`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`_________________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FASTVDO LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_________________
`
`Case IPR2016-01203
`Patent 5,850,482
`_________________
`
`____________________________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`
`RYAN J. MALLOY UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`la-1340933
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01203
`
`I.
`
`Relief Requested
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10, Petitioner Apple Inc. requests that the Board
`
`admit Ryan J. Malloy pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`II.
`
`Statement of Facts Showing Good Cause for the Board to Recognize
`Counsel Pro Hac Vice During the Proceeding
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board may recognize counsel
`
`pro hac vice during a proceeding, subject to the conditions set forth therein, and
`
`any others that the Board may impose. Petitioner sets forth these facts in support
`
`of this motion:
`
`1.
`
`The undersigned, who is Backup Counsel for Petitioner, contacted
`
`Wayne Helge, Esq., Lead Counsel for Patent Owner FastVDO LLC, who indicated
`
`that Patent Owner does not object to Mr. Malloy’s admission pro hac vice.
`
`2.
`
`Petitioner’s Lead Counsel David L. Fehrman and Backup Counsel
`
`Martin M. Noonen are registered practitioners before the USPTO.
`
`3.
`
`Counsel Ryan J. Malloy is an experienced litigator and has established
`
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. Accompanying this
`
`motion is Exhibit 1013, the Declaration of Ryan J. Malloy in Support of this
`
`Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (“Malloy Decl.”). In his Declaration,
`
`Mr. Malloy attests, among other things, that he is a member in good standing of the
`
`California State Bar, with no suspensions or disbarments from practice, nor any
`
`application for admission to practice denied, nor any sanctions or contempt
`
`la-1340933
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01203
`
`citations. Mr. Malloy further attests that he is admitted to practice in the United
`
`States District Court for the Central District of California, the United States
`
`District Court for the Southern District of California, and the United States Court
`
`of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Mr. Malloy also attests to other items set forth
`
`by 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c). See Malloy Decl. ¶¶ 1, 7-8.
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`admit Ryan J. Malloy pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Date: February 13, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`By: /Martin M. Noonen/
`David L. Fehrman, Reg. No. 28,600
`Martin M. Noonen, Reg. No. 44,264
`Morrison & Foerster LLP
`707 Wilshire Boulevard
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Tel: (213) 892-5601
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner Apple Inc.
`
`la-1340933
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01203
`
`
`
`Certificate of Service (37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4))
`
`I hereby certify that the attached Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission of Ryan J. Malloy Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) and the Supporting
`
`Declaration of Ryan J. Malloy were served on the date listed below via electronic
`
`mail upon the following counsel of record for Patent Owner:
`
`
`
`Wayne M. Helge
`Walter Davis
`DAVIDSON BERQUIST JACKSON & GOWDEY, LLP
`8300 Greensboro Drive, Suite 500
`McLean, VA 22102
`Telephone: 571-765-7700
`Fax: 571-765-7200
`Email: whelge@dbjg.com
`Email: wdavis@dbjg.com
`
`
`Dated: February 13, 2017
`
`By: /Martin M. Noonen/
` Martin M. Noonen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`la-1340933
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
