`Trials@uspto.gov
`Entered: January 17, 2017
`
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PARTHENON UNIFIED MEMORY ARCHITECTURE LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01114 (Patent 7,777,753 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01118 (Patent 7,321,368 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01121 (Patent 5,960,464)
`Case IPR2016-01134 (Patent 7,542,045 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01135 (Patent 5,812,789)1
`_______________
`
`Before MICHAEL R. ZECHER, JAMES B. ARPIN,
`MATTHEW R. CLEMENTS, and SUSAN L. C. MITCHELL,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ARPIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`of Messrs. Michael McBride and Amir Alavi
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues pertaining to all five cases. Therefore, we
`exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The
`parties are not authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent
`papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01114 (Patent 7,777,753 B2), IPR2016-01118 (Patent 7,321,368
`B2), IPR2016-01121 (Patent 5,960,464), IPR2016-01134 (Patent 7,542,045
`B2), and IPR2016-01135 (Patent 5,812,789)
`
`
`Having considered Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac
`Vice Admission of Mr. Amir Alavi (Paper 12), Patent Owner’s Unopposed
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Mr. Michael McBride (Paper 13),
`and the Affidavits of Mr. Alavi (Ex. 2006) and of Mr. McBride (Ex. 2007)2
`filed in support, it is:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motions for Pro Hac
`Vice admission of Messrs. Alavi and McBride are granted; Messrs. Alavi
`and McBride are authorized to represent Patent Owner only as back-up
`counsel in the above-captioned proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the above-captioned
`proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Messrs. Alavi and McBride are to
`comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of
`Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal
`Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Messrs. Alavi and McBride are to be
`subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a),
`and the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R.
`§§ 11.101–901.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 Citations are to the papers and exhibits filed in Case IPR2016-01114.
`Corresponding papers and exhibits have been filed in the other captioned
`cases.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01114 (Patent 7,777,753 B2), IPR2016-01118 (Patent 7,321,368
`B2), IPR2016-01121 (Patent 5,960,464), IPR2016-01134 (Patent 7,542,045
`B2), and IPR2016-01135 (Patent 5,812,789)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`David W. O’Brien
`Andrew Ehmke
`HAYNES & BOONE, LLP
`David.obrien.ipr@haynesboone.com
`Andy.ehmke.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Masood Anjom
`Scott Clark
`AHMAD, ZAVITSANOS, ANAIPAKOS, ALAVI & MENSING P.C.
`manjom@azalaw.com
`sclark@azalaw.com
`
`
`3
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
