throbber
TELEPHONIC HEARING 1/19/2018
`
`Page 1
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
` APPLE, INC.,
` Petitioner,
` vs.
` VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
` Patent Owner
`
` CASE: IPR2016-01198
` PATENT: 9,179,005 B2
` and
` CASE: IPR2016-01201
` PATENT: 8,542,815 B2
`
` TELEPHONIC HEARING BEFORE THE
` ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGES:
` JOSIAH C. COCKS,
` JENNIFER MEYER CHAGNON
` JOHN A. HUDALLA
`
` JANUARY 19TH, 2018
` HELD AT
` ERISE IP
` 7015 College Boulevard
` Suite 700
` Overland Park, Kansas 66211
`
`1
`2
`
`34
`
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`www.alaris.us
`
`ALARIS LITIGATION SERVICES
`Phone: 1.800.280.3376
`
`Fax: 314.644.1334
`
`IPR2016-01198
`Apple EX1022 Page 1
`
`

`

` TELEPHONIC HEARING 1/19/2018
`
`Page 2
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S
` For the Petitioner:
` Adam P. Seitz
` ERISE IP
` 7015 College Boulevard
` Suite 700
` Overland Park, Kansas 66211
` (913)777-5600
` adam.seitz@eriseip.com
` and
` Paul R. Hart (telephonically)
` ERISE IP
` 5600 Greenwood Plaza Blvd.
` Suite 200
` Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111
` (913)777-5600
` paul.hart@eriseip.com
` Appearing telephonically for the
` Patent Owner:
` Kevin N. Malek
` Malek Moss, PLLC
` 340 Madison Avenue
` New York, New York, 10173
` (212)812-1491
` kevin.malek@malekmoss.com
`
`Mary Lynn Cushing
`Missouri CCR #1077
`Alaris Litigation Services
`1608 Locust Street
`Kansas City, Missouri 64108
`(816) 221-1160
`1-800-280-3376
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`89
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`www.alaris.us
`
`ALARIS LITIGATION SERVICES
`Phone: 1.800.280.3376
`
`Fax: 314.644.1334
`
`IPR2016-01198
`Apple EX1022 Page 2
`
`

`

` TELEPHONIC HEARING 1/19/2018
`
`Page 3
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` JUDGE COCKS: So this is a conference
`call for IPR2016-01198 and 01201. Mr. Malek, I think
`you requested the call so.
` MR. MALEK: Your Honor, just quickly
`here. Probably the most contentious request for a
`motion to withdraw, but in any event, the patent
`owner respectfully requests authorization from the
`board to file a motion for withdrawal of counsel by
`Knobbe, Martens and that withdrawal is mandated by
`the rules, and Apple indicated they oppose or would
`oppose the motion, so that's I think what
`precipitated this call. I just submit that my firm
`would become lead counsel and so patent owner would
`continue to be represented by what I would submit is
`confident counsel and that would be the basis of the
`motion.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. And before I hear
`from Mr. Seitz, I just want to verify that there is
`no other counsel on this call for patent owner, is
`that correct? So none of the counsel that are
`seeking to withdraw are on this call or that you are
`seeking to have withdrawn are on this call?
` MR. MALEK: Not that I'm aware of.
`When I dialed in I got a message that said there were
`seven participants and that's all I know, but not to
`
`www.alaris.us
`
`ALARIS LITIGATION SERVICES
`Phone: 1.800.280.3376
`
`Fax: 314.644.1334
`
`IPR2016-01198
`Apple EX1022 Page 3
`
`

`

` TELEPHONIC HEARING 1/19/2018
`
`Page 4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`my knowledge.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. So let me ask, is
`there any counsel on the call for Knobbe, Martens?
`Okay.
` Mr. Seitz, go ahead, you oppose?
` MR. SEITZ: Yes, Your Honor. Let me
`clarify our position. Apple has no objection to
`Viop-Pal hiring whoever it wants to represent itself
`in these proceedings and does not object per se to
`Knobbe's withdraw. We're not trying to interfere
`with the party's right to select counsel, but there
`are many issues and factual questions that remain
`about the course of this proceeding in which Knobbe
`is implicated that give rise to a concern on our end.
` And to explain briefly, in our last
`conference call, Voip-Pal's position was that it had
`no involvement with Dr. Sawyer, the author of the
`letters, the ex parte letters, and that he was
`essentially nothing more than a concerned third party
`shareholder. Of course, as we discussed last time,
`Dr. Sawyer's October 23 letter admitted that he had
`been meeting with and working with both Voip-Pal and
`its attorneys. Since the filing of our motion and in
`the opposition that came in last week, Voip-Pal has
`now reversed course and admitted that it was involved
`
`www.alaris.us
`
`ALARIS LITIGATION SERVICES
`Phone: 1.800.280.3376
`
`Fax: 314.644.1334
`
`IPR2016-01198
`Apple EX1022 Page 4
`
`

`

` TELEPHONIC HEARING 1/19/2018
`
`Page 5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`with Dr. Sawyer from the very beginning and was
`working with him on each and every letter. But it
`is, however, still unclear as to which of Voip-Pal's
`attorneys were involved in these meetings and
`essentially who knew what and when. Presumably it
`would have been lead counsel, which was Knobbe at
`that time, and throughout the course of this
`proceeding.
` Now there are certainly questions
`about the waiver of the attorney/client privilege in
`the meetings between Sawyer, Voip-Pal and Voip-Pal's
`attorneys, but more importantly, we don't know where
`this proceeding is going to go. There are scenarios
`here that could implicate significant ethical issues.
`We want to make sure that Voip-Pal's attorneys, the
`ones who were counsel of record during the time Dr.
`Sawyer and Voip-Pal were writing these letters,
`remain involved and subject to the board's
`jurisdiction. The board doesn't have third party
`subpoena power and that's essentially my concern. In
`the event it becomes necessary to determine which
`particular attorneys were involved with Dr. Sawyer in
`his campaign or to conduct other discovery into who,
`what and when, we simply think Knobbe should remain
`in this case and subject to the board's jurisdiction
`
`www.alaris.us
`
`ALARIS LITIGATION SERVICES
`Phone: 1.800.280.3376
`
`Fax: 314.644.1334
`
`IPR2016-01198
`Apple EX1022 Page 5
`
`

`

` TELEPHONIC HEARING 1/19/2018
`
`Page 6
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`and discovery. And while this concern may seem
`unwarranted or perhaps unusual, Knobbe has simply
`disappeared from this proceeding. Our last
`communication with anyonr from Knobbe, Martens was on
`December 22, two days after we filed our motion for
`sanctions, indicating that they wanted to withdraw as
`counsel, and that's the last we've heard of them. As
`Your Honor just asked and became clear, they aren't
`even on this call today discussing their withdrawal.
` So our position is if the board should
`grant Knobbe's request to withdraw, we believe the
`board should also require Knobbe to remain part of
`this proceeding in some way, shape or form so that
`they would be subject to the board's jurisdictional
`power and authority. Voip-Pal simply shouldn't be
`allowed to escape inquiry into the historical facts
`of this case by having its counsel withdraw.
` JUDGE COCKS: Thank you, Mr. Seitz.
`Mr. Malek, do you have any last thoughts before I
`discuss?
` MR. MALEK: Just to jump to the first
`thing that Mr. Seitz said, the statement that
`Voip-Pal took the position that it didn't have any
`involvement in the Sawyer letters is a significant
`overstatement and, you know, that has been clarified
`
`www.alaris.us
`
`ALARIS LITIGATION SERVICES
`Phone: 1.800.280.3376
`
`Fax: 314.644.1334
`
`IPR2016-01198
`Apple EX1022 Page 6
`
`

`

` TELEPHONIC HEARING 1/19/2018
`
`Page 7
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`and well expressed in Voip-Pal's opposition which was
`filed on January 12th, and I'll just leave it to the
`board to read what is there.
` But in follow-up just to get to the
`crux of the inquiry, I'd have to hear from Apple as
`to what basis they feel that they have the right to
`prevent withdrawal because the rules mandate
`withdrawal. It's not permissive, it's obligatory,
`and I'm not sure what position Apple or what law
`Apple is relying on to prevent that. That being
`said, I also would submit that Knobbe's retained
`appearance or not, that Apple does have mechanisms to
`seek discovery by United States Code and so I would
`leave it to that as an appropriate mechanism set by
`Congress for Apple to take its discovery, but, again,
`very hard to figure out how to respond to Apple's
`position without knowing what basis in the law
`they're relying on for that position.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. Thank you, Mr.
`Malek. I'm going to confer with my colleagues, but I
`want to make two points before I do so. One, our
`rules require authorization from the panel of the
`board to withdraw as counsel, so that's the reason
`why we're having this call.
` The second is, I want to make sure the
`
`www.alaris.us
`
`ALARIS LITIGATION SERVICES
`Phone: 1.800.280.3376
`
`Fax: 314.644.1334
`
`IPR2016-01198
`Apple EX1022 Page 7
`
`

`

` TELEPHONIC HEARING 1/19/2018
`
`Page 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`parties are clear, Mr. Malek, you can become lead
`counsel for Voip-Pal without the counsel from Knobbe
`withdrawing. I want to make sure the parties
`understand that.
` MR. MALEK: Yes, I appreciate that,
`Your Honor. I think the issue that Voip-Pal and
`Knobbe are having is the fact of the discharge of
`Knobbe and the fact that the rules require
`withdrawal. I think Knobbe is just trying to make,
`and Voip-Pal for that matter, are trying to make sure
`that they comply with the rules.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. Thank you. Would
`both parties please stay on the call? I'm going to
`confer briefly will my colleagues. Thank you.
` (Off the record.)
` JUDGE COCKS: Hello, it's Judge Cocks
`again. I'm joined again with the remaining panel
`members. Do we still have -- Mr. Seitz, are you
`still on the call?
` MR. SEITZ: Yes, Your Honor.
` JUDGE COCKS: And Mr. Malek, are you
`still on the call?
` MR. MALEK: Yes, Your Honor.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. So we have
`conferred and for the time being given that there are
`
`www.alaris.us
`
`ALARIS LITIGATION SERVICES
`Phone: 1.800.280.3376
`
`Fax: 314.644.1334
`
`IPR2016-01198
`Apple EX1022 Page 8
`
`

`

` TELEPHONIC HEARING 1/19/2018
`
`Page 9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`motion for sanctions pending in two proceedings,
`pending the resolution of those motions we're not
`going to permit, authorize a withdraw of any counsel
`at this time.
` MR. MALEK: Okay. This is Kevin
`Malek. We'll respect that decision. So in line with
`what you suggested previously, I think that we would
`make a submission in order to substitute my firm as
`lead counsel and Knobbe as backup counsel. Would
`that be acceptable?
` JUDGE COCKS: Yes. That sounds fine.
`Just to double check, Mr. Seitz, do you have any
`objection in that respect?
` MR. SEITZ: To the swapping of lead
`counsel and backup, no, Your Honor, we do not.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. So, Mr. Malek,
`that will be fine. Go ahead and take the necessary
`steps to do that.
` MR. MALEK: Okay. Thank you, Your
`Honors.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. Is there anything
`else the parties want to talk about today?
` MR. SEITZ: Nothing further from
`petitioner, Your Honor.
` MR. MALEK: One thing, Mr. Seitz, if
`
`www.alaris.us
`
`ALARIS LITIGATION SERVICES
`Phone: 1.800.280.3376
`
`Fax: 314.644.1334
`
`IPR2016-01198
`Apple EX1022 Page 9
`
`

`

` TELEPHONIC HEARING 1/19/2018
`
`Page 10
`
`you wouldn't mind handling the filing of the
`transcript, that would alleviate the obligation for
`me to do that. Is that okay?
` JUDGE COCKS: So we now have the
`potential for two transcripts. The record only needs
`one, so if either side doesn't have any objection,
`then I don't think that the panel has any concern
`with just filing one copy of the transcript. Is that
`-- Mr. Seitz, do you have any objection to that?
` MR. SEITZ: No. If Mr. Malek is okay
`with that approach, I will get our transcript and
`file that and that can be the official transcript for
`both parties then, Your Honor. That's fine with me.
` MR. MALEK: That's acceptable to the
`patent owner as well.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. Thank you very
`much. If the parties don't have anything further,
`the panel doesn't either and this call is adjourned.
` MR. SEITZ: Thank you for your time.
` MR. MALEK: Thank you.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`www.alaris.us
`
`ALARIS LITIGATION SERVICES
`Phone: 1.800.280.3376
`
`Fax: 314.644.1334
`
`IPR2016-01198
`Apple EX1022 Page 10
`
`

`

` TELEPHONIC HEARING 1/19/2018
`
`Page 11
`
` CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER
`STATE OF MISSOURI )
` ) ss.
`CITY OF KANSAS CITY )
` I, Mary Lynn Cushing, a Certified
`Court Reporter (MO), and a Notary Public within and
`for the State of Missouri, do hereby certify that the
`telephonic hearing was taken by me to the best of my
`ability and thereafter reduced to typewriting under
`my direction; that I am neither counsel for, related
`to, nor employed by any of the parties to the action
`in which this deposition was taken, and further that
`I am not a relative or employee of any attorney or
`counsel employed by the parties thereto, nor
`financially or otherwise interested in the outcome of
`the action.
`
` ____________________________
` Mary Lynn Cushing, CCR #1077
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`www.alaris.us
`
`ALARIS LITIGATION SERVICES
`Phone: 1.800.280.3376
`
`Fax: 314.644.1334
`
`IPR2016-01198
`Apple EX1022 Page 11
`
`

`

`
`
` TELEPHONIC HEARING 1/19/2018 TELEPHONIC HEARING 1/19/2018
`
`A
`ability 11:8
`acceptable 9:10
`10:14
`action 11:10,15
`Adam 2:3
`adam.seitz@e...
`2:6
`adjourned 10:18
`ADMINISTRA...
`1:14
`admitted 4:21
`4:25
`ahead 4:5 9:17
`Alaris 2:22
`alleviate 10:2
`allowed 6:16
`anyonr 6:4
`APPEAL 1:2
`appearance
`7:12
`Appearing 2:13
`Apple 1:4 3:10
`4:7 7:5,9,10,12
`7:15
`Apple's 7:16
`appreciate 8:5
`approach 10:11
`appropriate
`7:14
`asked 6:8
`attorney 11:12
`attorney/client
`5:10
`attorneys 4:23
`5:4,12,15,22
`author 4:17
`authority 6:15
`authorization
`3:7 7:22
`authorize 9:3
`Avenue 2:16
`aware 3:23
`B
`B2 1:9,11
`backup 9:9,15
`
`basis 3:15 7:6,17
`beginning 5:1
`believe 6:11
`best 11:7
`Blvd 2:10
`board 1:2 3:8
`5:19 6:10,12
`7:3,23
`board's 5:18,25
`6:14
`Boulevard 1:20
`2:4
`briefly 4:15 8:14
`C
`C 1:15 2:1
`call 3:2,3,12,19
`3:21,22 4:3,16
`6:9 7:24 8:13
`8:19,22 10:18
`campaign 5:23
`case 1:8,11 5:25
`6:17
`CCR 2:21 11:18
`certainly 5:9
`CERTIFICATE
`11:1
`Certified 11:4
`certify 11:6
`CHAGNON 1:16
`check 9:12
`City 2:23 11:3,3
`clarified 6:25
`clarify 4:7
`clear 6:8 8:1
`Cocks 1:15 3:1,17
`4:2 6:18 7:19
`8:12,16,16,21
`8:24 9:11,16,21
`10:4,16
`Code 7:13
`colleagues
`7:20 8:14
`College 1:20
`2:4
`Colorado 2:11
`communication
`
`6:4
`comply 8:11
`concern 4:14
`5:20 6:1 10:7
`concerned 4:19
`conduct 5:23
`confer 7:20
`8:14
`conference 3:1
`4:16
`conferred 8:25
`confident 3:15
`Congress 7:15
`contentious 3:5
`continue 3:14
`copy 10:8
`correct 3:20
`counsel 3:8,13
`3:15,19,20 4:3
`4:11 5:6,16 6:7
`6:17 7:23 8:2
`8:2 9:3,9,9,15
`11:9,13
`course 4:13,20
`4:25 5:7
`Court 11:5
`crux 7:5
`Cushing 2:21
`11:4,18
`D
`days 6:5
`December 6:5
`decision 9:6
`deposition 11:11
`determine 5:21
`dialed 3:24
`direction 11:9
`disappeared
`6:3
`discharge 8:7
`discovery 5:23
`6:1 7:13,15
`discuss 6:20
`discussed 4:20
`discussing 6:9
`double 9:12
`
`Dr 4:17,21 5:1,16
`5:22
`
`E
`
`E 2:1,1
`either 10:6,18
`employed 11:10
`11:13
`employee 11:12
`ERISE 1:20 2:4
`2:9
`escape 6:16
`essentially 4:19
`5:5,20
`ethical 5:14
`event 3:6 5:21
`ex 4:18
`explain 4:15
`expressed 7:1
`F
`fact 8:7,8
`facts 6:16
`factual 4:12
`feel 7:6
`figure 7:16
`file 3:8 10:12
`filed 6:5 7:2
`filing 4:23 10:1,8
`financially 11:14
`fine 9:11,17 10:13
`firm 3:12 9:8
`first 6:21
`follow-up 7:4
`form 6:13
`further 9:23
`10:17 11:11
`G
`give 4:14
`given 8:25
`go 4:5 5:13 9:17
`going 5:13 7:20
`8:13 9:3
`grant 6:11
`Greenwood
`2:10,11
`
`H
`handling 10:1
`hard 7:16
`Hart 2:9
`hear 3:17 7:5
`heard 6:7
`hearing 1:14 11:7
`HELD 1:19
`Hello 8:16
`hiring 4:8
`historical 6:16
`Honor 3:4 4:6
`6:8 8:6,20,23
`9:15,24 10:13
`Honors 9:20
`HUDALLA 1:16
`I
`implicate 5:14
`implicated 4:14
`importantly 5:12
`indicated 3:10
`indicating 6:6
`inquiry 6:16 7:5
`interested 11:14
`interfere 4:10
`involved 4:25
`5:4,18,22
`involvement
`4:17 6:24
`IP 1:20 2:4,9
`IPR2016-01198
`1:8 3:2
`IPR2016-01201
`1:11
`issue 8:6
`issues 4:12 5:14
`J
`January 1:18 7:2
`JENNIFER 1:16
`JOHN 1:16
`joined 8:17
`JOSIAH 1:15
`Judge 3:1,17 4:2
`6:18 7:19 8:12
`8:16,16,21,24
`
`
`
`www.alaris.uswww.alaris.us
`
`
`ALARIS LITIGATION SERVICESALARIS LITIGATION SERVICES
`
`Phone: 1.800.280.3376Phone: 1.800.280.3376
`
`
`
`Fax: 314.644.1334Fax: 314.644.1334
`
`IPR2016-01198
`Apple EX1022 Page 12
`
`

`

` TELEPHONIC HEARING 1/19/2018
`
`9:11,16,21 10:4
`10:16
`JUDGES 1:14
`jump 6:21
`jurisdiction 5:19
`5:25
`jurisdictional
`6:14
`
`K
`Kansas 1:21 2:5
`2:23 11:3
`Kevin 2:15 9:5
`kevin.malek@...
`2:17
`knew 5:5
`Knobbe 3:9 4:3
`4:13 5:6,24
`6:2,4,12 8:2,7
`8:8,9 9:9
`Knobbe's 4:10
`6:11 7:11
`know 3:25 5:12
`6:25
`knowing 7:17
`knowledge 4:1
`L
`law 7:9,17
`lead 3:13 5:6 8:1
`9:9,14
`leave 7:2,14
`letter 4:21 5:2
`letters 4:18,18
`5:17 6:24
`line 9:6
`Litigation 2:22
`Locust 2:22
`Lynn 2:21 11:4
`11:18
`
`M
`Madison 2:16
`Malek 2:15,15
`3:2,4,23 6:19
`6:21 7:20 8:1
`8:5,21,23 9:5
`
`9:6,16,19,25
`10:10,14,20
`mandate 7:7
`mandated 3:9
`Martens 3:9 4:3
`6:4
`Mary 2:21 11:4
`11:18
`matter 8:10
`mechanism 7:14
`mechanisms
`7:12
`meeting 4:22
`meetings 5:4,11
`members 8:18
`message 3:24
`MEYER 1:16
`mind 10:1
`Missouri 2:21
`2:23 11:2,6
`MO 11:5
`Moss 2:15
`motion 3:6,8,11
`3:16 4:23 6:5
`9:1
`motions 9:2
`N
`N 2:1,15
`necessary 5:21
`9:17
`needs 10:5
`neither 11:9
`New 2:16,16
`Notary 11:5
`O
`object 4:9
`objection 4:7
`9:13 10:6,9
`obligation 10:2
`obligatory 7:8
`October 4:21
`OFFICE 1:1
`official 10:12
`okay 3:17 4:2,4
`7:19 8:12,24
`
`9:5,16,19,21
`10:3,10,16
`ones 5:16
`oppose 3:10,11
`4:5
`opposition 4:24
`7:1
`order 9:8
`outcome 11:14
`Overland 1:21
`2:5
`overstatement
`6:25
`owner 1:7 2:14
`3:7,13,19 10:15
`P
`P 2:1,1,3
`panel 7:22 8:17
`10:7,18
`Park 1:21 2:5
`part 6:12
`parte 4:18
`participants
`3:25
`particular 5:22
`parties 8:1,3,13
`9:22 10:13,17
`11:10,13
`party 4:19 5:19
`party's 4:11
`patent 1:1,2,7,9
`1:11,14 2:14 3:6
`3:13,19 10:15
`Paul 2:9
`paul.hart@eri...
`2:12
`pending 9:1,2
`permissive 7:8
`permit 9:3
`petitioner 1:4
`2:2 9:24
`Plaza 2:10
`please 8:13
`PLLC 2:15
`points 7:21
`position 4:7,16
`
`6:10,23 7:9,17
`7:18
`potential 10:5
`power 5:20
`6:15
`precipitated
`3:12
`Presumably 5:5
`prevent 7:7,10
`previously 9:7
`privilege 5:10
`Probably 3:5
`proceeding
`4:13 5:8,13 6:3
`6:13
`proceedings
`4:9 9:1
`Public 11:5
`Q
`questions 4:12
`5:9
`quickly 3:4
`R
`
`R 2:1,9
`read 7:3
`reason 7:23
`record 5:16 8:15
`10:5
`reduced 11:8
`related 11:9
`relative 11:12
`relying 7:10,18
`remain 4:12
`5:18,24 6:12
`remaining 8:17
`Reporter 11:1,5
`represent 4:8
`represented
`3:14
`request 3:5 6:11
`requested 3:3
`requests 3:7
`require 6:12
`7:22 8:8
`resolution 9:2
`
`respect 9:6,13
`respectfully 3:7
`respond 7:16
`retained 7:11
`reversed 4:25
`right 4:11 7:6
`rise 4:14
`rules 3:10 7:7
`7:22 8:8,11
`S
`
`S 2:1
`sanctions 6:6
`9:1
`Sawyer 4:17 5:1
`5:11,17,22
`6:24
`Sawyer's 4:21
`scenarios 5:13
`se 4:9
`second 7:25
`seek 7:13
`seeking 3:21,22
`Seitz 2:3 3:18
`4:5,6 6:18,22
`8:18,20 9:12
`9:14,23,25
`10:9,10,19
`select 4:11
`Services 2:22
`set 7:14
`seven 3:25
`shape 6:13
`shareholder
`4:20
`side 10:6
`significant 5:14
`6:24
`simply 5:24 6:2
`6:15
`sounds 9:11
`ss 11:2
`State 11:2,6
`statement 6:22
`States 1:1 7:13
`stay 8:13
`steps 9:18
`
`www.alaris.us
`
`ALARIS LITIGATION SERVICES
`Phone: 1.800.280.3376
`
`Fax: 314.644.1334
`
`IPR2016-01198
`Apple EX1022 Page 13
`
`

`

` TELEPHONIC HEARING 1/19/2018
`
`9
`9,179,005 1:9
`913)777-5600
`2:6,11
`
`X Y
`
`York 2:16,16
`
`Z 0
`
`01201 3:2
`1
`1-800-280-33...
`2:24
`10173 2:16
`1077 2:21 11:18
`12th 7:2
`1608 2:22
`19TH 1:18
`2
`200 2:10
`2018 1:18
`212)812-1491
`2:17
`22 6:5
`221-1160 2:23
`23 4:21
`
`3
`340 2:16
`
`4 5
`
`5600 2:10
`6
`64108 2:23
`66211 1:21 2:5
`7
`700 1:21 2:5
`7015 1:20 2:4
`8
`8,542,815 1:11
`80111 2:11
`816 2:23
`
`Street 2:22
`subject 5:18,25
`6:14
`submission 9:8
`submit 3:12,14
`7:11
`subpoena 5:20
`substitute 9:8
`suggested 9:7
`Suite 1:21 2:5,10
`sure 5:15 7:9,25
`8:3,10
`swapping 9:14
`T
`take 7:15 9:17
`taken 11:7,11
`talk 9:22
`telephonic 1:14
`11:7
`telephonically
`2:9,13
`Thank 6:18 7:19
`8:12,14 9:19
`10:16,19,20
`thereto 11:13
`thing 6:22 9:25
`think 3:2,11 5:24
`8:6,9 9:7 10:7
`third 4:19 5:19
`thoughts 6:19
`time 4:20 5:7,16
`8:25 9:4 10:19
`today 6:9 9:22
`TRADEMARK
`1:1
`transcript 10:2,8
`10:11,12
`transcripts 10:5
`TRIAL 1:2
`trying 4:10 8:9
`8:10
`two 6:5 7:21 9:1
`10:5
`typewriting 11:8
`U
`
`unclear 5:3
`understand 8:4
`United 1:1 7:13
`unusual 6:2
`unwarranted
`6:2
`
`V
`verify 3:18
`Village 2:11
`Viop-Pal 4:8
`Voip-Pal 4:22
`4:24 5:11,17
`6:15,23 8:2,6
`8:10
`Voip-Pal's 4:16
`5:3,11,15 7:1
`VOIP-PAL.COM
`1:6
`vs 1:5
`
`W
`waiver 5:10
`want 3:18 5:15
`7:21,25 8:3
`9:22
`wanted 6:6
`wants 4:8
`way 6:13
`We'll 9:6
`we're 4:10 7:24
`9:2
`we've 6:7
`week 4:24
`withdraw 3:6,21
`4:10 6:6,11,17
`7:23 9:3
`withdrawal 3:8
`3:9 6:9 7:7,8
`8:9
`withdrawing
`8:3
`withdrawn 3:22
`working 4:22
`5:2
`wouldn't 10:1
`writing 5:17
`
`www.alaris.us
`
`ALARIS LITIGATION SERVICES
`Phone: 1.800.280.3376
`
`Fax: 314.644.1334
`
`IPR2016-01198
`Apple EX1022 Page 14
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket