`
`PATENT
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Applicant:
`
`Michael Tasler
`
`Filed:
`
`September 27, 2010
`
`For: ANALOG DATA GENERATING AND
`PROCESSING DEVICE FOR USE WITH A
`PERSONAL COMPUTER
`
`Application No.: 12/891,443
`
`Examiner:
`
`na
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Art Group: 2111
`
`Confirmation No.:
`1408
`
`NOTICE UNDERMPEP §1442.04
`REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION
`
`Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
`US Patent and Trademark Office
`PO Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`Sir:
`
`This is a Notice Under MPEP §1442.04 providing the Final Invalidity Contentions
`
`filed by defendants in the ongoing multi-district litigation proceeding styled In Re Papst Licensing
`
`Digital Camera Patent Litigation. An lnfonnation Disclosure Statement, listing the documents
`
`newly cited in the Invalidity Contentions was filed on March 17, 2011.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP
`
`es A. Scheer
`egistration No. 29,434
`
`Date: March 25, 2011
`
`HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP
`120 South Riverside Plaza
`Suite 2200
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`(312) 655-1500
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 1
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07-mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed O 1 /20/11 Page 1 of 202
`
`Exhibit A - Part 1
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 2
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07 -mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed 01 /20/11 Page 2 of 202
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
`
`IN RE P APST LICENSING GMBH & CO.
`KG LITIGATION
`
`This Document Re]ates To:
`
`ALL CASES
`
`Misc. Action No. 07-493 (RMC)
`MDL Docket No. 1880
`
`THE FIRST WA VE CAMERA MANUFACTURERS' FINAL INV ALIDJTY
`CONTENTIONS {CORRECTED)
`
`Pursuant to this Court's Sixth Practice and Procedure Order: Regarding Scheduling
`
`("Procedure Order"), dated September 2, 2010 (Dkt. No. 372), defendants Fujifilm Corporation;
`
`Fujifilm U.S.A., Inc.; Fujifilm Japan; Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd: Victor Company
`
`of Japan, Ltd.; Panasonic Corporation of North America; JVC Company of America; Olympus
`
`Corporation; Olympus Imaging America Inc: Samsung Techwin Co.; Samsung Opto-Electronics
`
`America, Inc.; Nikon Corporation· and Nikon, lnc. (collectively, the "First Wave Camera
`
`Manufacturers", or "Camera Manufacturers") submit the following Final Invalidity Contentions
`
`("Invalidity Contentions") in response to the Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG's Asserted
`
`Claims and Infringement Contentions ("Infringement Contentions") submitted by plaintiff Papst
`
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG ("Papst") on October 13, 2010 (Dkt. No. 379).
`
`The Camera Manufacturers have served these corrected invalidity contentions in response
`
`to Papst's complaints that Pap t did not completely understand the originally filed First Wave
`
`Camera Manufacturers ' Final Invalidity Contention (Dkt. No. 395) ("Final Invalidity
`
`Contentions"). The Camera Manufacturers believe that the Final Invalidity Contentions do
`
`provide sufficient detail and are compl.iant with the Court's Procedure Order, but now serve
`
`these corrected invalidi.ty contentions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) to eliminate certain
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 3
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07 -mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed 01 /20/11 Page 3 of 202
`
`typographical errors and to resolve certain issues raised by Papst. The Camera Manufacturers
`
`have provided Papst with these corrected invalidity contentions pursuant to a:n agreement
`
`reached between counsel of all parties.'
`
`PRELIMINARY STATEMENTS
`
`The Camera Manufacturers base these [nvalidity Contentions on their current knowledge,
`
`understanding, and belief as to the facts and information available as of the date of these
`
`contentions. As explained in The Camera Manufacturers' Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed.
`
`R. Civ. P. J6(t) and 37(b) (Dkt. No. 388), Papst's Infringement Contentions, including Papst's
`
`proposed constructions of claim language, are unintelligible, overly expansive and ignore the
`
`Court's claim constructions2 pursuant to the Modified Order Regarding Claims Construction,
`
`dated November 24, 2009 (Dkt. No. 337) and the associated Memorandum (Dkt. No. 336).
`
`Papst's Inrringement Contentions (which are, at least in part and by Papst's own
`
`admission, based on claim constructions that are inconsistent with the Court's claim
`
`constructions) do not provide the Camera Manufacturers with sufficient infom1ation to
`
`understand the bases for Papst's infringement allegations under the Court's constructions, and
`
`thereby pem1it the Camera Manufacturers to identify all of the prior art that might be
`
`invalidating. This is the subject of the Camera Manufacturers' Motion for Sanctions that is
`
`pending decision by the Court. The Camera Manufacturers have based the e Invalidity
`
`Contentions on the Cou1t' construction of claim terms in addressing relevant prior art -
`
`however, with regard to certain terms that Papst has indicated it will continue to construe
`
`contrary to the Court's construction, the Camera Manufacturers have additionally identified and
`
`charted prior art that would be pertinent under Papst's improper constructions.
`
`1 Pursuant to a telephone call between the Camera Manufacturers aud Papst on December 16, 2010, and continued
`in a letter from Jerold Schnayer to Steven Routh on December J 7, 20] 0.
`
`2 See, e.g., Papst's Infringement Contentions (Diet. No. 379), ("Papst maintains its position ... ", "Papst objects to ... ")
`pp.6 17 19 20, 21 , 36,40 41 42, 46, 47 48 50 71 , 75, 77.
`
`2
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 4
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07-mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed O 1 /20/11 Page 4 of 202
`
`In particular, Papst's Infringement Contentions ignore or distort the Court's constructions
`
`of the claim limitations "interface device" (which, properly construed, must be "stand-alone")
`
`and "second connecting device" (which, properly construed, must pem1it a user "readily to attach
`
`and detach" the interface device with a plurality of dissimilar data transmit/receive devices).
`
`Accordingly, if Papst prevails on its distorted view of the proper constructions of those claim
`
`limitations, then the Camera Manufacturers offer the cited references as showing that the prior
`
`art contained those limitations. Additionally, aside and apart from those two limitations, the
`
`cited references show that the other limitations of the asserted claims were present in the prior art
`
`to support invalidating obviousness contentions and combinations under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
`
`To the extent Papst's Infringement Contentions are understandable, certain of these
`
`Invalidity Contentions are based on Papst's constructions regarding claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 14
`
`and 15 ofU.S. Patent No. 6,470,399 ("the '399 Patent"), claims l, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17
`
`and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,895,449 ("the '449 Patent"), and Papst's application of those
`
`constructions to the accused products. Papst did not provide any contentions suggesting that the
`
`Camera Manufacturers infringe other claims of these patents or any other patent. Consequently,
`
`in reliance thereon, the Camera Manufacturers have not separately addressed the other claims in
`
`the '399 and ' 449 Patents (the "Patents-in-Suit" or "Asserted Patents").
`
`In addition, the Camera Manufacturers have not received all of the documents that may
`
`be relevant to their Invalidity Contentions. Further relevant material may be revealed during
`
`discovery. The Camera Manufacturers also have not had the opportunity to complete the
`
`deposition of the named inventor of the '399 and ' 449 Patents and/or other persons having
`
`potentially relevant information.
`
`Further, the Camera Manufacturers have had little or no discovery concerning the alleged
`
`conception and reduction to practice by the named inventor of the subject matter of the asserted
`
`patents. Accordingly, the Camera Manufacturers do not presently have a basis for assessing the
`
`date(s) to which Papst might be entitled as an earliest conception date or the named inventor's
`
`diligence, if any, through reduction to practice. The Camera Manufacturers may seek documents
`
`3
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 5
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07-mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed O 1 /20/11 Page 5 of 202
`
`from third parties in discovery that establish earlier dates of conception and reduction to practice,
`
`as appropriate, in order to demonstrate such third parties' earlier dates of invention under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 102(g). Moreover, Papst's Infringement Contentions do not identify the priority date to
`
`which each asserted claim allegedly is entitled as required by the Procedure Order. Lacking any
`
`such identification (or analysis showing the '399 and ' 449 Patents are entitled to any earlier
`
`priority date), the Camera Manufacturers presume, for purposes of invalidity, that the respective
`
`U.S. application filing dates serve as the relevant dates.
`
`In the claim charts accompanying these Invalidity Contentions, the Camera
`
`Manufacturers identify specific portions of prior art references that disclose the elements of the
`
`asserted claims. Although the Camera Manufacturers have attempted to identify at least one
`
`citation per element for each reference, each and every disclosure of the same element in the
`
`reference is not necessarily identified. The lack of a citation for an element should not be deemed
`
`an admission that the element is not disclosed or is not inherent in the reference. In an effort to
`
`focus the issues, the Camera Manufacturers identify only exemplary portions of cited references.
`
`It should be recognized that persons of ordinary skill in the art generally read a prior art
`
`reference as a whole and in the context of other publications and literature. To understand and
`
`interpret any specific statement or disclosure within a prior art reference, such persons would
`
`rely on other information within the reference, along with other publications and their general
`
`scientific or engineering knowledge.
`
`The Camera Manufacturers consequently may rely upon other portions of the prior art
`
`references and on other publications and expert testimony to provide context, as aids to
`
`understanding and interpreting the portions that are identified, or to establish that a person of
`
`ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to modify or combine certain of the cited
`
`references so as to render the claims obvious.
`
`Certain limitations in the asserted claims may be disclosed in the prior art by the
`
`disclosure of certain characteristics. By way of example only, a disclosure of interface
`
`communication using only standard protocols ( e.g., the SCSI protocol) may also constitute a
`
`4
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 6
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07-mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed O 1 /20/11 Page 6 of 202
`
`disclosure of using only the standard communication drivers for that protocol. Nothing contained
`
`in these Invalidity Contentions or any accompanying exhibits or claim charts should be
`
`understood or deemed to be an express or implied admission or contention with respect to any
`
`correlation between the limitations of the asserted claims and other characteristics of the subject
`
`matter in the prior art references.
`
`Where the Camera Manufacturers identify a particular figure in a prior art reference, the
`
`identification should be understood to encompass the caption and description of the figure and
`
`any text relating to the figure in addition to the figure itself. Similarly, where an identified
`
`portion of text refers to a figure, the identification should be understood to include the figure.
`
`IDENTIFICATION OF EACH ITEM OF PRIOR ART
`
`The Court's Procedure Order (p. 3, 3(a)) requires the Camera Manufacturers to identify
`
`each item of prior art that allegedly anticipates each asserted claim or renders it obvious.
`
`Below are tables identifying the individual items of prior art that the Camera
`
`Manufacturers assert anticipate and/or render obvious each of the asserted claims of the '399 and
`
`'449 Patents providing the information requested by the Court's Procedure Order. For the sake of
`
`convenience, each prior art reference has been provided a unique identifier beginning with the
`
`letter "A", which may be subsequently utilized as shorthand for a particular reference as well as
`
`the Exhibit number for the associated claim chart.
`
`The prior art is identified in separate tables below according to the type of prior art:
`
`• Table I: United States Patent Prior Art;
`
`• Table II: Foreign Patent Prior Art;
`
`• Table III: Non-Patent References; and
`
`• Table IV: Prior Art Products.
`
`5
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 7
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07 -mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed 01 /20/11 Page 7 of 202
`
`4,901 ,275
`
`5,297.124
`
`5 430,855
`
`5,440,699
`
`5,463 ,772
`
`5,479,206
`
`5,493 ,335
`
`5,499,378
`
`5,506,692
`
`5,508,82 1
`
`5,532,825
`
`5,539,535
`
`Table I: United States Patent Prior Art
`
`tlUMi Uit¥Mfr !~!!~~!!~~!!~~!!~~!!~~!!~~!!~~!!~~!!~~!!~~!!~~!!~~!!~~!!~~!!~~!!~~!:
`• r:IM~iil~ij~~·••
`Jtitt)
`f ij'1:rnr~ r •••••tJij#fVijN••rr•••
`
`Hardie et al.
`
`9/4/1987
`
`2/13/1990
`
`I 02(b)
`
`A l
`
`Plotkin et al.
`
`4/24/1992
`
`3/22/1994
`
`102(b)
`
`Walsh
`
`2/6/l99 l ;
`8/31/ 1994
`
`7/4/ 1995
`
`102(b)
`
`A2
`
`A3
`
`Analog Data Acquisition
`Apparatus and Method
`Provided With Electro-
`Optical Csolation
`
`Tape Drive Emulation
`System for a Disk Drive
`
`Disk Drive Array
`Memory System Using
`Nommifrom Disk Drives
`
`System by which a remote Farrand et
`computer receives screen
`al.
`images from and transmits
`commands to a host
`computer
`
`Transparent peripheral file Thompson et
`systems with on-board
`al.
`compression,
`decompression , and space
`management
`
`7/24/l 99 l
`
`8/8/ 1995
`
`102 (b)
`
`A4
`
`4/23/l 993
`
`10/31/1995
`
`102 (b)
`
`AS / A68
`
`[magi ng System
`Electron.ic amera,
`Computer System for
`Controll ing Said
`Electronic Camera, And
`Metbods of 011trolli11g
`Same
`
`ingle Sensor Color
`Camera With User
`Selectable Image Record
`Size
`
`Small Computer System
`Emulator for Non-local
`SCSI Devices
`
`[mage Handling
`Apparatus Having File
`System Emulation Means
`
`Ueno, et al.
`
`2/2/1993
`
`12/26/ 1995
`
`I 02(b)
`
`A6
`
`Paru.lski, et
`al.
`
`6/30/ 1993
`
`2/20/ 1996
`
`I 02(b)
`
`A?
`
`McNeill
`
`6/21/1994
`
`3/12/1996
`
`102(b)
`
`AS
`
`Murata
`
`6/14/ 1994
`
`4/9/ 1996
`
`I 02(b)
`
`A9
`
`[mage Sca1mer and [mage Mw11ta
`Fanning Apparatus Witb
`An foteri'ace for
`Connection With an
`External Computer
`
`3/23/ 1993
`
`4/16/1996
`
`I 02(b)
`
`AIO
`
`Add-On Scanner for
`Existing Ink Jet Printer
`
`Portable Electronic Still
`Camera Recording
`Optical [mages of
`Subjects in a Memory
`Which Facilitates
`
`Lim et al.
`
`8/30/ 1993
`
`7/2/ 1996
`
`I 02(b)
`
`Aizawa, et
`al.
`
`3/22/ 1994
`
`7/23/1996
`
`I 02(b)
`
`A 12
`
`Al3
`
`6
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 8
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07 -mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed 01 /20/11 Page 8 of 202
`
`5,548,782
`
`5,692,159
`
`5,724, 155
`(JP 7-
`202982)
`
`5,576,757
`
`5,754,227
`
`ftlmiP#i(~fC :,:,:.:,:.:,:.:,:.:,:.:,:.:,:.:,:.·.·.·.· ·.· ··
`lJUM> •••• J":ijij!ij@cJMtffifl
`•••
`tffo.f mtK >
`fiijtep~ij r . .. . . . . .. ........... . .......... . .
`••••
`
`............................
`
`5/7/ 1993
`
`8/20/1996
`
`l 02(b)
`
`Al4
`
`Memory Access From an
`External Request
`
`Apparatus for Preventing Michael et
`Transferring of Data Witb
`al.
`Peripheral Device for
`Period of Time lu
`Response to Collllection
`or DiscoL1necling of the
`Device with the
`Apparatus
`
`Configurable digital
`signal interface i1sing field
`programmable gate array
`to reformat data
`
`Shand
`
`5119/1995
`
`11/25/1997
`
`102(e)
`
`Al5
`
`Electronic imaging system Sai to
`
`12/30/1994
`
`3/3/ 1998
`
`102(b) (JP
`counterparts)
`
`All
`
`Roberts, et
`al.
`
`1/20/ 1990
`(parent)
`
`1/19/1996
`
`l 02(b)
`(parent)
`
`A84
`
`Fukuoka
`
`9/28/1995
`
`3/19/1998
`
`J 02(e)
`
`Al6
`
`Electronjc Still Video
`Camern with Direct
`Persona l Computer (P
`Compatible Digital
`Fonnal Output
`
`Digital Electronic Camera
`Having au External
`lnpul/Outpul lntertace
`Through Wlticb The
`Camera is Mouitored and
`Controlled
`
`5,802 325
`
`Mas. Memory Card with
`[npul/Output Function
`
`Le Roux
`
`3/20/ 1995
`
`PCT Pub.
`01 /20/1994·
`Issue 9/ I 11998
`
`I 02(b)
`
`Al7
`
`5,806,072
`
`5,812,879
`
`5,815,205
`
`5,841 ,471
`
`Kuba el al
`
`12/21/1992
`
`9/8/ 1998
`
`l 02(e)
`
`Al8
`
`Moro
`
`4/ [9/ 1993
`
`9/22/ 1998
`
`l 02(e)
`
`Al9
`
`Electronjc [maging
`Apparatus Having
`Hierarchical Image Data
`Storage Structure for
`Computer Compatible
`Image Data Mallagement
`
`External Multi.pie
`Periphera l I11te1face Lo
`Computer Serial Port
`Using l11dividually
`Configmed Parallel Port
`Tenni na]s
`
`External Communication
`[nterace for a Digital
`am era
`
`Hashlmoto,
`et al.
`
`Ti.ming Control for a
`Digitally Interfaced
`Camera Using Vari.able
`Line Readout Cntervals
`
`Endsley el
`al.
`
`2/21 / 1996
`
`9/29/1998
`
`102(e)
`
`A2I
`
`9/12/1996
`
`l l/24/ 1998
`
`l02(e)
`
`A22
`
`7
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 9
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07 -mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed 01 /20/11 Page 9 of 202
`
`............................
`
`ftlmiP#i(~fC :,:,:.:,:.:,:.:,:.:,:.:,:.:,:.:,:.·.·.·.· ·.· ··
`lJUM> •••• J":ijij!ij@cJMtffifl
`•••
`tffo.f mtK >
`fiijtep~ij r . .. . . . . .. ........... . .......... . .
`••••
`102(e)
`12/1/1998
`7/26/1996
`7/26/1995
`
`Xu
`
`6/J 4/1996
`
`12/8/199
`
`l 02(e)
`
`A23
`
`A24
`
`System and Method for
`Accessing Date of a
`Digital Camera from a
`Personal Computer
`
`Method and Apparat11s for Pamlsk.i et
`Generating a omposite
`al.
`Image Using the
`Difference ofTwo Images
`
`8/30/1996
`
`6/22/1999
`
`I 02(e)
`
`A25
`
`Method and System for
`Operating a Scanner
`Which E1mllates a Disk
`Drive
`
`Ard
`
`/20/1997
`
`6/22/ 1999
`
`I 02(e)
`
`A26
`
`Bus Ln terface for TDE
`Device
`
`Harttmg, el
`al.
`
`11/ 18/1996
`6/4/ 1996
`
`7/6/ 1999
`
`l 02(e)
`
`Nooneu et
`al.
`
`9/6/1996
`
`7/20/1999
`
`102(e)
`
`Jones, et al.
`
`l 1/ 18/ 1997
`
`7/27/J 999
`
`102(e)
`
`Hsieh
`
`9/4/ 1996
`
`10/19/1999
`
`102(e)
`
`A27
`
`A28
`
`A29
`
`AJO
`
`York
`
`3/1/1996
`
`10/26/1999
`
`102(e)
`
`A31 I A65
`
`Okada et al.
`
`Endsley, et
`al.
`
`11/23/1999
`
`I02(e)
`
`A32
`
`I 0/22/1997
`Continuation
`of app I ication
`filed 1/31/94
`
`9/ 12/1996
`
`12/21 / 1999
`
`I 02(e)
`
`A33
`
`omer
`
`12/2/1997
`
`6/27/2000
`
`l 02(e)
`
`A34
`
`5,848,420
`
`5,914,748
`
`5,915, 106
`
`5,920,709
`
`5,926,208
`
`5,928,347
`
`5,969 750
`
`5,974,16 1
`
`5,99 1,530
`
`6,005,613
`
`6.081 856
`
`Video Compression and
`Decompession
`Arrangement Having
`Reconfigurable amera
`and Low-Bandwidth
`Transmission Capability
`
`Universal Memory Card
`Interface Apparatus
`
`Moving picture camera
`with universal serial bus
`interface
`
`Detachable card for
`capturing graphics
`
`[nterface device
`receivable in card storage
`device slot of host
`computer
`
`Multi-mode Digital
`Camera with Computer
`[nte1face Using Data
`Packets ombiniug [mage
`and Mode Data
`
`Adapter and method for
`emulating the operation of
`a peripheral device ofa
`computer
`
`6,088,532
`
`Image Signal Reading
`Operation ontrol Device
`
`Yamamoto
`et al.
`
`l 2/29/ 1995
`
`l 02(b)
`
`A35
`
`7/l l /2000 (JP
`counterparl~
`were published
`on July 23,
`l996)
`
`6,098,116
`
`Process control system
`including a method and
`a aratus for
`
`Nix.on et al.
`
`4/ 12/ 1996
`
`8/1 /2000
`
`I 02(e)
`
`A36
`
`8
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 10
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07 -mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed 01 /20/11 Page 10 of 202
`
`ftlmiP#i(~fC :,:,:.:,:.:,:.:,:.:,:.:,:.:,:.:,:.·.·.·.· ·.· ··
`lJUM> •••• J":ijij!ij@cJMtffifl
`•••
`tffo.f mtK >
`fiijtep~ij r . .. . . . . .. ........... . .......... . .
`••••
`
`............................
`
`Hashimoto
`et al.
`
`2/2 l/1996
`
`8/29/2000
`
`I02(e)
`
`AJ7
`
`Hashimoto.
`et al.
`
`2/21/1996
`4/ I0/2000t
`
`Hashimoto, Wl/1996
`et al.
`1/6/2002t
`
`2/5/2002
`
`I 02(e)
`
`AJ7
`
`3/16/2006
`
`I 02(e)
`
`A37
`
`automatically sensing the
`connection of devi.ces to a
`network
`
`Digital Camera which
`Detects a Connection to
`an External Device
`
`Digital Camera whi.ch
`Detects a Connection to
`an External Device
`
`Digital Camera with
`External Connection
`Detection and Mode
`Switching Capabilities
`
`Method and apparatus for
`parallel port
`interconnection
`
`Schuman et
`al.
`
`1/22/1997
`
`1/30/200 l
`
`I 02(e)
`
`AJ8
`
`Electronic apparan1s and
`method for discriminating
`whether a first or second
`card is attached thereto
`
`Taguchi
`
`9/1 6/1994
`
`10/2/2001
`
`I02(e)
`
`A39
`
`Wayama, et
`al.
`
`2/22/ 1985
`
`1/23/1990
`
`J 02(b)
`
`A71
`
`5,917 545
`
`Electronic Still
`Camera That
`CaJJ Be Directly
`Inserted In An
`Externa l Device
`
`Kowno, et
`al.
`
`8/27/1996
`
`6/29/1999
`
`J02(e)
`
`A80
`
`9
`
`6, 111.604
`
`6,344,875
`
`7,046,276
`
`6, 182, 145
`
`6.298,388
`
`5,854,945
`
`5,663 ,90 I
`
`5,570,146
`
`5 29 1,584
`
`5,226, 168
`
`4.896,262
`
`Bar Code Scanner with
`Keyboard Simulation
`
`Criscito, et
`al.
`
`Computer Memory Cards Wallace, el
`Us ing Flash EEPROM
`al.
`fntegrated CircLLit Chips
`a nd Memory- ontroller
`System
`
`J /21 /1997
`
`12/29/1 998
`
`9/12/1995
`
`9/2/ 1997
`
`I02(a) /
`J 02(e)
`
`I 02(a) /
`J 02(e)
`
`Collette
`
`5/3 l/1994
`
`10/29/1 996
`
`J02(b)
`
`ha Ila, et al.
`
`7/23/ 1991
`
`3/ 1/1 994
`
`I02(b)
`
`Kobayashi,
`et al.
`
`4/24/ 1990
`
`7/6/1 993
`
`J 02(b)
`
`A63
`
`A66
`
`A67
`
`A69
`
`A70
`
`Digital Image Recording
`Device
`
`Methods and Apparatus
`for Hard Disk Emulation
`
`Semiconductor Memory
`Configured to Emulate
`Floppy and Hard Disk
`Magnetic Storage Based
`Upon a Oetennined
`Storage apacity of the
`Semiconductor Memory
`
`Emulation Device for
`Converting Magnetic Disc
`Memoiy Mode Sig1Jal
`from Computer into
`Semiconductor Memory
`Access Mode Signal for
`Semiconductor Memory
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 11
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07 -mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed 01 /20/11 Page 11 of 202
`
`ftlmiP#i(~fC
`/·····
`lffUM > •••• •H":ijij!ij@cJMtNm•
`•••
`iidfo~ij r •••• • fijUiwmrnr•
`•••
`9/27/1995
`
`12/30/2003
`
`I 02(e)
`
`A85
`
`Letwin
`
`9/29/ 1989
`
`12/6/ 1994
`
`I 02(b)
`
`Dean
`
`3/30/1990
`
`7/7/1992
`
`J02(e)
`
`A86
`
`A87
`
`A88
`
`AIOO
`
`fmage sensing apparatus
`including a card device
`connectable to an
`information processing
`device
`
`High Perfonnaoce Fi le
`System
`
`Broadcast Digital Sound
`Processing System
`
`5,371 ,885
`
`5, 129,036
`
`5,475441
`
`5,402.170
`
`5,742 934
`
`Electronic amera with
`Memory Card Cnterface to
`a omputer
`
`Hand-Manipulated
`Electronic camera
`Tetbered to a Personal
`omputer
`
`Flasb So lid State Disk
`Card with Selective Use
`of Au Address
`Conversion Table
`Depending on Logical and
`Physical Sector Numbers
`
`5,23 1,50 1
`
`Still Video Apparntus
`
`Sakai
`
`5/22/ 1990
`
`7/27/1993
`
`12/10/ 1992
`
`12/12/ 1995
`
`I 02(b)
`
`I 02(b)
`
`Pamlski et
`al.
`
`Pamlski et
`al.
`
`J 2/ll/1991
`
`3/28/1995
`
`102(b)
`
`Al03
`
`Shinohara
`
`9/ 13/1995
`
`4/21/1998
`
`J 02(b)
`
`AI04
`
`Table 11: Foreign Patent Prior Art
`
`JP 02-051727
`
`JP 04-309156
`
`JP 06-08391 7
`
`JP 08-130702
`
`JP 08-328990
`
`JP 08-223341
`
`JP 07-177406
`
`Etlropean Pat. App.
`0705037A2
`
`Kiyotaka Oucbi et al.
`
`Yasutada Kashiwagi
`
`Koji Kajita
`
`Satomi Tanaka et al.
`
`2/2 1/ 1990
`
`10/30/ 1992
`
`3/25/1994
`
`5/21 /I 996
`
`Tadashi Uewaki, et. al.
`
`12/ 13/ 1996
`
`Izumi Miyake
`
`ll irokazu Hisayoshi
`
`Yukuo et al. (Canon)
`
`8/30/ 1996
`
`7/14/1995
`
`3/4/ 1996
`
`102(b)
`
`I 02(b)
`
`102(b)
`
`102(b)
`
`I 02(b)
`
`102(b)
`
`I 02(b)
`
`I 02(b)
`
`A43
`
`A44
`
`A41
`
`A40
`
`A42
`
`A45
`
`A46
`
`A89
`
`10
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 12
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07 -mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed 01 /20/11 Page 12 of 202
`
`Table ill: Non-Patent References
`
`Design and Construction of a Tasler
`Universal Data Acquisition and
`Control System for Scallllillg
`Probe Mi -roscopy
`
`051 196 (more than one
`year before
`the
`'399
`effective U.S. filing date,
`03/03/98)
`
`PC-based Data Acquisition in Steve Martin
`an [ndustrial Environment
`
`Data Disasters: What Not To Michael Lang
`Do
`
`Designing Control Uni ts That Richard Keele
`Interface Peripherals to the IBM
`[10 Cba,mel
`
`The SCSI Bus
`[nterface Book
`
`and
`
`IDE Friedhelm
`Schmidt
`
`" Device Class Defiuition for
`Human
`Interface
`Devices
`(HID)" version 1.0 - Final
`
`"July 1996 Apple article on
`SCS [ drivers"
`
`"Derived Virtual Devices: A
`Secure Distributed File System
`Mechanism"
`
`1990
`
`Dec-93
`
`1/31 / 1989
`
`(Gennan
`6117/1995
`version publisbed as early
`as 1993 - need
`to get
`copy)
`
`6/21/1997 (A draft of this
`specification
`was
`published m 1996. We
`are now trying to obtain a
`copy of the pub I ished
`draft.)
`
`7/3/ 1996
`
`9/17/1996
`
`102(b)
`
`I02(b)
`
`I02(b)
`
`102(b)
`
`I02(b)
`
`l02(b)
`
`I02(b)
`
`102(b)
`
`32MByte High Performance Unno, et al.
`Solid State Disk
`
`Nikon Digital Camera El 00 Nikon
`User's Manual
`
`April 1996
`
`102(a) / l02(b)
`
`11/1/1996
`
`102(a) / l02(b)
`
`A48
`
`A50
`
`A49
`
`A51
`
`A47
`
`A52
`
`A53
`
`A54
`
`A72
`
`A64
`
`Sandisk
`(www.sandisk.com)
`
`Website SanDisk
`
`least as early as
`At
`November 14, 1996
`
`I02(a) / l02(b)
`
`A78 / A79
`
`October 1992
`
`102(a) / I 02(b)
`
`A73
`
`A90
`
`A91
`
`A92
`
`Shippable Digital
`Program
`TRI/+
`Products Catalog - DeskLab
`Equipment Corp.I
`Gradient
`Technology, Inc.
`
`Desklab 2 16 User Manual
`
`Gradient
`Technology, lnc.
`
`At least as early as 1992
`
`102(a) / J02(b)
`
`DASM-FGM Brochu.re
`
`Analogic Corp.
`
`1992
`
`V.M. Bove. et al.
`
`Apr-95
`
`Cheops: A Reconfigurable
`Data-Flow System for Video
`Processing, V. M. Bove, Jr., J.
`A. Watlington, IEEE Trans.
`Circ. Sys. Video Tech. Vol.5,
`No. 2, April 1995, p.140-149
`
`I02(a) / l02(b)
`
`102(b)
`
`1 1
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 13
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07 -mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed 01 /20/11 Page 13 of 202
`
`" Real-Time Marcus R. YouJJg.
`Reference:
`Visualization
`of
`Cardiac
`et al.,
`Arrhythmias," by Marcus R.
`Yow1g, et al., IEEE, published
`1992. 0-7803-0785 -2/92$03.00
`OIEEE, pages 1244-1245.
`
`1992
`
`l02(b)
`
`A94
`
`IEEE
`
`18-May-93
`
`102(b)
`
`A95
`
`''Real-time Data
`Reference:
`Acquisition within a Standard
`UNIX Environment," published
`May 18, 1993, appearing in
`[nSlnLmentation
`and
`Measurement
`Technology
`onference, 1993,
`IMTC/93,
`IEEE,
`Conference Record,
`CSBN: 0-7803- 1229-5, pages
`687-689.
`
`12-0ct-95
`
`102(b)
`
`A96
`
`"Vision Systems for Quality Pattl K. Gallagher
`ontrol," by Paul K. Gallagl1er,
`#
`ISBN
`0-7803 -2639-3,
`Nortbcon 95. [ EEE Technical
`Applications Conference and
`Workshops Northcon95, pages
`38 1 - 388, issue date: October
`12, 1995.
`
`Advanced MS-DOS (Microsoft Ray Du.ncan
`Press)
`
`1986
`
`S5326 Data Sheet
`
`Microprocessors
`Programmed Logic
`
`Crystal
`Semiconductor
`
`March, 1992
`
`and Kenneth Short
`
`1981
`
`Principles
`omputers
`Equipment
`
`of
`to
`
`lnterfacing Francis
`Medical
`
`Dec. 1990
`
`Kodak D S200 camera user Kodak
`manual
`
`Kodak DC25
`manual
`
`camera user Kodak
`
`Kodak DCSI. DCS 3. DCS 5. Kodak
`Collectively,
`(he
`"D S
`Cameras' camera user manual
`
`1992-93
`
`1996 (upon
`and belief)
`
`1997
`
`102(b)
`
`102(b)
`
`102(b)
`
`102(b)
`
`102(b)
`
`information
`
`102(b)
`
`102(b)
`
`A97
`
`A98
`
`A99
`
`SeeB7
`
`A56
`
`A57
`
`ASS
`
`12
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 14
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07 -mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed 01 /20/11 Page 14 of 202
`
`Table IV: Prior Art Products
`
`Casio QV- 10 camera
`
`Before 03/04/96
`
`Kodak DCS200 camera
`
`1992-93
`
`Kodak OC25 camera
`
`Kodak DCS I, DCS 3 DCS 5.
`ollectively, the " DCS
`Cameras"
`
`1996
`
`fal-95
`
`Macintosll Power Book 180 +
`Quadra
`
`1992
`
`HP PhotoSmart C5340
`
`Better Light Company Scanning
`Camera Back (commercial
`. Pat. No.
`emboru ment ofU .
`5,570, 146)
`
`Hewlett-Packard 88396/88395
`SCSI/Para ll el [nterfaces
`("JetLag')
`
`Nikon EI 00 CooiPix Camera
`
`3/ 17/1997
`
`1994
`
`At least as early as
`1987
`
`Al least as early as
`January 1997
`
`OKI 32 Mbyte PCMCIA ATA
`SS D Card
`
`At least as early as
`April 1996
`
`I 02(b)
`
`I 02(b)
`
`I 02(b)
`
`l02(b)
`
`l02(a)
`
`I 02(b)
`
`A56
`
`A57
`
`A58
`
`A59
`
`A62
`
`A67
`
`l02(b)
`
`A83
`
`l02(a) / 102(b)
`
`A64
`
`l02(a) I 102(b)
`
`A72
`
`Polaroid PDC 2000 Camera
`
`Al least as early as
`1996
`
`102(a) I l02(b)
`
`A77
`
`SanDisk FlashDisk series and
`CompactF!asll series
`
`At least as early as
`1994
`
`l02(a) / 102(b)
`
`A78
`
`SanDisk FlashDrive series
`
`DeskLab 2 16
`
`Analogic Corp. DASM-AD 14
`
`Universal Laboratory Interface
`(UL()
`
`Al least as early as
`1995
`
`Al least as ea rl y as
`1992
`
`At least as early as
`1992
`
`I 02(a) / 102(b)
`
`A79
`
`I 02(a) / I 02(b)
`
`AIOI
`
`102(a) / 102(b)
`
`A8 1
`
`First sold 1995
`
`l02(b)
`
`Al02
`
`For the prior art products, the Camera Manufacturer have identified the dates on which
`
`such products were sold, on sale or used in the U.S. based on their current knowledge. See Table
`
`JV and Ex. 'A.' In addition, for the Nikon ElOO Coo!Pix Camera, invoices, including
`
`infom1ation regarding purchasers and shipping dates have been produced to Papst. See NIKON(cid:173)
`
`p K0000201 26 - NJKON-P K000020135. Further information regarding sale, offer for sale and
`
`13
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 15
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07 -mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed 01 /20/11 Page 15 of 202
`
`use dates for the prior art products will be sought by the Camera Manufacturers during
`
`discovery, as outlined in the discovery plan for invalidity to be filed by the Camera
`
`Manufacturers in accordance with the Court's Sixth Practice and Procedure Order.
`
`Concurrent with the service of these Invalidity Contentions, the Camera Manufactur rs
`
`coll ctively will produce to Papst all of the items of p1ior art identified above to the extent not
`
`previously produced. To the extent any such item is not in English, the Camera Manufacturers
`
`will produce a certified English translation of the portion(s) relied upon.
`
`IDENTIFICATION OF EACH ITEM OF PRIOR ART
`
`The Court's Procedure Order (p. 3, 3(b)) requires the Camera Manufacturers to indicate
`
`whether each item of prior art anticipates each asserted claim or renders the asserted claim
`
`obvious, and to explain why the prior art renders the asserted claim obvious, including an
`
`identification of any combinations of prior art showing obviousness.
`
`The Summary Invalidity Chart below indicates those references that anticipate various
`
`claims of the Patents-in-Suit under 35 U.S .C. § I 02, and also indicates multiple combinations of
`
`references (obviousness grouping charts Bn) that render various claim of the Patents-in-Suit
`
`obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The Camera Manufacturers have provided individual references
`
`and combinations of references as described below. However, the identification of any particular
`
`combination does not preclude the applicability of other reference and combinations.
`
`Table V: Summary Invalidity Chart
`
`USPN
`5 463,772
`(A5/A68)
`
`USPN
`5,506,692,
`USPN
`5,508 821
`
`• • •
`
`•
`
`• • • •
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`• • • • •
`
`•
`
`• • • • • •
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`14
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 16
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07 -mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed 01 /20/11 Page 16 of 202
`
`f
`
`f
`
`(A9/AJ0)
`
`USPN
`5,802,325
`(A l7)
`
`USPN
`5,806,072
`(A18)
`
`USPN
`5,815,205
`(A21)
`
`USPN
`5,915.106
`(A26)
`
`USPN
`6,005,613
`(A33)
`
`USPN
`6,088,532
`(A35)
`
`USPN
`6,111 ,604
`(A37)
`
`,~~i~~iii
`I 111r
`
`!
`!1 I~ I~
`
`~ ~ i ~
`
`~#~~ i~~i~~
`i ~~ I ill 1l~ ii III
`I
`
`·····~··· ·····~···
`
`·······~·~······
`
`·······~ ······ ·····~···
`
`········~~·······
`
`•
`
`• • • • • •
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`• • • • • •
`
`• • • • • •
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`• •
`
`• • • •
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`• •
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`• • • • • •
`
`• • • • • •
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`SCSC Bus
`Book (A47)
`
`Casio QV- 10
`Camera (ASS)
`
`Kodak
`D S200
`Camera (A56)
`
`KodakDCSl ,
`DCS 3 DCS 5.
`Collectively,
`the "DCS
`Cameras"
`(A58)
`
`Macintosh
`PowerBook
`180 + Quadra
`(A59)
`
`• • • •
`
`•
`
`HP PhotoSman
`C5340 (A62)
`
`• • • • • •
`
`USPN
`5,854 945
`(A63)
`
`Nikon EIOO
`CoolPix
`
`•
`
`• •
`
`•
`
`• • • • • •
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`• • • • • •
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`15
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG - Exhibit 2008, p. 17
`
`
`
`Case 1 :07 -mc-00493-RMC Document 414-2 Filed 01 /20/11 Page 17 of 202
`
`f
`
`f
`
`Camera (A64)
`
`,~~i~~iii
`I 111r
`
`!
`!1 I~ I~
`
`~ ~ i ~
`
`~#~~ i~~i~~
`i ~~ I ill 1l~ ii III
`I
`
`·····~··· ·····~···
`
`·······~·~······
`
`·······~ ······ ·····~···
`
`········~~·······
`
`USPN
`5,663,901
`(A66)
`
`USPN
`5,570, 146
`(A67)
`
`USPN
`5,291,584
`(A69)
`
`USPN
`5,226.168
`(A70)
`
`USPN
`4,896.262
`(A71)
`
`32MByte High
`Performance
`Disk (A72)
`
`TRI/+ Program
`Shippable
`Products
`Catalog -
`DeskLab (A 73)
`
`•
`
`• • • • • •
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`• •
`
`• • •
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`• • • • • •
`
`•
`
`• • • • • •
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`• • • • • •
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`• • • • • •
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`• • • • • •
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`• • •