Noonen, Martin
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Reza Mirzaie <rmirzaie@raklaw.com>
`Thursday, June 09, 2016 9:37 PM
`Marando, Christopher
`cconkle@raklaw.com; FastVDO_JDG@orrick.com; fastvdo@raklaw.com
`Re: FastVDO v AT&T - FastVDO First Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions &
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Thanks, Chris. No, those cites are not part of our proposed structure.
`
`Reza
`
`
`
`On Jun 9, 2016, at 10:40 AM, Marando, Christopher <Christopher.Marando@weil.com> wrote:
`
`Hi Reza, 
`
` 
`Further to our call last night, can you please provide an update concerning FastVDO’s position on the 
`corresponding structures for the means plus function claims? Specifically, can you indicate whether 
`FastVDO contends that the specification cites following the “See, e.g.” language are included in 
`FastVDO’s proposals for the corresponding structure?
`
` 
`Thanks,  
`Chris
` 
`
`<image002.jpg>
`
` 
`Christopher T. Marando
` 
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005-3314
`christopher.marando@weil.com
`+1 202 682 7094 Direct
`+1 202 857 0940 Fax
`
`  
`
`
`From: Marando, Christopher
`Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 10:10 PM
`To: 'Reza Mirzaie'
`Cc: cconkle@raklaw.com; FastVDO_JDG@orrick.com; fastvdo@raklaw.com
`Subject: RE: FastVDO v AT&T - FastVDO First Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions & Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`
`Thanks, Reza. Let’s plan to discuss tomorrow at 2:30pm pacific. We can use the following dial in: 1‐888‐
`235‐7501, 2026827094.
` 
`
`<image003.jpg>
`
`1
`
`Apple Inc. Exhibit 1012 Page 1
`
`

`
`
` 
`Christopher T. Marando
` 
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005-3314
`christopher.marando@weil.com
`+1 202 682 7094 Direct
`+1 202 857 0940 Fax
`
`
` 
`From: Reza Mirzaie [mailto:rmirzaie@raklaw.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 7:50 PM
`To: Marando, Christopher
`Cc: cconkle@raklaw.com; FastVDO_JDG@orrick.com; fastvdo@raklaw.com
`Subject: Re: FastVDO v AT&T - FastVDO First Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions & Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`
`Hello Chris,
`
`
`Thanks for the follow up email. This covers the same points raised in your May 25th email. As
`we previously discussed, we do not think our contentions are deficient. We also believe
`Defendants’ excessive delay in raising these issues not only confirms the sufficiency of
`FastVDO’s disclosures, but also renders any potential dispute moot under Judge Gallo’s rules,
`including Rule IV(C) and (F).
`
`I am available tomorrow afternoon around 2:30 pm Pacific to discuss this further and also Friday
`morning.
`
`
`Thanks,
`Reza
`
`
`
`On Jun 6, 2016, at 6:24 PM, Marando, Christopher <Christopher.Marando@weil.com> wrote:
`
`Counsel,
`
` 
`FastVDO’s amended preliminary claim constructions served on 6/1 identified numerous 
`proposed structures for the means plus function elements of claims 7‐11 and 22‐26. 
`FastVDO’s infringement contentions for these claims, however, did not provide the 
`identity of these structures as required by the Court’s Scheduling Order. Dkt. 125 
`(requiring that Plaintiff’s contentions include a “chart identifying specifically where each 
`element of each asserted claim is found within each Accused Instrumentality, including 
`for each element that such party contends is governed by 35 U.S.C. § 112(6), the 
`identity of the structure(s), act(s), or material(s) in the Accused Instrumentality that 
`performs the claimed function”) (emphasis added). 
`
` 
`Please confirm that FastVDO will supplement its infringement contentions for these 
`claims to identify the accused structures no later than 6/7, or else confirm that FastVDO 
`is no longer asserting claims 7‐11 and 22‐26. If FastVDO is unwilling or unable to do so, 
`please provide a time on 6/7 or 6/8 when FastVDO is available to meet and confer.
` 
`
`2
`
`Apple Inc. Exhibit 1012 Page 2
`
`

`
`As we noted previously, the substantive deficiencies in FastVDO’s infringement 
`contentions have prejudiced Defendants’ ability to fully analyze and consider the alleged 
`scope of the asserted claim limitations in advance of the deadlines to serve proposed 
`claim constructions. Defendants continue to reserve the right to serve modified claim 
`constructions.
`
` 
`Thanks,
`Chris
` 
`
`<image002.jpg>
`
` 
`Christopher T. Marando
` 
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005-3314
`christopher.marando@weil.com
`+1 202 682 7094 Direct
`+1 202 857 0940 Fax
`
`  
`
`
`From: Reza Mirzaie [mailto:rmirzaie@raklaw.com]
`Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 2:27 AM
`To: Marando, Christopher
`Cc: Christian W. Conkle; oppfastvdomaster@raklaw.com; fastvdo@raklaw.com; Nikeisha
`Wilson
`Subject: Re: FastVDO v AT&T - FastVDO First Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions
`& Extrinsic Evidence
`
`
`Hello Chris,
`
`
`Yes, FastVDO currently continues to assert claims 7-11 and 22-26.
`
`
`Thanks,
`Reza
`
`
`Reza Mirzaie
`Russ August & Kabat
`12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`(310) 979-8251
`rmirzaie@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`On Jun 2, 2016, at 10:03 AM, Marando, Christopher
`<Christopher.Marando@weil.com> wrote:
`
`
`Counsel,
`
` 
`Can you confirm that FastVDO is continuing to assert claims 7‐11 and 
`22‐26?
`
`3
`
`Apple Inc. Exhibit 1012 Page 3
`
`

`
`
` 
`Thanks,
`Chris
` 
`
`<image001.jpg>
`
` 
`Christopher T. Marando
` 
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005-3314
`christopher.marando@weil.com
`+1 202 682 7094 Direct
`+1 202 857 0940 Fax
`
`  
`
`
`From: Christian W. Conkle [mailto:cconkle@raklaw.com]
`Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 11:35 PM
`To: oppfastvdomaster@raklaw.com
`Cc: fastvdo@raklaw.com; Nikeisha Wilson
`Subject: FastVDO v AT&T - FastVDO First Amended Preliminary Claim
`Constructions & Extrinsic Evidence
`
`
`Counsel,
`
`
`Please see the attached first amended claim constructions of
`plaintiff FastVDO LLC.
`
`
`Thank you,
`
`
`Christian W. Conkle
`Russ, August & Kabat
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`310 826-7474
`310 826-6991 Fax
`cconkle@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The information contained in this email message is intended only for use
`of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is
`not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to
`deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
`dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
`prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
`immediately notify us by email, postmaster@weil.com, and destroy the
`original message. Thank you.
`
`4
`
`Apple Inc. Exhibit 1012 Page 4
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual
`or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
`employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
`notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
`prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us
`by email, postmaster@weil.com, and destroy the original message. Thank you.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named
`above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to
`deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying
`of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
`immediately notify us by email, postmaster@weil.com, and destroy the original message. Thank you.
`
`
`
`5
`
`Apple Inc. Exhibit 1012 Page 5