`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-01198
`Patent 9,179,005
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01198
`U.S. Patent No. 9,179,005
`Pursuant to the Board’s November 21, 2016, Scheduling Order (Paper 7),
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests oral argument for the trial currently scheduled on July 20,
`
`2017. Petitioner notes that oral argument for this IPR is scheduled on the same date as
`
`the oral argument for IPR2016-01201, for which Petitioner is filing a similar request for
`
`oral argument. Petitioner respectfully submits that due to the overlap between these two
`
`IPRs combining the oral argument into one hearing would be more efficient than holding
`
`two separate hearings. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner requests a total of one
`
`hour of time for an oral argument addressing both IPRs as well as Patent Owner’s
`
`attempts to establish an actual reduction to practice. Petitioner further specifies the
`
`following issues, without intent to waive consideration of any issue not requested, to be
`
`argued for this proceeding:
`
`I. Whether claims 1, 24-26, 49-50, 73-79, 83-84, 88-89, 92, 94-96, and 98-99
`
`of the ’005 Patent are obvious over U.S. Patent No. 7,486,684 to Chu, et al.
`
`(“Chu ’684”) in view of U.S. Patent No 8,036,366 to Chu (“Chu ’366”);
`
`II. Whether claims 1, 24-26, 49-50, 73-79, 83-84, 88-89, 92, 94-96, and 98-99
`
`of the ’005 Patent are obvious over Chu ’684 in view of U.S. Patent
`
`Publication No. 2007/00644919 to Chen, et al. (“Chen”);
`
`III. Whether Voip-Pal has met its burden for establishing an actual reduction to
`
`practice for purposes of antedating Chu ‘366.
`
`IV. Whether Voip-Pal has met its burden for establishing an actual reduction to
`
`practice for purposes of antedating Chen.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01198
`U.S. Patent No. 9,179,005
`V. Whether any evidence should be excluded pursuant Voip-Pal’s objections
`
`as set forth in Voip-Pal’s not yet filed Motion to Exclude.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Adam P. Seitz
`Adam P. Seitz, Reg. No. 52,206
`Eric A. Buresh, Reg. No. 50,394
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`6201 College Blvd., Suite 300
`Overland Park, KS 66211
`(913) 777-5600 Phone
`(913) 777-5601 Fax
`eric.buresh@eriseip.com
`adam.seitz@eriseip.com
`Paul R. Hart, Reg. No. 59,646
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`5600 Greenwood Plaza Blvd., Suite 200
`Greenwood Village, CO 80111
`(913) 777-5600 Phone
`(913) 777-5601 Fax
`paul.hart@eriseip.com
`ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER
`
`2
`
`
`
`Date: June 14, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01198
`U.S. Patent No. 9,179,005
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on June 14, 2017, a true and correct
`
`copy of this PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING was
`
`served upon
`
`the following counsel for Petitioners, via
`
`the email
`
`correspondence address of record:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Kerry Taylor, Reg. No. 43,947
`2kst@knobbe.com
`John M. Carson, Reg. No. 34,303
`2jmc@knobbe.com
`Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP
`2040 Main Street, 14th Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`858-707-4000 Phone
`858-707-4001 Fax
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`BY:
`
`
`/s/ Adam P. Seitz
`Adam P. Seitz, Reg. No. 52,206
`
`ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
