`571-272-7822
`
`Paper No. 25
`Entered: July 11, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FASTVDO LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01179
`Patent 5,850,482
`____________
`
`
`Before KARL EASTHOM, JEFFREY S. SMITH, and PATRICK M. BOUCHER,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01179
`Patent 5,850,482
`
`
`
`
`On July 10, 2017, a conference call was held between counsel for the parties
`and Judges Easthom, Boucher, and Smith. Patent Owner provided a court reporter
`and stated that it will file the transcript in due course.
`Patent Owner initiated the conference call to request leave to file a motion to
`strike new evidence and new arguments raised in Petitioner’s Reply (Paper 24).
`Petitioner opposed asserting that (1) Petitioner did not make new arguments or
`present new evidence, and (2) if Petitioner did make new arguments or present new
`evidence, Petitioner did so to address Patent Owner’s arguments made in Patent
`Owner’s Response (Paper 22).
`The Board denied Patent Owner’s request to file a motion to strike. The
`Board authorizes Patent Owner to raise this issue at the Oral Hearing.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that the request to file a motion to strike is denied.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01179
`Patent 5,850,482
`
`PETITIONER:
`Derrick W. Toddy
`Garth A. Winn
`John D. Vandenberg
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
`derrick.toddy@klarquist.com
`garth.winn@klarquist.com
`john.vandenberg@klarquist.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Neil A. Rubin
`Amir Naini
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`nrubin@raklaw.com
`anaini@raklaw.com
`
`Wayne M. Helge
`Walter D. Davis
`DAVIDSON, BERQUIST, JACKSON & GOWDEY, LLP
`whelge@dbjg.com
`wdavis@dbjg.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`