throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA,
`INC., and AKORN INC., 1
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ALLERGAN, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01127 (8,685,930 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01128 (8,629,111 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01129 (8,642,556 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01130 (8,633,162 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01131 (8,648,048 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01132 (9,248,191 B2)
`_____________
`
`PATENT OWNER SAINT REGIS MOHAWK TRIBE’S
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`MARSHA K. SCHMIDT UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 1
`
` Cases IPR2017-00576 and IPR2017-00594, IPR2017-00578 and IPR2017- 00596,
`IPR2017-00579 and IPR2017-00598, IPR2017-00583 and IPR2017- 00599,
`IPR2017-00585 and IPR2017-00600, and IPR2017-00586 and IPR2017-00601, have
`respectively been joined with the captioned proceedings. The word-for-word
`identical paper is filed in each proceeding identified in the caption pursuant to the
`Board’s Scheduling Order (Paper 10).
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`I. RELIEF REQUESTED
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Patent Owner, Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe,
`
`respectfully request the pro hac vice admission of Marsha K. Schmidt in these
`
`proceedings.
`
`II. GOVERNING LAWS, RULES, AND PRECEDENT
`Section 42.10(c) states as follows:
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during
`a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to
`the condition that lead counsel be a registered
`practitioner and to any other conditions as the Board may
`impose. For example, where the lead counsel is a
`registered practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac
`vice by counsel who is not a registered practitioner may
`be granted upon showing that counsel is an experienced
`litigating attorney and has an established familiarity with
`the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.
`As stated in the "Order Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission"
`
`entered in Case IPR2013-00010 (MPT) (Paper 6) ("Motorola Order"), any motion
`
`for pro hac vice admission under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) must be filed “no sooner
`
`than (21) days after service of the petition.
`
`III. STATEMENT OF FACTS
`Based on the following facts, and supported by the Declaration of Marsha K.
`
`Schmidt submitted herewith, Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe requests the pro hac vice
`
`admission of Marsha K. Schmidt in this proceeding.
`
`2
`
`

`

`1. Patent Owner Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe’s lead counsel, Alfonso Chan, is a
`
`registered practitioner (Reg. No. 45,964).
`
`2. In addition, Allergan, Inc.’s lead counsel, Dorothy Whelan, is a registered
`
`practitioner (Reg. No. 33,814).
`
`3. Marsha Schmidt is an attorney with expertise in Indian law, practicing in
`
`Washington, D.C. Declaration of M. Schmidt, ¶ 3.
`
`4. Ms. Schmidt is an experienced attorney who has been litigating Indian law
`
`cases for over 30 years. Declaration of M. Schmidt, ¶ 3
`
`5. Ms. Schmidt is an expert in tribal sovereign immunity which is the subject
`
`matter at issue in this proceeding. Ms. Schmidt has represented the Saint Regis
`
`Mohawk Tribe and many other tribes in the course of her career on Indian law issues
`
`including sovereign immunity. Id. at ¶¶ 11-12.
`
`6. Ms. Schmidt is a member in good standing of the District of Columbia Bar. Id.
`
`at ¶ 4.
`
`7. Ms. Schmidt has never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body. Id. at ¶ 5.
`
`8. No application of Ms. Schmidt for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body has ever been denied. Id. at ¶ 6.
`
`9. No sanctions or contempt citations have ever been imposed against Ms.
`
`Schmidt by any court or administrative body. Id. at ¶ 7.
`
`3
`
`

`

`10. Ms. Schmidt has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42. Id. at ¶
`
`8.
`
`11. Ms. Schmidt understands that she will be subject to the USPTO Code of
`
`Professional Responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 10.20 et seq. and disciplinary
`
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). Id. at ¶ 9.
`
`12. Ms. Schmidt has not applied to appear pro hac vice in any other proceedings
`
`before the Office in the last three years. Id. at ¶ 10.
`
`13. This motion was filed more than 21 days after service of the Petition in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`IV. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR THE PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF MS
`SCHMIDT IN THIS PROCEEDING
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a
`
`showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead counsel be a registered
`
`practitioner and to any other conditions as the Board may impose. 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.10(c). Patent Owner’s lead counsel, Alfonso Chan, is a registered practitioner.
`
`Based on the facts contained herein, as supported by Ms. Schmidt’s Declaration,
`
`good cause exists to admit Ms. Schmidt pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`Ms. Schmidt has unique knowledge of the law on tribal sovereign immunity.
`
`Ms. Schmidt has represented the Patent Owner Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe for over
`
`20 years in various proceedings and the Patent Owner, Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe,
`
`4
`
`

`

`has a substantial need for Mr. Evans’s pro hac vice admission and her involvement
`
`in the briefing and oral arguments concerning that issue.
`
`V. CONCLUSION
`For the foregoing reasons as well as the reasons contained in the attached
`
`affidavit, Patent Owner Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe respectfully requests admission
`
`of Marsha K. Schmidt as counsel pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`Dated: September 22, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
` /Alfonso Chan/
`Alfonso Chan, Reg. No. 45,964
`achan@shorechan.com
`
`
`SHORE CHAN DEPUMPO LLP
`901 Main Street, Suite 3300
`Dallas, TX 75201
`214-593-9110
`
`5
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`This is to certify that I caused to be served true and correct copies of the Saint
`
`Regis Mohawk Tribe’s Motion For Pro Hac Vice Admission of Marsha K.
`
`Schmidt Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) on September 22, 2017 to the Petitioner at
`
`the correspondence address of the Petitioners as follows:
`
`Steven W. Parmelee
`Michael T. Rosato
`Jad A. Mills
`Wendy L. Devine
`Douglas H. Carsten
`Richard Torczon
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104-7036
`Email: sparmelee@wsgr.com
`Email: mrosato@wsgr.com
`Email: jmills@wsgr.com
`Email: wdevine@wsgr.com
`Email: dcarsten@wsgr.com
`Email: rtorczon@wsgr.com
`
`Brandon M. White
`Perkins Coie LLP
`700 13th Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Email: bmwhite@perkinscoie.com
`Attorneys for Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`Michael Dzwonczyk
`Azadeh Kokabi
`Travis Ribar
`Sheila Blackston
`SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
`2100 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20037
`Email: mdzwonczyk@sughrue.com
`Email: akokabi@sughrue.com
`Email: tribar@sughrue.com
`Attorneys for Akorn Inc.
`
`Gary Speier
`Mark Schuman
`CARLSON, CASPERS VANDERBURGE,
`LINDQUIST & SCHUMAN, P.A.
`225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Email: gspeier@carlsoncaspers.com
`Email:
`mschuman@carlsoncaspers.com
`Attorneys for Teva Pharmaceuticals
`USA, Inc.
`
`
`
` /Alfonso Chan/
`Alfonso Chan, Reg. No. 45,964
`Phone: 214-593-9110
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket