`Motion to Seal Certain Portions of Patent Owner’s Opposition
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`RUBICON COMMUNICATIONS, LP
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`LEGO A/S
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01187
`Patent 8,894,066
`
`
`
`MOTION TO SEAL CERTAIN PORTIONS OF PATENT
`OWNER’S OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER’S MOTION TO LIST
`ADDITIONAL PARTIES AS REAL PARTIES-IN-INTEREST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,894,066
`Motion to Seal Certain Portions of Patent Owner’s Opposition
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`STATEMENT OF RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.14, LEGO A/S (the “Patent Owner”) respectfully
`
`requests the Board seal certain portions of Patent Owner’s Opposition to
`
`Petitioner’s Motion to List Additional Parties as Real Parties-in-Interest
`
`(“Opposition”).
`
`
`
`
`
`II.
`
`STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR THE RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Patent Owner respectfully requests the Board seal certain portions of the
`
`Opposition and concurrently submits a redacted, non-confidential version for the
`
`public. Patent Owner believes seeking the Board’s prior authorization to file this
`
`Motion would be impractical and, as a result, submits this Motion without the
`
`Board’s authorization. See Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg.
`
`48,755, 48,762 (Aug. 14, 2012) (“Motions where it is not practical to seek prior
`
`Board authorization include motions to seal . . . .”).
`
`Petitioner has informed Patent Owner that parts of the Opposition, which
`
`relies on the transcript of James Thompson deposition, contain confidential
`
`information and business strategy. See Paper 52. Accordingly, Patent Owner
`
`respectfully requests certain redacted portions to remain sealed under the Board’s
`
`default protective order, or alternatively, Petitioner’s proposed protective order.
`
`Ex. 1035.
`
`
`
`.
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,894,066
`Motion to Seal Certain Portions of Patent Owner’s Opposition
`
`
`
`
`
`III. CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reason, Patent Owner respectfully requests that the
`
`unredacted version of the Opposition be sealed from the public.
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`/ Elizabeth A. Alquist/
`
`
`
`
`Andrew M. Riddles
`Registration No. 31,657
`ariddles@daypitney.com
`
`Elizabeth A. Alquist
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`eaalquist@daypitney.com
`
`
`
`Day Pitney LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Tel: (212) 297-5855
`Fax: (203) 202-3896
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 10, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,894,066
`Motion to Seal Certain Portions of Patent Owner’s Opposition
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on March 10,
`
`
`
`
`
`2017, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion, via UPS Overnight, was
`
`served on the following counsel of record:
`
`
`
`
`
`Dean M. Munyon
`Anthony M. Petro
`Ryan T. Beard
`Geoffrey W. Heaven
`1120 S. Capital of Texas Hwy.
`Building 2, Suite 300
`Austin, Texas 78746
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/ Elizabeth A. Alquist/
`
`
`
`
`Andrew M. Riddles
`Registration No. 31,657
`ariddles@daypitney.com
`
`Elizabeth A. Alquist
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`eaalquist@daypitney.com
`
`Day Pitney LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Tel: (212) 297-5855
`Fax: (203) 202-3896
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`.
`
`-4-
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
