throbber
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/04/13/technology/how-europe-is-going-after-us-tech-giants.html
`
`How Europe Is Going After Apple, Google and
`Other U.S. Tech Giants
`
`Kelly Couturier
`
`Antitrust: European antitrust authorities announced in July a new round of charges against
`
`the company — the third set since early 2015 — claiming that some of the company’s
`
`advertising products had restricted consumer choice.
`
`Google vigorously denied any wrongdoing in two previous European antitrust cases linked to
`
`Android, its popular mobile operating system, and some of its dominant online search
`
`services.
`
`Google could face fines of up to 10 percent, or about $7 billion, of its global annual revenue if
`
`it is found to have broken Europe’s tough competition rules.
`
`European regulators began formally investigating the tech giant in 2010 over antitrust issues
`
`regarding search results. Over the years, competitors like Microsoft have also filed formal
`
`complaints against Google, as have media and telecommunications companies like Deutsche
`
`Telekom.
`
`Right to Be Forgotten: Europe’s highest court, the European Court of Justice, ruled in May
`
`2014 that citizens had a so-called right to be forgotten, and that search engines, including
`
`Google, must honor some requests from users to delete links to personal information.
`
`European regulators have since called on Google to apply the “right to be forgotten” ruling
`
`beyond the borders of the European Union. In March, France’s data protection watchdog
`
`fined Google $112,000 for failing to comply with demands to extend the ruling across its
`
`global domains, including Google.com in the United States. Google filed an appeal in May to
`
`overturn the fine.
`
`As of April, almost two years since the court ruling, Google had passed judgment in over
`
`417,000 cases — roughly 571 a day — from people wanting links to certain search results to be
`
`removed, according to the company’s records. It approved fewer than half of those requests,
`
`all behind closed doors, raising questions about the role of commercial interests in protecting
`
`people’s privacy.
`
`Taxation: Margrethe Vestager, the European Union’s antitrust chief who has become the
`
`bloc’s chief tax inquisitor, said in January that she might look into the 130 million pound, or
`
`$175 million, settlement reached between Google and the British government over back taxes.
`
`Spanish authorities in June opened a new investigation into possible tax evasion by Google,
`
`and in late May, French tax authorities raided Google’s offices there as part of an
`
`taxes.
`
`investigation for aggravated financial fraud. Google is also in discussions with Italy over back
`Voip-Pal Ex. 2066
`IPR2016-01198 and
`IPR2016-01201
`How Europe Is Going After Apple, Google and Other U.S. Tech Giants
`
`1 of 1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket