`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 24
`Date: October 11, 2016
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`RUBICON COMMUNICATIONS, LP,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`LEGO A/S,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01187
`Patent 8,894,066 B2
`
`
`
`Before SCOTT A. DANIELS, NEIL T. POWELL, and
`TIMOTHY J. GOODSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`POWELL, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Elizabeth A. Alquist
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`Patent Owner filed a Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Ms. Elizabeth
`
`A. Alquist and an accompanying Declaration in the above-captioned proceeding.
`
`IPR2016-01187, Paper 6, Ex. 2001. Petitioner did not file an opposition to Patent
`
`Owner’s Motion. After considering Patent Owner’s Motion and accompanying
`
`Declaration, it is
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01187
`Patent 8,894,066 B2
`
`
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Ms.
`
`Elizabeth A. Alquist is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a registered
`
`practitioner as lead counsel in the instant proceeding, but Ms. Elizabeth A. Alquist
`
`is authorized to be designated as backup counsel; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Elizabeth A. Alquist is to comply with the
`
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`
`set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the C.F.R., and is subject to the USPTO’s
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and the USPTO Rules of
`
`Professional Conduct as set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Eric B. Meyertons
`emeyertons@intprop.com
`
`Brian Mangum
`bmangum@intprop.com
`
`Chris Thompson
`cthompson@intprop.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Brian Pollack
`bpollack@daypitney.com
`
`Howard Grossman
`hgrossman@daypitney.com
`
`
`
`2