throbber
UNITED STA IBS p A IBNT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STA TES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria., Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`FILING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`CONFIRMATION NO.
`
`11/467,073
`
`08/24/2006
`
`Michael Tasler
`
`0757/97866
`
`3012
`
`05/01/2008
`
`24628
`7590
`WELSH & KATZ, LTD
`120 S RIVERSIDE PLAZA
`22NDFLOOR
`CHICAGO, IL 60606
`
`EXAMINER
`
`LEE, CHUN KUAN
`
`ART UNIT
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`2181
`
`MAIL DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`05/01/2008
`
`PAPER
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2006 - p. 1
`
`

`
`Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary
`
`Application No.
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`11/467,073
`
`Examiner
`
`Chun-Kuan Lee
`
`TASLER, MICHAEL
`
`Art Unit
`
`2181
`
`All Participants:
`
`Status of Application: __
`
`(1) Alford Kindred (SPE).
`
`(3) Jeffrey Salmon (Reg. # 37.435).
`
`(2) Chun-Kuan Lee (Examiner).
`
`Date of Interview: March 04. 2008
`
`Type of Interview:
`1:8:1 Telephonic
`D Video Conference
`D Personal (Copy given to: D Applicant
`Exhibit Shown or Demonstrated: D Yes
`If Yes, provide a brief description:
`
`(4) __ .
`
`Time:
`
`D Applicant's representative)
`1:8:1 No
`
`Part I.
`
`Rejection(s) discussed:
`NIA
`
`Claims discussed:
`NIA
`
`Prior art documents discussed:
`NIA
`
`Part II.
`
`SUBSTANCE OF INTERVIEW DESCRIBING THE GENERAL NATURE OF WHAT WAS DISCUSSED:
`See Continuation Sheet
`
`Part Ill.
`D It is not necessary for applicant to provide a separate record of the substance of the interview, since the interview
`directly resulted in the allowance of the application. The examiner will provide a written summary of the substance
`of the interview in the Notice of Allowability.
`D It is not necessary for applicant to provide a separate record of the substance of the interview, since the interview
`did not result in resolution of all issues. A brief summary by the examiner appears in Part II above.
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-4138 (04-03)
`
`Examiner Initiated Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20080312
`
`(Applicant/ Applicant's Representative Signature - if appropriate)
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2006 - p. 2
`
`

`
`Continuation Sheet (PTOL-4138)
`
`Application No. 11/467,073
`
`Continuation of Substance of Interview including description of the general nature of what was discussed: The
`attorney assisted the examiners in gaining a better understanding of the novelty for the instant claimed invention by
`providing a real world example; such as a digital camera (i.e. ADGPD) having a unidirectional sensor for taking
`pictures, wherein upon the connection of the digital camera to a computer, an automatic configuring by automatic
`selecting a corresponding driver to establish communication between the digital camera and the computer would be
`implemented without any loading of the driver; in summary, the novelty of the instant invention is the automatic
`detection of the connected peripheral device and selection of the corresponding driver to establish communication with
`the peripheral device without any user loading of the driver on the computer.
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2006 - p. 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket