`
`Patent Owner Voip—Pal.com Inc.
`By: Kerry Taylor
`John M. Carson
`
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON &BEAR, LLP '
`
`2040 Main Street, 14th Floor
`
`Irvine, CA 92614
`
`(858) 707-4000
`Tel;
`Fax: (858)707-4001
`Email: BoxDigifonica@k11obbe. com
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC.
`
`Petitioner,
`
`V .
`
`VOIP—PAL.COM INC.,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case: IPR2016-01198
`
`U.S. Patent 9,179,005
`
`DECLARATION OF RYAN THOMAS IN
`
`SUPPORT OF PRO HAC VICE MOTION
`
`Voip-Pal EX. 2002
`IPR2016—01198
`
`Voip-Pal Ex. 2002
`IPR2016-01198
`
`
`
`|PR2016—01198
`
`Annie Inc. v. Vo|P—Pa|
`
`I, Ryan Thomas, do hereby declare:
`
`l. I am an attorney in private practice. Lead counsel in this inter parres
`
`review proceeding is Kerry Taylor. Mr. Taylor is registered to practice
`
`before the United States Patent and Trademark Office and holds
`
`Registration No. 43,947. With respect to this proceeding, I will work
`
`closely with Mr. Taylor.
`
`. I have over 30 years of experience as a litigator and legal educator and I
`
`have represented clients in several cases in courts in California Idaho and
`
`Utah.
`
`. I am comfortable and experienced with technically and legally complex
`
`matters, such as will be present in this proceeding. In particular, I am
`
`experienced with technically and legally complex matters in the field of
`
`telephony. In addition to my general experience with technically and
`
`legally complex patent matters, I served as Chief Information Officer at
`
`Utah Valley University and chaired the technical services committee for the
`
`Utah Education Network.
`
`. I am familiar with U.S. Patent 9,179,005 and with the legal subject
`
`matter, technical subject matter, and prior art discussed in Petitioner's
`
`request for inter partes review of U.S. Patent 9,179,005, which forms
`
`the basis for this proceeding. I also am familiar with the U.S. Patents,
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01198
`
`Apple Inc. V. VoIP-Pal
`
`legal subject matter, technical subject matter, and prior art at
`
`issue in related matters. In View of my legal experience, technical
`
`background, and familiarity with the issues in the present matter
`
`and the
`
`related matters, Patent Owner VoIP-Pal,
`
`Inc., has
`
`requested my services in the present matter and related matter
`
`IPR20l6-01201. Denial of my appearance in this case would
`
`create anundue burden on Patent Owner.
`
`. I am admitted to the Bar of the States of California and Utah. My
`
`license is currently active in Utah where I am a member in good
`
`standing.
`
`. I have never been suspended or disbarred fi'om practice before
`
`any court or administrative body.
`
`. I have never had a court or administrative body deny my
`
`application for admissiontopractice.
`
`8. I have never been sanctioned or cited for contempt by any court
`
`or administrative body.
`
`. I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Board's Rules of Practice for Trials set
`
`forth in Part 42 of Title 37 ofthe C.F.R.
`
`
`
`|PR2016—01198
`
`Aonle Inc. v. VoiP-Pal
`
`10.
`
`I agree to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark Office Rules of
`
`Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et .seq., and disciplinary
`
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §§ l 1.l9(a).
`
`11. In the past three (3) years, I have not appeared pro hac vice in any proceedings
`
`before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
`
`12.1 declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are true and that
`
`all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true; and further
`
`that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful, false statements
`
`and the like so made are punishable by fine or impfisonment, or both, under
`
`Dated: January 20, 2017
`
`By
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
