`571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 29
`Entered: July 24, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., and SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.1, and
`APPLE INC. and LG ELECTRONICS, INC.2,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FASTVDO LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01179
`Case IPR2016-01203
`Patent 5,850,482
`____________
`
`
`Before KARL D. EASTHOM, JEFFREY S. SMITH, and PATRICK M.
`BOUCHER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Oral Argument
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`1 Petitioner for IPR2016-01179
`2 Petitioner for IPR2016-01203
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01179
`IPR2016-01203
`Patent 5,850,482
`
`The parties for these inter partes reviews have filed requests for oral
`
`argument. See, e.g., IPR2016-01179, Papers 26, 27; IPR2016-01203, Papers
`31, 32. Oral argument is granted in each proceeding. The date for oral
`argument is Thursday, August 24, 2017. There will be back-to-back
`hearings for these inter partes reviews. The first hearing will be for
`IPR2016-01179 and will commence at 10:00 AM Eastern Time. The second
`hearing will be for IPR2016-01203 and will commence immediately after
`the first hearing concludes.
`
`The hearings will be open to the public for in-person attendance, on
`the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`Virginia. Space in the hearing room is limited, and any attendees beyond
`three per party (including any attorneys who may be appearing) will be
`accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. One or more judges of
`the panel may attend remotely.
`
`For each proceeding, each party will have thirty (30) minutes of total
`time to present arguments. In each proceeding, Petitioner will proceed first,
`Patent Owner thereafter will respond, and Petitioner may rebut if it has time
`remaining.
`
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearings, and the
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearings.
`
`At least seven (7) business days prior to the hearing, each party shall
`serve on the other party (and not file) any demonstrative it intends to use
`during the hearing. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b). The parties should attempt to
`resolve any objections to demonstratives prior to involving the Board. If any
`objections remain, a party may raise them during the hearing as part of its
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01179
`IPR2016-01203
`Patent 5,850,482
`
`allotted argument time. At least one (1) business day prior to the hearing,
`the parties shall provide the demonstratives to the Board by emailing them in
`portable document format (.pdf) to Trials@uspto.gov. The parties are
`directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of
`Regents of the University of Michigan, No. IPR2013-00041 (PTAB Jan. 27,
`2014) (Paper 65) for guidance regarding appropriate content of
`demonstratives.
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at
`hearing, although any backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in
`whole or in part. If any lead counsel will not be in attendance at the hearing,
`the Board should be notified via a joint telephone conference call no later
`than two days prior to the hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`Any special requests for audio visual equipment should be directed to
`Trials@uspto.gov.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01179
`IPR2016-01203
`Patent 5,850,482
`
`PETITIONER:
`Derrick W. Toddy
`John D. Vandenberg
`Garth A. Winn
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
`derrick.toddy@klarquist.com
`john.vandenberg@klarquist.com
`garth.winn@klarquist.com
`
`David L. Fehrman
`Martin M. Noonen
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`dfehrman@mofo.com
`mnoonen@mofo.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Neil A. Rubin
`Amir Naini
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`nrubin@raklaw.com
`anaini@raklaw.com
`
`Wayne M. Helge
`Walter D. Davis
`DAVIDSON BERQUIST JACKSON & GOWDEY, LLP
`whelge@dbjg.com
`wdavis@dbjg.com
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
