`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE, INC., HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC.,
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION, MICROSOFT MOBILE OY,
`MICROSOFT MOBILE, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., and ZTE (USA) INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`Case IPR2016-012091
`Patent 7,746,916 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`1 IPR2016-01280 has been consolidated with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2016-01209
`Attorney Docket: 00035-0006IP2
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Scheduling Order (Paper 9),
`
`
`
`Petitioners submit this Request for Oral Argument on all of the instituted grounds of
`
`unpatentability of U.S. Patent No. 7,746,916. Requests for Oral Argument in a
`
`related IPR proceeding (IPR2016-01208) is being filed on this same day.
`
`With regard to this particular proceeding, Petitioners request (without waiving
`
`consideration of any issue not listed below) to address the following issues:
`
`1. Whether claims 1–3, 5–8, and 10 are anticipated by Zhuang175 pursuant to
`
`35 U.S.C. § 102;
`
`2. Whether claims 4 and 9 are obvious over Zhuang175 and Popović pursuant
`
`to 35 U.S.C. § 103;
`
`3. Whether claims 1–3, 5–8, and 10 are obvious over Zhuang175 and Hou
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 103;
`
`4. Whether claims 4 and 9 are obvious over Zhuang175, Hou, and Popović
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 103;
`
`5. Whether claims 6–8 and 10 are obvious over Zhuang175 and Fukuta
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 103;
`
`6. Whether claim 9 is obvious over Zhuang175, Fukuta, and Popović
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 103;
`
`7. Any motions to exclude evidence by Patent Owner; and
`
`8. Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2016-01209
`Attorney Docket: 00035-0006IP2
`9. Any additional issues on which the Board seeks clarification. The Board
`
`has already scheduled Oral Hearing for September 15, 2017. See
`
`Scheduling Order of December 21, 2016, Paper No. 9.
`
`Petitioners also respectfully request the ability to use audio visual equipment
`
`to display demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector and screen that
`
`connects to a laptop computer. Petitioners’ counsel will use a laptop computer with
`
`a VGA-type connector. In addition, Petitioners request that an ELMO-type projector
`
`be made available for use.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: 8-4-17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/ Roberto J. Devoto /
`W. Karl Renner, Reg. No. 41,265
`Roberto J. Devoto, Reg. No. 55,108
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2016-01209
`Attorney Docket: 00035-0006IP2
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR §§ 42.6(e)(1) and 42.6(e)(4)(iii), the undersigned certifies
`
`that on August 4, 2017, a complete and entire copy of this Petitioner’s Request for
`
`Oral Argument was provided via email to the Patent Owner by serving the email
`
`correspondence addresses of record as follows:
`
`
`
`Cyrus A. Morton, Ryan M. Schultz
`Robins Kaplan LLP
`2800 LaSalle Plaza, 800 LaSalle Ave
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`
`CMorton@robinskaplan.com
`RSchultz@robinskaplan.com
` Evolved_RK_Team@robinskaplan.com
`
`Email:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Diana Bradley/
`
`Diana Bradley
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(858) 678-5667
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`