throbber
voip-pal | News & Interviews
`
`11/30/17, 4)13 PM
`
`November 27, 2017
`Voip-Pal.com, Inc. Addresses Shareholders' Most Frequently Asked
`Questions Following its IPR Validations vs Apple and AT&T
`November 21, 2017
`Voip-Pal.com, Inc. Receives Decisions from the USPTO’s Patent Trial and
`Appeal Board on the Remaining Seven IPR’s Filed by Apple and AT&T
`
`About Us
`
`Our Technology
`
`Our Team
`
`Investor Relations
`
`Legal Action
`
`News & Interviews
`
`•••••
`
`INDEPENDENT LETTERS FROM DR. THOMAS SAWYER & SHAREHOLDERS
`
`Letter to Judge Ruschke & Matal (October 23, 2017)..............................................................................
`
`PTAB Defies SCOTUS (September 5, 2017 -- IP Watchdog)....................................................................
`
`Letter to Wilbur Ross (August 31, 2017 -- Dr. Thomas Sawyer)..............................................................
`
`Letter to Wilbur Ross & David Ruschke (July 27, 2017 -- Dr. Thomas Sawyer)....................................
`
`Letter to David Ruschke (June 21, 2017 -- Dr. Thomas Sawyer)............................................................
`
`Letter to Donald Trump & Wilbur Ross (May 22, 2017 -- Shareholders)...............................................
`
`Letter to Judge David Ruschke (May 1, 2017 -- Dr. Thomas Sawyer)....................................................
`
`COMPANY INTERVIEWS
`
`Patent News Profile of Voip-Pal & CEO Emil Malak...................................................................................
`
`CEOCFO Magazine Interview with CEO Emil Malak...................................................................................
`
`Interview with Emil Malak -
`
`00:00 / 15:51
`
`"We started late 2004...we felt that in 10-15 years internet telephony and communications would be the major way of communicating between people, and we
`designed a system making it easier and seamless to move between internet and legacy [telephony]....We have seventeen patents today in the United States,
`that encompass all of this, so you are able to work as an internet telephony company in compliance the same as legacy."
`
`"We went to Apple over two years ago, we went to AT&T and Verizon, and unfortunately....we were not listened to. We didn't want to litigate, but the only way to
`
`https://www.voip-pal.com/news-interviews-more
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`Wall Street Analyzer
`
`IPR2016-01198
`Apple EX1020 Page 1
`
`

`

`voip-pal | News & Interviews
`
`11/30/17, 4)13 PM
`
`protect our shareholders interest was to file lawsuits in the United States in the Nevada [Federal District] Court...against Apple, Verizon and AT&T, and later
`against Twitter, because we believe there is a very strong infringement angle there. We believe sooner or later they are going to have to come to us."
`
`"We have now managed to prove, in our filing last Friday [February 10, 2017], that we were first to invent and we have all the source code...therefore, their "prior
`art" is negated by us....we believe we will win this case on prior art....We have lawsuits between the four of $9.7 billion, and we're not stopping there. We are
`going to be adding some more...we put 62 companies on notice."
`
`"I want to achieve for my shareholders a good return on capital....the shares have been suppressed. I can't say what they're worth, but I believe they're worth
`much more."
`
`WHITE PAPERS
`
`Understanding the Technology of RBR & RBR Messaging........................................................................
`
`Voip-Pal Patents List (US & Canada)...........................................................................................................
`
`Voip-Pal Core Patents Detail..........................................................................................................................
`
`All statements contained in this website, other than those identifying historical facts, constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning ofAll statements contained in this website, other than those identifying historical facts, constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of
`
`
`Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Safe Harbor provisions as contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act ofSection 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Safe Harbor provisions as contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
`
`1995. Such forward-looking statements relating to the Company's future expectations, including but not limited to revenues and earnings, technology1995. Such forward-looking statements relating to the Company's future expectations, including but not limited to revenues and earnings, technology
`
`efficacy, strategies and plans, are subject to safe harbors protection. Actual Company results and performance may be materially different from anyefficacy, strategies and plans, are subject to safe harbors protection. Actual Company results and performance may be materially different from any
`
`future results, performance, strategies, plans, or achievements that may be expressed or implied by any such forward-looking statements. Thefuture results, performance, strategies, plans, or achievements that may be expressed or implied by any such forward-looking statements. The
`
`Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements.Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements.
`
`
`
`© 2017 VOIP-PAL.COM. All Rights Reserved.© 2017 VOIP-PAL.COM. All Rights Reserved.
`
`https://www.voip-pal.com/news-interviews-more
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`IPR2016-01198
`Apple EX1020 Page 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket