throbber
U.S. Patent No. 8,894,066
`Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`RUBICON COMMUNICATIONS, LP
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`LEGO A/S
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01187
`Patent 8,894,066
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,894,066
`Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`
`LEGO A/S (“Patent Owner”) hereby objects to the admissibility of certain
`
`evidence submitted by Rubicon Communications, LP (“Petitioner”) during the
`
`preliminary proceeding. The filing of this Objections to Evidence is timely, as the
`
`Board issued the Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review (Paper 38)
`
`on December 16, 2016.
`
`1. Patent Owner objects to Exhibit B1 (copied pages of Building Robots with
`
`Lego® MindstormsTM : The ULTIMATE Tool for Mindstorms Maniacs!),
`
`because it is not authentic or original as required by Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 901 and 1002 and is not self-authenticating under Federal Rule of
`
`Evidence 902. Exhibit B1 also contains inadmissible hearsay under Federal
`
`Rules of Evidence 801–07 about the publication date.
`
`2. Patent Owner objects to Exhibit B2 (printouts from the Internet Archive’s
`
`“Wayback Machine” allegedly about “Philo’s Home page”), because it is not
`
`authentic or original as required by Federal Rules of Evidence 901 and 1002
`
`and is not self-authenticating under Federal Rule of Evidence 902. Exhibit
`
`B2 also contains inadmissible hearsay under Federal Rules of Evidence 801–
`
`07 about the publication date.
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 23, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,894,066
`Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/ Elizabeth A. Alquist/
`
`
`
`
`Andrew M. Riddles
`Registration No. 31,657
`ariddles@daypitney.com
`
`Elizabeth A. Alquist
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`eaalquist@daypitney.com
`
`Howard Grossman
`Registration No. 48,673
`hgrossman@daypitney.com
`
`Day Pitney LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Tel: (212) 297-5855
`Fax: (203) 202-3896
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,894,066
`Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on December
`
`
`
`
`
`23, 2016, a true and correct copy of Objections to Evidence, via UPS Overnight,
`
`was served on the following counsel of record:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`Eric B. Meyertons (Reg. No. 34,876)
`Chris D. Thompson (Reg. No. 43,188)
`Brian Mangum (Reg. No. 64,224)
`Ryan Beard (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`1120 S. Capital of Texas Hwy.
`Building 2, Suite 300
`Austin, Texas 78746
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/ Elizabeth A. Alquist/
`
`
`
`
`Andrew M. Riddles
`Registration No. 31,657
`ariddles@daypitney.com
`
`Elizabeth A. Alquist
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`eaalquist@daypitney.com
`
`Howard Grossman
`Registration No. 48,673
`hgrossman@daypitney.com
`
`Day Pitney LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Tel: (212) 297-5855
`Fax: (203) 202-3896
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`-4-

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket