throbber
William Henry Mangione-Smith
`
`4146 118th Ave NE
`Kirkland WA, 98033
`(425) 654-1424
`billms@gmail.com
`
`Reviewed and valued thousands of patents.
`Priced over $500M worth in patent portfolios.
`Key technical support for licensing that has raised more than $1B.
`Significant experience developing claim charts and evidence of use.
`Former tenured professor at the University of California.
`Deposition and trial testifying experience.
`
`
`Highlights
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Education
`
`
`BSE (1987), MSE (1992), & Ph.D. University of Michigan
`Doctoral Thesis 1992: Performance Bounds and Buffer Space Requirements for
`Concurrent Processors
`
`
`Employment
`
`2009-Present
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2012 May-June
`
`2005-2008
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2001-2005
`1995-2001
`
`
`
`1993-1995
`
`
`
`1991-1992
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Sole Proprietor of Phase Two LLC – Consulting and intellectual property
`services
`All IP related work since 2009 has been conducted under the auspices of
`Phase Two
`
`CTO Computers and Consumer Electronics at IP Navigation Group
`
`Intellectual Ventures, Bellevue Washington
`2005 Patent valuation, licensing support, focus on computer patents
`2006 Head of all IV valuation efforts – managed a team of 12
`2007 Director of technology, outbound licensing in consumer electronics
`2008 Director of investment strategy, inventor relations
`
`Associate Professor, EE UCLA
`Assistant Professor, EE UCLA
`Focus low power embedded multimedia communications systems
`
`Motorola Wireless Data Group
`Systems architect for General Magic wireless PDA
`
`Motorola Corporate Research
`
`Page 1 of 23
`
`Voip-Pal Ex. 2045
`IPR2016-01201
`
`

`

`
`1986-1987
`
`
`
`Chrysler Corporation
`Software Architect
`
`Parallel computer performance monitoring
`Low power processor architecture
`
`
`Patents
`
`9,513,157 Selective audio/sound aspects
`9,479,535 Transmitting aggregated information arising from appnet information
`9,455,035 Management of memory refresh power consumption
`9,426,387
`Image anonymization
`9,374,242 Using evaluations of tentative message content
`9,372,536 Touch screen with tactile feedback
`9,367,833 Data services outsourcing verification
`9,306,975 Transmitting aggregated information arising from appnet information
`9,274,582 Power consumption management
`9,230,601 Media markup system for content alteration in derivative works
`9,219,815
`Identifier technique for communication interchange
`9,215,512
`Implementation of media content alteration
`9,191,341 Packet routing within an on-chip network
`9,178,911 Evaluation systems and methods for coordinating software agents
`9,158,771 Component information and auxiliary information related to information …
`9,152,928 Context parameters and identifiers for communication
`9,092,928
`Implementing group content substitution in media works
`9,065,979 Promotional placement in media works
`9,008,117 Cross-media storage coordination
`9,008,116 Cross-media communication coordination
`8,984,579 Evaluation systems and methods for coordinating software agents
`8,984,133 Providing treatment-indicative feedback dependent on putative …
`8,966,630 Generating and distributing a malware countermeasure
`8,949,337 Generation and establishment of identifiers for communication
`8,943,267 Management of memory refresh power consumption
`8,929,208 Conditionally releasing a communique determined to be affiliated …
`8,924,975 Core selection for applications running on multiprocessor systems …
`8,913,753 Selective audio/sound aspects
`8,910,033
`Implementing group content substitution in media works
`8,886,577 Feedback during surgical events
`8,850,044 Obfuscating identity of a source entity affiliated with a communique in …
`8,839,255 Scheduling of threads by batch scheduling
`8,819,686 Scheduling threads on different processor cores based on …
`8,818,196 Data center with free-space optical communications
`8,799,912 Application selection of memory request scheduling
`8,774,637 Data center with free-space optical communications
`8,732,087 Authorization for media content alteration
`8,730,836 Conditionally intercepting data indicating one or more aspects …
`
`Page 2 of 23
`
`

`

`8,712,250 Data center with free-space optical communications
`8,682,982 Preliminary destination-dependent evaluation of message content
`8,655,187 Data center with free-space optical communications
`8,640,248 Handling masquerading elements
`8,640,247 Receiving an indication of a security breach of a protected set of files
`8,627,402 Evaluation systems and methods for coordinating software agents
`8,626,848 Obfuscating identity of a source entity affiliated with a communique …
`8,626,731 Component information and auxiliary information related to …
`8,613,095 Smart distribution of a malware countermeasure
`8,607,336 Evaluation systems and methods for coordinating software agents
`8,607,234 Batch scheduling with thread segregation and per thread type marking caps
`8,601,530 Evaluation systems and methods for coordinating software agents
`8,601,207 Management of memory refresh power consumption
`8,601,104 Using network access port linkages for data structure update decisions
`8,588,618 Data center with free-space optical communications
`8,583,553 Conditionally obfuscating one or more secret entities with respect to …
`8,559,307 Routing packets in on-chip networks
`8,555,396 Authenticatable displayed content
`8,549,077 Usage parameters for communication content
`8,539,581 Efficient distribution of a malware countermeasure
`8,516,300 Multi-votage synchronous systems
`8,483,569 Data center with free-space optical communications
`8,483,568 Data center with free-space optical communications
`8,473,818 - Reliable communications in on-chip networks
`8,473,388 - Facilitating compensation arrangements providing for data tracking …
`8,473,387 - Facilitating compensation arrangements between data providers and data …
`8,468,073 - Facilitating compensation arrangements providing for data tracking …
`8,452,182 - Data center with free-space optical communications
`8,442,440 - Hierarchical spectrum sensing for cognitive radios
`8,434,674 - Fiducial markers for augmented reality
`8,429,040 - Facilitating compensation arrangements for data brokering
`8,423,824 - Power sparing synchronous apparatus
`8,402,257 - Alteration of execution of a program in response to an execution- …
`8,401,393 - Data center with free-space optical communications
`8,392,342 - Method and apparatus for predicting movement of a tool in each of four …
`8,385,831 - Secure cognitive radio transmissions
`8,384,043 - Plasmon filter
`8,375,247 - Handling processor computational errors
`8,369,708 - Data center with free-space optical communications
`8,346,872 - Context parameters and identifiers for communication
`8,327,358 - Hypervisor driver management in virtual machine environments
`8,327,155 - Screening for masquerading content
`8,301,028 - Data center with free-space optical communications
`8,281,036 - Using network access port linkages for data structure update decisions
`8,255,745 - Hardware-error tolerant computing
`8,243,045 - Touch-sensitive display device and method
`
`Page 3 of 23
`
`

`

`8,224,930 - Signaling partial service configuration changes in appnets
`8,224,907 - System and method for transmitting illusory identification characteristics
`8,214,191 - Cross-architecture execution optimization
`8,209,755 - Signaling a security breach of a protected set of files
`8,209,524 - Cross-architecture optimization
`8,203,609 - Anonymization pursuant to a broadcasted policy
`8,191,140 - Indicating a security breach of a protected set of files
`8,161,232 - Periodically and empirically determined memory refresh intervals
`8,126,938 - Group content substitution in media works
`8,126,190 - Targeted obstrufication of an image
`8,117,654 - Implementation of malware countermeasures in a network device
`8,082,225 - Using destination-dependent criteria to guide data transmission decisions
`8,065,404 - Layering destination-dependent content handling guidance
`8,055,797 - Transmitting aggregated information arising from appnet information
`8,055,732 - Signaling partial service configuration changes in appnets
`8,055,648 - Managing information related to communication
`7,972,557 - Plasmon filter
`7,930,389 - Adaptive filtering of annotated messages or the like
`7,877,584 - Predictive processor resource management
`7,860,887 - Cross-media storage coordination
`7,752,255 - Configuring software agent security remotely
`7,739,524 - Power consumption management
`7,653,834 - Power sparing synchronous apparatus
`7,607,042 - Adjusting a processor operating parameter based on a performance criterion
`7,519,995 - Programmable hardware for deep packet filtering
`7,512,842 - Multi-voltage synchronous systems
`7,493,516 - Hardware-error tolerant computing
`5,793,991 - Method of equalizing loads on a computer bus
`
`Patent Applications
`
`Dr. Mangione-Smith has no known financial interest in any pending US patent
`applications other than some applications where he is listed as an inventor. The list of
`such published patent applications where he is a named inventor can be found by
`searching the online USPTO database or directly accessed via this link:
`http://goo.gl/Uq2q7Q.
`
`Expert Consultant in IP Matters – Multi-Year Engagements Noted Once
`
`
`2017
`
`2016
`
`
`INTEL CORPORATION v. FUTURE LINK SYSTEMS, LLC - C.A. No. 14-377-LPS
`Retained by Irell and Manella LLP on behalf of Future Link Systems, LLC
`Technology relates to computer communications systems
`
`Page 4 of 23
`
`

`

`Declarations filed on behalf of Future Link Systems, LLC
`
`Voip-Pal.com Inc.
`Technology relates to VOIP service providers
`Retained to assist during an IPR action
`
`TiVo Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-1503 (E.D. Tex.)
`Technology relates to digital video recorders
`Retained by Irell and Manella LLP on behalf of TiVo Inc.
`
`Rosetta-Wireless Corporation Inter Partes Reviews Nos. IPR2016-00616 and
`IPR2016-00622
`Technology relates to personal communications and computing devices.
`Retained by Heim, Payne and Chorush on behalf of Rosetta-Wireless
`Declaration filed.
`
`Innovative Memory Solutions, Inc. (IMS) v. Micron Technology
`District of Delaware - 14-cv-01480-RGA
`Engaged by IMS via Cohen & Grace, LLC
`Technology relates to semiconductor memory manufacturing
`
`Zak v. Facebook
`Eastern District of Michigan - 4:15-cv-13437
`Engaged by Zak via Harness, Dickey & Pierce PLC
`Technology relates to client-server software
`Declaration filed.
`
`Advanced Silicon Technologies, LLC Delaware District Court and at the ITC (No matter
`number assigned)
`Technology relates to programmable processor hardware
`Accused parties:
`Texas Instruments Incorporated 1:15-cv-01175
`NVIDIA Corporation 1:15-cv-01177
`Renesas Electronics Corporation et al. 1:15-cv-01176
`Fujitsu Ten Limited et al. 1:15-cv-01174
`Bayerische Motoren Werke AG et al. 1:15-cv-01178
`VOLKSWAGEN AG 1:15-cv-01181
`Harmon International Industries Incorporated et al. 1:15-cv-01173
`Honda Motor Co., Ltd. et al. 1:15-cv-01179
`Toyota Motor Corporation 1:15-cv-01180
`
`
`FlatWorld Interactives LLC v. Samsung and LG
`C.A. No. 12-804·-LPS and C.A. No. 12-964-LPS
`Engaged on behalf of FlatWorld
`
`
`
`
`
`2015
`
`Page 5 of 23
`
`

`

`Technology relates to user interface design
`
`Ericsson Inc. vs. Apple Inc.
`EDTX 2:15-cv-290 and 2:15-cv-292
`Engaged on behalf of Ericsson
`Technology relates to peripheral devices
`
`Synaptics vs. Goodix
`US ITC 337-TA-957
`Engaged on behalf of Goodix
`Provided Expert Testimony via Report, Deposition and at hearing
`Technology relates to touch screens
`
`Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
`Engaged on behalf of AMD
`IPR Defense
`Provided testimony via expert report
`Technology relates to digital video
`
`Solocron Media LLC v. Verizon Communications, Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a/
`Verizon Wireless, AT&T Mobility LLC, T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Sprint Spectrum L.P.
`The Eastern District of TX, Case 2:13-cv-1059-JRG
`Retained by tensegrity on behalf of Solocron
`Technology relates to MMS and multi-media transcoding.
`Prepared expert reports on infringement.
`
`Enterprise Systems Technologies S.a.r.l v. Apple Inc., Cirrus Logic Inc., HTC
`Corporation, LG Electronics, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co
`The International Trade Commission of the United States of America
`Inv. No. 337-TA-924
`Retained by Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo LLP for complainant.
`Technology relates to device drivers.
`Prepared expert reports and deposed.
`
`Ziilabs Inc., LTD., v. Samsung and Apple
`Case 2:14-cv-00203 In the Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division
`Retained by Davis of Heim, Payne & Chorush, L.L.P. for Ziilabs
`Technology relates to graphics systems.
`Provided expert report on infringement as well as deposition testimony.
`
`Packet Intelligence LLC v. Cisco
`Case 2:2014cv00252 In the Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division
`Retained by Heim, Payne & Chorush, L.L.P. for Packet Intelligence
`Technology relates to secure networking.
`
`
`
`Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. LG Corp., et al.
`
`Page 6 of 23
`
`

`

`5:14-cv-01012 U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
`Retained by Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP on behalf of Advanced Micro
`Devices, Inc.
`Technology relates to microprocessors and multimedia.
`
`dunnhumby USA, LLC, et al. v. emnos USA Corp.
`U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
`Case No.: 1:13-cv-00399
`Retained by Baker Hostetler who represents dunnhumby
`Technology relates to databases.
`
`Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture LLC, v. HTC CORPORATION and HTC
`AMERICA, INC., LG ELECTRONICS, INC. and LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC.
`Case No. 2:14-cv-690-JRG-RSP
`Case No. 2:14-cv-691-JRG-RSP
`Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
`Technology relates to multimedia systems.
`Retained on behalf of Parthenon
`
`Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture LLC, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
`LTD., ET AL. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD, HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES
`USA, INC. and HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC. and MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
`Case No. 2:14-cv-902-RSP
`Case No. 2:14-cv-687-JRG-RSP
`Case No. 2:14-cv-689-JRG-RSP
`Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
`Technology relates to multimedia systems.
`Retained on behalf of Parthenon
`
`NEXUS DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. DELL INC., LENO (UNITED
`STATES) INC., PANASONIC CORP. OF NORTH AMERICA, EIZO CORP. AND
`EIZO INC., NEC CORP. AND NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC.
`Civil Action No: 2:14-cv-00762
`Civil Action No: 2:14-cv-00762
`Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-00763
`Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-00764
`Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-00765
`Technology relates to communications circuits.
`Retained on behalf of Parthenon
`
`INTEL CORPORATION, v. FUTURE LINK SYSTEMS, LLC
`C.A. No. 1:14-CV-00377-LPS
`District Court for Delaware
`Technology relates to communications circuits.
`Retained on behalf of Future Link Systems
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 23
`
`

