`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE, INC., HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC., MICROSOFT
`CORPORATION, MICROSOFT MOBILE OY, MICROSOFT MOBILE INC.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC., AND ZTE (USA) INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2016-012091
`Patent 7,746,916 B2
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`1 IPR2016-01280 has been consolidated with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01209
`Patent 7,746,916 B2
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70, Patent Owner, Evolved Wireless, LLC,
`
`hereby respectfully requests oral argument. Pursuant to the Scheduling Order
`
`(Paper 9), oral argument is currently scheduled for September 15, 2017.
`
`Evolved Wireless, LLC respectfully requests one hour to address the below-
`
`identified issues and one half hour for rebuttal on any issues for which it
`
`bears the ultimate burden of proof. Patent Owner also requests the ability to
`
`use audio-visual equipment to display demonstrative exhibits, including the
`
`use of a projector and screen for a PowerPoint display. Patent Owner
`
`requests the services of a court reporter to transcribe the proceeding.
`
`Patent Owner states that it anticipates that its Lead Counsel will not
`
`attend the Oral Argument, and that Backup Counsel will make all
`
`arguments for Patent Owner.
`
`Issues to be argued:
`
`
`
`
`
`1.) Whether claims 1–3, 5–8, and 10 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`102 as having been anticipated by Zhuang175;
`
`2.) Whether claims 4 and 9 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
`
`having been obvious over Zhuang175 and Popović;
`
`3.) Whether claims 1–3, 5–8, and 10 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`103 as having been obvious over Zhuang175 and Hou;
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01209
`Patent 7,746,916 B2
`
`
`4.) Whether claims 4 and 9 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
`
`having been obvious over Zhuang175, Hou, and Popović;
`
`5.) Whether claims 6–8 and 10 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103
`
`as having been obvious over Zhuang175 and Fukuta;
`
`6.) Whether claim 9 is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as having
`
`been obvious over Zhuang175, Fukuta, and Popović; and
`
`7.) Any issues raised by Petitioners in any filings contemporaneous with
`
`or subsequent to this request.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: August 4, 2017
`
`For Patent Owner:
`
`
`
`/Ryan M. Schultz/
`Cyrus A. Morton
`cmorton@robinskaplan.com
`Ryan M. Schultz
`rschultz@robinskaplan.com
`Robins Kaplan LLP
`2800 LaSalle Center
`800 LaSalle Ave
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`
`Miles A. Finn
`mfinn@robinskaplan.com
`Robins Kaplan LLP
`399 Park Avenue
`Suite 3600
`New York, NY 10022
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01209
`Patent 7,746,916 B2
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this August 4, 2017, a copy of PATENT OWNER’S
`
`REQUEST FOR ORGAL ARGUMENT has been served in its entirety by
`
`electronic mail to the petitioners:
`
`W. Karl Renner
`renner@fr.com
`Roberto J. Devoto
`devoto@fr.com
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022
`IPR00035-0006IP2@fr.com
`PTABInbound@fr.com
`
`Stephen S. Korniczky
`skorniczky@sheppardmullin.com
`Martin Bader
`mbader@sheppardmullin.com
`Ericka J. Schulz
`eschulz@sheppardmullin.com
`SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER &
`HAMPTON LLP
`12275 El Camino Real, Suite 200
`San Diego, CA 92130
`
`James M. Glass
`jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`John McKee
`johnmckee@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`
`Kevin P.B. Johnson
`kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
`Todd M. Briggs
`toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`555 Twin Dolphin Dr., 5th Floor
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`
`Charles M. McMahon
`cmcmahon@mwe.com
`Hersh H. Mehta
`hmehta@mwe.com
`MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY
`227 W. Monroe
`Chicago, IL 60606
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01209
`Patent 7,746,916 B2
`
`
`Dated: August 4, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Ryan M. Schultz/
`
`Registration No. 65,134
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`5
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
