throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 43
`Filed: June 22, 2017
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201
`Patents 9,179,005 B2 and 8,542,815 B21
`____________
`
`
`Before JOSIAH C. COCKS, JENNIFER MEYER CHAGNON, and
`JOHN A. HUDALLA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`COCKS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This Order pertains to both noted proceedings. The Board exercises its
`discretion to issue a single Order for entry in each proceeding. The parties
`are not authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent papers.
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201
`Patent 9,179,005 B2 and 8,542,815 B2
`
`
`1. Introduction
`
`On June 20, 2017, a call was held between counsel for the respective
`
`parties and Judges Cocks, Chagnon, and Hudalla. Apple Inc. (“Petitioner”)
`
`was represented by Adam Seitz. Voip-Pal.com, Inc. (“Patent Owner”) was
`
`represented by Brent Babcock. The purpose of the call was to discuss
`
`Petitioner’s request for authorization to file a motion to expunge pages 2–15
`
`of Patent Owner’s Motion to Exclude in each proceeding (Paper 402).3
`
`2. Discussion
`
`During the call, Petitioner indicated that it believed that the majority
`
`of Patent Owner’s Motion to Exclude constituted an unauthorized sur-reply
`
`to the Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response (Paper 34) rather than
`
`setting forth appropriate reasons to exclude content of the record. Petitioner,
`
`thus, requested authorization to file a motion to expunge portions of the
`
`Motion to Exclude. Patent Owner opposed Petitioner’s request. According
`
`to Patent Owner, even if portions of the Motion to Exclude do amount to
`
`substantive response to Petitioner’s Reply, the panel could deny the Motion
`
`to Exclude, if it believes that is appropriate, rather than entertain the extreme
`
`remedy of expungement.
`
`Motions to exclude are filed to preserve evidentiary objections
`
`previously made on the record; they “must identify the objections in the
`
`record in order and must explain the objections.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(c).
`
`
`2 The identified Paper numbers in this Order are the same for each
`proceeding.
`
`3 Patent Owner had arranged for a court reporter to transcribe the call. When
`a transcript of the call is available, Patent Owner should file a copy of the
`transcript using its next available exhibit number.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201
`Patent 9,179,005 B2 and 8,542,815 B2
`
`
`Importantly, such motions are directed to “evidence” that a party considers
`
`to be inadmissible. Id. They do not pertain to a party’s arguments. In that
`
`respect, the panel advised the parties on the call that a motion seeking to
`
`exclude an opposing party’s argument is beyond of the scope of § 42.64 and
`
`will not be successful. In reviewing Patent Owner’s Motion to Exclude in
`
`each proceeding, we observe that various portions of the Motion seek to
`
`exclude Petitioner’s “citations” to evidence of record, rather than the
`
`underlying evidence itself. See, e.g., Paper 40, 6, 8, 11, 14, 15. Although
`
`we do not authorize, at this time, a motion to expunge, we advise the parties
`
`that, to the extent that Patent Owner’s Motion to Exclude amounts to an
`
`unauthorized sur-reply or seeks to exclude Petitioner’s argument in its
`
`Reply, such content is not proper for a motion to exclude.
`
`It is
`
`3. Order
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner is not authorized to file a motion to
`
`expunge in connection with Patent Owner’s Motion to Exclude (Paper 40);
`
`and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that any opposition to the Motion to Exclude
`
`is due as set forth in the Scheduling Order (Paper 7).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201
`Patent 9,179,005 B2 and 8,542,815 B2
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Adam Seitz
`adam.seitz@eriseip.com
`
`Eric Buresh
`Eric.Buresh@EriseIP.com
`
`Paul Hart
`Paul.Hart@EriseIP.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Kerry Taylor
`2KST@knobbe.com
`
`John Carson
`2jmc@knobbe.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket