throbber
162. (previously presented) The method of claim 46, further including the step
`
`of communicating a user image from said one of the plurality of the participator computers to the
`
`other of the participator computers.
`
`09/399,578
`
`163. (previously presented) The method of claim 61, further including the step
`
`of communicating a user image from said one of the plurality of the participator computers to the
`
`other of the participator computers.
`
`164. (previously presented) The method of claim 1, further including the step of
`
`communicating a user image from one member in the group to another member in the group.
`
`165. (currently amended) A method of using a computer system to distribute
`
`communication over an Internet network, the method including the steps of:
`
`connecting a plurality of participator computers with a controller computer
`
`through the Internet;
`
`receiving an authenticated user identity from a first of the participator computers;
`
`receiving an authenticated user identity from a second of the participator
`
`computers;
`
`using participator software respectively on the participator computers to enable
`
`the communication, including at least one of a video, graphic, sound, or multimedia;
`
`communicating a message including text or ascii, and a pointer, from the first
`
`participator computer to said controller computer and from said controller computer to the
`
`second participator computer; and
`
`using said pointer to receive the communication from the first of the participator
`
`computers at the second of the participator computers in real time over the Internet network.
`
`24
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4501
`
`

`
`166. (previously presented) The method of claim 165, further including the step
`
`of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`09/399,578
`
`167. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 165, wherein the step of using
`
`is carried out with said communication including said video.
`
`168. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 166, wherein the step of using
`
`is carried out with said communication including said video.
`
`169. (previously presented) The method of claim 165, further including the step
`
`of forming a chat channel over the Internet network, and arbitrating channel communications
`
`between said participator computers at said controller computer.
`
`170. (currently amended) A method of using computers to communicate over an
`
`Internet network, the method including the steps of:
`
`connecting a controller computer with a plurality of participator computers, said
`
`connecting including connecting at least one of the plurality of participator computers with the
`
`controller computer through the Internet network;
`
`receiving a log in name and a password, respectively from each of said
`
`participator computers;
`
`respectively storing a set of privileges corresponding to each of said user
`
`identities, the set including a privilege to receive non-textual communication; and
`
`determining which of the participator computers can communicate to an other of
`
`the participator computers over the Internet network in real time, in accordance with the
`
`corresponding privilege, at least one of a video, a graphic, or a pointer-triggered message that is
`
`25
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4502
`
`

`
`receivable on demand.
`
`09/399,578
`
`171. (currently amended) The method of claim 165, wherein said step of using is
`
`carried out with said communication including said sound.
`
`172. (currently amended) The method of claim 165, wherein said step of using
`
`is carried out with said communication including said sound and said video.
`
`173. (currently amended) The method of claim 166, wherein said step of using is
`
`carried out with said communication including said sound.
`
`174. (currently amended) The method of claim 166, wherein said step of using is
`
`carried out with said communication including said sound and said video.
`
`175. (currently amended) The method of claim 165, further including the step of
`
`sending the communication as an out of band communication.
`
`176. (previously presented) The method of claim 166, further including the step of:
`
`communicating an asynchronous communication from said controller computer to
`
`one of said participator computers.
`
`177. (previously presented) The method of claim 165, further including the step of:
`
`communicating an asynchronous communication from said controller computer to
`
`one of said participator computers.
`
`178. (previously presented) The method of claim 170, further including the step of:
`
`26
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4503
`
`

`
`09/399,578
`
`communicating an asynchronous communication from said controller computer to
`
`one of said participator computers.
`
`179. (previously presented) The method of claim 5, further including the step of:
`
`communicating a user image from one member in the group to another member in
`
`the group.
`
`the group.
`
`the group.
`
`the group.
`
`180. (previously presented) The method of claim 6, further including the step of:
`
`communicating a user image from one member in the group to another member in
`
`181. (previously presented) The method of claim 10, further including the step of:
`
`communicating a user image from one member in the group to another member in
`
`182. (previously presented) The method of claim 23, further including the step of:
`
`communicating a user image from one member in the group to another member in
`
`183. (previously presented) The method of claim 1, further including the step of:
`
`communicating an asynchronous communication from said controller computer to
`
`one of said participator computers.
`
`184.
`
`(previously presented)
`
`The method of claim 1, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`27
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4504
`
`

`
`09/399,578
`
`185.
`
`(previously presented)
`
`The method of claim 2, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`186.
`
`(previously presented)
`
`The method of claim 3, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`187.
`
`(previously presented)
`
`The method of claim 4, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`188. (previously presented) The method of claim 5, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`189. (previously presented) The method of claim 6, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`190. (previously presented) The method of claim 7, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`191. (previously presented) The method of claim 8, wherein the step of
`
`28
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4505
`
`

`
`09/399,578
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`192. (previously presented) The method of claim 9, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`193. (previously presented) The method of claim 1 0, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`194. (previously presented) The method of claim 11, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`195. (previously presented) The method of claim 12, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`196. (previously presented) The method of claim 13, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`197. (previously presented) The method of claim 14, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`29
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4506
`
`

`
`09/399,578
`
`198. (previously presented) The method of claim 15, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`199. (previously presented) The method of claim 16, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`200. (previously presented) The method of claim 17, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`201. (previously presented) The method of claim 18, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`202. (previously presented) The method of claim 19, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`203. (previously presented) The method of claim 20, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`204. (previously presented) The method of claim 21, wherein the step of
`
`30
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4507
`
`

`
`09/399,578
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`205. (previously presented) The method of claim 22, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`206. (previously presented) The method of claim 23, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`207. (previously presented) The method of claim 24, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`208. (previously presented) The method of claim 25, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`209. (previously presented) The method of claim 26, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`210. (previously presented) The method of claim 27, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`31
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4508
`
`

`
`09/399,578
`
`211. (previously presented) The method of claim 28, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`212. (previously presented) The method of claim 29, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`213. (previously presented) The method of claim 30, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`214. (previously presented) The method of claim 31, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`215. (previously presented) The method of claim 32, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`216. (previously presented) The method of claim 1, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`32
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4509
`
`

`
`09/399,578
`
`217. (previously presented) The method of claim 2, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`218. (previously presented) The method of claim 3, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`219. (previously presented) The method of claim 4, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`220. (previously presented) The method of claim 5, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`221. (previously presented) The method of claim 6, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`222. (previously presented) The method of claim 7, wherein the step of
`
`33
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4510
`
`

`
`09/399,578
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`aut~orizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`223. (previously presented) The method of claim 8, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`224. (previously presented) The method of claim 9, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`225. (previously presented) The method of claim 1 0, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`226. (previously presented) The method of claim 11, wherein the step·of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`227. (previously presented) The method of claim 12, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`34
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4511
`
`

`
`09/399,578
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`228. (previously presented) The method of claim 13, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`229. (previously presented) The method of claim 14, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`230. (previously presented) The method of claim 15, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`231. (previously presented) The method of claim 16, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`232. (previously presented) The method of claim 17, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`35
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4512
`
`

`
`09/399,578
`
`communications.
`
`233. (previously presented) The method of claim 18, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`234. (previously presented) The method of claim 19, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`235. (previously presented) The method of claim 20, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`236. (previously presented) The method of claim 21, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`237. (previously presented) The method of claim 22, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`36
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4513
`
`

`
`09/399,578
`
`238. (previously presented) The method of claim 23, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`239. (previously presented) The method of claim 24, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`240. (previously presented) The method of claim 25, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`241. (previously presented) The method of claim 26, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`242. (previously presented) The method of claim 27, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`37
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4514
`
`

`
`09/399,578
`
`243. (previously presented) The method of claim 28, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`244. (previously presented) The method of claim 29, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`245. (previously presented) The method of claim 30, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`246. (previously presented) The method of claim 31, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`247. (previously presented) The method of claim 32, wherein the step of
`
`. arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`248.
`
`(previously presented)
`
`The method of claim 1, wherein the step of
`
`38
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4515
`
`

`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`09/399,578
`
`249.
`
`(previously presented)
`
`The method of claim 2, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`250.
`
`(previously presented)
`
`The method of claim 3, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`251. (previously presented) The method of claim 4, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`252. (previously presented) The method of claim 5, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`253. (previously presented) The method of claim 6, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`39
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4516
`
`

`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, b~tween some of the group.
`
`09/399,578
`
`254. (previously presented) The method of claim 7, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`255. (previously presented) The method of claim 8, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`256. (previously presented) The method of claim 9, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`257. (previously presented) The method of claim 10, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`258. (previously presented) The method of claim 11, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`40
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4517
`
`

`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`09/399,578
`
`259. {previously presented) The method of claim 12, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`260. (previously presented) The method of claim 13, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`261. (previously presented) The method of claim 14, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`262. (previously presented) The method of claim 15, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`263. (previously presented) The method of claim 16, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`41
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4518
`
`

`
`09/399,578
`
`264. (previously presented) The method of claim 17, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`265. (previously presented) The method of claim 18, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`266. (previously presented) The method of claim 19, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`267. (previously presented) The method of claim 20, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`268. (previously presented) _The method of claim 21, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`42
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4519
`
`

`
`09/399,578
`
`269. (previously presented) The method of claim 22, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`270. (previously presented) The method of claim 23, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`271. (previously presented) The method of claim 24, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`272. (previously presented) The method of claim 25, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`273. (previously presented) The method of claim 26, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`274. (previously presented) The method of claim 27, wherein the step of
`
`43
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4520
`
`

`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`09/399,578
`
`275. (previously presented) The method of claim 28, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`276. (previously presented) The method of claim 29, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`277. (previously presented) The method of claim 30, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`278. (previously presented) The method of claim 31, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`279. (previously presented) The method of claim 32, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`44
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4521
`
`

`
`providing private, real time communication over the Internet network, with said
`
`controller computer, between some of the group.
`
`09/399,578
`
`280. (previously presented) The method of claim 170, further including the step
`
`of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`281. (previously presented) The method of claim 170, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`282. (previously presented) The method of claim 170, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity, group, and
`
`content.
`
`283. (previously presented) The method of claim 170, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes:
`
`authorizing, with said controller computer, invisible viewing of some of the
`
`communications.
`
`284. (previously presented) The method of claim 170, further including the step
`
`of:
`
`providing group communications capability, with said controller computer, to
`
`handle communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the
`
`plurality of computers, said group communications capability including private communication
`
`45
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4522
`
`

`
`window capability.
`
`09/399,578
`
`285. (previously presented) The method of claim 33, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`286. (previously presented) The method of claim 34, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`287. (previously presented) The method of claim 35, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`288. (previously presented) The method of claim 36, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`289. (previously presented) The method of claim 37, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`46
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4523
`
`

`
`09/399,578
`
`290. (previously presented) The method of claim 38, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`291. (previously presented) The method of claim 39, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`292. (previously presented) The method of claim 40, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`293. (previously presented) The method of claim 41, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`294. (previously presented) The method of claim 42, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`47
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4524
`
`

`
`09/399,578
`
`295. (previously presented) The method of claim 43, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`296. (previously presented) The method of claim 44, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`297. (previously presented) The method of claim 45, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`298. (previously presented) The method of claim 46, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`299. (previously presented) The method of claim 47, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`300. (previously presented) The method of claim 48, wherein the step of
`
`48
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 4525
`
`

`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`09/399,578
`
`301. (previously presented) The method of claim 49, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`302. (previously presented) The method of claim 50, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communications including
`
`communications between the one of the plurality of computers and the other of the plurality of
`
`computers.
`
`303. (previously presented) The method of claim 51, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for group communicat

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket