`571-272-7822
`
`Paper No. 33
`Entered: July 21, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`APPLE INC. and LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FASTVDO LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2016-01203
`Patent 5,850,482
`____________
`
`
`
`Before KARL EASTHOM, JEFFREY S. SMITH, and PATRICK M. BOUCHER,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01203
`Patent 5,850,482
`
`
`
`
`On July 14, 2017, a conference call was held between counsel for the parties
`and Judges Easthom, Boucher, and Smith. Patent Owner provided a court reporter
`and stated that it will file the transcript in due course.
`Patent Owner initiated the conference call to address what it contends are
`new evidence and new arguments raised in Petitioner’s Reply (Paper 30).
`Petitioner opposed, asserting that Petitioner did not make new arguments or
`present new evidence in the Reply.
`The Board denied Patent Owner authorization to file a motion to strike. The
`Board authorizes Patent Owner to raise this issue at the Oral Hearing.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that authorization to file a motion to strike is denied.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01203
`Patent 5,850,482
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`David L. Ferrman
`Martin M. Noonen
`MORRISON & FORERSTER, LLP
`dferman@mofo.com
`mnoonen@mofo.com
`10684-FastVDO-IPR@mofo.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Wayne Helge
`Walter Davis
`DAVIDSON, BERQUIST, JACKSON & GOWDEY, LLP
`whelge@dbjg.com
`wdavis@davidsonberquist.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`