`

`2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Content Guard v. Apple Inc., Amazon.com Inc., BlackBerry Corporation, Huawei Device
`USA, Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, BlackBerry Limited, HTC Corporation, HTC
`America, Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung
`Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC
`The Eastern District of TX, case 2:13-cv-01112-JRG
`Retained by McKool Smith on behalf of Content Guard
`Technology relates to digital right management.
`
`Content Guard v. Google Inc.
`The Eastern District of TX, Case 2:14-cv-00061-JRG
`Retained by McKool Smith on behalf of Content Guard
`Technology relates to digital right management.
`
`Solocron Media LLC v. Verizon Communications, Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a/
`Verizon Wireless, AT&T Mobility LLC, T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Sprint Spectrum L.P.
`The Eastern District of TX, Case 2:13-cv-1059-JRG
`Retained by tensegrity on behalf of Solocron
`Technology relates to MMS and multi-media transcoding.
`
`Enterprise Systems Technologies S.a.r.l v. Apple Inc., Cirrus Logic Inc., HTC
`Corporation, LG Electronics, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co
`The International Trade Commission of the United States of America
`Inv. No. 337-TA-924
`Retained by Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo LLP for complainant.
`Technology relates to device drivers.
`
`Ziilabs Inc., LTD., v. Samsung and Apple
`Case 2:14-cv-00203 In the Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division
`Retained by Davis of Heim, Payne & Chorush, L.L.P. for Ziilabs
`Technology relates to graphics systems.
`
`Packet Intelligence LLC v. Cisco
`Case 2:2014cv00252 In the Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division
`Retained by Heim, Payne & Chorush, L.L.P. for Packet Intelligence
`Technology relates to secure networking.
`
`Rockstar Consortium US v. Asustek, Google, HTC, LGE, Pantech, Samsung and ZTE
`2:13-cv-00899 In the Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division
`Retained by McKool Smith for Rockstar
`Technology relates to user interfaces and messaging.
`
`Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. LG Corp., et al.
`5:14-cv-01012 U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
`Retained by Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP on behalf of Advanced Micro
`
`Page 8 of 23
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`2013
`
`
`
`
`Devices, Inc.
`Technology relates to microprocessors and multimedia.
`
`Pragmatus Mobile LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd, etc.
`U.S. ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-905
`Retained by Flagship IP. P.C. on behalf of Complainant Pragmatus Mobile LLC
`Technology relates to converged devices.
`
`CallCopy Inc.
`Assistance with Reexamination efforts related to Verint Americas Inc.
`Retained by Baker Hostetler
`Technology related to call systems and call center management.
`Submitted declarations with the USPTO.
`
`dunnhumby USA, LLC, et al. v. emnos USA Corp.
`U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
`Case No.: 1:13-cv-00399
`Retained by Baker Hostetler who represents dunnhumby
`Technology relates to database technology.
`
`Graphics Properties Holdings, v. Panasonic et al.
`ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-884
`Retained by Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo LLP for complainant.
`Provided testimony through expert reports, deposition and at trial.
`Technology relates to graphics hardware.
`
`Graphics Properties Holdings, v. Panasonic et al.
`ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-884
`Retained by Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo LLP for complainant.
`Provided testimony through expert reports and deposition.
`Technology relates to graphics hardware.
`
`CallCopy Inc.
`Assistance with Reexamination efforts related to Verint Americas Inc.
`Retained by Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP
`Technology related to call systems and call center management.
`Submitted declarations with the USPTO.
`
`dunnhumby USA, LLC, et al. v. emnos USA Corp.
`U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
`Case No.: 1:13-cv-00399
`Retained by Baker Hostetler who represents dunnhumby
`Technology relates to database technology.
`
`
`Page 9 of 23
`
`

`

`Microlinc, LLC v. INTEL CORPORATION, ACER, INC., ACER AMERICA
`CORPORATION, ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., APPLE, INC., DELL, INC.,
`GATEWAY, INC., HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, LENOVO GROUP, LTD,
`LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC., NVIDIA CORPORATION, SONY COMPUTER
`ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC., TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA
`AMERICA INC., and TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
`Eastern District of Texas
`Retained by Eugene M. Cummings, P.C.
`Submitted reports regarding infringement, invalidity and claim construction along with
`numerous declarations. Appeared at the Markman hearing. Deposed.
`Technology relates to microprocessor communications.
`
`FlashPoint Technology, Inc. v. HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., Pantech Co., Ltd.,
`Pantech Wireless, Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., FutureWei Technologies, Inc. d/b/a
`Huawei Technologies (USA), ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc.,
`USA International Trade Commission
`Certain Electronic Imaging Devices, Inv. No. 337-TA-850
`Expert for FlashPoint, who is represented by Pepper Hamilton, LLP.
`Submitted reports numerous declarations. Testified at the ITC. Deposed.
`Technology relates to converged devices.
`
`FlashPoint Technology, Inc. v. HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., Pantech Co., Ltd.,
`Pantech Wireless, Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., FutureWei Technologies, Inc. d/b/a
`Huawei Technologies (USA), ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc.,
`USA International Trade Commission
`Certain Electronic Imaging Devices, Inv. No. 337-TA-850
`Expert for FlashPoint, who is represented by Pepper Hamilton, LLP.
`Submitted reports numerous declarations. Testified at the ITC. Deposed.
`Technology relates to converged devices.
`
`Graphics Properties Holdings v. HTC et. al.
`Graphics Properties Holdings v. LG Electronics et. al.
`Graphics Properties Holdings v. Sony et. al.
`Graphics Properties Holdings v. Samsung Electronics et. al.
`Graphics Properties Holdings v. Apple
`Graphics Properties Holdings v. Research In Motion et. al.
`United States District Court for the District of Deleware
`Testifying expert witness for GPH on matters related to invalidity.
`Pepper Hamilton LLP and Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo LLP represent
`plaintiffs.
`Subject matter relates to graphics systems and CPU microarchitecture.
`Submitted reports numerous declarations. Deposed.
`
`IPValue
`Non-litigation related patent evaluation services.
`
`
`
`
`
`2012
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 23
`
`

`

`
`TV Interactive Data Corporation v. Sony Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment
`Inc, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc, Sony Corporation of America, Sony
`Electronics Inc, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Electronics America Inc, Royal
`Philips Electronics NV, Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Toshiba
`Corporation, Toshiba America Inc., Toshiba America Consumer Products LLC,
`Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Victor Company of
`Japan, LTD, JVC Americas Corp, LG Electronics Inc, LG Electronics USA Inc., Zenith
`Electronics LLC, Pioneer Corporation, Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc., Sharp
`Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Funai Electric Co., Ltd., Funai
`Corporation, Inc., D&M Holdings Inc., D&M Holdings US Inc. and Denon Electronics
`(USA), LLC
`United States District Court for the Northern District of California
`Case 5:2010cv00475
`Consultant for defendant Funai
`Defendants Funai Electric Co. Ltd. and Funai Corporation, Inc. are represented by Kevin
`W. Kirsch, David A. Mancino, John F. Bennett, Matthew P. Hayden, and Hayes F.
`Michel of Baker Hostetler
`Subject matter relates to DVDs and computer Operating Systems.
`
`Interval Licensing LLC, v. AOL, Inc.,; Apple, Inc.; eBay, Inc.; Facebook, Inc.; Netflix,
`Inc.; Office depot, Inc.; Officemax, Inc.; Staples, Inc.; Yahoo! Inc.; and Youtube, LLC.
`United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Case 2:10-cv-01385
`Consultant for Interval Licensing LLC
`Technology relates to user interfaces and data organization.
`
`Interval Licensing LLC is represented by Michael F. Heim, Eric J. Enger, and Nathan J.
`Davis of Heim, Payne & Chorush, L.L.P.
`Subject matter relates to online search, advertising and data presentation.
`Submitted declarations related to claim construction. Deposed.
`Technology relates to user interfaces and data organization.
`
`St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Acer, Inc., Acer America Corporation,
`Dell Inc., Gateway Companies, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Lenovo Group, Limited and Lenovo
`(United States) Inc.
`United States District Court for the District of Delaware - 1:2009cv00354
`Consultant for St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants
`St. Clair is represented by R. Terrance Rader, Charles W. Bradley, Glenn E. Forbis, and
`Justin S. Cohen of Rader Fishman & Grauer PLLC
`Subject matter relates to power management and graphics hardware.
`Filed reports regarding validity and infringement and provided deposition testimony.
`
`ST. CLAIR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONSULTANTS, INC., v. APPLE, INC. HIGH
`TECH COMPUTER CORP., a/k/a HTC CORP., HTC (B.V.I.), HTC AMERICA, INC.,
`EXEDEA, INC., RESEARCH IN MOTION LTD., and RESEARCH IN MOTION
`CORPORATION
`United States District Court for the District of Delaware - 1:10-cv-00982-LPS
`
`Page 11 of 23
`
`

`

`Consultant for St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants
`St. Clair is represented by R. Terrance Rader, Charles W. Bradley, Glenn E. Forbis, and
`Justin S. Cohen of Rader Fishman & Grauer PLLC
`Filed a declaration.
`Subject matter relates to cameras and messaging.
`
`Red Chalk Group
`Subject matter relates to patent analysis.
`
`Siemens
`Subject matter relates to patent analysis.
`
`Phoenix Technologies
`Subject matter relates to patent analysis.
`
`TV Interactive Data Corporation v. Sony Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment
`Inc, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc, Sony Corporation of America, Sony
`Electronics Inc, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Electronics America Inc, Royal
`Philips Electronics NV, Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Toshiba
`Corporation, Toshiba America Inc., Toshiba America Consumer Products LLC,
`Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Victor Company of
`Japan, LTD, JVC Americas Corp, LG Electronics Inc, LG Electronics USA Inc., Zenith
`Electronics LLC, Pioneer Corporation, Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc., Sharp
`Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Funai Electric Co., Ltd., Funai
`Corporation, Inc., D&M Holdings Inc., D&M Holdings US Inc. and Denon Electronics
`(USA), LLC
`United States District Court for the Northern District of California
`Case 5:2010cv00475
`Consultant for defendant Funai
`Defendants Funai Electric Co. Ltd. and Funai Corporation, Inc. are represented by Kevin
`W. Kirsch, David A. Mancino, John F. Bennett, Matthew P. Hayden, and Hayes F.
`Michel of Baker Hostetler
`Subject matter relates to DVDs and computer Operating Systems.
`
`Interval Licensing LLC, v. AOL, Inc.,; Apple, Inc.; eBay, Inc.; Facebook, Inc.; Netflix,
`Inc.; Office depot, Inc.; Officemax, Inc.; Staples, Inc.; Yahoo! Inc.; and Youtube, LLC.
`United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Case 2:10-cv-01385
`Consultant for Interval Licensing LLC
`Interval Licensing LLC is represented by Michael F. Heim, Eric J. Enger, and Nathan J.
`Davis of Heim, Payne & Chorush, L.L.P.
`Subject matter relates to online search, advertising and data presentation.
`
`St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Acer, Inc., Acer America Corporation,
`Dell Inc., Gateway Companies, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Lenovo Group, Limited and Lenovo
`(United States) Inc.
`
`2011
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 12 of 23
`
`

`

`United States District Court for the District of Delaware - 1:2009cv00354
`Consultant for St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants
`St. Clair is represented by R. Terrance Rader, Charles W. Bradley, Glenn E. Forbis, and
`Justin S. Cohen of Rader Fishman & Grauer PLLC
`Technology relates to power management.
`
`ST. CLAIR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONSULTANTS, INC., v. APPLE, INC. HIGH
`TECH COMPUTER CORP., a/k/a HTC CORP., HTC (B.V.I.), HTC AMERICA, INC.,
`EXEDEA, INC., RESEARCH IN MOTION LTD., and RESEARCH IN MOTION
`CORPORATION
`United States District Court for the District of Delaware - 1:10-cv-00982-LPS
`Consultant for St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants
`St. Clair is represented by R. Terrance Rader, Charles W. Bradley, Glenn E. Forbis, and
`Justin S. Cohen of Rader Fishman & Grauer PLLC
`Filed a declaration.
`Subject matter relates to power management and graphics hardware.
`
`Negotiated Data Solutions
`Consultant for Negotiated Data Solutions
`Negotiated Data Solutions is represented by Susman, Godfrey LLP.
`Subject matter relates to IO devices.
`
`Acqis LLC
`Declarations filed with USPTO in response to a series of reexamination requests.
`Deposed in a related case (Texas Eastern District Court 6:2009cv00148) as a
`consequence of declarations.
`Acqis LLC is represented by Cooley, Godward, Kronish LLP
`Subject matter relates to computer systems.
`
`FlashPoint Technology, Inc. v. Nokia Corp. of Finland, Nokia, Inc. of Irving, Texas,
`Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada, Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas, HTC
`Corp. of Taiwan, HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington, LG Electronics of South
`Korea, LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, and LG Electronics
`MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California
`US ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-726
`Consultant for FlashPoint Technology, Inc.
`FlashPoint Technology Inc. is represented by William D. Belanger, Gregory D. Len, and
`Frank Liu of Pepper Hamilton LLP.
`Filed reports regarding validity and infringement and provided testimony both via
`deposition and in court.
`Subject matter relates to camera systems.
`
`MicroUnity, Inc.v. Texas Instruments Inc., Qualcomm, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co
`LTD, Motorola, Inc., Nokia Corporation, Palm, Inc., Samsung TeleCommunications
`America, LLC, Acer, Inc., HTC Corporation, Google Inc., LG Electronics Inc, Apple,
`Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Sprint Nextel Corporation and AT&T
`
`
`
`Page 13 of 23
`
`

`

`
`
`2010
`
`
`2:2010cv00091
`Consultant for MicroUnity, Inc.
`Eastern District of Texas
`MicroUnity, Inc., is represented by Heim, Payne, and Chorush LLP.
`Subject matter relates to graphics hardware and microarchitecture.
`
`TV Interactive Data Corporation v. Sony Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment
`Inc, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc, Sony Corporation of America, Sony
`Electronics Inc, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Electronics America Inc, Royal
`Philips Electronics NV, Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Toshiba
`Corporation, Toshiba America Inc., Toshiba America Consumer Products LLC,
`Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Victor Company of
`Japan, LTD, JVC Americas Corp, LG Electronics Inc, LG Electronics USA Inc., Zenith
`Electronics LLC, Pioneer Corporation, Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc., Sharp
`Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Funai Electric Co., Ltd., Funai
`Corporation, Inc., D&M Holdings Inc., D&M Holdings US Inc. and Denon Electronics
`(USA), LLC
`United States District Court for the Northern District of California
`Case 5:2010cv00475
`Consultant for defendant Funai
`Defendants Funai Electric Co. Ltd. and Funai Corporation, Inc. are represented by Kevin
`W. Kirsch, David A. Mancino, John F. Bennett, Matthew P. Hayden, and Hayes F.
`Michel of Baker Hostetler
`Subject matter relates to DVDs and computer Operating Systems.
`
`Interval Licensing LLC, v. AOL, Inc.,; Apple, Inc.; eBay, Inc.; Facebook, Inc.; Netflix,
`Inc.; Office depot, Inc.; Officemax, Inc.; Staples, Inc.; Yahoo! Inc.; and Youtube, LLC.
`United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Case 2:10-cv-01385
`Consultant for Interval Licensing LLC
`Interval Licensing LLC is represented by Michael F. Heim, Eric J. Enger, and Nathan J.
`Davis of Heim, Payne & Chorush, L.L.P.
`Subject matter relates to online search, advertising and data presentation.
`
`St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Acer, Inc., Acer America Corporation,
`Dell Inc., Gateway Companies, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Lenovo Group, Limited and Lenovo
`(United States) Inc.
`United States District Court for the District of Delaware - 1:2009cv00354
`Consultant for St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants
`St. Clair is represented by R. Terrance Rader, Charles W. Bradley, Glenn E. Forbis, and
`Justin S. Cohen of Rader Fishman & Grauer PLLC
`Subject matter relates to power management and graphics hardware.
`
`Negotiated Data Solutions
`Consultant for Negotiated Data Solutions
`Negotiated Data Solutions is represented by Susman, Godfrey LLP.
`
`Page 14 of 23
`
`

`

`Subject matter relates to IO devices.
`
`Acqis LLC
`Declarations filed with USPTO in response to a series of reexamination requests.
`Deposed in a related case (Texas Eastern District Court 6:2009cv00148) as a
`consequence of declarations.
`Acqis LLC is represented by Cooley, Godward, Kronish LLP
`Subject matter relates to computer systems.
`
`FlashPoint Technology, Inc. v. Nokia Corp. of Finland, Nokia, Inc. of Irving, Texas,
`Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada, Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas, HTC
`Corp. of Taiwan, HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington, LG Electronics of South
`Korea, LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, and LG Electronics
`MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California
`US ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-726
`Consultant for FlashPoint Technology, Inc.
`FlashPoint Technology Inc. is represented by William D. Belanger, Gregory D. Len, and
`Frank Liu of Pepper Hamilton LLP.
`Subject matter

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket