lipophilic vectors that would be free of
`negative side effects and contain omega-3 fatty acids.
`In this study, we evaluated the in vitro and in vivo toxicity
`of four vegetable oils to validate their use as vehicles of li-
`pophflic drugs in eye drops. They were chosen because of
`their biological properties and fatty acid composition“‘17’18:
`Two of them are rich in omega-3 fatty acids (Aleurites and
`camelina) and two are free of omega-3 (maize and olive). The
`olive oil was highly refined (neutral, denatured, and free of
`antioxidants) and was chosen as the negative control; castor oil
`was tested to confirm its cytotoxic effects in our cell model.
`Cell assays for necrosis, apoptosis, intracellular redox status,
`
`Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, November 2007, Vol. 48, No. 1 1
`Copyright © Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
`
`ALL 2003
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS V. ALLERGAN
`IPRZO16-01232
`
`1
`
`ALL 2003
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS V. ALLERGAN
`IPR2016-01232
`
`

`
`IOVS, November 2007, Vol. 48, No. 11
`
`Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Different Vector Oils
`
`5001
`
`and antioxidant properties were performed on human con-
`junctival cells. In addition, we analyzed the incorporation of
`oils (i.e., of their constitutive fatty acids) in cultured conjunc-
`tival epithelial cell membranes. In vivo ocular irritation was
`evaluated by using the Draize test.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Reagents
`Castor, maize, and olive oils were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St.
`Louis, M0) at the highest purity grade available. Camelina oil was
`purchased from Phytocos (Poitiers, France); and Aleurites moluccamz
`oil was purchased from Plant Extract laboratory (Antanarivo, Madagas-
`car).
`
`Ocular Cytotoxicity Assessment on a
`Conjunctival Cell Line
`Wong Kilboume— derived human conjunctival epithelial cells (WKD,
`ECACC 93120839) Were cultured under standard conditions (moist
`atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C) in Dulbecco’s minimum essential
`medium (DMEM; Eurobio, Les Ulis, France) supplemented with 10%
`fetal bovine serum (FBS, Eurobio), 2 mM 1-glutamine, 50 IU/mL peni-
`cillin, and 50 IU/mL streptomycin (Eurobio). The culture medium was
`changed every 3 days; confluent cultures were removed by trypsin
`incubation. The cells were counted, seeded into 96-well microplates
`(Costar; VWR, Fontenay sous Bois, France), and kept at 37°C for 24
`hours. The different undiluted oils, including olive oil as the control,
`were incubated for 15 minutes (30 minutes for the fatty acid incorpo-
`ration test), and tests were performed after a 24-hour recovery period
`in culture medium. Olive oil was chosen as the control.
`Fluorometry was performed with a microplate cold light cytoflu-
`orometer” (Fluorolite 1000; Dynex, Cergy Pontoise, France). All fluo-
`rescent dyes were added to living cells, since this method allows
`detection of the fluorescent signal directly from the microplate.
`
`Cell Viability
`
`Membrane Integrity. Membrane integrity, which is closely
`correlated with cell viability, was evaluated with neutral red (Fluka,
`Buchs, Switzerland), by fluorometric detection (Aexcitation [ex.] =
`535 run; Aemission [em.] = 600 nm). Neutral red was used at a
`concentration of 50 (g/mL, according to Borenfreund and Puerner2°;
`200 ML per well of medium containing neutral red was added to living
`cells, and the microplate was incubated for 3 hours at 37°C in moist
`
`atmosphere With 5% C02. The neutral red fluorescence was then
`measured.
`
`Redox Status. The Alamar blue assay was used to measure redox
`status variations.2"22 Alamar blue penetrates cells passively and
`thereby is reduced. The oxidized nonfluorescent dye becomes a re-
`duced fluorescent dye. A solution at 0.1 mg/mL in PBS is diluted (1/1 1)
`in culture medium containing 2.5% FBS. Cells were incubated at 37°C
`for 7 hours, and fluorescence detection (Aex. = 535 um; Aem. = 600
`nm) was then measured.
`Cell Proliferation. Cell proliferation was evaluated by the in-
`corporation of BrdU in DNA during replication. The BrdU kit (Cell
`Proliferation ELISA, BrdU) was provided by Roche (Meylan, France).
`
`Apoptosis
`
`P2X7 Cell Death Receptor Activation: the YO-PRO-1
`Test. YO-PRO-1 , a DNA probe (lnvitrogen-Molecular Probes, PoortGe-
`bouw, The Netherlands), penetrates apoptotic cells only through the
`P2X7 receptor. After incubation with the different oils, a 2-p.M YO-
`PRO-1 solution in phosphate-buffered saline was applied (200 ML per
`well), and the microplate was placed for 10 minutes in the dark at
`room temperature. The fluorescence signal was scanned by using a
`cytofluorometer with a small band pass and precise wave lengths for
`YO-PRO-1 fluorescence detection (Aex. = 491 nm; Aem. = 509 nm).
`This test was simultaneously performed with the neutral red test.
`Caspase 3 Activation. To assess apoptosis, caspase 3 activity
`was evaluated by using a caspase 3 kit assay with rhodainine 1 10-DEVD
`fluorogenic substrate (lnvitrogen-Molecular Probes).
`
`Reactive Oxygen Species Production
`Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (mainly H202)
`was detected with the 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate fluoroprobe
`(DCFH-DA; lnvitrogen-Molecular Probes).23 This probe is a nonfluores-
`cent compound currently used in flow cytometry and adapted for use
`in the microplate assay.“ Once incorporated into the cells, the probe
`is cleaved by endogenous esterases and can no longer exit the cell. The
`de-esterified product becomes a fluorescent compound 2',7'-dichlo-
`rofluorescein after its oxidation by intracellular ROS. Fluorescent signal
`detected ().ex.: 490 rim; ).em.: 535 nm) is proportional to ROS pro-
`duction.
`
`Fatty Acid Incorporation in Membrane
`The cells were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 1000g. The cell pellets
`were resuspended in 1 mL of 0.1 M sucrose-10 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4)
`
`250
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`"/2Fluorescence
`
`FIGURE 1. Membrane integrity eval-
`uation using the neutral red test after
`incubation with different oils for 15
`minutes followed by a 24-hour recov-
`ery period. Results are expressed as a
`percentage of control. Castor oil de-
`creased cell viability. *P < 0.001.
`
`I Neutral Red
`
`OHVB
`
`Came-Iina
`
`Aleurites
`
`Maize
`
`Castor
`
`2
`
`

`
`5002
`
`Said et al.
`
`IOVS, November 2007, Vol. 48, No. 11
`
`140
`
`120
`
`100
`
`so
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`o
`
`abslolive
`
`I Brdu
`
`FIGURE 2. Cell proliferation evalua-
`tion with BrdU incorporation after
`incubation with different oils for 15
`minutes followed by a 24-hour recov-
`ery period. Castor oil inhibited cell
`proliferation. *P < 0.001.
`
`Olive
`
`Camelina
`
`Aleurites
`
`Maize
`
`ca5t°r
`
`at 4°C. They were then lysed after five freeze—thaw cycles and a cold
`sonication for 30 to 60 seconds. Cell membranes were isolated by
`several ultracentrifugations. Total lipids were extracted, and mem-
`brane fatty acids were analyzed and quantified by high-pressure liquid
`chromatography, as previously described.25’2(’
`
`In Vivo Assessment of Ocular Irritation:
`Draize Test
`
`All procedures in this study were performed in compliance with the
`ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Visual
`Research. Animal care and experimentation complied with the rules of
`European Council Guidelines:
`license for experimental studies on
`living animals. Eight-week-old male New-Zealand rabbits (Cegav, Saint
`Mars d’Egrenne, France) were placed in an individual cage and kept in
`standard laboratory conditions (at 20°C, 12-hour light— dark cycle), fed
`ad libitum on the standard laboratory diet with free access to water.
`Ocular irritation was evaluated by a modified Draize test.27 Briefly,
`0.1 mL of nondiluted (100%) oil was instilled into the conjunctival sac,
`
`and the upper and lower lids were gently held together for 10 seconds.
`The opposite eye of each animal served as the untreated control.
`Ocular responses (conjunctiva, iris, cornea) were scored at 1, 24, 48,
`72, and 96 hours, and at 7 days. A fluorescein stain was used to confirm
`corneal effects visible by examination at the 24-hour observation and at
`each subsequent observation period until the cornea failed to exhibit
`uptake of fluorescein. Irritation was scored according to the method of
`Draize et al.27 A score of less than 15 was considered to show that the
`oil was a nonirritant.
`
`Statistical Analysis
`Results were obtained in arbitrary fluorescence units and expressed as
`a percentage of control values. For cell experiments, oils were tested
`in six wells, and each experiment was performed in triplicate. Mean
`values for each concentration were analyzed by one-way ANOVA
`followed by the Dunnett test.28*29 All statistical analyses were per-
`formed with commercial software (Sigma Stat 2.0; SPSS, Chicago, USA).
`P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
`
`5.0
`
`415
`
`-10
`
`35
`
`3.0
`
`25
`
`20%fluorescence
`
`1.5
`
`1D
`
`05
`
`0.0
`
`Icaspases 3Iredox status
`
`FIGURE 3. Caspase 3 activity evalu-
`ated by the rhodamine 1 10-DEVD flu-
`orogenic substrate after incubation
`with different oils for 15 minutes fol-
`lowed by a 24-hour recovery period.
`Results are expressed as a percent-
`age of the control. Castor oil acti-
`vated caspase 3. *P < 0.001.
`
`3
`
`

`
`IOVS, November 2007, Vol. 48, No. 11
`
`Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Different Vector Oils
`
`5003
`
`
`
`3.0
`
`2.5 <
`
`2.0 -
`
`1.54
`
`1.0
`
`0.5 -
`
`%fluorescence
`
`I yopro-1:‘ redox status
`
`FIGURE 4. P2X7 cell death receptor
`activation evaluated with the YO-
`
`PRO—1 test after incubation With dif
`ferent oils for 15 minutes followed
`
`OD
`
`'::::$:.::;°::::.‘::::?.‘;.“::$:::
`control. Castor oil activated P2X7
`cell death receptor. *P < 0.001.
`
`O
`
`<\«<°
`0
`.36‘
`C-'
`
`9‘
`\¢v
`Y.
`
`.-,-°
`‘1~
`
`‘D
`0
`
`RESULTS
`
`Cell Viability, Apoptosis, and Oxidative Stress
`
`Cell viability results, as evaluated with the neutral red assay
`(Fig. 1), indicated that maize, Aleurites moluccana, and cam-
`elina oils did not induce any cellular necrosis when compared
`with the control olive oil. Although an increase in neutral red
`incorporation was observed for the three oils when compared
`with olive oil, no proliferative effect was detected by the
`specific proliferation BrdU assay (Fig. 2). On the other hand,
`the neutral red and BrdU assays indicate that castor oil signif-
`icantly decreased cell viability (P < 0.001). In the same Way,
`assays for apoptosis revealed that maize, Aleurites moluccana,
`and camelina oils did not activate the PZX7 cell death receptor
`and caspase 3 (Fig. 3), whereas castor oil significantly induced
`apoptosis through both PZX7 cell death receptor activation
`(+200%, P < 0.001; Fig. 4) and caspase 3 activation (+301%,
`P < 0.001; Fig. 3).
`
`Finally, When compared with control olive oil, maize, Aleu-
`rites moluccana, and camelina oils did not alter intracellular
`redoX status, whereas castor oil significantly decreased intra-
`cellular redoX potential (—42.3%; Fig. 5). Assays with the
`H202-sensitive DCF fluorogenic probe confirmed that castor
`oil, but not other oils, significantly increased intracellular ROS
`production (+1400%; Fig. 6) that was surely responsible for
`the alteration of global redoX status measured by the Alamar
`blue assay.
`
`Fatty Acid Incorporation in Membranes
`
`When compared with olive oil, cells incubated with camelina
`or Aleurites oils significantly increased the incorporation rate
`of on-linolenic acid in their membranes, and concomitantly, a
`decrease in the membrane arachidonic acid content was ob-
`served (Table 1). Because of the strong necrotic effect of castor
`oil, the modification in membrane fatty acid composition of
`
`110
`
`IEIU
`
`90
`
`ED
`
`fl-1
`U 7n
`5u
`an
`I”
`ED EIU
`
`E "
`
`:
`3‘
`
`I Redox status
`
`4n
`
`30
`29
`
`‘”
`
`Olive
`
`camelina
`
`Aleurites
`
`Maize
`
`Castor
`
`FIGURE 5. Redox status evaluation
`using the Alamar blue test after incu—
`bation with different oils for 15 min—
`utes followed by a 24-hour recovery
`period. Results are expressed as a
`percentage of the control. Castor oil
`altered intracellular
`redox status.
`*P < 0.001.
`
`4
`
`

`
`5004
`
`Said et al.
`
`IOVS, November 2007, Vol. 48, No. 11
`
`%fluorescence
`
`I H2CFDAIredox status
`
`FIGURE 6. ROS production evalu-
`ated by DCF-DA test after incubation
`with different oils for 15 minutes fol-
`lowed by a 24-hour recovery period.
`Results are expressed in DCF/NR flu-
`orescence ratio. Castor oil increased
`ROS production. *P < 0.001.
`
`cells maintained for 30 minutes in the presence of this oil was
`impossible to determine in our experimental conditions.
`
`In Vivo Assessment of Ocular Irritation:
`Draize Test
`
`As indicated in Table 2, none of the five tested oils induced any
`noticeable in vivo ocular irritation. For each oil, the score
`remained S2, whereas positivity for this test corresponds to a
`score of :15 or higher.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The results of our study demonstrate that castor oil exhibited
`significant ir1 vitro cell toxicity in comparison with olive oil.
`Other tested oils (i.e., camelina, Aleurites moluccama, and
`maize oils) did not exhibit such deleterious effects, since there
`was no difference in the necrotic and apoptotic processes or
`the alteration of ROS production between these oils and olive
`oil.
`
`When it occurs, eye drop intolerance can result from either
`the active component or the vehicle. As an example, benzal-
`konium chloride, a well-known preservative, is known to in-
`duce apoptosis in certain ocular cells; recent published studies
`from our laboratory demonstrated that benzalkonium chloride
`activates P2X7 cell death receptor, leading to fluoroquinolone
`eye drop intolerance.3° Available cyclosporine eye drops con-
`
`TABLE 1. Fatty Acid Incorporation in Conjunctival Cell Membranes
`after Incubation with Different Oils
`
`Fatty Acid
`
`Control Olive Maize Camelina Aleurites
`
`Arachidonic acid
`20:4 (116)
`an-Linolenic acid
`1823 (11-3)
`
`6.75
`
`0.60
`
`4.62
`
`0.60
`
`4.45
`
`2.82
`
`4.09
`
`7.20
`
`1.65
`
`1 3-52
`
`Incubation lasted 30 minutes followed by a 24-hour recovery
`period. The different oils modified cell membrane fatty acid composi-
`tion.
`
`tain maize oil or castor oil as the vehiclef“ Reports indicate
`that ophthalmic formulations containing castor oil are more
`cytotoxic than those containing maize oil.” Our present re-
`sults showed that castor oil induced necrosis, apoptosis (P2X7
`receptor and caspase 3 activations), and intracellular H202
`overproduction in an in vitro model of conjunctival cells. As a
`hypothesis, the cytotoxic effects of castor oil could be due to
`its high ricinoleic acid content.
`Indeed, high concentrations of ricinoleic acid (20.1 mM)
`were shown to be cytotoxic in isolated hamster intestinal
`epithelial cells.“ The lack of in vivo toxicity (Draize test) may
`be due to the single application of castor oil, which is not
`sufficient to induce a toxic effect and ocular irritation. As a
`
`further study, in vivo assays testing repeated applications of
`castor oil (as well as ricinoleic acid) might show toxicity and
`explain clinical observations. Indeed, some patients who use
`eye drops containing castor oil exhibit discomfort and ocular
`irritation after long-term treatment. Use of nontoxic lipophilic
`eye drop vehicles, instead of castor oil, could suppress such
`adverse effects. The other tested oils presented better in vitro
`tolerance than castor oil and could be used in ophthalmic
`formulations instead of castor oil. Maize oil is not cytotoxic and
`is already used in cyclosporine eye drop preparations at the
`French Ophthalmologic National Center (Hopital des Quinze-
`Vingts, Paris, France). Our in vitro results confirm the tolerance
`of this oil and suggest that long-term treatment of patients
`would be safe.
`
`Omega-3 fatty acids are critical for membrane functions and
`were shown to exhibit anti-inflammatory effects.“ In response
`to proinflammatory stimuli, enhanced catalytic activity of phos-
`pholipase A2 degrades membrane phospholipids to form free
`arachidonic acid that is converted into prostaglandins and
`other eicosanoids through activation of the oxidative enzymes
`cyclooxygenases and lipoxygenases. All these enzymes are
`found in ocular conjunctiva.“ '57 Replacement of arachidonic
`acid by DHA and EPA in cell membranes reduces the inflam-
`matory process related to proinflammatory prostaglandin syn-
`thesis, since products of the catalytic action of phospholipase
`A2, cyclooxygenases, and lipoxygenases more likely result in
`
`5
`
`

`
`IOVS, November 2007, Vol. 48, No. 11
`
`Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Different Vector Oils
`
`5005
`
`TABLE 2. In Vivo Ocular Irritation Score
`
`Oils
`
`1 h
`
`24 h
`
`48 h
`
`72 h
`
`96 h
`
`7 d
`
`Total
`
`Comparison
`
`Observations
`
`Olive
`Castor
`Maize
`Aleurites moluccana
`Camelina
`
`0
`2
`1
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`2
`1
`0
`0
`
`< 1 5
`< 1 5
`< 1 5
`< 1 5
`< 1 5
`
`N0 irritant
`N0 irritant
`N0 irritant
`N0 irritant
`N0 irritant
`
`Undiluted oils (100 %) were instilled into the conjunctival sac of rabbits. None of the tested oils was an irritant.
`
`the formation of anti-inflammatory38 and proresolving than
`proinflammatory products,59*4" especially in the retina.“ As
`another beneficial effect of the membrane enrichment
`in
`
`omega-3, modification of membrane fatty acids is responsible
`for quantitative and/or qualitative changes in lipid raft domain
`activity. Lipid rafts consist of lateral assemblies of cholesterol
`and sphingolipids in the outer exoplasmic leaflet connected to
`phospholipids and cholesterol in the inner cytoplasmic leaflet
`of the membrane bilayer. Components of the death-inducing
`signaling complex have been shown to be present in the raft
`fraction.“
`Both Aleurites moluccana and camelina oils have a high
`content of omega-3 fatty acids (35% and 40% of total fatty acids,
`respectively), which may precipitate a better tolerance and
`efficacy of the drug, improving cell membrane fluidity, and
`drug incorporation. These oils should be considered as inter-
`esting candidates for alternative lipophilic vehicles in eye drop
`formulations, since our data showed that they did not exhibit
`in vitro and in vivo toxic effects and contributed to beneficial
`changes in cell membrane fatty acid composition (i.e., deple-
`tion in arachidonic acid and a substantial enrichment of cell
`membranes in ALA; Table 1).
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`In our in vitro experimental conditions, castor oil induced
`necrosis and apoptosis and enhanced oxidative stress, which
`could contribute to the side effects of eye drops containing this
`oil as a vehicle. Aleurites moluccana and camelina oils did not
`exhibit such cell deleterious effects and may exert beneficial
`actions on both inflammatory process and drug incorporation
`by decreasing membrane content in arachidonic acid on behalf
`of omega-3 acids. The innocuous effects of these oils allow
`their potential use as novel vehicles for eye drops that require
`lipophilic vectors.
`
`References
`
`1 . Lallemand F, Felt-Baeyens O, Besseghir K, Behar-Cohen F, Gumy R.
`Cyclosporine A delivery to the eye: a pharmaceutical challenge.
`Eur] Pharm Biopharm. 2003;56:307-318.
`2. Mosteller MW, Gebhardt BM, Hamilton AM, Kaufman HE. Penetra-
`tion of topical cyclosporine into the rabbit cornea, aqueous hu-
`mor, and serum. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:101-102.
`3. Ozsoy Y, Gungor S, Cevher E. Vehicle effects on in vitro release of
`tiaprofenic acid from different
`topical formulations. Farmaco.
`2004;59:563-566.
`4. Burdock GA, Carabin IG, Griffiths _]C. Toxicology and pharmacol-
`ogy of sodium ricinoleate. Food Chem Toxicol. 2006;44:1689-
`1698.
`5. Wiederholt M, Kossendrup D, Schulz W, Hoffmann F. Pharmaco-
`kinetic of topical cyclosporin A in the rabbit eye. Invest Ophthal-
`mol Vis Sci. 1986;27:519-524.
`6. Kanpolat A, Batioglu F, Yilmaz M, Akbas F. Penetration of cyclo-
`sporin A into the rabbit cornea and aqueous humor after topical
`drop and collagen shield administration. CLAO f 1994;20:119-
`122.
`
`7. Brignole F, Pisella P], De Saint Jean M, Goldschild M, Goguel A,
`Baudo11in C. Flow cytometric analysis of inflammatory markers in
`KCS: 6-month treatment with topical cyclosporin A. Invest Oph-
`thalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:90 -95.
`8. Crosasso P, Ceruti M, Brusa P, Arpicco S, Dosio F, Cattel L. Prep-
`aration, characterization and properties of sterically stabilized pa-
`clitaxel-containing liposomes. ] Control Release. 2000;63:19 -30.
`9. Uauy R, Mena P, Rojas C. Essential fatty acids in early life: structural
`and functional role. Proc Nutr Soc. 2000;59:3-15.
`10. Flachs P, Horakova O, Brauner P, et al. Polyunsaturated fatty acids
`of marine origin upregulate mitochondrial biogenesis and induce
`beta-oxidation in white fat. Diabetologia. 2005;48:2365-2375.
`1 1. Karvonen HM, Aro A, Tapola NS, Salminen I, Uusitupa MI, Sarkki-
`nen ES. Effect of alpha-linolenic acid-rich camelina sativa oil on
`serum fatty acid composition and serum lipids in hypercholester-
`olemic subjects. Metab Clin Exp. 2002;51:1253-1260.
`12. Jia Q, Shi Y, Bennink MB, Pestka J]. Docosahexaenoic acid and
`eicosapentaenoic acid, but not alpha-linolenic acid, suppress de-
`oxynivalenol-induced experimental IgA nephropathy in mice. ]
`Nutr. 2004;134:1353-1361.
`13. Sinclair A], Murphy K], Li D. Marine lipids: overview “news in-
`sights and lipid composition of Lyprinol”. Allerg Immunol. 2000;
`32:261-271.
`14. Morris DD, Henry M, Moore JN, Fischer K. Effect of dietary
`linolenic acid on endotoxin-induced thromboxane and prostacy-
`clin production by equine peritoneal macrophages. Circ Shocle.
`1989;29:311-318.
`15. Wflfiams RN, Bhattacherjee P, Eakins KE. Biosynthesis of lipoxy-
`genase products by ocular tissues. Exp Eye Res. 1983;36:397— 402.
`16. Kulkarni PS, Srinivasan BD. Cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase
`pathways in anterior uvea and conjunctiva. Prog Clin Biol Res.
`1989;312:39 -52.
`17. Satyanarayana P, Kumar KA, Singh SK, Rao GN. A new phorbol
`diester from Aleurites moluccana. Fitoterapia. 2001;72:304 -306.
`18. Locher CP, Burch MT, Mower HF, et al. Anti-microbial activity and
`anticomplement activity of extracts obtained from selected Hawai-
`ian medicinal plants. ] Ethnopharmacol. 1995;49:23—32.
`19. Rat P, Korwin-Zmijowska C, Warnet JM, Adolphe M. New in vitro
`fluorimetric microtitration assays for toxicological screening of
`drugs. Cell Biol Toxicol. 1994;10:329-337.
`20. Borenfreund E, Puerner J. A simple quantitative procedure using
`monolayer cultures for cytotoxicity assay (HTD/NR-90). Methods
`Cell Sci. 1985;9:7—9.
`21. Larson EM, Doughman DJ, Gregerson DS, Obritsch WF. A new,
`simple, nonradioactive, nontoxic in vitro assay to monitor corneal
`endothelial cell viability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:
`1 929 -1 933.
`22. de Fries R, Mitsuhashi M. Quantification of mitogen induced hu-
`man lymphocyte proliferation: comparison of Alamar blue assay
`to 3H-thymidine incorporation assay. ] Clin Lab Anal. 1995;9:89 —
`95.
`23. Brubacher JL, Bols NC. Chemically de-acetylated 2',7'-dichlorodi-
`hydrofluorescein diacetate as a probe of respiratory burst activity
`in mononuclear phagocytes. ] Immunol Methods. 2001;251:81-
`91.
`24. Debbasch C, Brignole F, Pisella P], Wamet JM, Rat P, Baudo11in C.
`Quaternary ammoniums and other preservatives’ contribution in
`oxidative stress and apoptosis on Chang conjunctival cells. Invest
`Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:642-652.
`
`6
`
`

`
`5006
`
`Said et al.
`
`IOVS, November 2007, Vol. 48, No. 11
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`Christon RA. Mechanisms of action of dietary fatty acids in regu-
`lating the activation of vascular endothelial cells during atherogen-
`esis. Nutr Rev. 2003;61:272-279.
`Linard A, Macaire J, Christon R. Phospholipid hydroperoxide glu-
`tathione peroxidase activity and vitamin E level in the liver micro-
`somal membrane: effects of age and dietary alpha-linolenic acid
`deficiency. ] Nutr Biochem. 2001 ;12:481 - 491.
`Draize JH, Woodard G, Calvery HO. Method for the study of
`irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin
`and mucous membranes. ] Pharmacol Exp Tber. 1944;82:377-
`390.
`Dunnett C. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing sev-
`eral treatments with a control. ] Am Stat Assoc. 1955;50:1096-
`1 12 1 .
`
`Dunnett C. New tables for multiple comparison with a control.
`Biometrics. 1964;20:782-791,782-791.
`Dutot M, Pouzaud F, Larosche I, Brignole-Baudo11in F, Wamet JM,
`Rat P. Fluoroquinolone eye drop-induced cytotoxicity: role of
`preservative in P2X7 cell death receptor activation and apoptosis.
`Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2812-2819.
`Acheampong AA, Shackleton M, Tang-Liu DD, Ding S, Stern ME,
`Decker R. Distribution of cyclosporin A in ocular tissues after
`topical administration to albino rabbits and beagle dogs. Curr Eye
`Res. 1999;18:91—103.
`Nourry H, Perrot S, Martin C, et al. Cytotoxicity evaluation of
`different eyes drops with cyclosporine oral solution (Sandimmun)
`(in French).]Fr Ophtalmol. 2006;29:251-257.
`Munsterman AS, Bertone AL, Zachos TA, Weisbrode SE. Effects of
`the omega-3 fatty acid, alpha-linolenic acid, on lipopolysaccharide-
`challenged synovial explants from horses. Am] Vet Res. 2005;66:
`1 503 — 1 508.
`
`34.
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`37.
`
`38.
`
`39.
`
`40.
`
`41.
`
`42.
`
`Kulkarni PS, Rodriguez AV, Srinivasan BD. Human anterior uvea
`synthesizes lipoxygenase products from arachidonic acid. Invest
`Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984;25:221-223.
`Woodward DF, Nieves AL, Hawley SB, Joseph R, Merlino GF, Spada
`CS. The pruritogenic and inflammatory effects of prostanoids in
`the conjunctiva. ] Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 1995;11:339-347.
`Kulkarni PS, Fleisher L, Srinivasan BD. The synthesis of cyclooxy-
`genase products in ocular tissues of various species. Curr Eye Res.
`1984;3:447- 452.
`Solomon A, Dursun D, Liu Z, Xie Y, Macri A, Pflugfelder SC. Pro-
`and anti-inflan1matory forms of interleukin-1 in the tear fluid and
`conjunctiva of patients with dry-eye disease. Invest Ophtlaalmol
`Vis Sci. 2001;42:2283-2292.
`Palombo JD, DeMichele SJ, Lydon E, Bistrian BR. Cyclic vs contin-
`uous enteral feeding with omega-3 and gamma-linolenic fatty
`acids: effects on modulation of phospholipid fatty acids in rat lung
`and liver immune cells. ]PEN] Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1997;21:
`123-132.
`Nieves D, Moreno JJ. Effect of arachidonic and eicosapentaenoic
`acid metabolism on RAW 264.7 macrophage proliferation. ] Cell
`Pbysiol. 2006;208:428 - 434.
`Chiang N, Serhan CN. Cell-cell interaction in the transcellular
`biosynthesis of novel omega-3-derived lipid mediators. Methods
`Mol Biol. 2006;341:227-250.
`SanGiovanni JP, Chew EY. The role of omega-3 long-chain polyun-
`saturated fatty acids in health and disease of the retina. Prog
`Retinal Eye Res. 2005;24:87-138.
`Scheel-Toellner D, Wang K, Singh R, et al. The death-inducing
`signalling complex is recruited to lipid rafts in Fas-induced apo-
`ptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;297:876-879.
`
`7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket