throbber
DOES GOOGLE’S MICHELLE LEE WORK FOR BOTH GOOGLE ...
`
`https://atvmdoe.wordpress.com/2016/04/06/does-googles-michelle-lee-w...
`
`Michelle Lee is Google’s lawyer. She runs the U.S. Patent
`Office.
`
`Google hates other people’s patents because, according
`to many inventors, Google has stolen most of it’s
`technology from others.
`
`Michelle Lee presided over some of the largest
`intellectual property thefts, by Google, while she was at
`Google’s
`
`The New York Times did a feature article about how
`Google founder Larry Page based Google’s business
`
`1 of 8
`
`Voip-Pal Ex. 2080
`IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201
`
`1/12/2018, 10:31 AM
`
`

`

`DOES GOOGLE’S MICHELLE LEE WORK FOR BOTH GOOGLE ...
`
`https://atvmdoe.wordpress.com/2016/04/06/does-googles-michelle-lee-w...
`
`model on ideas he stole
`
`Google spent more money, than any other company,
`trying to over‐throw modern patent laws that protect
`small inventors
`
`Most people think that Michelle Lee is a “criminal mole
`planted by Google to protect Google and only Google”
`
`Michelle Lee makes huge amounts of money off of
`Google while she runs the U.S. patent office.
`
`Google funded Obama’s campaign and Obama
`appointed Michelle Lee
`
`Michelle Lee has vindictively and overtly sought to
`invalidate tens of thousands of existing patents on a
`“seemingly maniacal crusade to protect Google by
`steam‐roller‐ing all patents that may affect Google.” She
`does so with the protection of the White House, who
`Google seems to “own”.
`
`Patent attorneys, start‐up CEO’s, inventors and small
`business hate Michelle Lee. Only Google seems to like
`Michelle
`
`Citizens groups plead with Trump, Sanders and Cruz to
`arrest and indict Michelle Lee if elected but know
`Hillary will keep her because Google finances Hillary,
`too.
`
`techrights.org/2014/10/20/michelle‐lee/
`
`– As we showed in past years, Google had hired many patent
`lawyers rather than fight software patents; Michelle Lee may
`therefore be part of the problem. … Microsoft’s Charm
`Offensive Against GNU/Linux Uses the Same …
`
`2 of 8
`
`1/12/2018, 10:31 AM
`
`

`

`DOES GOOGLE’S MICHELLE LEE WORK FOR BOTH GOOGLE ...
`
`https://atvmdoe.wordpress.com/2016/04/06/does-googles-michelle-lee-w...
`
`https://www.linkedin.com/in/mlee95070(https://www.linkedin.com
`/in/mlee95070)
`
`Washington D.C. Metro Area – Under Secretary of
`Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director at USPTO
`– United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
`
`– Michelle Lee is currently the chief executive of one of the
`largest intellectual … Executive lead of Google’s patent and
`patent strategy efforts. … to Fortune 100 tech companies in
`the areas of internet, online commerce, software, …
`
`http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/02/29/what‐is‐(http://www.ipwatchdog.com
`/2016/02/29/what‐is‐)michelle‐lee…/id=66590/
`
`– If you google “Michelle Lee transparency” you can find
`more quotes with … Act. To be clear—just like the pharma
`companies we are up against, we are …… So small software
`entities have to fight for 7, 8, 9, 10+ years for truly …
`
`3 of 8
`
`1/12/2018, 10:31 AM
`
`

`

`DOES GOOGLE’S MICHELLE LEE WORK FOR BOTH GOOGLE ...
`
`https://atvmdoe.wordpress.com/2016/04/06/does-googles-michelle-lee-w...
`
`http://www.theverge.com/…/ (http://www.theverge.com/…/)michelle‐
`lee‐nominated‐uspto‐director‐…
`
`The Verge
`
`– Former Google patent chief Michelle Lee has been
`nominated by … from the tech industry and a broader
`struggle around software patents, Lee’s … Feb 4 The ultimate
`patent troll is going to trial against Google and Motorola.
`
`Images for “michelle lee” google against software(https://www.google.com
`/search?q=%22michelle+lee%22+google+against+software
`&biw=1222&bih=595&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&
`sa=X&
`ved=0ahUKEwjzk9fXjvvLAhVE5GMKHWOeCukQsAQI
`NA)Report images
`
` (https://www.google.com
`/search?q=%22michelle+lee%22+google+against+software
`&biw=1222&bih=595&tbm=isch&
`imgil=5O1CS9qPDyJyCM%253A%253BXn7FlbEEW2Fwj
`M%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fgadgets.ndtv.com
`%25252Fothers%25252Fnews%25252Fformer‐google‐
`executive‐michelle‐lee‐named‐deputy‐director‐of‐uspto‐
`457840&source=iu&pf=m&
`
`4 of 8
`
`1/12/2018, 10:31 AM
`
`

`

`DOES GOOGLE’S MICHELLE LEE WORK FOR BOTH GOOGLE ...
`
`https://atvmdoe.wordpress.com/2016/04/06/does-googles-michelle-lee-w...
`
`fir=5O1CS9qPDyJyCM%253A%252CXn7FlbEEW2FwjM%
`252C_&usg=__PbWtHJSbwjB26hooMOCor8gPIwg%3D)
`
` (https://www.google.com
`/search?q=%22michelle+lee%22+google+against+software
`&biw=1222&bih=595&tbm=isch&
`imgil=vnQ6Ehpsvl8hVM%253A%253BhW7ghKVSMhjzo
`M%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.bizjournals.c
`om%25252Fsanjose%25252Fnews%25252F2012%25252F11
`%25252F16%25252Fformer‐google‐ip‐attorney‐michelle‐
`lee.html&source=iu&pf=m&
`fir=vnQ6Ehpsvl8hVM%253A%252ChW7ghKVSMhjzoM%
`252C_&usg=__KkttNcC_QoqAHCXh1cQPVuhk9eY%3D)
`
` (https://www.google.com
`/search?q=%22michelle+lee%22+google+against+software
`&biw=1222&bih=595&tbm=isch&
`imgil=laxqI_FJVbZacM%253A%253BwHZbHKZjGwgnA
`M%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.wired.com%
`25252F2013%25252F12%25252Fmichelle‐lee%25252F&
`source=iu&pf=m&
`fir=laxqI_FJVbZacM%253A%252CwHZbHKZjGwgnAM%
`252C_&usg=__5qqmV2xEaG_TegHwk1Q25j2stx0%3D)
`
` (https://www.google.com
`/search?q=%22michelle+lee%22+google+against+software
`&biw=1222&bih=595&tbm=isch&
`imgil=QUKT9LQYllHx_M%253A%253BFFa4O6FyUENcX
`M%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.wired.com%
`25252F2014%25252F10%25252Fmichelle‐lee‐
`uspto%25252F&source=iu&pf=m&
`fir=QUKT9LQYllHx_M%253A%252CFFa4O6FyUENcXM%
`252C_&usg=__WMCQp7OFx8deaPYAYhda1YCfOJ4%3D)
`
`More images for “michelle lee” google against software(https://www.google.com
`/search?q=%22michelle+lee%22+google+against+software
`&biw=1222&bih=595&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&
`sa=X&
`ved=0ahUKEwjzk9fXjvvLAhVE5GMKHWOeCukQ7AkIP
`w)
`
`5 of 8
`
`1/12/2018, 10:31 AM
`
`

`

`DOES GOOGLE’S MICHELLE LEE WORK FOR BOTH GOOGLE ...
`
`https://atvmdoe.wordpress.com/2016/04/06/does-googles-michelle-lee-w...
`
`googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/…/patent‐reform‐needed‐more‐
`than‐ev…
`
`– Posted by Michelle Lee, Head of Patents and Patent
`Strategy …. If a company is really against software patents, it
`should sign the European …
`
`http://www.burdlaw.com/blog/?tag=(http://www.burdlaw.com
`/blog/?tag=)michelle‐lee
`
`Posts Tagged ‘michelle lee‘. Michelle Lee, What Will You Be?
`… Big software wants to kill the enforcement of software
`patents, with Google leading the charge. … and regulations,
`but I wonder how strongly she will fight against jobflow to
`Asia.
`
`6 of 8
`
`1/12/2018, 10:31 AM
`
`

`

`DOES GOOGLE’S MICHELLE LEE WORK FOR BOTH GOOGLE ...
`
`https://atvmdoe.wordpress.com/2016/04/06/does-googles-michelle-lee-w...
`
`https://gigaom.com/…/former‐ (https://gigaom.com
`/…/former‐)google‐lawyer‐to‐lead‐silicon‐valley‐paten…
`
`– Fantastic news: Michelle K. Lee, formerly Google’s chief
`patent … while many experts have called for the reform or
`abolition of software patents.
`
`http://www.ipnav.com/blog/the‐fox‐guarding‐the‐chicken‐
`coop/?printPDF (http://www.ipnav.com/blog/the‐fox‐
`guarding‐the‐chicken‐coop/?printPDF)
`
`Former Google patent boss named as head of USPTO Silicon
`Valley office; does she bring her biases against NPEs to the
`job? … The US Patent and Trademark Office has appointed
`Michelle Lee, former deputy general counsel … At the Silicon
`Valley software conference where news of Lee’s appointment
`first came to light, …
`
`7 of 8
`
`1/12/2018, 10:31 AM
`
`

`

`DOES GOOGLE’S MICHELLE LEE WORK FOR BOTH GOOGLE ...
`
`https://atvmdoe.wordpress.com/2016/04/06/does-googles-michelle-lee-w...
`
`arstechnica.com/…/long‐time‐googler‐will‐head‐silicon‐vall…
`
`Ars Technica
`
`– Michelle Lee, a former Google attorney who was one of the
`first … The move was announced Friday afternoon at a
`conference about software patents, … Of twenty patent
`lawsuits that had been filed against Google, only two …
`
`THE WIKI REVIEW TEAM
`APRIL 6, 2016
`NEWS
`DOES GOOGLEʹS MICHELLE LEE WORK
`FOR BOTH GOOGLE AND THE U.S. PATENT OFFICE
`AT THE SAME TIME?, MICHELE LEE, MICHELLE LEE
`AND GOOGLE, MICHELLE LEE CONFLICT OF
`INTEREST, USPTO
`
`8 of 8
`
`1/12/2018, 10:31 AM
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket