throbber
Smart 421 Contract signed and Faxed.
`
`Subject: Smart 421 Contract signed and Faxed.
`From: Clay S Perreault <clay@klondike.com>
`Date: 6/6/05, 8:53 AM
`To: steve Nicholson <steve@digifonica.com>, Hamish Malkin <hmalkin@shaw.ca>, Mike Bowerman
`<mbowerman@digifonica.com>, edwincandy@btinternet.com, gblankstein@telus.net, Rob Blankstein
`<rblankstein@telus.net>
`Gentlemen:
`The contract with Smart 421 has been signed and faxed to them in order for them to immediately begin their review.(cid:1) I will begin
`forwarding these guys our existing documentation as previously arranged:
`for your interest the specifics of the contract follow below:
`Mr Malkin:(cid:1) We will immediately need to send them the first installment of £7500 to ensure that there are no delays.
`Sincerely
`Clay S Perreault
`Digifonica
`
`Contract Specifics:
`Perform a technical review of the applications that constitute the Voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP) solution provided by Digifonica.
`The results of the review to be presented to Digifonica on completion, with documentation provided for use only by Digifonica.(cid:1) The
`results and documentation are not to be relied upon by any other parties
`The work will be conducted in 3 phases by a team of two technical resources:
`Phase 1 – Initial System Appraisal, UK
`Phase 2 – Design Review, Canada
`Phase 3 – Results Presentation, UK
`Scope of Services:
`Technical appraisal of system architecture and design to assess its suitability for the creation of a scalable and flexible
`environment
`Review of supplied design documentation to assess completeness and suitability
`Code review of selected components to verify general competence, the use of standards, and to check for maintainability of
`the source code.
`Review of process documentation covering the software development lifecycle, to report on completeness, use of industry
`practices, standards, quality control and relevant level of detail.
`Overview of service management capability for the provision of the VOIP call handling environment, the system management
`software environment, customer provisioning and billing systems, and reseller integration capability.
`High level assessment of built-in redundancy, reliability and failover capability of system components that comprise the
`overall Digifonica VOIP application software.
`The review will not include any assessment of the commercial viability or marketability of the application nor its potential
`patentability.(cid:1) This is a technical review only.
`
`Project Managers:
`Smart421 – John Rutter
`Digifonica – Clay Perreault
`Frequency of Project Meetings:(cid:1)(cid:1) Weekly(cid:1)(cid:1) Project meetings will be held as appropriate throughout the 3 phases of the work.
`Charges:
`Charges are on time and materials basis at the rate of £700 per Man Day.(cid:1) The 3 phases are estimated at:
`Phase 1(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1) 8 Man Days(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1) £5,600
`Phase 2(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1) 12 Man Days(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1) £8,400
`Phase 3(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1) 4 Man Days(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1) £2,800
`
`1 of 2
`
`Voip-Pal Ex. 2004
`IPR2016-01198
`
`

`

`Smart 421 Contract signed and Faxed.
`
` £16,800
`Total(cid:1)
`The above charges are exclusive of any VAT that may apply and expenses.(cid:1)
`Payment Profile:(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1) £7,500 upon commencement
` Balance upon delivery of report
`Expenses:(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1) Expenses will be charged at cost and supported by receipts / invoices
`Anticipated Timetable:
`Phase 1, during the period 2nd to 9th June, 2x4 Man Days
`Phase 2, during the period 13th to 18th June, 2x6 Man Days (including travel)
`Phase 3, during the period 23rd to 24th June, 2x2 Man Days
`
`2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket