throbber
·1· · ·UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`· · · · BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`·2
`
`Page 1
`
`·3
`
`·4· ·ARRIS GROUP, INC.,· · · ·)
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`·5· · · · · · ·Petitioner,· · )· Case IPR2016-01160
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`·6· ·vs.· · · · · · · · · · · )· Patent No. 8,611,404
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`·7· ·TQ DELTA, LLC,· · · · · ·)
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`·8· · · · · · ·Patent Owner.· )
`
`·9
`
`10
`
`11· · · · · · ·Deposition of LANCE J. McNALLY, taken on
`
`12· ·behalf of the Patent Owner, pursuant to Notice and
`
`13· ·agreement of counsel, before Judith L. Leitz Moran,
`
`14· ·Certified Court Reporter, at Thomas Horstemeyer,
`
`15· ·L.L.P., 400 Interstate North Parkway, Suite 1500,
`
`16· ·Atlanta, Georgia, on the 23rd day of February,
`
`17· ·2017, commencing at the hour of 9:00 a.m.
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TQ Delta Exhibit 2002
`
`
`Arris Group, Inc. v. TQ Delta, LLC
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01160
`
`1
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
`·1· ·APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL:
`
`·2
`
`·3· ·On behalf of the Petitioner:
`
`·4· · · · Dan R. Gresham, Esquire
`
`·5· · · · Charles W. Griggers, Esquire
`
`·6· · · · THOMAS HORSTEMEYER, L.L.P.
`
`·7· · · · 400 Interstate North Parkway, SE
`
`·8· · · · Suite 1500
`
`·9· · · · Atlanta, Georgia· 30339
`
`10
`
`11· ·On behalf of all named Patent Owner:
`
`12· · · · Thomas J. Wimbiscus, Esquire
`
`13· · · · Rajendra A. Chiplunkar, Esquire
`
`14· · · · David Z. Petty, Esquire - (via telephone)
`
`15· · · · McANDREWS HELD & MALLOY, LTD.
`
`16· · · · 500 West Madison Street
`
`17· · · · 34th Floor
`
`18· · · · Chicago, Illinois· 60661
`
`19
`
`20· ·ALSO PRESENT:
`
`21· · · · BOB STARR, ESQ., SR. PATENT COUNSEL, ARRIS
`
`22· · · · CAROL ANSLEY, ESQ., SR. DIRECTOR, ARRIS
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`2
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · · · · · ·I N D E X
`
`Page 3
`
`·2· ·EXAMINATION· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · PAGE
`
`·3· · · · BY MR. WIMBISCUS .......................· · ·4
`
`·4· · · · BY MR. GRESHAM .........................· · 94
`
`·5· · · · BY MS. WIMBISCUS .......................· ·102
`
`·6
`
`·7
`
`·8· · · · · ·E X H I B I T S (REFERRED TO)
`
`·9· ·EXHIBIT NO.· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · PAGE
`
`10· ·Exhibit 1003· ·Declaration of Lance· · · · · · · 19
`
`11· · · · · · · · · McNally
`
`12· ·Exhibit 1004· ·Curriculum Vitae· · · · · · · · · ·8
`
`13· ·Exhibit 1005· ·Bowie Patent, 5,956,323· · · · · ·33
`
`14· ·Exhibit 1006· ·Vanzieleghem Patent,· · · · · · · 67
`
`15· · · · · · · · · 6,246,725
`
`16· ·Exhibit 1009· ·ADSL Standards· · · · · · · · · · 27
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`3
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · · · ·LANCE J. McNALLY,
`
`·2· ·being first duly sworn, was examined as follows:
`
`Page 4
`
`·3· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I do.
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · · EXAMINATION
`
`·5· ·BY MR. WIMBISCUS:
`
`·6· · · · Q· · Good morning, Mr. McNally.
`
`·7· · · · A· · Good morning.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · Would you state and spell your name for
`
`·9· ·the record, please.
`
`10· · · · A· · My full name is Lance John McNally,
`
`11· ·L-A-N-C-E, J-O-H-N, M-C-N-A-L-L-Y.
`
`12· · · · Q· · What is your residence address, please?
`
`13· · · · A· · I reside at 11 Shirley Road, Townsend,
`
`14· ·Massachusetts.
`
`15· · · · Q· · Covered with snow right now?
`
`16· · · · A· · I hope not.· I hope it all melted, but it
`
`17· ·was pretty brutal the last couple of weeks.
`
`18· · · · Q· · What is your age, please?
`
`19· · · · A· · My age, 58.
`
`20· · · · Q· · Okay.· And you had your deposition taken
`
`21· ·a number of times, I trust?
`
`22· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`23· · · · Q· · Okay.· And just for clarity, I'll go
`
`24· ·quickly through some of the ground rules just to
`
`25· ·refresh you.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Page 5
`·1· · · · · · ·So we have a court reporter here today,
`
`·2· ·so you'll need to answer audibly, right?
`
`·3· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`·4· · · · Q· · All right.· And if you can wait -- do
`
`·5· ·your best to wait till I'm done with my question
`
`·6· ·before you start your answer, it will make her life
`
`·7· ·a lot easier.
`
`·8· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`·9· · · · Q· · All right.
`
`10· · · · A· · She'll kick me.
`
`11· · · · Q· · Okay.· I'm sure she'll give us a heads
`
`12· ·up.
`
`13· · · · · · ·I'll try to take periodic breaks, maybe
`
`14· ·every hour or so, but if you need a break before
`
`15· ·then, just let me know.
`
`16· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`17· · · · Q· · I just ask that you don't take a break
`
`18· ·during the pendency of a question.
`
`19· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`20· · · · Q· · Okay.· And during the breaks that may
`
`21· ·occur during the course of my cross-examination, do
`
`22· ·you understand that you're not supposed to speak to
`
`23· ·counsel about the substance of your testimony?
`
`24· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`25· · · · Q· · Okay.· Is there any reason why you would
`
`5
`
`

`

`·1· ·not be able to testify accurately and truthfully
`
`Page 6
`
`·2· ·today?
`
`·3· · · · A· · There's no reason.
`
`·4· · · · Q· · Okay.· And you're not under any
`
`·5· ·medications or anything like that?
`
`·6· · · · A· · No, sir.
`
`·7· · · · Q· · Okay.· All right.· What did you do to
`
`·8· ·prepare for your deposition for today?
`
`·9· · · · A· · I reviewed the '404 patent.· I reviewed
`
`10· ·the '725 patent.· I reviewed the '323 patent. I
`
`11· ·took a quick look at the prosecution history for
`
`12· ·the '323 patent.
`
`13· · · · · · ·I reviewed the first section of my expert
`
`14· ·report dealing with the beginning of it, and the
`
`15· ·'323, the '725, and the ADSL Standard.· I did not
`
`16· ·review the second part of my expert report with
`
`17· ·regards to the two T1 references.
`
`18· · · · · · ·I reviewed the Patent Owners' petition to
`
`19· ·the Patent Board.· I looked at the ADSL Standard --
`
`20· ·well, use the word "review," that whole document
`
`21· ·sentence by sentence, I did not do, I just did a
`
`22· ·quick overview of that.· And I did a quick overview
`
`23· ·of the original petition.· And I reviewed the
`
`24· ·decision.
`
`25· · · · Q· · Thank you.
`
`6
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·Did you review any other documents?
`
`Page 7
`
`·2· · · · A· · I reviewed very, very briefly the PCT of
`
`·3· ·Gross that is referred to in the '404, as well as
`
`·4· ·the provisional application that it cites.
`
`·5· · · · Q· · Okay.· Anything else?
`
`·6· · · · A· · I cannot think of anything else or I do
`
`·7· ·not recall anything else at this time.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · Okay.· And did you meet with anyone in
`
`·9· ·preparation for your deposition?
`
`10· · · · A· · Yes, I did.
`
`11· · · · Q· · And with whom did you meet and when,
`
`12· ·please?
`
`13· · · · A· · I met with the attorneys, Chuck and Dan,
`
`14· ·and with Bob and Carol, and we met yesterday.
`
`15· · · · Q· · Okay.· Was that here at the Thomas
`
`16· ·Horstemeyer law firm in Atlanta?
`
`17· · · · A· · Yes, and I sat on this side of the
`
`18· ·conference room table.
`
`19· · · · Q· · All right.· Where we are today?
`
`20· · · · A· · Correct.
`
`21· · · · Q· · You're familiar with that seat then?
`
`22· · · · A· · Well, no, I actually sat down there
`
`23· ·(indicating).
`
`24· · · · Q· · All right.· Did you have occasion to
`
`25· ·speak with anyone else in preparation for your
`
`7
`
`

`

`·1· ·deposition?
`
`·2· · · · A· · No, sir.
`
`Page 8
`
`·3· · · · Q· · How long did you meet?
`
`·4· · · · A· · Approximately 3 to 4 hours.
`
`·5· · · · Q· · Okay.· And that's the extent of your
`
`·6· ·preparation for your deposition; is that right?
`
`·7· · · · A· · Correct.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · Okay.· I'm going to show you a copy of
`
`·9· ·your CV which has been previously marked
`
`10· ·Exhibit 1004 in connection with this case.
`
`11· · · · · · ·That's a true and accurate copy of your
`
`12· ·current CV; is that right?
`
`13· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`14· · · · Q· · Does that accurately describe your work
`
`15· ·experience to the extent it's set forth?
`
`16· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`17· · · · Q· · Okay.· Did you have any prior work
`
`18· ·experience with multichannel modems or
`
`19· ·transceivers?
`
`20· · · · A· · I would characterize the DOCSIS cable
`
`21· ·modem work as dealing with transceivers and
`
`22· ·receivers.· I would characterize the work that I
`
`23· ·did on T1 with transmitters and receivers.· I would
`
`24· ·characterize the work that I did in communications
`
`25· ·as well with various technologies.
`
`8
`
`

`

`Page 9
`·1· · · · Q· · Okay.· Did any of that work involve low
`
`·2· ·power mode transceivers?
`
`·3· · · · A· · I would say Wake-on-LAN did, yes.
`
`·4· · · · Q· · Can you --
`
`·5· · · · A· · Wake-on-LAN, local area network.
`
`·6· · · · Q· · Can you spell that, Wake?
`
`·7· · · · A· · Wake as in W-A-K-E.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · Uh-huh.
`
`·9· · · · A· · Whiskey Alpha Kilo Echo.
`
`10· · · · Q· · All right.· And would you direct me to
`
`11· ·that on your CV here, please.
`
`12· · · · A· · It would be during the time that I worked
`
`13· ·at Zenith Data Systems.· Responsible for leading
`
`14· ·the R&D team, developing OEM and validating
`
`15· ·Intel-based server products.
`
`16· · · · Q· · Can you point me to where that is,
`
`17· ·please.
`
`18· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`19· · · · Q· · Very good.· Thank you.
`
`20· · · · · · ·What was the nature of that work?
`
`21· · · · A· · The nature of that work was that Intel
`
`22· ·and IBM formed an alliance that basically puts
`
`23· ·computers into a low power mode.· And so -- to
`
`24· ·conserve energy.· And then upon receipt of a
`
`25· ·packet, then the computer would wake back up.
`
`9
`
`

`

`·1· · · · Q· · Was that technology commercialized?
`
`Page 10
`
`·2· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`·3· · · · Q· · In what products?
`
`·4· · · · A· · Intel-based servers.
`
`·5· · · · Q· · Okay.· And what was your role in
`
`·6· ·connection with that project?
`
`·7· · · · A· · I held various roles from design engineer
`
`·8· ·to managing the hard -- managing the system
`
`·9· ·development and then managing the engineering
`
`10· ·organization.
`
`11· · · · Q· · Did you have a design role in the low
`
`12· ·power mode features of that server technology?
`
`13· · · · A· · I -- my role was in the OEM'ing of it to
`
`14· ·select products that had that capability in terms
`
`15· ·of -- from assistant engineering of hardware and
`
`16· ·software as well as directing the development on
`
`17· ·lower end servers.· So, yes, yes, sir.
`
`18· · · · Q· · What do you mean when you say OEM'ing of
`
`19· ·select products that had the capability in...
`
`20· · · · A· · In the server organization, we basically
`
`21· ·offered products ranging from symmetrical
`
`22· ·multiprocessors all the way down to low end
`
`23· ·servers.
`
`24· · · · · · ·OEM'ing stands for original equipment
`
`25· ·manufacture.· So on the very high end of the
`
`10
`
`

`

`Page 11
`·1· ·product line for, like, say a six-way symmetrical
`
`·2· ·multiprocessor computer, the R&D cost to develop
`
`·3· ·that are extremely high.· The volume is relatively
`
`·4· ·low.· So our strategy was to essentially OEM the
`
`·5· ·motherboard, the chassis, the plastics from IBM.
`
`·6· · · · · · ·We would then select peripheral cards
`
`·7· ·that would support, for example, an ethernet
`
`·8· ·controller for low power mode.
`
`·9· · · · · · ·And so it was a mixture of OEM'ing where
`
`10· ·you don't actually develop the product or the
`
`11· ·entire product, you source it, put it together,
`
`12· ·build it.· We did a build-to-order system.· And
`
`13· ·then go ahead and validate that everything works
`
`14· ·properly, validate you are compliant with UL and
`
`15· ·FCC admissions and what have you.
`
`16· · · · Q· · Okay.· Did you do any work on the BIOS
`
`17· ·for that technology?
`
`18· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`19· · · · Q· · What was your role?
`
`20· · · · A· · I managed the group that actually did the
`
`21· ·BIOS.· We did extensions to the BIOS.· We also
`
`22· ·worked with Phoenix on our BIOS which was our prime
`
`23· ·vendor.
`
`24· · · · Q· · Was that in connection with implementing
`
`25· ·or designing?
`
`11
`
`

`

`·1· · · · A· · Both.
`
`Page 12
`
`·2· · · · Q· · So did you design the messaging aspects
`
`·3· ·of this low power mode system?
`
`·4· · · · A· · From a systems engineering point, yes.
`
`·5· · · · Q· · Did you design it or you did not?· Can
`
`·6· ·you clarify that?
`
`·7· · · · A· · A systems engineer basically is
`
`·8· ·responsible for specifying the requirements of the
`
`·9· ·various subsystems.· That is in my opinion one
`
`10· ·level of design.
`
`11· · · · Q· · Okay.· But you weren't provided with the
`
`12· ·requirements for the subsystems?
`
`13· · · · A· · We developed the requirements for the
`
`14· ·subsystems.
`
`15· · · · Q· · And you were provided with the overall
`
`16· ·design architecture?
`
`17· · · · A· · No.
`
`18· · · · Q· · Okay, what were you provided with?
`
`19· · · · A· · We were provided with a product
`
`20· ·requirements document at a high level that is from
`
`21· ·product management that specifies we want a product
`
`22· ·that has this high level feature.
`
`23· · · · · · ·From an engineering standpoint, we
`
`24· ·basically have to perform the various design roles
`
`25· ·that occur in multiple functional areas.
`
`12
`
`

`

`·1· · · · Q· · All right.· And you didn't author the
`
`Page 13
`
`·2· ·PRD, did you?
`
`·3· · · · A· · No.
`
`·4· · · · Q· · Okay.· All right.· Your CV doesn't
`
`·5· ·reference any prior litigation work.· Have you
`
`·6· ·testified in connection with any prior litigation?
`
`·7· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · Did any prior litigation involve
`
`·9· ·multichannel transceivers or modems?
`
`10· · · · A· · Not directly, sir.
`
`11· · · · Q· · Have you testified at trial before?
`
`12· · · · A· · No, sir.
`
`13· · · · Q· · Have you testified -- obviously, by depo
`
`14· ·-- at deposition you've testified, right?
`
`15· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`16· · · · Q· · Has any of your proffered testimony ever
`
`17· ·been excluded in court?
`
`18· · · · A· · Not that I'm aware of, sir.
`
`19· · · · Q· · Do you know if any of your prior
`
`20· ·testimony has ever been used in a district court
`
`21· ·litigation?
`
`22· · · · A· · Not that I'm aware of, sir.
`
`23· · · · Q· · Okay.· You're aware that TQ Delta is
`
`24· ·involved in various other legal proceedings in
`
`25· ·litigations and IPRs?
`
`13
`
`

`

`·1· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`Page 14
`
`·2· · · · Q· · Okay.· You've done some work in
`
`·3· ·connection with several other IPRs other than the
`
`·4· ·one at issue here; is that right?
`
`·5· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`·6· · · · Q· · Would that be for the '430, the '956 and
`
`·7· ·the '412 patents?
`
`·8· · · · A· · I don't recall, sir.
`
`·9· · · · Q· · Okay.· You recall it was three IPRs that
`
`10· ·you submitted declarations in?
`
`11· · · · A· · I don't recall, sir.
`
`12· · · · Q· · Okay.· Did you do any work other than in
`
`13· ·connection with three IPRs involving TQ Delta?
`
`14· · · · · · ·Let me withdraw the question.
`
`15· · · · · · ·Other than three IPRs with TQ Delta, did
`
`16· ·you do any other work in connection with any TQ
`
`17· ·Delta matter?
`
`18· · · · A· · Not that I recall, sir.
`
`19· · · · Q· · Okay.· Have you spoken with anyone
`
`20· ·regarding any other TQ Delta matter other than the
`
`21· ·three IPRs that we referenced?
`
`22· · · · A· · No.
`
`23· · · · Q· · Have you spoken about any other TQ Delta
`
`24· ·matter other than the three IPRs that you
`
`25· ·referenced?
`
`14
`
`

`

`·1· · · · A· · No.
`
`·2· · · · Q· · Okay.· And who is paying your fees in
`
`Page 15
`
`·3· ·connection with this proceeding?
`
`·4· · · · A· · ARRIS.
`
`·5· · · · Q· · Do you know approximately how much the
`
`·6· ·fees have been in connection with this case?
`
`·7· · · · A· · No, sir.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · Is it more than $20,000?
`
`·9· · · · A· · I would say approximately that.
`
`10· · · · Q· · Your hourly rate is $105?
`
`11· · · · A· · With ARRIS.
`
`12· · · · Q· · Is that a discounted rate?
`
`13· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`14· · · · Q· · Why is that?
`
`15· · · · A· · Because I've done a lot work for them in
`
`16· ·the past.
`
`17· · · · Q· · Over what period of time?
`
`18· · · · A· · From, I believe, 2009 until present.
`
`19· · · · Q· · How would you characterize that work?
`
`20· · · · A· · That work involved litigation in
`
`21· ·noninfringement positions, in terms of invalidity,
`
`22· ·in terms of discovery, in terms of claim
`
`23· ·construction.· Second, I worked on patent
`
`24· ·prosecution.· And thirdly, I did analysis on patent
`
`25· ·portfolios.
`
`15
`
`

`

`Page 16
`·1· · · · Q· · Approximately how much of your business
`
`·2· ·has been involved with ARRIS over the past six
`
`·3· ·years?
`
`·4· · · · A· · Significant.
`
`·5· · · · Q· · And can you characterize it more than --
`
`·6· ·is it more than 50 percent?
`
`·7· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · Is it more than 75 percent?
`
`·9· · · · A· · I don't know.
`
`10· · · · Q· · Somewhere between 50 and 75 percent?
`
`11· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`12· · · · Q· · Can you quantify the per year
`
`13· ·compensation you received from ARRIS over any of
`
`14· ·the last six years?
`
`15· · · · A· · No, sir, it varies.
`
`16· · · · Q· · Did any of your prior work with ARRIS
`
`17· ·involve DSL modems?
`
`18· · · · A· · No, sir, not that I can recall.
`
`19· · · · Q· · You mentioned you were involved in some
`
`20· ·litigation work.· Did you -- withdrawn.
`
`21· · · · · · ·Were you ever an expert witness on any
`
`22· ·litigation for ARRIS?
`
`23· · · · A· · No, sir.
`
`24· · · · Q· · You serve in a consulting role?
`
`25· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`16
`
`

`

`·1· · · · Q· · What's your normally hourly rate?
`
`Page 17
`
`·2· · · · A· · 350.
`
`·3· · · · Q· · Now, your CV, Exhibit 1004, does not
`
`·4· ·identify any publications.· Have you authored
`
`·5· ·publications?
`
`·6· · · · A· · Not that I can recall.
`
`·7· · · · Q· · Your CV, Exhibit 1004, does not identify
`
`·8· ·any patents for which you're a named inventor.· Are
`
`·9· ·you a named inventor on any patents?
`
`10· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`11· · · · Q· · Do any of those patents involve
`
`12· ·multichannel technology?
`
`13· · · · A· · I don't recall.
`
`14· · · · Q· · Did any of the patents involve sleep mode
`
`15· ·technology or low power mode technology?
`
`16· · · · A· · I don't recall.
`
`17· · · · Q· · So directing your attention to your CV,
`
`18· ·Exhibit 1004, you have a heading that says
`
`19· ·Highlights?
`
`20· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`21· · · · Q· · And under that, it says, in part,
`
`22· ·provides the basis for effective and efficient
`
`23· ·patent non-infringement and invalidation analysis;
`
`24· ·is that correct?
`
`25· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`17
`
`

`

`Page 18
`·1· · · · Q· · Is it fair to say that the focus of your
`
`·2· ·consulting work in connection with your company,
`
`·3· ·Harbor Falls, Inc., has been in connection with the
`
`·4· ·assisting -- with defending charges of patent
`
`·5· ·infringement?
`
`·6· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`·7· · · · Q· · Is there some reason that you focus on
`
`·8· ·the defense side?
`
`·9· · · · A· · Yes, because that's where 90 percent of
`
`10· ·the work I believe I've worked on is defense.
`
`11· · · · Q· · Is most of that work from ARRIS?
`
`12· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`13· · · · Q· · Midway in your CV it says that your
`
`14· ·experience in connection with your work at Harbor
`
`15· ·Falls, Inc., includes identification of key patent
`
`16· ·terms in claim construction; is that right?
`
`17· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`18· · · · Q· · And you identified key patent terms for
`
`19· ·construction in connection with this case; is that
`
`20· ·right?
`
`21· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`22· · · · Q· · Are you the only principal at Harbor
`
`23· ·Falls, Inc.?
`
`24· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`25· · · · Q· · So it's your company essentially?
`
`18
`
`

`

`·1· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`·2· · · · Q· · Do you have any employees?
`
`·3· · · · A· · No, sir.
`
`Page 19
`
`·4· · · · Q· · Let me show you a copy of your
`
`·5· ·declaration which is Exhibit 1003 from the IPR.
`
`·6· · · · · · ·Mr. McNally, can you identify that as a
`
`·7· ·copy of your declaration?
`
`·8· · · · A· · It appears to be a copy of my
`
`·9· ·declaration, sir.
`
`10· · · · Q· · Do you recognize your signature at the
`
`11· ·last page, 176?
`
`12· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`13· · · · Q· · Did you sign it on June 6th, 2016?
`
`14· · · · A· · It appears so, sir.
`
`15· · · · Q· · Okay.· And did you review the declaration
`
`16· ·before you signed it?
`
`17· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`18· · · · Q· · And you reviewed it to the extent you
`
`19· ·noted earlier in preparation for your deposition,
`
`20· ·right?
`
`21· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`22· · · · Q· · Okay.· Have you ever noticed any errors
`
`23· ·in your declaration?
`
`24· · · · A· · I noticed one error when I was
`
`25· ·re-reviewing it.
`
`19
`
`

`

`·1· · · · Q· · What was that error, please?
`
`·2· · · · A· · On Page 17 of the declaration.
`
`·3· · · · Q· · Yes.
`
`Page 20
`
`·4· · · · A· · On the very, very last sentence, 97-191R1
`
`·5· ·should be corrected to 97-161R1.
`
`·6· · · · Q· · All right.· Thank you.
`
`·7· · · · · · ·Anything else?
`
`·8· · · · A· · No, sir.
`
`·9· · · · Q· · Okay.· You also noted that you had
`
`10· ·reviewed the petition filed in this case; is that
`
`11· ·right?
`
`12· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`13· · · · Q· · Okay.· Did you notice any errors in the
`
`14· ·petition?
`
`15· · · · A· · No, sir.
`
`16· · · · Q· · So at Page 34 of your -- I'm sorry,
`
`17· ·Paragraph 34 of your declaration, which is
`
`18· ·Exhibit 21, there's a section on Claim
`
`19· ·Construction, correct?
`
`20· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`21· · · · Q· · And you state:· "I have been asked to
`
`22· ·offer my opinion about the broadest reasonable
`
`23· ·construction, in light of the '404 Patent
`
`24· ·specification and prosecution history, for the
`
`25· ·claim terms that are discussed below."
`
`20
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·Were you given the claim terms to be
`
`·2· ·construed or did you come up with those on your
`
`Page 21
`
`·3· ·own?
`
`·4· · · · A· · I think it was a -- if I recall, I
`
`·5· ·believe that it was jointly discussed that these
`
`·6· ·are the terms to construe.
`
`·7· · · · Q· · Okay.· And that was with counsel here
`
`·8· ·from the Thomas Horstemeyer law firm; is that
`
`·9· ·right?
`
`10· · · · A· · I recall having conversations with Bob
`
`11· ·Starr and Carol.· I do not recall discussions with
`
`12· ·the law firm here, but that's not to say that, you
`
`13· ·know, there's something I'm not recalling.
`
`14· · · · Q· · Did you have conversations with Bob Starr
`
`15· ·and Carol outside of other counsel?
`
`16· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`17· · · · Q· · Is Mr. Starr, forgive me, is he an
`
`18· ·attorney?
`
`19· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`20· · · · · · ·MR. STARR:· Yes.
`
`21· · · · · · ·MR. WIMBISCUS:· Okay, very good.· Thank
`
`22· ·you.
`
`23· · · · · · ·MR. GRESHAM:· Just for the record, both
`
`24· ·Mr. Starr and Ms. Ansley are attorneys.
`
`25· · · · · · ·MR. WIMBISCUS:· Thank you very much.
`
`21
`
`

`

`·1· ·BY MR. WIMBISCUS:
`
`Page 22
`
`·2· · · · Q· · Did you arrive at terms then that you
`
`·3· ·thought were appropriate for construction in order
`
`·4· ·to understand the meaning of the claims and apply
`
`·5· ·the claims to the prior art?
`
`·6· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`·7· · · · Q· · Are those the constructions that are set
`
`·8· ·forth in your declaration?
`
`·9· · · · A· · I don't understand your question.
`
`10· · · · Q· · The terms that you identified as
`
`11· ·appropriate for construction and important in
`
`12· ·applying the claims of the prior art, those claim
`
`13· ·terms are what you construed in your declaration,
`
`14· ·yes?
`
`15· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`16· · · · Q· · Thank you.
`
`17· · · · · · ·Let me direct your attention to Page 10,
`
`18· ·Paragraph 15 of your declaration, Exhibit 1003.
`
`19· ·You identified Materials Considered?
`
`20· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`21· · · · Q· · All right.· And you considered
`
`22· ·IPR2014-00891 Decision; is that correct?
`
`23· · · · A· · It appears so, sir.
`
`24· · · · Q· · Okay.· Did you find that to be relevant;
`
`25· ·and if so, how?
`
`22
`
`

`

`Page 23
`·1· · · · A· · I do not recall.· I did not review that
`
`·2· ·prior to today, so it's over a year ago, so I can't
`
`·3· ·recall.
`
`·4· · · · Q· · Do you recall relying upon anything from
`
`·5· ·that decision?
`
`·6· · · · A· · I would have to go back and review it.
`
`·7· ·As I mentioned earlier, I did not review anything
`
`·8· ·that did not pertain to the '323, the '725, the
`
`·9· ·ADSL Standard, and of course, the '404 patent.
`
`10· · · · Q· · Okay, very good.· Thank you.
`
`11· · · · · · ·All right.· Let me direct your attention,
`
`12· ·please, to Page 12 of your declaration at
`
`13· ·Paragraph 18.· There is a sentence in the middle of
`
`14· ·the paragraph that recites:· "When a DSL modem
`
`15· ·initializes, it goes through a lengthy process to
`
`16· ·characterize each frequency carrier's
`
`17· ·characteristics on a subscriber loop and the
`
`18· ·resulting transmitter and receiver settings."
`
`19· · · · · · ·What are frequency carrier's
`
`20· ·characteristics on a subscriber loop?
`
`21· · · · A· · At a very, very high level would be the
`
`22· ·frequency response over the transmission band.· It
`
`23· ·can result in phase distortions frequency, it can
`
`24· ·result in attenuation, it can result in echos.
`
`25· · · · Q· · Does the term "frequency carrier's
`
`23
`
`

`

`·1· ·characteristics on a subscriber loop" mean loop
`
`Page 24
`
`·2· ·characteristics?
`
`·3· · · · A· · Could you use the term in a sentence,
`
`·4· ·please?
`
`·5· · · · Q· · Well, it's your -- I'm reading back a
`
`·6· ·sentence from your declaration and I'm asking you
`
`·7· ·if "frequency carrier's characteristics on a
`
`·8· ·subscriber loop" are meant to include -- or refer
`
`·9· ·to loop characteristics?
`
`10· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`11· · · · Q· · And then your sentence says -- also
`
`12· ·refers to resulting transmitter and receiver
`
`13· ·settings.· What do you mean by that term?
`
`14· · · · A· · One example would be to determine the
`
`15· ·modulation that would be used for a particular
`
`16· ·carrier as one.
`
`17· · · · Q· · What about bit allocation parameters,
`
`18· ·would that be another term?
`
`19· · · · A· · That's essentially the modulation
`
`20· ·technique.· If you're QAM16 versus, like, QAM64,
`
`21· ·you would have the different number of bits per
`
`22· ·symbol.
`
`23· · · · Q· · Would fine gains also be another
`
`24· ·resulting transmitter and receiver setting?
`
`25· · · · A· · It would certainly be a receiver setting.
`
`24
`
`

`

`Page 25
`·1· · · · Q· · What does the term "initialization" mean
`
`·2· ·in the context of DSL modems?
`
`·3· · · · A· · To go through what is required prior to
`
`·4· ·resuming normal operation.· Going through multiple
`
`·5· ·steps to resume normal operation.
`
`·6· · · · Q· · By "normal operation," do you mean full
`
`·7· ·power operation?
`
`·8· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`·9· · · · Q· · Okay.· And can you be a little bit more
`
`10· ·precise when you say "multiple steps to resume
`
`11· ·normal operation"?· What are the multiple steps?
`
`12· · · · A· · I would probably, first of all, refer to
`
`13· ·the ADSL Chapter 12 that basically goes through all
`
`14· ·of the initialization for DSL modems.
`
`15· · · · Q· · Okay.· And that's the multiple steps that
`
`16· ·you are referring to to resume full power modem,
`
`17· ·correct?
`
`18· · · · A· · That would be a subset of the multiple
`
`19· ·steps.
`
`20· · · · Q· · What information is obtained during this
`
`21· ·initialization process?
`
`22· · · · A· · Information such as the modulation or the
`
`23· ·number of the bit rate is obtained and gain
`
`24· ·settings are obtained as a few.
`
`25· · · · Q· · Are loop characteristics obtained?
`
`25
`
`

`

`·1· · · · A· · Yes.· And the loop characteristics
`
`Page 26
`
`·2· ·include those factors -- or those factors influence
`
`·3· ·or the loop characteristics influence the
`
`·4· ·determination of those factors.
`
`·5· · · · Q· · Can you explain how loop characteristics
`
`·6· ·influence the determination of fine gain or bit
`
`·7· ·allocation parameters?
`
`·8· · · · A· · Certainly.· The length of the loop would
`
`·9· ·affect the gain of a signal or the attenuation of a
`
`10· ·signal.
`
`11· · · · Q· · All right.· And what are some other loop
`
`12· ·characteristics?· Some other loop characteristics
`
`13· ·other than length of the loop?
`
`14· · · · A· · Capacitance, resistive, inductive factors
`
`15· ·on the loop.
`
`16· · · · Q· · Anything else?
`
`17· · · · A· · Interference.
`
`18· · · · Q· · Okay.· Can you identify any other loop
`
`19· ·characteristics?
`
`20· · · · A· · Not at this time.· I mean, I could refer
`
`21· ·to the standard.
`
`22· · · · Q· · Would it help if I gave you a copy of the
`
`23· ·standard?
`
`24· · · · A· · Sure.
`
`25· · · · Q· · Okay.
`
`26
`
`

`

`·1· · · · A· · The bit error rate would be a
`
`Page 27
`
`·2· ·characteristic.
`
`·3· · · · Q· · Okay.· I'm going to hand you a copy of
`
`·4· ·the 1995 ADSL Standard previously marked as
`
`·5· ·Exhibit 1009.
`
`·6· · · · A· · So direct you to Page 9.
`
`·7· · · · Q· · Okay.
`
`·8· · · · A· · Paragraph 6, which begins with Each
`
`·9· ·bearer channel shall be individually assigned to an
`
`10· ·ADSL sub-channel for transport, and the ADSL
`
`11· ·sub-channel rate shall be configured during the
`
`12· ·initialization and training procedures to match the
`
`13· ·bearer rate.
`
`14· · · · · · ·Excuse me, I was off a paragraph.· Let me
`
`15· ·rephrase.
`
`16· · · · · · ·The maximum net data capacity of an ADSL
`
`17· ·system will depend on the characteristics of the
`
`18· ·loop on which the system is deployed and on certain
`
`19· ·configurable options that affect overhead (see note
`
`20· ·3).
`
`21· · · · · · ·Note 3:· One part of the ADSL
`
`22· ·initialization and training sequence estimates the
`
`23· ·loop characteristics to determine whether the
`
`24· ·number of bytes per Discrete MultiTone frame
`
`25· ·required for the requested configuration's
`
`27
`
`

`

`Page 28
`·1· ·aggregate data rate can be transmitted across the
`
`·2· ·given loop.· The net data rate is then the
`
`·3· ·aggregate data rate minus the ADSL system overhead.
`
`·4· ·Part of the ADSL system overhead is dependent upon
`
`·5· ·the configurable options, such as discussed of user
`
`·6· ·data streams to interleaving or non-interleaving
`
`·7· ·datas within the buffers from the ADSL frame (as
`
`·8· ·discussed in 6.2, 6.4.2, 7.2, and 7.4.2), and part
`
`·9· ·of it is fixed.
`
`10· · · · · · ·So clearly the -- before the Note 3, that
`
`11· ·we can essentially see that we have a different
`
`12· ·data rate depending upon loop characteristics.
`
`13· · · · · · ·If we then move to Page 21 -- go to Page
`
`14· ·87 of the standard which is titled Chapter 12,
`
`15· ·Initialization.
`
`16· · · · Q· · Yes.
`
`17· · · · A· · If I go to the second to last paragraph.
`
`18· · · · · · ·Determination of channel attribute values
`
`19· ·and establishment of transmission characteristics
`
`20· ·requires that each transceiver produce, and
`
`21· ·appropriately respond to, a specific set of
`
`22· ·precisely-timed signals.· This clause describes
`
`23· ·these initialization signals, along with the rules
`
`24· ·that determine the proper starting and ending time
`
`25· ·for each signal.· This description is made through
`
`28
`
`

`

`Page 29
`·1· ·the definition of initialization states in which
`
`·2· ·each transceiver will reside, and the definition of
`
`·3· ·initialization signals.
`
`·4· · · · · · ·If we go up then to the second full
`
`·5· ·paragraph.· In order to maximize the throughput and
`
`·6· ·reliability of this link, ADSL transceivers shall
`
`·7· ·determine certain relevant attributes for a
`
`·8· ·connecting channel and establish transmission and
`
`·9· ·processing characteristics suitable for that
`
`10· ·channel.· The time line at figure 29, blah, blah,
`
`11· ·blah, blah, blah.
`
`12· · · · · · ·Certain processing and transmission
`
`13· ·characteristics can also be established at each
`
`14· ·receiver during this time.· During the exchange
`
`15· ·process each receiver shares with its corresponding
`
`16· ·far-end transmitter certain transmission settings
`
`17· ·that it expects to see.· Specifically, each
`
`18· ·receiver communicates to its far-end transmitter
`
`19· ·the number of bits and the relative power levels,
`
`20· ·i.e., gains to be used for each DMT sub-carrier.
`
`21· · · · Q· · Okay.
`
`22· · · · A· · And then in my expert report, and if you
`
`23· ·wish me to go through these, I will, I basically
`
`24· ·identify on Page 40 of my expert report the
`
`25· ·additional cites in the standard where the bit rate
`
`29
`
`

`

`·1· ·and the gains are disclosed.
`
`·2· · · · Q· · Okay.· So let me try to take that in
`
`·3· ·bites.· Let's go back to Page 9 of the ADSL
`
`·4· ·Standard, Exhibit 1009.
`
`Page 30
`
`·5· · · · · · ·From what -- you referred to Note 3; is
`
`·6· ·that right?
`
`·7· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · Okay.· And the first sentence of Note 3
`
`·9· ·states:· "One part of the ADSL initialization and
`
`10· ·training sequence estimates the loop
`
`11· ·characteristics to determine whether the number of
`
`12· ·bytes per Discrete MultiTone (DMT) frame required
`
`13· ·for the requested configuration's aggregate data
`
`14· ·rate can be transmitted across the given loop."
`
`15· · · · · · ·Did I read that accurately?
`
`16· · · · A· · I believe so.
`
`17· · · · Q· · Okay.· So the ADSL Standard here of note
`
`18· ·3, Page 9, is referring to an initial --
`
`19· ·initialization and training sequence that estimates
`
`20· ·the loop characteristics, right?
`
`21· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`22· · · · Q· · And that estimate is used to determine
`
`23· ·whether the number of bytes per Discrete MultiTone
`
`24· ·frame required for the requested configuration's
`
`25· ·aggregate data rate can be transmitted across the
`
`30
`
`

`

`·1· ·given loop; is that fair?
`
`·2· · · · A· · Yes, sir.
`
`Page 31
`
`·3· · · · Q· · So first an estimate is done as to the
`
`·4· ·loop characteristics

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket