throbber
said sound and said pointer-triggered communication message and said graphic, and wherein
`
`some of said communications include and further comprising a human communication sound
`
`and text or ascii.
`
`31. (currently amended) The method of claim 1, wherein the step§ of
`
`arbitrating sending and receiving are is carried out with one of said communications comprising
`
`said video, and said graphic, and said pointer-triggered message, and wherein some of said
`
`communications include and further comprising text or ascii.
`
`32. (currently amended) The method of claim 1, wherein the step§ of
`
`arbitrating sending and receiving are is carried out with one of said communications comprising
`
`said graphic and said pointer-triggered communication message, and wherein some of said
`
`communications include and further comprising text or ascii.
`
`33. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said sound and said pointer-triggered communication message,
`
`and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer and INherein said step
`
`of arbitrating includes arbitrating to determine which of the participator computers can
`
`communicate a human communication sound and text or ascii to the other of the participator
`
`computers text or ascii.
`
`@
`
`34. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said pointer-triggered communication message and said graphic,
`
`and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer and 'Nherein said step
`
`of arbitrating includes arbitrating to determine which of the participator computers can
`
`8
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5001
`
`

`
`communicate test or ascii to the other of the participator computers te~ QF assii.
`
`35. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said SQUAd aAd said video and said graphic, and further including
`
`the step of arbitrating with the controller computer aAd whereiA said step Qf arbitratiAg iAsludes
`
`arbitratiAg to determine which of the participator computers can communicate a human
`
`communication sound and text or ascii to the other of the participator computers te~ QF assii.
`
`36. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said SQUAd aAd said graphic and said pointer-triggered message.
`
`GQFAFAUAisatiQA, aAd whereiA said step Qf arbitratiAg iAsludes arbitratiAg and further including
`
`the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of the participator
`
`computers can communicate a human communication sound and text or ascii to the other of
`
`the participator computers te~ QF assii.
`
`37. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said graphic and said video, aAd whereiA said step Qf arbitratiAg
`
`iAsludes arbitratiAg and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to
`
`determine which of the participator computers can communicate text or ascii to the other of the
`
`participator computers te~ QF assii.
`
`38. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said video and said graphic and said pointer-triggered message.
`
`GQFAFAUAisatiQA, aAd whereiA and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller
`
`computer to determine which of the participator computers can communicate text or ascii to the
`
`9
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5002
`
`

`
`other of the participator computers some of said communications include text or ascii.
`
`39. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said video and said pointer-triggered message. communication,
`
`and wherein said stef') of arbitrating includes arbitrating and further including the step of
`
`arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of the participator computers can
`
`communicate text or ascii to the other of the participator computers text or ascii.
`
`40. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said video and said graphic and said pointer-triggered
`
`communication message.
`
`41. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said stef') of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said sound further including the step of arbitrating with the
`
`controller computer to determine which of the participator computers can communicate a
`
`human communication sound.
`
`42. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said sound and said video. and further including the step of
`
`arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of the participator computers can
`
`communicate a human communication sound.
`
`43. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said sound and said graphic. and further including the step of
`
`arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of the participator computers can
`
`10
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5003
`
`

`
`communicate a human communication sound.
`
`44. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with saia smma ana said pointer-triggered communication message
`
`and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of
`
`the participator computers can communicate a human communication sound.
`
`45. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, further including the step of
`
`arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of the participator computers can
`
`communicate a human communication sound and text or ascii to the other of the participator
`
`computers te~d or ascii.
`
`46. (previously amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said video.
`
`47. (previously amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said video and said graphic.
`
`48. (previously amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said video and said pointer-triggered communication message.
`
`49. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said video, ana wherein saia step of arbitrating insluaes arbitrating
`
`and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of
`
`the participator computers can communicate text or ascii to the other of the participator
`
`11
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5004
`
`

`
`computers text er ascii.
`
`50. (previously amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said graphic.
`
`51. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said graphic and said pointer-triggered cemmunicatien message.
`
`52. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said· graphic, and wherein said step ef arbitrating includes
`
`arbitrating and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to determine
`
`which of the participator computers can communicate text or ascii to the other of the participator
`
`computers text er ascii.
`
`53. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said seund and said video and said graphic. and further including
`
`the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of the participator
`
`computers can communicate a human communication sound.
`
`54. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170 a, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said seund and said video and said pointer-triggered
`
`cemmunicatien message. and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller
`
`computer to determine which of the participator computers can communicate a human
`
`communication sound.
`
`12
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5005
`
`

`
`;y'
`
`55. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with saie sabine ane said video, ane wherein saie step of arBitrating
`
`inslblees arBitrating and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to
`
`determine which of the participator computers can communicate a human communication
`
`sound and text or ascii to the other of the participator computers text or assii.
`
`56. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with saie soblne ane said video and said graphic and said pointer(cid:173)
`
`triggered sommblnisation message. and further including the step of arbitrating with the
`
`controller computer to determine which of the participator computers can communicate a
`
`human communication sound.
`
`57. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with saie soblne ane said video and said pointer-triggered
`
`sammblnisation message, ane wherein saie step of arBitrating inclblees arBitrating and further
`
`including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of the
`
`participator computers can communicate a human communication sound and text or ascii to the
`
`other of the participator computers text or assii.
`
`58. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with saie soblne ane said video and said graphic and said pointer(cid:173)
`
`triggered sammblnisation message, ane \".'herein saie step of arBitrating inslblees arBitrating and
`
`further including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of the
`
`participator computers can communicate a human communication sound and text or ascii to the
`
`other of the participator computers text or assii.
`
`13
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5006
`
`

`
`59. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said sound and said graphic and said pointer-triggered message
`
`and further comprising a human communication sound communication.
`
`60. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said pointer-triggered message communication, and wherein said
`
`step of arbitrating includes arbitrating to determine which of the participator computers can
`
`communicate text or ascii to the other of the participator computers te~ or ascii.
`
`61. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said step of arbitrating includes arbitrating to determine which of
`
`the participator computers can communicate text or ascii to the other of the participator
`
`computers te)d or ascii.
`
`y'
`
`62. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said pointer-triggered communication message.
`
`63. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said sound and said graphic, and wherein said step of arbitrating
`
`includes arbitrating to determine which of the participator computers can communicate a human
`
`communication sound and text or ascii to the other of the participator computers te)d or ascii.
`
`64. (previously amended) The method of claim 1, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`14
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5007
`
`

`
`65. (previously amended) The method of claim 2, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`66. (previously amended)
`
`The method of claim 3, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`67. (previously amended) The method of claim 4, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`68. (previously amended) The method of claim 5, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`69. {previously amended)
`
`The method of claim 6, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`70. (previously amended) The method of claim 7, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`71. {previously amended) The method of claim 8, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`72. (previously amended) The method of claim 9, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`15
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5008
`
`

`
`73. (previously amended) The method of claim 10, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`74. (previously amended) The method of claim 11, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`75. (previously amended) The method of claim 12, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`76. (previously amended) The method of claim 13, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`~\
`
`77. (previously amended) The method of claim 14, further including the step-of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`78. (previously amended) The method of claim 15, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`79. (previously amended) The method of claim 16, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`80. (previously amended) The method of claim 17, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`16
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5009
`
`

`
`81. (previously amended) The method of claim 18, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`82. (previously amended) The method of claim 19, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`83. (previously amended) The method of claim 20, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`84. (previously amended) The method of claim 21, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`85. (previously amended) The method of claim 22, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`86. (previously amended) The method of claim 23, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`87. (previously amended) The method of claim 24, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`88. (previously amended) The method of claim 25, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`89. (previously amended) The method of claim 26, further including the step of:
`
`17
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5010
`
`

`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`90. (previously amended) The method of claim 27, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`91. (previously amended) The method of claim 28, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`92. (previously amended) The method of claim 29, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`y'
`
`93. (previously amended) The method of claim 30, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`94. (previously amended) The method of claim 31, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`95. (previously amended) The method of claim 32, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`96. (previously amended) The method of claim 33, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`97. (previously amended) The method of claim 34, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`18
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5011
`
`

`
`98. (previously amended) The method of claim 35, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`99. (previously amended) The method of claim 36, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`100. (previously amended) The method of claim 37, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`101. (previously amended) The method of claim 38, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`102. (previously amended) The method of claim 39, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`103. (previously amended) The method of claim 40, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`104. (previously amended) The method of claim 41, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`105. (previously amended) The method of claim 42, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`19
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5012
`
`

`
`106. (previously amended) The method of claim 43, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`107. (previously amended) The method of claim 44, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`108. (previously amended) The method of claim 45, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`109. (previously amended) The method of claim 46, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`110. (previously amended) The method of claim 47, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`111. (previously amended) The method of claim 48, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`112. (previously amended) The method of claim 49, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`113. (previously amended) The method of claim 50, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`114. (previously amended) The method of claim 51, further including the step of:
`
`20
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5013
`
`

`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`115. (previously amended) The method of claim 52, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`116. (previously amended) The method of claim 53, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`117. (previously amended) The method of claim 54, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`118. (previously amended) The method of claim 55, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`119. (previously amended) The method of claim 56, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`120. (previously amended) The method of claim 57, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`121. (previously amended) The method of claim 58, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`122. (previously amended) The method of claim 59, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`21
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5014
`
`

`
`123. (previously amended) The method of claim 60, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`124. (previously amended) The method of claim 61, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`125. (previously amended) The method of claim 62, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`~'
`
`126. (previously amended) The method of claim 63, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`127. (currently amended) The method of claim 1, wherein the step of arbitrating
`
`includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`128. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 2, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`129. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 3, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`130. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 4, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`22
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5015
`
`

`
`\~
`
`131. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 5, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`132. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 6, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`133. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 7, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`134. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 8, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`135. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 9, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`136. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 10, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`137. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 11, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`138. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 12, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`139. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 13, wherein the step of
`
`23
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5016
`
`

`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`140. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 14, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`141. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 15, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`142. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 16, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`143. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim .17, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`144. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 18, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`145. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 19, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`146. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 20, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`147. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 21, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`24
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5017
`
`

`
`148. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 22, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`149. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 23, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`150. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 24, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`151. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 25, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`152. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 26, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`153. (currently amended) The method of claim 27, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`154. (currently amended) The method of claim 28, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`155. (currently amended) The method of claim 29, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`25
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5018
`
`

`
`156. (currently amended) The method of claim 30, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`157. (currently amended) The method of claim 31, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`158. (currently amended) The method of claim 32, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`159. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein further including
`
`the step of areitrating includes communicating a user image from said one of the plurality of the
`
`participator computers to the other of the participator computers.
`
`~\
`
`160. (currently amended) The method of claim 41, wherein further including the
`
`step of areitrating includes communicating a user image from said one of the plurality of the
`
`participator computers to the other of the participator computers.
`
`161. (currently amended) The method of claim 42, 'Nherein further including the
`
`step of areitrating includes communicating a user image from said one of the plurality of the
`
`participator computers to the other of the participator computers.
`
`162. (currently amended) The method of claim 46, wherein further including the
`
`step of areitrating includes communicating a user image from said one of the plurality of the
`
`participator computers to the other of the participator computers.
`
`26
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5019
`
`

`
`163. (currently amended) The method of claim 61, wherein further including the
`
`step of areitmting includes communicating a user image from said one of the plurality of the
`
`participator computers to the other of the participator computers.
`
`164. (currently amended) The method of claim 1, further including the step of7
`
`communicating a user image from one member in the group to another member
`
`in the group.
`
`165. (currently amended) A method fef of using a computer system to distribute
`
`communication over an Internet network, the method including the steps of:
`
`obtaining a respective authenticated user identity from a controller computer over
`
`the Internet network for respective use on each of a plurality of participator computers, each
`
`said participator computer connected to an input device and to an output device;
`
`programming the participator computers to enable the communication, including
`
`at least one of a ffi:lmaR sound, a video, a graphic.~, or multimedia a serneinatien thereof;
`
`connecting said participator computers to said Internet network;
`
`using said authenticated user identity to communicate a pointer-triggered
`
`message from one of said participator computers to said controller computer and from said
`
`controller computer to an other of said participator computers; and
`
`using said pointer-triggered message to receive the communication at the other
`
`of said participator computers in real time over the Internet network.
`
`166. (currently amended) The method of claim 165, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`27
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5020
`
`

`
`167. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 165, wherein the step of
`
`programming is carried out with said communication including said video.
`
`168. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 166, wherein the step of
`
`programming is carried out with said communication including said video.
`
`y'
`
`169. (previously amended) The method of claim 165, further including the step
`
`of forming a chat channel over the Internet network, and arbitrating channel communications
`
`between said participator computers at said controller computer.
`
`170. (currently amended) A method fe.F of using computers to communicate over
`
`an Internet network, the method including the steps of:
`
`connecting eRe-ef a controller computer with a plurality of participator computers ..
`
`said connecting including connecting at least one of the plurality of participator computers with
`
`a the controller computer through the Internet network, each said participator computer
`
`connected to an input device and to an output device; and
`
`arbitrating with the controller computer, in accordance with predefined rules
`
`including a test for an authenticated user identity applied te said ene ef the plurality ef
`
`partisipater semputers, to determine which of the participator computers can communicate to
`
`an other of the participator computers over the Internet network in real time, human seund, at
`
`least one of a video, a graphic, or a pointer-triggered message, era semeinatien thereef.
`
`171. (previously amended) The method of claim 165, wherein said step of
`
`programming is carried out with said communication including said sound.
`
`28
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5021
`
`

`
`172. (previously amended) The method of claim 165, wherein said step of
`
`programming is carried out with said communication including said sound and said video.
`
`173. (previously amended) The method of claim 166, wherein said step of
`
`programming is carried out with said communication including said sound.
`
`174. (previously amended) The method of claim 166, wherein said step of
`
`programming is carried out with said communication including said sound and said video.
`
`175. (currently amended) The method of claim 165, further including the step of
`
`wherein sending includes sending the communication as an out of band communication.
`
`176. (previously amended) The method of claim 166, further including the step of:
`
`communicating an asynchronous communication from said controller computer to
`
`one of said participator computers.
`
`177. (previously amended) The method of claim 165, further including the step of:
`
`communicating an asynchronous communication from said controller computer to
`
`one of said participator computers.
`
`178. (previously amended) The method of claim 170, further including the step of:
`
`communicating an asynchronous communication from said controller computer to
`
`one of said participator computers.
`
`179. (previously amended) The method of claim 5, further including the step of:
`
`29
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5022
`
`

`
`communicating a user image from one member in the group to another member in
`
`180. (previously amended) The method of claim 6, further including the step of:
`
`communicating a user image from one member in the group to another member in
`
`181. (previously amended) The method of claim 10, further including the step of:
`
`communicating a user image from one member in the group to another member in
`
`the group.
`
`the group.
`
`the group.
`
`182. (currently amended) The method of claim 23, further including the step of:
`
`_____ communicating a user image from one member in the group to another member in
`
`the group.
`
`183. (previously added) The method of claim 1, further including the step of:
`
`communicating an asynchronous communication from said controller computer to
`
`o

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket